How to avoid code duplication on forms?
Hello,
Wicket uses input validation on the presentation layer. This leads often to
code duplication and I'm looking for a way to avoid it.
Example: I have a registration form where you fill in your first and last name,
password and so on. Every field has its restrictions like max length or
required. Registered users have a form for their personal information with
additional fields. The password can be changed on a seperate page.
How can I avoid to double the programmtic configuration of the form fields? To
extract and reuse panels is not an option, because of the different composition
of the forms.
a) I could create a subclass for every form field, but this would be a lot of
writing.
b)I could create something like a FormFieldFactory:
public class UserFormFieldFactory
{
public static TextField createEmailField()
{
return new TextField(email)
.setRequired(true)
.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
public static PasswordTextField createPasswordField()
{
...
}
...
}
c) ?
How do you avoid code duplication on forms?
Regards,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-igor
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hello,
Wicket uses input validation on the presentation layer. This leads often to
code duplication and I'm looking for a way to avoid it.
Example: I have a registration form where you fill in your first and last
name, password and so on. Every field has its restrictions like max length or
required. Registered users have a form for their personal information with
additional fields. The password can be changed on a seperate page.
How can I avoid to double the programmtic configuration of the form fields?
To extract and reuse panels is not an option, because of the different
composition of the forms.
a) I could create a subclass for every form field, but this would be a lot of
writing.
b)I could create something like a FormFieldFactory:
public class UserFormFieldFactory
{
public static TextField createEmailField()
{
return new TextField(email)
.setRequired(true)
.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
public static PasswordTextField createPasswordField()
{
...
}
...
}
c) ?
How do you avoid code duplication on forms?
Regards,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Eelco's wicket-contrib-navmenu revival? OR: Doing menus in Wicket...
under wicketstuff for 1.2 I found the little project wicket-contrib-navmenu. I started to update it for Wicket 1.4-rc2. Does this make sense or is there a better way to create hierarchy-like menues? Eelco? I know there is a TabbedPanel component. But I somehow feel strange to implement my whole application's pages as Panels... So what is the best way to create the navigation for a big application having an upper tab-navigation and a corresponding hierarchical tree-navigation on the left... Wicket in Action did not address proper menu creation... ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Eelco's wicket-contrib-navmenu revival? OR: Doing menus in Wicket...
Martijn Dashorst wrote: Wicket in Action does discuss menus: see page 185 (index entry: menu), though not multilevel menus. You are right, the easy way is described... Martijn Dashorst wrote: Just take a look at YUI-menu or some jquery plugin for menus. The reason for not continuing the menu component is that there are enough alternatives available for rendering a menu. And most folks want their own styling, and a typical menu is nothing more than a couple of nested ul's with css. Yes, menus should be nothing else than ul/li/a-trees styled with CSS. But when I have a foldable menu, clicking a page link which results in a new page (without ajax...), how can I restore the last menu state folding and deactivating the active page's link? (without cookies) So is it the best to use wicket:link for the links (which takes care about deactivating the link to the actual page) thrown into a hierarchically ul/li/a-tree? That would leave the question open, how to unfold the tree to the level where the active link resides... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Eelco%27s-wicket-contrib-navmenu-revival--OR%3A-Doing-menus-in-Wicket...-tp23441481p23442248.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxResponse with control characters is not validated
done!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
open a jira issue and add a quickstart please.
-igor
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Jens Alenius jens.alen...@megasol.se
wrote:
Hi.
Found something that might be a wicket ajax bug.
This code wont work in Firefox and we believe that its the Ajax xml
response
that is invalid.
The control characters is not properly escaped. Ex: \u0014 is written
as
0014 in the xml Ajax Response but should be #0014.
See: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#dt-charref.
This code wont work in firefox
Markup:
...
div wicket:id=testValue/div
form wicket:id=testform
div wicket:id=testSubmit class=submitbuttonSubmit/div
/form
...
Java:
final Label testLabel = new Label(testValue,themodel);
testLabel.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testLabel);
FormString testForm = new FormString(testform);
testForm.add(new AjaxButton(testSubmit){
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget pTarget, Form?
pForm)
{
themodel.setObject(\u0014);
pTarget.addComponent(testLabel);
} });
add(testForm);
...
Jens Alenius
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxResponse-with-control-characters-is-not-validated-tp23424575p23442249.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Eelco's wicket-contrib-navmenu revival? OR: Doing menus in Wicket...
