Re: Asynchronous construction of page
I will try to use pages in iframes then. Thanks a lot, Igor. Kaspar On 02.11.2009, at 22:59, Igor Vaynberg wrote: if you want nonblocking you have to make each thing you are trying to load asynchronously its own page inside an iframe. the page itself can only be accessed synchronously, otherwise you would have to do your own multithreaded access handling in components...which would be horrific. -igor On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Kaspar Fischer kaspar.fisc...@dreizak.com wrote: I am trying to find out how to load several parts (Wicket panels) of a page in parallel using Ajax. The content of these parts takes long to render but I still want the user to see the other, readily available parts of the page, with the delayed panels appearing when available. Several posts on this list indicate that AjaxLazyLoadPanel's only work synchronously. Is this still the case with the latest version/snapshot of Wicket? Is there maybe another approach available (one that still uses Wicket for the parts)? Thanks, Kaspar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Attribute modified question
I am sure I am doing something very silly here but
When I add the following AttributeModifier in my onBeforeRender()
method, the solution works as expected (so I load an image that
indicates that this page is selected)
icon.add(new AttributeModifier(this.src='
, null, true, new Model(urlFor(active)+';)));
However, when I abstract that same code into a private class, the
solution still works and the correct image loads that indicates which
page I am on, but the browser, never completes the request (so the
spinning wheel on the tab keeps on spinning).
icon.add(new ActivateImage(onload, active));
.
private class ActivateImage extends AttributeModifier {
private ActivateImage(String id, final ResourceReference ref) {
super(id, null, true, new Model(this.src=' + urlFor(ref) + ';));
}
}
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Pieter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Where to put HTML files?
Thank you a lot to all for your commentaries... Everything exposed here seems to help me in one way or another. I will run a test for best approach and after decide the best way for me. Thank you again! El jue, 29-10-2009 a las 14:27 +0100, Martijn Dashorst escribió: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Olivier Bourgeois olivier.bourgeois@gmail.com wrote: The pros : - you have instant template/properties reloading in development mode without redeploying or complex IDE setup. This is something that the quickstart (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) already provides, no need for complex setups having to keep directory structures in sync, or having to debug a custom resource resolver, or finding out why the templates don't match your java code (Oh shouldn't I have updated production with the new templates?) Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
Hello Again!
I have a form that I build dynamically based on a render parameter
value. I'm using
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/forms-with-dynamic-elements.html
I use the constructor:
/**
* Constructor
*/
public ViewModePage()
{
...
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
...
// Check for a valid answer from this customer
if(value!=null value.length()0)
{
log.debug(Value length: + value.length());
User user =
userDAOBean.find(UuidUserType.fromString(value));
if(user!=null)
{
answer = getLastAnswer(1,user);
if(answer!=null)
{
buildForm(answer);
surveySubmitButton.setEnabled(true);
}
}
}
...
}
buildForm(answer); gets the form build based on the user answer
The problem as you can figure out. It works as I do nothing with the
form... But when I submit the form the constructer gets not
called anymore. So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
The GREAT book wicket in action explained this issue well. You have to
use dynamic models:
CODE --
In chapter 4, we’ll discuss the differences between static models
and dynamic mod-
els (the issue at hand) in greater depth. For now, we’ll solve the
problem by providing
the label with a model that calculates its value every time it’s
requested:
add(new Label(total, new Model() {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance();
return nf.format(getCart().getTotal());
}
}));
---WICKET IN ACTION
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
So how do I make the form gets updated each time
the page it's rendered without disturbing Wicket normal behaviour?
Do I explain myself?
Thank you all in advance.
SimpleAttributeModifier on SubmitLink?
Hi,
how can I achieve something like that:
abschliessen = (SubmitLink) new SubmitLink(abschliessen, antwortForm) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
preQuestionInit();
Worker.ClosingTestprocedure(tp);
preQuestionInit();
}
}
.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(
onclick,
return confirm('Information...');));
I detected, that the add Statement overwrites the onclick handler for the
form submit! How can I have both: After click on the Ok-Button it should fire
up the form.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
But when I submit the form the constructer gets not called anymore.
this is an expected behavior, an component instance is held on pagemap
between requests.
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
Can't you manage an instance of an dynamic model on your component,
independent of your form build logic? You can. Figure out the best way to
your component. You can simple keep this model on an instance variable for
example.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
Hello Again!
