RE: Uploading Files Larger than 2GB
I tried with IE6, IE7, and Firefox 2.0.0.14 and no luck with any of them. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Uploading-Files-Larger-than-2GB-tp16996471p17019824.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploading Files Larger than 2GB
I am having trouble with a JSP/Spring application that allows users to upload files. I am running Tomcat 6.0.14 and I am utilizing commons file upload 1.2. I get an error anytime I try to upload a file that is greater than 2GB. I set serverFileUpload.setFileSizeMax() to Long.MAX_VALUE and that doesn't work. Is this a browser limitation or a Tomcat limitation? Can I get around it without creating an applet or using some sort of ftp service? The application is hosted on a Windows 2003 64 bit server. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Uploading-Files-Larger-than-2GB-tp16996471p16996471.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
This issue was resolved by correctly utilizing the constructor of the StreamSource object. It was expecting a String in URL/URI format and we were passing in the file name only. The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the Windows Service Installer option threw the Unknown protocol c error. Does anyone know why this would be? Both installs were pointing to the same JDK. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15069803.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
That makes sense to me. Thanks Chuck. Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: hoffmandirt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml The Zip download option of Tomcat did not mind, but the Windows Service Installer option threw the Unknown protocol c error. Possibly due to the lack of a current directory setting when running as a service. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15070186.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
I am having issues with XSLT files depending on which download option of Tomcat 6.0.14 that I choose. If I download the ZIP file under Core, my XSLT files transform with no problems. However if I download and use the Windows Service Installer instead, I am getting the following errors in my Tomcat log: ERROR: 'unknown protocol: c' FATAL ERROR: 'Could not compile stylesheet' javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException: Could not compile stylesheet [http-8080-1] Has anyone else had this problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15048926.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Windows Service Installer vs Core zip install xml
Interesting, however I am pointing to the same JDK 1.5 for both. I wanted to switch to the service instead of the bat startup and shutdown scripts. I will give that a try and check it out. I was searching google for could not compile stylesheet. markt-2 wrote: hoffmandirt wrote: I am having issues with XSLT files depending on which download option of Tomcat 6.0.14 that I choose. If I download the ZIP file under Core, my XSLT files transform with no problems. However if I download and use the Windows Service Installer instead, I am getting the following errors in my Tomcat log: ERROR: 'unknown protocol: c' FATAL ERROR: 'Could not compile stylesheet' javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException: Could not compile stylesheet [http-8080-1] Has anyone else had this problem? Did you try Google? I found just over 0.75 million hits so it looks like the answer to your question is yes. The issue is usually caused when you use C:\\MyFile.txt for a URL rather than file:///C:/MyFile.txt somewhere in your code. Are both installs using exactly the same JVM? There may be slight differences in how tolerant different JVMs are of this issue. Mark - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Windows-Service-Installer-vs-Core-zip-install-xml-tp15048926p15054962.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]