Wicket in Action does discuss menus: see page 185 (index entry: menu), though not multilevel menus. Just take a look at YUI-menu or some jquery plugin for menus. The reason for not continuing the menu component is that there are enough alternatives available for rendering a menu. And most folks want their own styling, and a typical menu is nothing more than a couple of nested ul's with css. Martijn On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ralf.eichin...@pixotec.de wrote: under wicketstuff for 1.2 I found the little project wicket-contrib-navmenu. I started to update it for Wicket 1.4-rc2. Does this make sense or is there a better way to create hierarchy-like menues? Eelco? I know there is a TabbedPanel component. But I somehow feel strange to implement my whole application's pages as Panels... So what is the best way to create the navigation for a big application having an upper tab-navigation and a corresponding hierarchical tree-navigation on the left... Wicket in Action did not address proper menu creation... ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
SV: Wicket SWFObject
I just figured out that the deal is that SWFObject doesn't like to be set visible false on page load then visible true via Ajax. Any thoughts on how to get around this? Ajax in Wicket needs the page DOM to have an element with the id it is supposed to replace with the output of a (now visible) component; by default an invisible Wicket component has no output at all. The traditional way to overcome this is to call setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) on the (initially invisible) component when you add it; that will make Wicket insert an empty element with the required id. (It also implicitly calls setOutputMarkupId(true) which is something else that the Ajax support needs to work properly.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AW: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is a
matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them in a
sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to create
fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do this. If
you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory methods are even
a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing that I have missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Spring Security's method security and Wicket
Hello, Reference for this post: http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?p=239559#post239559 (the related Spring Security thread) It actually seems my interpretation about how it might work was correct below (though my original interpretation was wrong, but let's not talk about that one ;-) ). Luke Tayler mentions it might be Wicket swallowing the exception which Spring Security creates and shows it to the user. That way Spring Security will never know that the exception was thrown and it can't redirect the user to the log in page. What Spring Security seems to like doing is: 1. Spring Security records the request data. 2. When a @Secured(SOME_ROLE) annotated method is found it throws a AuthenticationException or a AuthorizationException 3. This exception is cought by Spring Security which redirect the user to the log in page. 4. When the user has logged on, the recorded request data is used again to simulate the original request. At step 2 above any transaction is rolled back. Between step 2 and 3, at step 2.5 it seems Wicket catches the AuthenticationException or AuthorizationException and (at least in development mode) shows the exception to the user. That way step 3 and 4 will never be executed. Between step 1 and 2, at step 1.5 above Wicket will do its stuff (page, models, etc). If the same (recorded) request arrives again (after user log in) how will Wicket react? Is it possible to get this working with Wicket? Should I? Any tips? I'm new to both Wicket and Spring Security, this might be a bit over my head. It would be really nice to get it working though. Thank you for reading! Have a nice weekend! Best regards, Kent On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know. I guess something like: 1. Record the request data (like with URL interception) then let the method call fail roll-back transactions 2. Show log in page 3. Play the recorded request and hope the call was determenistic But maybe I just misinterpreted him. Or maybe it would work with Spring MVC if they have this built into their architecture. But it sounds strange so I understand why you ask. Best regards, Kent On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: 2. At this point, the method call is intercepted by Spring and I _think_ I should get the option to log in here. However I do not get this option, instead I'm shown a stack trace. how is (2) accomplished? -igor I'm really banging my head against the wall here. I just wanted to ask here if this could have anything with the Wicket-Spring-IOC project? I would suspect no and that I'm to blame, but I'm also having a really hard time finding the source of the problem. If you have any tip for my as well I would really appreciate it! ;-) Best regards, Kent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
Hi.
How about using varargs or a similar approach in your TextField:
code
public class ValidatedTextFieldT extends TextFieldT{
public ValidatedTextField(String id, final IModelT model, boolean
required, AbstractValidator... validators)
{
super(id, model);
setRequired(required);
for(AbstractValidator validator : validators){
add(validator);
}
}
}
/code
And the use case:
code
TextField t = new ValidatedTextField(id, new Model(your Model),
true,
EmailAddressValidator.getInstance(),
StringValidator.maximumLength(50));
/code
Maybe you could then use it in a class factory as you suggested. At least it
will shorten a few lines of code.
Best regards.
--
Marc Nuri
http://blog.marcnuri.com
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is a
matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them in
a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do this.
If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory methods
are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing that I have
missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
TextField t = new ValidatedTextField(id, new Model(your Model),
And remember to use Model.of(your Model)
**
Martin
http://tyoajanseuranta.blogit.fi/ Wicket työajanseuranta
true,
EmailAddressValidator.getInstance(),
StringValidator.maximumLength(50));
/code
Maybe you could then use it in a class factory as you suggested. At least it
will shorten a few lines of code.
Best regards.
--
Marc Nuri
http://blog.marcnuri.com
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is a
matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them in
a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do this.
If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory methods
are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing that I have
missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RadioGroup with Boolean Model
Hello,
I want to have a radio group that looks like this:
How do I have to set the model of the Radio Group? Must this be a Boolean
one and what is set with getObject and setObject methods?
input name=radiogroup wicket:id=field1 type=radio
id=radiogroup13-field114 value=radio10 checked=checked/
input name=radiogroup wicket:id=field2 type=radio
id=radiogroup13-field215 value=radio11/
RadioGroup groupOne = new RadioGroup(radiogroup, new ModelBoolean() {
@Override
public Boolean getObject() {
}
@Override
public void setObject(Boolean object) {
}
}
);
groupOne.add(new Radio(field1, new Model(new Boolean(true;
groupOne.add(new Radio(field2, new ModelBoolean() {
@Override
public Boolean getObject() {
return false;.