I have a form that I build dynamically based on a render parameter
value. I'm using
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/forms-with-dynamic-elements.html
I use the constructor:
/**
* Constructor
*/
public ViewModePage()
{
...
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
...
// Check for a valid answer from this customer
if(value!=null value.length()0)
{
log.debug(Value length: + value.length());
User user =
userDAOBean.find(UuidUserType.fromString(value));
if(user!=null)
{
answer = getLastAnswer(1,user);
if(answer!=null)
{
buildForm(answer);
surveySubmitButton.setEnabled(true);
}
}
}
...
}
buildForm(answer); gets the form build based on the user answer
The problem as you can figure out. It works as I do nothing with the
form... But when I submit the form the constructer gets not
called anymore. So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
The GREAT book wicket in action explained this issue well. You have to
use dynamic models:
CODE --
In chapter 4, we’ll discuss the differences between static models
and dynamic mod-
els (the issue at hand) in greater depth. For now, we’ll solve the
problem by providing
the label with a model that calculates its value every time it’s
requested:
add(new Label(total, new Model() {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance();
return nf.format(getCart().getTotal());
}
}));
---WICKET IN ACTION
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
So how do I make the form gets updated each time
the page it's rendered without disturbing Wicket normal behaviour?
Do I explain myself?
Thank you all in advance.
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
AW: OSGi Wicket
Thanks for all answers. I think OSGi is to much overhead for my needs. Joint fits more my needs, but includes unneeded overhead (for my project). I think I will implement my own mechanism with using a custom ClassResolver, cause I just need to search in new added jars (URLClassloader), Authorizationstrategy for security and a class the recursivly mounts a whole package on a given basepath which is extended with the package structur of the plugin (this structur includes a unique path so no collision will happen). But thanks anyway for ideas! Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ben Tilford [mailto:bentilf...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 2. November 2009 16:45 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: OSGi Wicket You might want to check out http://kenai.com/projects/joint the wicket example builds a menu system based of pages / links that are on the classpath which implement a Navigatable interface and have the @Navigation annotation. Still very early in development but it still might do what you need. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Giambalvo, Christian christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com wrote: Maybe OSGi ist o much overhead for my needs. I just want to be able to load WicketPages from a jar during runtime. Lets say i have a wicket app with just the wicketapplication and a homepage (extendable through plugins (jar)). Then during runtime i dropin a jar containing some Pages and i want wicket to be able to reach them. My idea is to to just add the jars to the classloader searchpath and let wicket do the rest. Is this a naive idea or whats the wicket way? Igor wrote (some time ago): what we have in wicket is a IClassResolver which we use to allow for pluggable class resolution. How can this pluggable resolution be accomplished? Greetz and thanks -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. November 2009 06:40 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: OSGi Wicket I do agree Eclipse buddy system in not proper OSGi, but it makes a lot easier to develop applications because 1- Your application, components, etc, will be same as in any normal Wicket application (no changes to are needed) 2- If you find out OSGi is not suitable at the end, you can always build the same application dropping OSGi and using the same (component) factory services. You will loose hot pluggability and that's it. I never hit serialization limitation myself. On the other hand, I do know from experience that integrating with certain application servers (using bridge approach) can be challenging. This is also something to take into account before deciding to use osgi. I think Igor is totally right about the things you should weight in deciding whether to use OSGi or not for a project. OSGi is a way to achieve pluggability but not the only one. Best, Ernesto On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:27 AM, David Leangen wic...@leangen.net wrote: If you do go with OSGi, you will have problems with classloaders and deserialization. To my knowledge, nobody has yet solved this (i.e. implemented a good solution) in a decent way. The Eclipse buddy system is not proper OSGi, IMO. pax-wicket does solve this problem (using proper OSGi), but I have never used their approach much even though I use the framework. Here is a post about this by me with some interesting comments from Igor: http://bioscene.blogspot.com/2009/03/serialization-in-osgi.html Good luck to you! =David On Nov 1, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: it is easy to create a pluggable application in wicket. all you need is a registry of component providers, whether it be something like spring [1], a custom registry like brix uses [2] or something more advanced like osgi. the choice should be based on the featureset you need. eg, if you need hot updating, classloader separation, etc, then osgi is good. if not, there are simpler ways to achieve modularity [1] [2]. the great news is that wicket lends itself easily to modularization. [1] http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/creating-pluggable-applications-with-wicket-and-spring/ [2] http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/source/browse/#svn/trunk/brix- core/src/main/java/brix/registry -igor 2009/10/29 Tomáš Mihok tomas.mi...@cnl.tuke.sk: Hello, I'm currently designing a new application. One of the requests is to make it modular. I found out that one of the possibilities to enable loading of modules while application is running is OSGi. Is there a tool/plugin/guide to accomplish this or are there any other possibilities of accomplishing same goal? Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SimpleAttributeModifier on SubmitLink?
