RE: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:sa-l...@alexb.ch] On 3/4/2010 7:34 PM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Is there still a reason for this update channel? 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0? ^ 20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ? 90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't upgraded to SA 3.3.x Thanks for that addition and confirmation of status. :) The original question and hence my answer was specifically about 3.3.x, though, and whether it still is needed from external sources with that version. I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported. Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage. Thanks, but I'm confused, as there are domains in 90_sare_freemail.cf that are not currently in 20_freemail_domains.cf. Hi Larry... Never got around to do the diff... your msg triggered :-) Unless I borked it, it should now included the missing from 90_sare_freemail.cf I still don't see the domains in 20_freemail_domains.cf. Thanks, Larry
Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
On 2010-03-09 15:48, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:sa-l...@alexb.ch] On 3/4/2010 7:34 PM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Is there still a reason for this update channel? 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0? ^ 20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ? 90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't upgraded to SA 3.3.x Thanks for that addition and confirmation of status. :) The original question and hence my answer was specifically about 3.3.x, though, and whether it still is needed from external sources with that version. I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported. Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage. Thanks, but I'm confused, as there are domains in 90_sare_freemail.cf that are not currently in 20_freemail_domains.cf. Hi Larry... Never got around to do the diff... your msg triggered :-) Unless I borked it, it should now included the missing from 90_sare_freemail.cf I still don't see the domains in 20_freemail_domains.cf. If you've done the diff, pls post the missing domains.
RE: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
-Original Message- From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:19 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote: On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Is there still a reason for this update channel? 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0? ^ 20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ? 90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't upgraded to SA 3.3.x Thanks for that addition and confirmation of status. :) The original question and hence my answer was specifically about 3.3.x, though, and whether it still is needed from external sources with that version. I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported. Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage. Thanks, but I'm confused, as there are domains in 90_sare_freemail.cf that are not currently in 20_freemail_domains.cf. L
Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ?
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Is there still a reason for this update channel? 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0? 20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ? 90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't upgraded to SA 3.3.x I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported. Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage.
Re: 90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:12 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 3/3/2010 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:38 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Is there still a reason for this update channel?
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Or is it now built in to SA v3.3.0?
^
20_freemail.cf and 20_freemail_domains.cf ?
90_sare_freemail.cf is still supported by for ppl who haven't upgraded
to SA 3.3.x
Thanks for that addition and confirmation of status. :)
The original question and hence my answer was specifically about 3.3.x,
though, and whether it still is needed from external sources with that
version.
I'm doing the same additions to 20_freemail_domains.cf
Later this year, 90_sare_freemail.cf, will become unsupported.
Anybody using SA 3.3.x should drop 90_sare_freemail.cf usage.
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