}
@Override
public void setObject(Boolean object) {
if (object) {
//set object
}
}
}
));
Re: Spring Security's method security and Wicket
You can check out my wicket-advanced application that I wrote for a talk I gave to our local Java users group. In there, I implemented a Spring Security-based implementation. Here's my session class: http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/src/main/java/com/carmanconsulting/wicket/advanced/web/common/session/SpringSecuritySession.java and here's my application class: http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/src/main/java/com/carmanconsulting/wicket/advanced/web/common/application/WicketApplication.java and here's my web configuration: http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml and here's my spring configuration: http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml It works, but I believe someone pointed out a little bit of a bug in my code at one point. I don't think I fixed it yet. I can't remember who it was. Anyone? Perhaps it was something about not catching the authentication exception in the login and returning false? I can't remember. :( On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Reference for this post: http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?p=239559#post239559 (the related Spring Security thread) It actually seems my interpretation about how it might work was correct below (though my original interpretation was wrong, but let's not talk about that one ;-) ). Luke Tayler mentions it might be Wicket swallowing the exception which Spring Security creates and shows it to the user. That way Spring Security will never know that the exception was thrown and it can't redirect the user to the log in page. What Spring Security seems to like doing is: 1. Spring Security records the request data. 2. When a @Secured(SOME_ROLE) annotated method is found it throws a AuthenticationException or a AuthorizationException 3. This exception is cought by Spring Security which redirect the user to the log in page. 4. When the user has logged on, the recorded request data is used again to simulate the original request. At step 2 above any transaction is rolled back. Between step 2 and 3, at step 2.5 it seems Wicket catches the AuthenticationException or AuthorizationException and (at least in development mode) shows the exception to the user. That way step 3 and 4 will never be executed. Between step 1 and 2, at step 1.5 above Wicket will do its stuff (page, models, etc). If the same (recorded) request arrives again (after user log in) how will Wicket react? Is it possible to get this working with Wicket? Should I? Any tips? I'm new to both Wicket and Spring Security, this might be a bit over my head. It would be really nice to get it working though. Thank you for reading! Have a nice weekend! Best regards, Kent On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know. I guess something like: 1. Record the request data (like with URL interception) then let the method call fail roll-back transactions 2. Show log in page 3. Play the recorded request and hope the call was determenistic But maybe I just misinterpreted him. Or maybe it would work with Spring MVC if they have this built into their architecture. But it sounds strange so I understand why you ask. Best regards, Kent On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote: 2. At this point, the method call is intercepted by Spring and I _think_ I should get the option to log in here. However I do not get this option, instead I'm shown a stack trace. how is (2) accomplished? -igor I'm really banging my head against the wall here. I just wanted to ask here if this could have anything with the Wicket-Spring-IOC project? I would suspect no and that I'm to blame, but I'm also having a really hard time finding the source of the problem. If you have any tip for my as well I would really appreciate it! ;-) Best regards, Kent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
If the fields (user/pwd) always go together on every pages, why not having
having one root Panel (called MyPanel) knowing the fields , validation etc
and several Panels that simply extends MyPanel ; avec each child has its
own layouts.
Best regards,
Gabriel Kastenbaum
http://blog.oxiane.com
2009/5/8 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
TextField t = new ValidatedTextField(id, new Model(your
Model),
And remember to use Model.of(your Model)
**
Martin
http://tyoajanseuranta.blogit.fi/ Wicket työajanseuranta
true,
EmailAddressValidator.getInstance(),
StringValidator.maximumLength(50));
/code
Maybe you could then use it in a class factory as you suggested. At least
it
will shorten a few lines of code.
Best regards.
--
Marc Nuri
http://blog.marcnuri.com
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Christian Helmbold
christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods
is a
matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them
in
a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do
this.
If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory
methods
are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing that I
have
missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: yui slider component does not work
Hi Christoph This was due to YuiHeaderContributor being moved to another package. I was doing some house keeping :p it should be fixed in /yui/ trunk now (no change in yui-examples). can you try again? Joshua 2009/5/5 Christoph Grün chris...@gmx.at Hello, I have downloaded the yui-examples-1.4-20090427.160726-141.war file. The sliders cannot be moved with the mouse and rather behave static. Moreover, the javascript error “yahoo.widget.slider is null” is reported. It seems that some js files are missing. Is there a workaround/update? Best regards, Christoph
AW: yui slider component does not work
Hi Joshua! Thanks a lot!! It works. Christoph -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Joshua Lim [mailto:lim.j...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 08. Mai 2009 13:45 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: yui slider component does not work Hi Christoph This was due to YuiHeaderContributor being moved to another package. I was doing some house keeping :p it should be fixed in /yui/ trunk now (no change in yui-examples). can you try again? Joshua 2009/5/5 Christoph Grün chris...@gmx.at Hello, I have downloaded the yui-examples-1.4-20090427.160726-141.war file. The sliders cannot be moved with the mouse and rather behave static. Moreover, the javascript error yahoo.widget.slider is null is reported. It seems that some js files are missing. Is there a workaround/update? Best regards, Christoph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AW: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized. i
also feel it's more intuitive to users for something like this. if you want
to see all the textfields on your project and you subclass textfield, you
can bring up textfield and hit F4 in eclipse and see the class hierarchy.
static factory methods are a bit more hidden to quick inspection. i like
static factory methods for things like units (Distance.meters(...) versus
Distance.feet(...)) or if you want to vary the subclass returned.
one improvement i'd make:
public class EmailField extends TextField
and write an EmailConverter. another reason subclassing is best.
Christian Helmbold-2 wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is
a matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them
in a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do
this. If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory
methods are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing
that I have missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-code-duplication-on-forms--tp23440920p23445544.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AW: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized. i
also feel it's more intuitive to users for something like this. if you want
to see all the textfields on your project and you subclass textfield, you
can bring up textfield and hit F4 in eclipse and see the class hierarchy.
static factory methods are a bit more hidden to quick inspection. i like
static factory methods for things like units (Distance.meters(...) versus
Distance.feet(...)) or if you want to vary the subclass returned.
one improvement i'd make:
public class EmailField extends TextField
and write an EmailConverter. another reason subclassing is best.
Christian Helmbold-2 wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is
a matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them
in a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do
this. If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory
methods are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing
that I have missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-code-duplication-on-forms--tp23440920p23445543.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AW: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
uh that was:
class EmailField extends TextField[Email]
where the square brackets are angle brackets :)
Christian Helmbold-2 wrote:
I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is
a matter of taste in this case.
