Re: New service configuration type
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in
so may aspects that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.
Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 12:44, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit :
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
different case by case. The TypeCoercer and it's CoercionTuple are another
example of a tree like structure being built by an UnorderedConfiguration.
https://tapestry.apache.org/type-coercion.html
On 4 May 2015 13:14, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
Thanks for your input Lance, you pictured what i had in mind when i was
talking about the workaround.
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 13:51, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a
écrit :
You could probably achieve this with an
OrderedConfigurationNodeConfig
Eg:
public interface NodeConfig() {
public String getName();
public String getParentName(); //optional
public ListString getChildNames(); // optional
}
After all contributions, you could build a tree of nodes by calculating
actual children combining getParentName() with getChildNames() where
appropriate. You could contribute multiple times to the same Node.
Re: New service configuration type
I was just asking if it could be possible to add new custom configuration types. I've already develop what i need and I'm building the tree myself. It works well and it is very clear on how to contribute to the service. This email's purpose was to acquire more knowledge about tapestry. Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 15:19, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit : Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give! It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with / contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what you want.
Re: New service configuration type
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in so may aspects Indeed it is . . . that maybe, it could have been for configuration type. But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC accomplish that is exactly through distributed configuration, so how could you contribute another distributed configuration using distributed configuration? :D -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: New service configuration type
Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give! It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with / contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what you want.
Re: New service configuration type
I thought that tapestry was doing magic... I'm disapointed :D Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 14:49, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com a écrit : On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in so may aspects Indeed it is . . . that maybe, it could have been for configuration type. But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC accomplish that is exactly through distributed configuration, so how could you contribute another distributed configuration using distributed configuration? :D -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
tapestry split button
Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks.
Re: New service configuration type
Haha ! The more concise is the answer, the more efficient we are :D Thanks :) Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 23:00, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com a écrit : On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:13:22 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is doable ? No. (I guess I've just broken my record on the shortest answer in this mailing list, hehehe) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tapestry split button
Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks.
Re: tapestry split button
Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks. -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos
Re: tapestry split button
I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for mixins. Example you can use t:button as usual and then assign the mixins if you want it as dropdown button. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are trying to achieve? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks. -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos
Re: tapestry split button
Thanks for your suggestion. I will On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for mixins. Example you can use t:button as usual and then assign the mixins if you want it as dropdown button. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are trying to achieve? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks. -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos
Re: tapestry split button
Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are trying to achieve? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks. -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos
Re: tapestry split button
I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for mixins. Example you can use t:button as usual and then assign the mixins if you want it as dropdown button. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are trying to achieve? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks. -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos -- Chung Khánh Duy Project Support Manager Formos
Re: New service configuration type
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
different case by case. The TypeCoercer and it's CoercionTuple are another
example of a tree like structure being built by an UnorderedConfiguration.
https://tapestry.apache.org/type-coercion.html
On 4 May 2015 13:14, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
Thanks for your input Lance, you pictured what i had in mind when i was
talking about the workaround.
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 13:51, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a
écrit :
You could probably achieve this with an OrderedConfigurationNodeConfig
Eg:
public interface NodeConfig() {
public String getName();
public String getParentName(); //optional
public ListString getChildNames(); // optional
}
After all contributions, you could build a tree of nodes by calculating
actual children combining getParentName() with getChildNames() where
appropriate. You could contribute multiple times to the same Node.