I have used ModalWindow for similar use cases... and then do the actual work
on the ok button of a modal confirmation dialog. Is that approach fine for
your use case?
Regards,
Ernesto
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Peter Arnulf Lustig u...@yahoo.dewrote:
Hi,
how can I achieve something like that:
abschliessen = (SubmitLink) new SubmitLink(abschliessen, antwortForm) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
preQuestionInit();
Worker.ClosingTestprocedure(tp);
preQuestionInit();
}
}
.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(
onclick,
return confirm('Information...');));
I detected, that the add Statement overwrites the onclick handler for the
form submit! How can I have both: After click on the Ok-Button it should
fire up the form.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SimpleAttributeModifier on SubmitLink?
Take a look at AttributeAppender, and transform it into AttributePrepender
Martijn
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Peter Arnulf Lustig u...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
how can I achieve something like that:
abschliessen = (SubmitLink) new SubmitLink(abschliessen, antwortForm) {
�...@override
public void onSubmit() {
preQuestionInit();
Worker.ClosingTestprocedure(tp);
preQuestionInit();
}
}
.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(
onclick,
return confirm('Information...');));
I detected, that the add Statement overwrites the onclick handler for the
form submit! How can I have both: After click on the Ok-Button it should
fire up the form.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Portlet, liferay, strange error messages
Hi I'm using wicket 1.4.1 to develop portlets for liferay 5.2.3. In jboss server.log I see errors coming from wicket. Does's somebody know if these are real errors or just info messages that wicket sends to console like error messages as it seems. Porlets works fine. Versions JBOSS-Tomcat-4.2.3 JDK 1.5.0_09 Liferay 5.2.3 This [1] is what I get when portlet is deployed, and bellow that [2] when I click on DropDownChoice and onSelectionChanged method is activated. Thanks, Goran 1. 09:50:33,088 INFO [STDOUT] 09:50:33,088 INFO [PortletHotDeployListener] 1 portlet for HelloWorldPortlet is available for use 09:50:33,604 INFO [STDOUT] [03 stu 2009 09:50:33,588] [DEBUG] [] [HwApplication] [ HwApplication.init()] 09:50:33,619 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.Application callInitializers INFO: [HwApplication] init: Wicket core library initializer 09:50:33,635 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] 09:50:33,635 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] 09:50:33,651 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IFormSubmitListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener.onFormSubmitted()] 09:50:33,666 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IFormSubmitListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmitListener.onFormSubmitted()] 09:50:33,682 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=ILinkListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.ILinkListener.onLinkClicked()] 09:50:33,697 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=ILinkListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.ILinkListener.onLinkClicked()] 09:50:33,713 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IOnChangeListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IOnChangeListener.onSelectionChanged()] 09:50:33,729 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IOnChangeListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IOnChangeListener.onSelectionChanged()] 09:50:33,744 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IRedirectListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IRedirectListener.onRedirect()] 09:50:33,760 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IRedirectListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IRedirectListener.onRedirect()] 09:50:33,776 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IResourceListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IResourceListener.onResourceRequested()] 09:50:33,791 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IResourceListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.IResourceListener.onResourceRequested()] 09:50:33,822 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface name=IActivePageBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] 09:50:33,838 ERROR [STDERR] 2009.11.03 09:50:33 org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface registerRequestListenerInterface INFO: registered listener interface [RequestListenerInterface
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
Let me see if I understand what you say.
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
This makes sense for me but I find one problem. Where do I read the
renderer parameter?
Because this code gets executed in the main page.
CODE
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
--
I can do it in submit but then I should be able to communicate it to the
new component and
make it render again.