If I have many fields, I'd need many classes for them. So I'd group them
in a sub package. In the case of factory methods I'd group the methods to
create fields in a class instead of a package.
Subclass:
1class UserEmailField extends TextField {
2 public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
3super(id, model);
4setRequired(true);
5add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
6add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
7 }
8}
Factory method:
1public static TextField emailTextField(String id){
2return (TextField) new TextField(id)
3.setRequired(true)
4.add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
5.add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class,
email));
6}
Your answer shows me, that there is no dramatically simpler way to do
this. If you ignore the two lines for factory class declaration factory
methods are even a bit shorter. Or is there an advantage of sub classing
that I have missed?
Regards,
Christian
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 8. Mai 2009, 09:08:34 Uhr
Betreff: Re: How to avoid code duplication on forms?
much simpler
class UserEmailField extends TextField {
public UserEmailField(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(EmailAddressValidator.getInstance())
add(UniqueValidator.unique(SystemUser.class, email));
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-code-duplication-on-forms--tp23440920p23445578.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AjaxTabbedPanel custom validation behaviour
I'm using an AjaxTabbedPanel and I would like to obtain the following
behaviours:
1) user input must be retained when switching tabs
2) tabs link should skip only the requireness validation but not all
other validators so the user can switch from tab to tab if he doesn't
insert bad input
3) a submit button present in all tabs should execute a full validation
of the TabbedPanel (all tabs) before execute some logic on the user input
Actually I've solved the point 1 overriding the AjaxTabbedPanel#newLink
returning an AjaxSubmitLink instead the AjaxFallbackLink.
What is the best way to solve the other two open points?
Thank you
The relevant code of my WebPage follow:
||
public TabbedPanelPage() {
final Form form = new Form(formy, new CompoundPropertyModel(this));
form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(form);
final FeedbackPanel fp = new FeedbackPanel(feedback);
fp.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(fp);
List tabs = new ArrayList();
tabs.add(new AbstractTab(new Model(first tab)) {
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel1(panelId, form.getModel());
firstNameText = new TextField(text1);
firstNameText.setOutputMarkupId(true);
firstNameText.add(new
StringValidator.MinimumLengthValidator(2));
p.add(firstNameText);
return p;
}
});
tabs.add(new AbstractTab(new Model(second tab)) {
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel2(panelId, form.getModel());
lastNameText = new TextField(text2);
lastNameText.add(new StringValidator.MinimumLengthValidator(2));
p.add(lastNameText);
return p;
}
});
tabPanel = new AjaxTabbedPanel(tabs, tabs) {
@Override
protected WebMarkupContainer newLink(String linkId, final int
index) {
return new AjaxSubmitLink(linkId, form) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
setSelectedTab(index);
if (target != null) {
target.addComponent(form);
}
onAjaxUpdate(target);
}
@Override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form){
target.addComponent(fp);
}
}.setDefaultFormProcessing(true);
}
};
form.add(tabPanel);
Button submit = new Button(submit_button) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
// TODO - validate entire form and process data
}
};
form.add(submit);
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxTabbedPanel custom validation behaviour
when used with forms it is a better idea to output the entire form and
use javascript tabs.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Alfredo Aleandri
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
I'm using an AjaxTabbedPanel and I would like to obtain the following
behaviours:
1) user input must be retained when switching tabs
2) tabs link should skip only the requireness validation but not all other
validators so the user can switch from tab to tab if he doesn't insert bad
input
3) a submit button present in all tabs should execute a full validation of
the TabbedPanel (all tabs) before execute some logic on the user input
Actually I've solved the point 1 overriding the AjaxTabbedPanel#newLink
returning an AjaxSubmitLink instead the AjaxFallbackLink.
What is the best way to solve the other two open points?
Thank you
The relevant code of my WebPage follow:
||
public TabbedPanelPage() {
final Form form = new Form(formy, new
CompoundPropertyModel(this));
form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(form);
final FeedbackPanel fp = new FeedbackPanel(feedback);
fp.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(fp);
List tabs = new ArrayList();
tabs.add(new AbstractTab(new Model(first tab)) {
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel1(panelId, form.getModel());
firstNameText = new TextField(text1);
firstNameText.setOutputMarkupId(true);
firstNameText.add(new
StringValidator.MinimumLengthValidator(2));
p.add(firstNameText);
return p;
}
});
tabs.add(new AbstractTab(new Model(second tab)) {
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel2(panelId, form.getModel());
lastNameText = new TextField(text2);
lastNameText.add(new
StringValidator.MinimumLengthValidator(2));
p.add(lastNameText);
return p;
}
}); tabPanel = new AjaxTabbedPanel(tabs, tabs) {
�...@override
protected WebMarkupContainer newLink(String linkId, final int
index) {
return new AjaxSubmitLink(linkId, form) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
setSelectedTab(index);
if (target != null) {
target.addComponent(form);
}
onAjaxUpdate(target);
}
�...@override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form){
target.addComponent(fp);
}
}.setDefaultFormProcessing(true);
}
};
form.add(tabPanel);
Button submit = new Button(submit_button) {
�...@override
public void onSubmit() {
// TODO - validate entire form and process
data
}
};
form.add(submit);
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Object without ID in LoadableDetachableModels
Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a fresh model object without an ID, the LoadableDetachableModel object contains no ID to load the model object from the DB on the next request. Because LoadableDetachableModel is read-only, I can not set an ID like in the hand made detachable model in Wicket in Action on Page 99, where the ID is set in setObject(Object o). Do I have to create a new LoadableDetachableModel after the initial saving of the domain object and then replace the old LoadableDetachableModel object with it? Tanks, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Object without ID in LoadableDetachableModels
Can you switch to using UUIDs? That saved me a LOT of headaches! On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Christian Helmbold christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote: Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a fresh model object without an ID, the LoadableDetachableModel object contains no ID to load the model object from the DB on the next request. Because LoadableDetachableModel is read-only, I can not set an ID like in the hand made detachable model in Wicket in Action on Page 99, where the ID is set in setObject(Object o). Do I have to create a new LoadableDetachableModel after the initial saving of the domain object and then replace the old LoadableDetachableModel object with it? Tanks, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: best way to add tooltips in wicket
