Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread daneturner

I just tested with mod_jk 1.2.19 and it still seems as though the distance
parameter is being ignored.  Output from the status/monitor.page shows
mod_jk alternating between tomcats with different distance values in
workers.properties.  

How can I troubleshoot this further?

Here's my workers.properties...

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/apache$ cat workers.properties
workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat5.5
workers.java_home=/usr/local/jdk
ps=/
worker.list=tomcat

worker.tomcat.type=lb
worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,ritin
worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False

worker.localhost.port=8009
worker.localhost.socket_timeout=195
worker.localhost.host=localhost
worker.localhost.type=ajp13
workers.localhost.distance=10
worker.localhost.lbfactor=1

worker.ritin.port=8009
worker.ritin.host=ritin
worker.ritin.type=ajp13
workers.localhost.distance=20
worker.ritin.lbfactor=1


And some version information...

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep mod_jk /var/log/apache/error_log |tail -1
[Thu Dec  7 16:13:04 2006] [notice] Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29
mod_ssl/2.8.28 OpenSSL/0.9.7e-p1 mod_jk/1.2.19 configured -- resuming normal
operations


Dane


Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
 
 The new attribute distance will help you. It was first implemented for
 version 1.2.16, which is in the process of being released (see my other
 answer).
 
 Please test and let us know your results.
 
 thuss2 schrieb:
 We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
 configuration to prefer the tomcat on localhost and only failover to
 another
 machine if the local one fails. This worked fine under our older mod_jk,
 however, we just upgraded to 1.2.15 and now it that the local_worker
 properties are no longer supported, it's load balancing every request.
 
 So I checked out the workers.properties options page:
 http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html and noticed
 the
 new distance option so that I can give localhost a distance of 0 and
 everything else a greater distance so that the load balancer should
 always
 prefer localhost. However, it seems to be ignoring the distance property
 completely and load balancing every request. Can anyone suggest what I
 might
 try to get it to always use the local tomcat for requests unless it
 fails:
 
 worker.list=tomcat
 worker.tomcat.type=lb
 worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
 worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,latin1,latin2,...
 worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False
 
 worker.localhost.port=8009
 worker.localhost.host=localhost
 worker.localhost.type=ajp13
 worker.localhost.lbfactor=1
 worker.localhost.distance=0
 
 worker.latin1.port=8009
 worker.latin1.host=latin1
 worker.latin1.type=ajp13
 worker.latin1.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin1.distance=1
 
 worker.latin2.port=8009
 worker.latin2.host=latin2
 worker.latin2.type=ajp13
 worker.latin2.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin2.distance=1
 
 Thanks,
 Todd
 
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143
 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.
 
 
 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-tf1825380.html#a7750978
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Short answer for your question:

the two lines you tried to use as a distance configuration both have typos:

 workers.localhost.distance=10
 workers.localhost.distance=20

workers - worker
localhost - ritin (once)

I just did a quick test with 1.2.20 (there should no be change wrt.
distance between 19 and 20) and it worked.

Regards,

Rainer

daneturner schrieb:
 I just tested with mod_jk 1.2.19 and it still seems as though the distance
 parameter is being ignored.  Output from the status/monitor.page shows
 mod_jk alternating between tomcats with different distance values in
 workers.properties.  
 
 How can I troubleshoot this further?
 
 Here's my workers.properties...
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/apache$ cat workers.properties
 workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat5.5
 workers.java_home=/usr/local/jdk
 ps=/
 worker.list=tomcat
 
 worker.tomcat.type=lb
 worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
 worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,ritin
 worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False
 
 worker.localhost.port=8009
 worker.localhost.socket_timeout=195
 worker.localhost.host=localhost
 worker.localhost.type=ajp13
 workers.localhost.distance=10
 worker.localhost.lbfactor=1
 
 worker.ritin.port=8009
 worker.ritin.host=ritin
 worker.ritin.type=ajp13
 workers.localhost.distance=20
 worker.ritin.lbfactor=1
 
 
 And some version information...
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep mod_jk /var/log/apache/error_log |tail -1
 [Thu Dec  7 16:13:04 2006] [notice] Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29
 mod_ssl/2.8.28 OpenSSL/0.9.7e-p1 mod_jk/1.2.19 configured -- resuming normal
 operations
 
 
 Dane
 
 
 Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
 The new attribute distance will help you. It was first implemented for
 version 1.2.16, which is in the process of being released (see my other
 answer).

 Please test and let us know your results.

 thuss2 schrieb:
 We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
 configuration to prefer the tomcat on localhost and only failover to
 another
 machine if the local one fails. This worked fine under our older mod_jk,
 however, we just upgraded to 1.2.15 and now it that the local_worker
 properties are no longer supported, it's load balancing every request.

 So I checked out the workers.properties options page:
 http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html and noticed
 the
 new distance option so that I can give localhost a distance of 0 and
 everything else a greater distance so that the load balancer should
 always
 prefer localhost. However, it seems to be ignoring the distance property
 completely and load balancing every request. Can anyone suggest what I
 might
 try to get it to always use the local tomcat for requests unless it
 fails:

 worker.list=tomcat
 worker.tomcat.type=lb
 worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
 worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,latin1,latin2,...
 worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False

 worker.localhost.port=8009
 worker.localhost.host=localhost
 worker.localhost.type=ajp13
 worker.localhost.lbfactor=1
 worker.localhost.distance=0

 worker.latin1.port=8009
 worker.latin1.host=latin1
 worker.latin1.type=ajp13
 worker.latin1.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin1.distance=1

 worker.latin2.port=8009
 worker.latin2.host=latin2
 worker.latin2.type=ajp13
 worker.latin2.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin2.distance=1

 Thanks,
 Todd

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143
 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.