Is there a common way to do this in wicket?
Thank you
El mar, 03-11-2009 a las 08:00 -0200, Pedro Santos escribió:
But when I submit the form the constructer gets not called anymore.
this is an expected behavior, an component instance is held on pagemap
between requests.
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
Can't you manage an instance of an dynamic model on your component,
independent of your form build logic? You can. Figure out the best way to
your component. You can simple keep this model on an instance variable for
example.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
Hello Again!
I have a form that I build dynamically based on a render parameter
value. I'm using
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/forms-with-dynamic-elements.html
I use the constructor:
/**
* Constructor
*/
public ViewModePage()
{
...
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
...
// Check for a valid answer from this customer
if(value!=null value.length()0)
{
log.debug(Value length: + value.length());
User user =
userDAOBean.find(UuidUserType.fromString(value));
if(user!=null)
{
answer = getLastAnswer(1,user);
if(answer!=null)
{
buildForm(answer);
surveySubmitButton.setEnabled(true);
}
}
}
...
}
buildForm(answer); gets the form build based on the user answer
The problem as you can figure out. It works as I do nothing with the
form... But when I submit the form the constructer gets not
called anymore. So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
The GREAT book wicket in action explained this issue well. You have to
use dynamic models:
CODE --
In chapter 4, we’ll discuss the differences between static models
and dynamic mod-
els (the issue at hand) in greater depth. For now, we’ll solve the
problem by providing
the label with a model that calculates its value every time it’s
requested:
add(new Label(total, new Model() {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance();
return nf.format(getCart().getTotal());
}
}));
---WICKET IN ACTION
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
So how do I make the form gets updated each time
the page it's rendered without disturbing Wicket normal behaviour?
Do I explain myself?
Thank you all in advance.
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
Not what I try to mean.
your report:
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
You can have your model, and you can have your component build logic.
you report:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
so i think you are working on diferent answer instances
can you send some buildForm(answer) lines?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
Let me see if I understand what you say.
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
This makes sense for me but I find one problem. Where do I read the
renderer parameter?
Because this code gets executed in the main page.
CODE
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
--
I can do it in submit but then I should be able to communicate it to the
new component and
make it render again.
Is there a common way to do this in wicket?
Thank you
El mar, 03-11-2009 a las 08:00 -0200, Pedro Santos escribió:
But when I submit the form the constructer gets not called anymore.
this is an expected behavior, an component instance is held on pagemap
between requests.
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
Can't you manage an instance of an dynamic model on your component,
independent of your form build logic? You can. Figure out the best way to
your component. You can simple keep this model on an instance variable
for
example.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
Hello Again!
I have a form that I build dynamically based on a render parameter
value. I'm using
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/forms-with-dynamic-elements.html
I use the constructor:
/**
* Constructor
*/
public ViewModePage()
{
...
// Get render parameter
String value =
((PortletRequestContext)RequestContext.get()).getPortletRequest().getParameter(crmportal:userId);
...
// Check for a valid answer from this customer
if(value!=null value.length()0)
{
log.debug(Value length: + value.length());
User user =
userDAOBean.find(UuidUserType.fromString(value));
if(user!=null)
{
answer = getLastAnswer(1,user);
if(answer!=null)
{
buildForm(answer);
surveySubmitButton.setEnabled(true);
}
}
}
...
}
buildForm(answer); gets the form build based on the user answer
The problem as you can figure out. It works as I do nothing with the
form... But when I submit the form the constructer gets not
called anymore. So no matter what's the value it will get not updated
to
the new one.
The GREAT book wicket in action explained this issue well. You have
to
use dynamic models:
CODE --
In chapter 4, we’ll discuss the differences between static models
and dynamic mod-
els (the issue at hand) in greater depth. For now, we’ll solve the
problem by providing
the label with a model that calculates its value every time it’s
requested:
add(new Label(total, new Model() {
@Override
public Object getObject() {
NumberFormat nf = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance();
return nf.format(getCart().getTotal());
}
}));
---WICKET IN ACTION
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
So how do I make the form gets updated each time
the page it's rendered without disturbing Wicket normal behaviour?
Do I explain myself?
Thank you all in advance.