very strange i'll look into it soon, when I get the app thats gonna use it up to 1.4 2009/5/7 RoyBatty math...@afjochnick.net: Thanks Nino. A little bit more input on the Mootip performance bit, if you're interested. Basically, when we're using it it behaves quite differently from the mootip examples you can see on their page. here's what happens: When a Mootip is added to, for example, a label, and you drag the mouse pointer reeally slowly over it, the tip shows up, then when the mouse comes to the next pixel, it disappears, then appears/disappears for every other pixel that the mouse moves across! If you check with Firebug, you can see that the div visibility settings are changed as you move the mouse across. Really funky, and i have no idea why it behaves like that :) Hi Roy Regarding 1. You should be able to tweak settings as you want theres a showdelay setting you can setup. And a lot more settings regarding timeout etc if wanted.. Regarding 2: No it seems it has to have a title at least my wrappers, you could try to set maxTitleChars to 0, int the mootip settings.. I just did'nt see the need for not having a title when I created it :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/best-way-to-add-tooltips-in-wicket-tp22697930p23422027.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Object without ID in LoadableDetachableModels
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/09/building-a-smart-entitymodel/ -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Christian Helmbold christian.helmb...@yahoo.de wrote: Domain (or model) objects get their IDs from Hibernate on saving in my application. When I create a new LoadableDetachableModel with a fresh model object without an ID, the LoadableDetachableModel object contains no ID to load the model object from the DB on the next request. Because LoadableDetachableModel is read-only, I can not set an ID like in the hand made detachable model in Wicket in Action on Page 99, where the ID is set in setObject(Object o). Do I have to create a new LoadableDetachableModel after the initial saving of the domain object and then replace the old LoadableDetachableModel object with it? Tanks, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
60% waste
Hi! I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my wicketTests and components. I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to get it right Anybody have the same experience? How about introducing type-safety and path-safety/identity into component hierarchies? Can this be done? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 Martijn On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my wicketTests and components. I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to get it right Anybody have the same experience? How about introducing type-safety and path-safety/identity into component hierarchies? Can this be done? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Martin Makundi ha scritto:
Hi!
I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my
wicketTests and components.
I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to
get it right
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached
utility class that, given a component, can print its containment
structure, along with the eventual component classes and
model values (toString-ed).
I find it useful to quickly visualize the current component hierarchy
while writing tests and debugging.
Hope this helps
Cheers
Andrea
import java.io.PrintStream;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import org.apache.wicket.Component;
import org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer;
import org.apache.wicket.Page;
/**
* Dumps a wicket component/page hierarchy to text, eventually writing
down the class and the model
* value as a string.
* p
* Each line in the dump follow the codecomponentId(class)
'value'/code format.
* /p
* p
* The class can be reused for multiple prints, but it's not thread safe
* /p
*/
public class WicketHierarchyPrinter {
static final Pattern NEWLINE = Pattern.compile(\\n,
Pattern.MULTILINE);
PrintStream out;
boolean valueDumpEnabled;
boolean classDumpEnabled;
/**
* Utility method to dump a single component/page to standard output
* @param c
* @param dumpClass
* @param dumpValue
*/
public static void print(Component c, boolean dumpClass, boolean
dumpValue) {
WicketHierarchyPrinter printer = new WicketHierarchyPrinter();
printer.setClassDumpEnabled(dumpClass);
printer.setValueDumpEnabled(dumpValue);
if(c instanceof Page) {
printer.print((Page) c);
} else {
printer.print(c);
}
}
/**
* Creates a printer that will dump to standard output
*/
public WicketHierarchyPrinter() {
out = System.out;
}
/**
* Creates a printer that will dump to the specified print stream
*/
public WicketHierarchyPrinter(PrintStream out) {
this.out = out;
}
/**
* Set to true if you want to see the model values in the dump
*
* @param valueDumpEnabled
*/
public void setValueDumpEnabled(boolean valueDumpEnabled) {
this.valueDumpEnabled = valueDumpEnabled;
}
/**
* Set to true if you want to see the component classes in the dump
*
* @param classDumpEnabled
*/
public void setClassDumpEnabled(boolean classDumpEnabled) {
this.classDumpEnabled = classDumpEnabled;
}
/**
* Prints the component containment hierarchy
*
* @param c
*/
public void print(Component c) {
walkHierarchy(c, 0);
}
/**
* Walks down the containment hierarchy depth first and prints each
component found
*/
private void walkHierarchy(Component c, int level) {
printComponent(c, level);
if (c instanceof MarkupContainer) {
MarkupContainer mc = (MarkupContainer) c;
for (Iterator it = mc.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
walkHierarchy((Component) it.next(), level + 1);
}
}
}
/**
* Prints a single component
*/
private void printComponent(Component c, int level) {
if(c instanceof Page)
out.print(tab(level) + PAGE_ROOT);
else
out.print(tab(level) + c.getId());
if (classDumpEnabled) {
String className;
if(c.getClass().isAnonymousClass()) {
className = c.getClass().getSuperclass().getName();
} else {
className = c.getClass().getName();
}
out.print(( + className + ));
}
if (valueDumpEnabled) {
try {
String value =
NEWLINE.matcher(c.getModelObjectAsString()).replaceAll(n);
out.print( ' + value + ');
} catch(Exception e) {
out.print( 'ERROR_RETRIEVING_MODEL + e.getMessage()
+ ');
}
}
out.println();
}
/**
* Generates three spaces per level
*/
String tab(int level) {
char[] spaces = new char[level * 3];
Arrays.fill(spaces, ' ');
return new String(spaces);
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Forms loading multiple times
I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Forms loading multiple times
define loading -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Chris ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote: I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like
this may work very well for you
TestUtils.attachTestId(Component c, String id) {
if (application.get().getconfigurationtype()!=production) {
c.setmatadata(testkey, id);
}
}
then in your code
Form form=new Form(..);
TestUtils.attachTestId(form, some_unique_form_id);
then in your tests
Page pageundertest=
Form form=TestUtils.findComponentByTestId(pageundertest, some_unique_form_id);
you have a potential problem of having collissions for components that
are inside repeaters, but you can set up test harnesses where you test
them in isolation.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached
utility class that, given a component, can print its containment
structure, along with the eventual component classes and
model values (toString-ed).
