Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?
It almost sounds like it's more a config issue than a module one... Using mod_proxy_ajp is nice because you use normal httpd directives (ProxyPass. etc..) to handle the stuff that TC needs to handle. On Nov 17, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Rocco Scappatura wrote: Hello. I would like to publish a Web application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static pages are processed directly by Apache2. - Use JkMount directive so that path is mapped to worker (and so to Tomcat) I don't know I have well understod the concept, but I have noted that application doesn't work correcltly. For example, assuming that the path of the application is '/path'. When I accesst to http://hostname/ path all works fine. But if I access to http://hostname/path/subpath I get Visualizzation errors (It seems tome that it misses CSS.. and so on). I read that it is possible to use mod proxy. Now, I would like to know from mailing list if mod_proxy is the best choice or otherwise if I have to solve problem similiar to the one I ve pointed out above, and to use mod_jk. Thanks, rocsca - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?
Rocco Scappatura wrote: Hello. I would like to publish a Web application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static pages are processed directly by Apache2. - Use JkMount directive so that path is mapped to worker (and so to Tomcat) I don't know I have well understod the concept, but I have noted that application doesn't work correcltly. For example, assuming that the path of the application is '/path'. When I accesst to http://hostname/path all works fine. But if I access to http://hostname/path/subpath I get Visualizzation errors (It seems tome that it misses CSS.. and so on). I read that it is possible to use mod proxy. Now, I would like to know from mailing list if mod_proxy is the best choice or otherwise if I have to solve problem similiar to the one I ve pointed out above, and to use mod_jk. Your problem sounds like a simple config issue, but since you didn't show us your config, who knows ... mod_proxy_* vs. mod_jk: mod_proxy_* comes automatically with httpd and is more tightly integrated into it, mod_jk is still more powerful especially concerning complex instance topologies. So your decision might depend on how complex you expect your final setup to be. Thanks, rocsca Regards, Rainer - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?
put this in your servlet.xml file Host name=localhost appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Added this for JK THIS-- Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig append=true forwardAll=false modJk=Path/To/mod_jk.so / /Host OK. Start Tomcat it will generate the mod_jk.conf file under Tomcat/conf/auto OK In the apache httpd.cong file... somewhere near the bottom... add # I added this for connector == Include Path/To/Tomcat 5.5/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf Done. That will make apache front end tomcat...I It was already? Then just study those files... It generates all the core stuff... all the JKMounts folder protection etc for all your webapps. ?? What files do you refer? Then you can edit as required... add aliases etc. Load sharing is different again... but the generated file comes in handy there as well. Remember that everytime you start tomcat this is generated... so remove the listener if you dont want it to change, or copy it and point apache at that. ??? I don't unserstandvery well.. Thanks, rocsca - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm Now Tomcat is also a cool pojo application server --- - Original Message - From: Rocco Scappatura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 3:20 AM Subject: mod_proxy or mod_jk? You need to post your config files for real help... I think everyone is tired of arguing the differences... just google for that. I like mod_jk just because its worked on by Tomcat developers and thus the focus is very much on Tomcat. Here a tip to get you going... This works on TC 5.5 put this in your servlet.xml file Host name=localhost appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Added this for JK THIS-- Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig append=true forwardAll=false modJk=Path/To/mod_jk.so / /Host Start Tomcat it will generate the mod_jk.conf file under Tomcat/conf/auto In the apache httpd.cong file... somewhere near the bottom... add # I added this for connector == Include Path/To/Tomcat 5.5/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf That will make apache front end tomcat... Then just study those files... It generates all the core stuff... all the JKMounts folder protection etc for all your webapps. Then you can edit as required... add aliases etc. Load sharing is different again... but the generated file comes in handy there as well. Remember that everytime you start tomcat this is generated... so remove the listener if you dont want it to change, or copy it and point apache at that. Have fun... Hello. I would like to publish a Web application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static pages are processed directly by Apache2. - Use JkMount directive so that path is mapped to worker (and so to Tomcat) I don't know I have well understod the concept, but I have noted that application doesn't work correcltly. For example, assuming that the path of the application is '/path'. When I accesst to http://hostname/path all works fine. But if I access to http://hostname/path/subpath I get Visualizzation errors (It seems tome that it misses CSS.. and so on). I read that it is possible to use mod proxy. Now, I would like to know from mailing list if mod_proxy is the best choice or otherwise if I have to solve problem similiar to the one I ve pointed out above, and to use mod_jk. Thanks, rocsca - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
