Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
Daniel J McDonald dan.mcdonald at austinenergy.com writes: On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:07 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Duncan Hill [mailto:spamassassin at cricalix.net] On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: So, you can't build the RPM as root. Very interesting, but I ran into this problem on a Solaris system and I wasn't trying to build an RPM. I was just trying to build SA from source with the usual perl Makefile.PL make make test (this step gave errors when run as root) Does the same logic apply when RPMs are not involved? Yes, unless your umask is 666. When it detects the root user, it tries to change to nobody. since Nobody can't write in the t/log/* directories, the test fails. Pardon my ignorance, but for those of us who have always installed SA as root, this new behavior in 3.2.1 appears to be a bit of a bug (and I'm just using the SA distribution the same way Larry is using - no RPM is being built). Is the workaround y'all are suggesting that the SA make be done as a non-root user, but the install be done as root in my situation? In other words, As non-root user: perl Makefile.PL make make test As root: make install Thanks, Jake
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Wed, June 13, 2007 9:38 am, Jake Richter wrote: Is the workaround y'all are suggesting that the SA make be done as a non-root user, but the install be done as root in my situation? In other words, As non-root user: perl Makefile.PL make make test As root: make install
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
Jake Richter jake at richterscale.org writes: Is the workaround y'all are suggesting that the SA make be done as a non-root user, but the install be done as root in my situation? [snip] To answer my own question: Yes. This works fine. Jake
RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. I'm wondering if this is the reason: + make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test /usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source directory found: exiting I don't see any other compilation errors. The build process complained about a few missing packages at the beginning Razor2, Mail::DKIM, and Encode::Detect. I was able to install all of those other than Encode::Detect (I can't get the perl-Encode-Detect srpm to recompile, and I can't figure out what pre-requisites it is missing, since it complained about not having ExtUtils::CBuilder, but installing that didn't seem to mollify it). I built 3.2.0 on this same box just a couple of weeks ago, and didn't see anything in the release notes, or the bugs that I read, telling me that I would need to make major changes, so I'm flummoxed. -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 t/spamc_optCNOK 2 Not found: revoked ham = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 t/spamc_optCNOK 4 Not found: failed to report spam = Unable to report/revoke message [...] Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 log/d.spamc_optC/out.5 log/d.spamc_optC/out.7 t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optL# Failed test 1 in t/spamc_optL.t at line 20 Not found: learned spam = Message successfully un/learned [...] t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/spamc_optC.t94 44.44% 2 4 6 8 t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16 t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t51 20.00% 4 t/spamd_plugin.t 62 33.33% 4 6 17 tests skipped. Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 23/1981 subtests failed, 98.84% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45769 (%check) Any thoughts? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
Daniel J McDonald writes: On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. I'm wondering if this is the reason: + make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test /usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source directory found: exiting nope, that can be ignored. I don't see any other compilation errors. The build process complained about a few missing packages at the beginning Razor2, Mail::DKIM, and Encode::Detect. I was able to install all of those other than Encode::Detect (I can't get the perl-Encode-Detect srpm to recompile, and I can't figure out what pre-requisites it is missing, since it complained about not having ExtUtils::CBuilder, but installing that didn't seem to mollify it). I built 3.2.0 on this same box just a couple of weeks ago, and didn't see anything in the release notes, or the bugs that I read, telling me that I would need to make major changes, so I'm flummoxed. There should be no major changes since 3.2.0 that'd require that... can you post the log files from t/log/d.spamc_optC/* ? --j. -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message --j. -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 t/spamc_optCNOK 2 Not found: revoked ham = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 t/spamc_optCNOK 4 Not found: failed to report spam = Unable to report/revoke message [...] Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 log/d.spamc_optC/out.5 log/d.spamc_optC/out.7 t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optL# Failed test 1 in t/spamc_optL.t at line 20 Not found: learned spam = Message successfully un/learned [...] t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/spamc_optC.t94 44.44% 2 4 6 8 t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16 t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t51 20.00% 4 t/spamd_plugin.t 62 33.33% 4 6 17 tests skipped. Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 23/1981 subtests failed, 98.84% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45769 (%check) Any thoughts? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
-Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:29 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. I'm wondering if this is the reason: + make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test /usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source directory found: exiting I don't see any other compilation errors. The build process complained about a few missing packages at the beginning Razor2, Mail::DKIM, and Encode::Detect. I was able to install all of those other than Encode::Detect (I can't get the perl-Encode-Detect srpm to recompile, and I can't figure out what pre-requisites it is missing, since it complained about not having ExtUtils::CBuilder, but installing that didn't seem to mollify it). I built 3.2.0 on this same box just a couple of weeks ago, and didn't see anything in the release notes, or the bugs that I read, telling me that I would need to make major changes, so I'm flummoxed. -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 t/spamc_optCNOK 2 Not found: revoked ham = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 t/spamc_optCNOK 4 Not found: failed to report spam = Unable to report/revoke message [...] Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 log/d.spamc_optC/out.5 log/d.spamc_optC/out.7 t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optL# Failed test 1 in t/spamc_optL.t at line 20 Not found: learned spam = Message successfully un/learned [...] t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/spamc_optC.t94 44.44% 2 4 6 8 t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16 t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t51 20.00% 4 t/spamd_plugin.t 62 33.33% 4 6 17 tests skipped. Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 23/1981 subtests failed, 98.84% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45769 (%check) Any thoughts? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com I am getting the same make test errors on Centos 3.0, fedora 2, and Centos 4.2 Fred Stein Network Administrator The Hill School 717 E. High Street Pottstown, PA 19464 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thehill.org