Well... printDoc and wicket
getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the
same thing.
See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5
How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket:
Integer round = 1;
String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS,
TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID,
AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS,
MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM);
String rowPath =
MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID,
MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER,
MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE,
MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS,
round.toString());
// Add row
tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath,
MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID,
MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER,
MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER,
MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick);
// Fill entry
FormTester formTester =
tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath));
formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath,
HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008);
formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath,
HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5);
formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath,
HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1);
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
you can also create a test panel that contains just your form and test that instead of creating the entire complex page just to test the form. break your tests into small units and test in isolaton. your test harness panel can have a getter that gives you direct access the the form you are testing. -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Well, strings all over the place, if I get what you mean. But I write the tests first and they define what the paths and ids should be and Wicket is really quick about discovering when the implementation doesn't follow spec (i.e. tests). Doing a small step at a time takes you there faster. Let's see there should be a label here, let's write a test for it and run it. Oh, it failed. Guess I add a label to the code. Oh it throw an exception, guess I add it to the markup as well. Green bar. Perhaps another label... if you do this in steps instead of doing a page at the time, you don't need chasing typos so much since you immediatley discovers any mistakes much more quickly. /Per On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! I use TDD: I spend 60% of my time type-checking and path-checking my wicketTests and components. I always have the wrong path and I must prinDocument and iterate to get it right Anybody have the same experience? How about introducing type-safety and path-safety/identity into component hierarchies? Can this be done? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- FaceBush, min insamling i Mustaschkampen: http://www.cancerfonden.se//sv/Mustaschkampen/Kampa/Insamlingar/?collection=243 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like this may work very well for you I know that with more work I can make ... more work. What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors etc. don't work (they do not save my time). I know it must be possible... somehow. I just don't know what would be the best way to make it happen. ** Martin On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Use an IDE plugin? On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like this may work very well for you I know that with more work I can make ... more work. What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors etc. don't work (they do not save my time). I know it must be possible... somehow. I just don't know what would be the best way to make it happen. ** Martin On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
But I write the tests first and they define what the paths and ids should be and Wicket is really quick about discovering when the implementation doesn't follow spec (i.e. tests). I concentrate on coding.. sometimes I write the implementation, sometimes the tests, whichever goes faster until it hangs and then I switch over... but working with the tests is like working with some prehistorical programming language without type and compile time safety ... it just wastes a lot of my time, that's the problem. Furthermore, I would like that when I refactor the component hierarcy, the tests would follow. This means that maybe wicket component hierarcy should be derived from package structure, maybe? Or something more native to java. ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Use an IDE plugin? That's a hack, not a design. ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
so what you are saying is that adding one line of code to mark the component you want to test, and then being able to find that component easily in your test - independent of its place in hierarchy and without relying on strings - is more work? -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like this may work very well for you I know that with more work I can make ... more work. What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors etc. don't work (they do not save my time). I know it must be possible... somehow. I just don't know what would be the best way to make it happen. ** Martin On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at compile time. this is one of the most powerful features of wicket. -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like this may work very well for you I know that with more work I can make ... more work. What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors etc. don't work (they do not save my time). I know it must be possible... somehow. I just don't know what would be the best way to make it happen. ** Martin On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
What about introducing an xpath-ish like expression API that could help you search for components within the hierarchy? On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at compile time. this is one of the most powerful features of wicket. -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: you should really use visitors for this kind of thing...something like this may work very well for you I know that with more work I can make ... more work. What I am looking for is a solution that makes it possible to have intellisense while coding and compile-time type checking. Visitors etc. don't work (they do not save my time). I know it must be possible... somehow. I just don't know what would be the best way to make it happen. ** Martin On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. See jdave-wicket for better test support. Slated to come to you in Wicket 1.5 How can this help me? For example the following is HELL with wicket: Integer round = 1; String mainFormPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MainPage.MAIN_TABS, TabbedPanel.TAB_PANEL_ID, AbstractInnerPanel.INNER_TABS, MyWizardPanel.WIZARD_FORM); String rowPath = MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_TABLE, MyPeriodPanel.PERIODS, round.toString()); // Add row tester.executeAjaxEvent(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath, MyWizardPanel.FANCY_PANEL_ID, MyPeriodPanel.HISTORY_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.BUTTON_CONTAINER, MyPeriodPanel.NEW_BUTTON), onclick); // Fill entry FormTester formTester = tester.newFormTester(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(mainFormPath)); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.START_DATE), 26.1.2008); formTester.setValue(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.DAYS), 5); formTester.select(MarkupUtils.getComponentPath(rowPath, HistoryEditorTable.SETTING), 1); ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Martin Makundi wrote: Use an IDE plugin? That's a hack, not a design. Wow...I'm new to this list, but I doubt you can expect much help with that attitude. I suggest you request a refund for your Wicket license and support subscription and go find a tool that better fits your needs. Oh, wait, Wicket is free and so is all the support you are receiving here. ;) -- - Chris Merrill | Web Performance, Inc. ch...@webperformance.com| http://webperformance.com 919-433-1762| 919-845-7601 Website Load Testing and Stress Testing Software Services - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Stream/download files through portlet