 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread daneturner


Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
 
 Short answer for your question:
 
 the two lines you tried to use as a distance configuration both have
 typos:
 
 workers.localhost.distance=10
 workers.localhost.distance=20
 
 workers - worker
 localhost - ritin (once)
 

Ouch.  How stupid.

Thanks for the correction.  Problem solved.  Apologies for the sloppy post
:-\

Dane
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-tf1825380.html#a7751349
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-07-03 Thread Rainer Jung
We just now tagged 1.2.16. A release candidate is available. Please have
a look at

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=115194553720728w=2

Test results are welcome. If no new problems will be found, the release
vote will procees starting Friday.

The final release will be announced on this list and on the dev list.

David Rees schrieb:
 On 6/22/06, Per Johnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere?
 
 Not that I know of, you have to grab the source from SVN.
 
 Found this:
 http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html
 
 I wonder how that got there!
 
 -Dave
 
 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-07-03 Thread Rainer Jung
The new attribute distance will help you. It was first implemented for
version 1.2.16, which is in the process of being released (see my other
answer).

Please test and let us know your results.

thuss2 schrieb:
 We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
 configuration to prefer the tomcat on localhost and only failover to another
 machine if the local one fails. This worked fine under our older mod_jk,
 however, we just upgraded to 1.2.15 and now it that the local_worker
 properties are no longer supported, it's load balancing every request.
 
 So I checked out the workers.properties options page:
 http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html and noticed the
 new distance option so that I can give localhost a distance of 0 and
 everything else a greater distance so that the load balancer should always
 prefer localhost. However, it seems to be ignoring the distance property
 completely and load balancing every request. Can anyone suggest what I might
 try to get it to always use the local tomcat for requests unless it fails:
 
 worker.list=tomcat
 worker.tomcat.type=lb
 worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
 worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,latin1,latin2,...
 worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False
 
 worker.localhost.port=8009
 worker.localhost.host=localhost
 worker.localhost.type=ajp13
 worker.localhost.lbfactor=1
 worker.localhost.distance=0
 
 worker.latin1.port=8009
 worker.latin1.host=latin1
 worker.latin1.type=ajp13
 worker.latin1.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin1.distance=1
 
 worker.latin2.port=8009
 worker.latin2.host=latin2
 worker.latin2.type=ajp13
 worker.latin2.lbfactor=1
 worker.latin2.distance=1
 
 Thanks,
 Todd
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143
 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.
 
 
 -
 To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-22 Thread Per Johnsson
Hi!
Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere? 

Found this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html

Regards Per

-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: den 21 juni 2006 21:14
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
 you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only 
 took
 0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?


Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just as an
convenience method.

Also the 'distance' param will be supported with the next 1.2.16
release.


Regards,
Mladen.

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe,
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



This e-mail and the information it contains may be privileged and/or
confidential.  It is for the intended addressee(s) only.
The unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail, or any information 
it contains, is prohibited. 
If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from your computer.




-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-22 Thread David Rees

On 6/22/06, Per Johnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere?


Not that I know of, you have to grab the source from SVN.


Found this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html


I wonder how that got there!

-Dave

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took 
0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?


Filip


thuss2 wrote:

We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
configuration to prefer the tomcat on localhost and only failover to another
machine if the local one fails. This worked fine under our older mod_jk,
however, we just upgraded to 1.2.15 and now it that the local_worker
properties are no longer supported, it's load balancing every request.

So I checked out the workers.properties options page:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html and noticed the
new distance option so that I can give localhost a distance of 0 and
everything else a greater distance so that the load balancer should always
prefer localhost. However, it seems to be ignoring the distance property
completely and load balancing every request. Can anyone suggest what I might
try to get it to always use the local tomcat for requests unless it fails:

worker.list=tomcat
worker.tomcat.type=lb
worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=195
worker.tomcat.balance_workers=localhost,latin1,latin2,...
worker.tomcat.sticky_session=False

worker.localhost.port=8009
worker.localhost.host=localhost
worker.localhost.type=ajp13
worker.localhost.lbfactor=1
worker.localhost.distance=0

worker.latin1.port=8009
worker.latin1.host=latin1
worker.latin1.type=ajp13
worker.latin1.lbfactor=1
worker.latin1.distance=1

worker.latin2.port=8009
worker.latin2.host=latin2
worker.latin2.type=ajp13
worker.latin2.lbfactor=1
worker.latin2.distance=1

Thanks,
Todd

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.


-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



--


Filip Hanik

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread thuss2

Filip, we're not using sessions so we don't need sessions affinity, but if we
did we'd use session replication rather than sticky sessions. The sticky
option does accept true/false according to the documentation
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html . I think that's
all unrelated to the issue we're seeing though which is that mod_jk seems to
be completely ignoring the distance parameter.

-Todd
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4980476
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.


-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Mladen Turk

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took 
0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?




Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just
as an convenience method.

Also the 'distance' param will be supported with
the next 1.2.16 release.


Regards,
Mladen.

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread thuss2

That explains it, thanks. I've just set the lbfactor extremely high on the
localhost in the interim to get mod_jk to prefer it over remote tomcats.

-Todd
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4980806
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.


-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

Mladen Turk wrote:

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only 
took 0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?




Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just
as an convenience method.

instead or as well, the latter right?

Filip






--


Filip Hanik

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]