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:45 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. I'm wondering if this is the reason: + make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test /usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source directory found: exiting nope, that can be ignored. I don't see any other compilation errors. The build process complained about a few missing packages at the beginning Razor2, Mail::DKIM, and Encode::Detect. I was able to install all of those other than Encode::Detect (I can't get the perl-Encode-Detect srpm to recompile, and I can't figure out what pre-requisites it is missing, since it complained about not having ExtUtils::CBuilder, but installing that didn't seem to mollify it). I built 3.2.0 on this same box just a couple of weeks ago, and didn't see anything in the release notes, or the bugs that I read, telling me that I would need to make major changes, so I'm flummoxed. There should be no major changes since 3.2.0 that'd require that... can you post the log files from t/log/d.spamc_optC/* ? I think the major error in the log files is: [27488] warn: spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody [27488] warn: spamd: bayes: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile ./log/user_state/bayes.lock.ldap.austin-energy.net.27488 for ./log/user_state/bayes.lock: Permission denied So, you can't build the RPM as root. I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least to the point that it normally bombs
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
Daniel J McDonald writes: On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:45 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote: I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. I'm wondering if this is the reason: + make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test /usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP no source directory found: exiting nope, that can be ignored. I don't see any other compilation errors. The build process complained about a few missing packages at the beginning Razor2, Mail::DKIM, and Encode::Detect. I was able to install all of those other than Encode::Detect (I can't get the perl-Encode-Detect srpm to recompile, and I can't figure out what pre-requisites it is missing, since it complained about not having ExtUtils::CBuilder, but installing that didn't seem to mollify it). I built 3.2.0 on this same box just a couple of weeks ago, and didn't see anything in the release notes, or the bugs that I read, telling me that I would need to make major changes, so I'm flummoxed. There should be no major changes since 3.2.0 that'd require that... can you post the log files from t/log/d.spamc_optC/* ? I think the major error in the log files is: [27488] warn: spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody [27488] warn: spamd: bayes: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile ./log/user_state/bayes.lock.ldap.austin-energy.net.27488 for ./log/user_state/bayes.lock: Permission denied So, you can't build the RPM as root. I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least to the point that it normally bombs aha, that's it alright. could you open a bug to get that fixed? --j.
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: So, you can't build the RPM as root. I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least to the point that it normally bombs aha, that's it alright. could you open a bug to get that fixed? One argument is that you shouldn't be building RPMs as root since you don't know if the spec file is perfect and won't break outside of the semi-jail that RPM sets up. I've had at least one such RPM build when working with qmail, and it went and buggered up the build server by actually installing itself outside of the jail when building. Doing it as a regular reason will limit that kind of activity.
RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: So, you can't build the RPM as root. I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least to the point that it normally bombs aha, that's it alright. could you open a bug to get that fixed? One argument is that you shouldn't be building RPMs as root since you don't know if the spec file is perfect and won't break outside of the semi-jail that RPM sets up. I've had at least one such RPM build when working with qmail, and it went and buggered up the build server by actually installing itself outside of the jail when building. Doing it as a regular reason will limit that kind of activity. Very interesting, but I ran into this problem on a Solaris system and I wasn't trying to build an RPM. I was just trying to build SA from source with the usual perl Makefile.PL make make test (this step gave errors when run as root) Does the same logic apply when RPMs are not involved?
RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:07 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote: Daniel J McDonald writes: So, you can't build the RPM as root. Very interesting, but I ran into this problem on a Solaris system and I wasn't trying to build an RPM. I was just trying to build SA from source with the usual perl Makefile.PL make make test (this step gave errors when run as root) Does the same logic apply when RPMs are not involved? Yes, unless your umask is 666. When it detects the root user, it tries to change to nobody. since Nobody can't write in the t/log/* directories, the test fails. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 t/spamc_optCNOK 2 Not found: revoked ham = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 t/spamc_optCNOK 4 Not found: failed to report spam = Unable to report/revoke message [...] Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 log/d.spamc_optC/out.5 log/d.spamc_optC/out.7 t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optL# Failed test 1 in t/spamc_optL.t at line 20 Not found: learned spam = Message successfully un/learned [...] t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/spamc_optC.t94 44.44% 2 4 6 8 t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16 t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t51 20.00% 4 t/spamd_plugin.t 62 33.33% 4 6 17 tests skipped. Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 23/1981 subtests failed, 98.84% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45769 (%check) Any thoughts? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from source on Redhat ES4 and running make test. -Original Message- From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:14 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 is now available! This is a maintenance and security release of the 3.2.x branch. It is highly recommended that people upgrade to this version from 3.2.0. Whilst compiling the RPM for mandriva corporate server 4: t/spamc_optCNot found: reported spam = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 t/spamc_optCNOK 2 Not found: revoked ham = Message successfully reported/revoked # Failed test 4 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 t/spamc_optCNOK 4 Not found: failed to report spam = Unable to report/revoke message [...] Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_optC/out.1 log/d.spamc_optC/out.3 log/d.spamc_optC/out.5 log/d.spamc_optC/out.7 t/spamc_optCFAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8 Failed 4/9 tests, 55.56% okay t/spamc_optL# Failed test 1 in t/spamc_optL.t at line 20 Not found: learned spam = Message successfully un/learned [...] t/spamc_optLFAILED tests 1-16 Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/spamc_optC.t94 44.44% 2 4 6 8 t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16 t/spamd_allow_user_rules.t51 20.00% 4 t/spamd_plugin.t 62 33.33% 4 6 17 tests skipped. Failed 4/129 test scripts, 96.90% okay. 23/1981 subtests failed, 98.84% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45769 (%check) Any thoughts? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