Hello All! Im facing problems trying to Stream/download files through portlet. I also used DynamicWebResource and a Resource link to serve the Resource Data. On a simple Wicket application everything works fine, but when my war is deployed as a portlet into a Liferay 5 instance, it doesnt work. The browser response is : The requested resource (/wick-portlet-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT/wick-portlet/) is not available. Does anyone have some idea,or know any issue about this kind of feature? thanks! Bruno Ledesma Rob Sonke wrote: Thijs and I debugged the code together this morning because when he read this thread he was sure that both options (overriding setheaders and onclick) should work. After some debugging we found a bug in Liferay which could be easily fixed in our used version. The current (5.1.2) version has a lot of changes around these properties, we will recheck that once we're able to upgrade. Thanks for your help. Serkan Camurcuoglu wrote: In the PLT.12.1.1 section of jsr 286 it says: Response properties can be viewed as header values set for the portal application. If these header values are intended to be transmitted to the client they should be set before the response is committed. When setting headers in the render lifecycle phase portlets should set the header in the render headers part or simply override the GenericPortlet.doHeaders method (see PLT.11.1.1.4.3). I think you may try: PortletRequestContext ctx = (PortletRequestContext) RequestContext.get(); PortletResponse presp = ctx.getPortletResponse(); presp.addProperty(header, value); this is kind of a hack but it might work.. Rob Sonke wrote: No, too bad. The headers aren't picked up. Serkan Camurcuoglu wrote: For the DynamicWebResource case, doesn't overriding setHeaders() in DynamicWebResource and adding your http header in this method work? By the way, which portlet container are you working with? Rob Sonke wrote: Hi, We're using wicket for our portlets now for almost 3/4 year and it's great. We're following/try to help with the full implementation of jsr 286 in wicket too (Thijs and me, see other threads). But I'm having a problem now with offering files through a portlet. There are actually two options, use the resource phase of jsr286 or use a separate download servlet. First option rocks, second option not (if option 1 won't work, I'll have to deal with it but I prefer not). So I'm trying to serve a file through the portlet based on a wicket link. A normal link would end up in a actionResponse which will not allow you to touch the resourcestream (returning null as the portlet specs describe). An ajax link (which uses the resource phase) will end up with a lot of binary code in the ajax xml output which will, of course, not work. I tried also adding a DynamicWebResource to a wicket ResourceLink, which works actually pretty good except that he's not communicating the filename to the brower by setting a header. I tried adding a header to the ResourceResponse but that one was not passed to the client too (maybe I did that wrong). Could anyone point me in the right direction or could tell me what I'm doing wrong over here? Regards, Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stream-download-files-through-portlet-tp19980617p23452007.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
Martin Makundi ha scritto: I don't know if this is of any help, but I've written the attached utility class that, given a component, can print its containment structure, along with the eventual component classes and model values (toString-ed). Well... printDoc and wicket getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true); does pretty much the same thing. Interesting. I googled for printDoc Wicket but did not find anything. Where is that utility? Cheers Andrea - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Stream/download files through portlet
Solved. Its a Liferay issue. http://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-1911 I was using portlet names and filter-mapping with a - char. I have to use the same string value for the portlet name and the filter-mapping stuff... without the - char, cause liferay (i dont have idea why) removes this char, causing the problem. sorry for the inconvenient question... Bruno 2009/5/8 Bruno Ledesma led.br...@gmail.com Hello All! Im facing problems trying to Stream/download files through portlet. I also used DynamicWebResource and a Resource link to serve the Resource Data. On a simple Wicket application everything works fine, but when my war is deployed as a portlet into a Liferay 5 instance, it doesnt work. The browser response is : The requested resource (/wick-portlet-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT/wick-portlet/) is not available. Does anyone have some idea,or know any issue about this kind of feature? thanks! Bruno Ledesma Rob Sonke wrote: Thijs and I debugged the code together this morning because when he read this thread he was sure that both options (overriding setheaders and onclick) should work. After some debugging we found a bug in Liferay which could be easily fixed in our used version. The current (5.1.2) version has a lot of changes around these properties, we will recheck that once we're able to upgrade. Thanks for your help. Serkan Camurcuoglu wrote: In the PLT.12.1.1 section of jsr 286 it says: Response properties can be viewed as header values set for the portal application. If these header values are intended to be transmitted to the client they should be set before the response is committed. When setting headers in the render lifecycle phase portlets should set the header in the render headers part or simply override the GenericPortlet.doHeaders method (see PLT.11.1.1.4.3). I think you may try: PortletRequestContext ctx = (PortletRequestContext) RequestContext.get(); PortletResponse presp = ctx.getPortletResponse(); presp.addProperty(header, value); this is kind of a hack but it might work.. Rob Sonke wrote: No, too bad. The headers aren't picked up. Serkan Camurcuoglu wrote: For the DynamicWebResource case, doesn't overriding setHeaders() in DynamicWebResource and adding your http header in this method work? By the way, which portlet container are you working with? Rob Sonke wrote: Hi, We're using wicket for our portlets now for almost 3/4 year and it's great. We're following/try to help with the full implementation of jsr 286 in wicket too (Thijs and me, see other threads). But I'm having a problem now with offering files through a portlet. There are actually two options, use the resource phase of jsr286 or use a separate download servlet. First option rocks, second option not (if option 1 won't work, I'll have to deal with it but I prefer not). So I'm trying to serve a file through the portlet based on a wicket link. A normal link would end up in a actionResponse which will not allow you to touch the resourcestream (returning null as the portlet specs describe). An ajax link (which uses the resource phase) will end up with a lot of binary code in the ajax xml output which will, of course, not work. I tried also adding a DynamicWebResource to a wicket ResourceLink, which works actually pretty good except that he's not communicating the filename to the brower by setting a header. I tried adding a header to the ResourceResponse but that one was not passed to the client too (maybe I did that wrong). Could anyone point me in the right direction or could tell me what I'm doing wrong over here? Regards, Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stream-download-files-through-portlet-tp19980617p23452007.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
DropDownChoice ID's
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as
1,2,3. I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing something.
Any help is appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Forms loading multiple times
I mean the DAO that populates my model, runs 2 times. Oblivian wrote: I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forms-loading-multiple-times-tp23449346p23453892.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Forms loading multiple times
if you use a detachable model connected to your dao then it will call the dao every render. -igor On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Oblivian ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote: I mean the DAO that populates my model, runs 2 times. Oblivian wrote: I'm having a issue with forms loading multiple times.. This is really screwing up ChoiceRenderer. Has anyone else experienced this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forms-loading-multiple-times-tp23449346p23453892.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice ID's
new ichoicerendererstring {
object getid(string object, int index) { return object; }
string getdisplayvalue(string object) { return object; }
}
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Chris ch...@carlsoncentral.com wrote:
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as 1,2,3.
I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing something.
Any help is appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice ID's
Think I figured it out by doing something like this. Is this the right way?
public class StringChoiceRender implements IChoiceRenderer {
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
return object.toString();
}
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index) {
return object.toString();
}
}
Oblivian wrote:
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as
1,2,3. I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing
something.
Any help is appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-ID%27s-tp23453868p23454055.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
inmethod grid generics patch
according to this post; http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to get generics. I'm finding the missing generics a real pain in the behind but I also have a recent checkout of the 1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicketstuff, and it does not yet have generics. Does anyone know if this component has been abandoned or not? If I have to I'll go an add the generics myself, but if there is a copy out there that already has them I'd rather use that version. - Brill Pappin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: inmethod grid generics patch
Hi, it's not abandoned. There's a project created for it in wicketstuff jira that can be used to submit patches. -Matej On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote: according to this post; http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to get generics. I'm finding the missing generics a real pain in the behind but I also have a recent checkout of the 1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicketstuff, and it does not yet have generics. Does anyone know if this component has been abandoned or not? If I have to I'll go an add the generics myself, but if there is a copy out there that already has them I'd rather use that version. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: inmethod grid generics patch
Found the patch, will assign it to jira issue. And possibly apply after review. -Matej On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, it's not abandoned. There's a project created for it in wicketstuff jira that can be used to submit patches. -Matej On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote: according to this post; http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to get generics. I'm finding the missing generics a real pain in the behind but I also have a recent checkout of the 1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicketstuff, and it does not yet have generics. Does anyone know if this component has been abandoned or not? If I have to I'll go an add the generics myself, but if there is a copy out there that already has them I'd rather use that version. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice ID's
Thanks.
Oblivian wrote:
List test = Arrays.asList(new String[] { A, B, C });
add(new DropDownChoice(test, test));
How can I make the Id's match the Values? There coming through as
1,2,3. I've tried custom ChoiceRenderer, but seem to be missing
something.
Any help is appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-ID%27s-tp23453868p23454080.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: inmethod grid generics patch
That would be great! If you need an area to focus on, it's the generics that type things like getSelectedItems() etc. and some of the other common overrides. - Brill Pappin On 8-May-09, at 5:57 PM, Matej Knopp wrote: Found the patch, will assign it to jira issue. And possibly apply after review. -Matej On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, it's not abandoned. There's a project created for it in wicketstuff jira that can be used to submit patches. -Matej On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote: according to this post; http://tinyurl.com/qlghyf the inmethod grid it he wicketstuff modules was to get generics. I'm finding the missing generics a real pain in the behind but I also have a recent checkout of the 1.4-SNAPSHOT of wicketstuff, and it does not yet have generics. Does anyone know if this component has been abandoned or not? If I have to I'll go an add the generics myself, but if there is a copy out there that already has them I'd rather use that version. - Brill Pappin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: 60% waste
Interesting. I googled for printDoc Wicket but did not find anything.
Where is that utility?
public void printDocument() {
System.out.println(tester.getServletResponse().getDocument());
}
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 60% waste
wicket component hierarchy is dynamic, so there is no predicting it at compile time. this is one of the most powerful features of wicket. Yes but each component is always fixed relative to its parent. The html markup fixes the hierarcy, so something might be devised here. What about introducing an xpath-ish like expression API that could help you search for components within the hierarchy? I am not familiar with this but sounds good, anybody have a suitable example for this? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