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: DefaultObjectStreamFactory | Re: AccessControlException with Wicket on Google App Engine (GAE)
Thanks Igor, I have seen that the Objects class provides a static setter in order to use a different Implementation of IObjectStreamFactory instead of the DefaultObjectStreamFactory. Where would you recommend to place the code to set my own implementation of IObjectStreamFactory using the static setter provided by Objects. I am not sure if it is enough to place it in the init method of my class that derives from org.apache.wicket.Application. (i.e., may the Objects instance be cleared at some time by the GC?) thanks, andr On 02.11.2009 17:28, Igor Vaynberg wrote: that should most likely work without problems. -igor On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andreas Mazaandr.m...@gmail.com wrote: just to circumvent the problem for a while, I am thinking of the following workaround: what would be the implications if I change the implementation of IObjectStreamFactor.DefaultObjectStreamFactory so that newObjectInputStream() and newObjectOutputStream return the regular JDK ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream, respectively? To my mind, this would eliminate the AccessControlException problem since I am not subclassing ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream. thanks, andr On 30.10.2009 10:27, A. Maza wrote: yes, except the fact that I am trying to use a Memcache-based implementation of the IPageStore instead of the HTTPSessionStore (based on the TerracottaPageStore. However, in my case the exception occurs when I am trying to serialize the page using the provided method of the AbstractPageStore. The exception of the second stacktrace I posted was reported by another user in the GAE forum [1], but happening in a totally different scenario. In my initial post I forgot the link to the issue I have opened on the GAE project site. [2] I am using Wicket 1.4.3 (I have also tried it with 1.4.2) and the latest GAE SDK (1.2.6) regards, andr [1] http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/b80648c126778ef5/0a259ba5bba8078f?lnk=gstq=wicket+accesscontrolexception#0a259ba5bba8078f [2]http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2334 On 29.10.2009 21:56, Esteban Masoero wrote: I'm sure the answer is yes but to be sure: have you done everything that is said here http://stronglytypedblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/wicket-on-google-app-engine.html ? Also, what versions of gae sdk and wicket are you using? A. Maza escribió: Hi, I've encountered now (and have seen reported by other users) several different cases where Wicket on GAE throws an AccessControlException when serializing an object to a byte array. Although this is clearly an issue of GAE permissions, I would like to ask if someone could give me a hint, why this exception occurs or if someone may know a workaround. I've already filed an issue for this on the GAE project site [1] and would forward any findings of the wicket community. Below I include snippets of two different stacktraces. Thanks in advance, andr snip1 java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.SerializablePermission enableSubclassImplementation) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:323) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerFactory$CustomSecurityManager.checkPermission(DevAppServerFactory.java:151) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.init(ObjectOutputStream.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.util.io.IObjectStreamFactory$DefaultObjectStreamFactory$2.init(IObjectStreamFactory.java:150) at org.apache.wicket.util.io.IObjectStreamFactory$DefaultObjectStreamFactory.newObjectOutputStream(IObjectStreamFactory.java:114) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects.objectToByteArray(Objects.java:) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore.serializePage(AbstractPageStore.java:203) /snip1 snip2 (java.io.SerializablePermission enableSubstitution) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission (AccessControlContext.java:264) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission (AccessController.java:427) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java: 532) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerFactory $CustomSecurityManager.checkPermission(DevAppServerFactory.java:122) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.enableReplaceObject (ObjectOutputStream.java:556) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects $ReplaceObjectOutputStream.init(Objects.java:179) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects $ReplaceObjectOutputStream.init(Objects.java:170) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects.cloneModel(Objects.java:442) at org.apache.wicket.version.undo.ModelChange.init(ModelChange.java: 103) at org.apache.wicket.version.undo.ChangeList.componentModelChanging (ChangeList.java:64) at org.apache.wicket.version.undo.UndoPageVersionManager.componentModelChanging
Re: Tree table with check box
Hello again,
Please find the code below
In Page class:
IColumn columns[] = new IColumn[]
{
new PropertyTreeColumn(new
ColumnLocation(Alignment.LEFT, 100,
Unit.PERCENT),Check,userObject.name)
{
public IRenderable
newCell(javax.swing.tree.TreeNode node, int level)
{
return null;
}
public Component newCell(MarkupContainer
parent,java.lang.String id,
javax.swing.tree.TreeNode node, int level)
{
CheckBoxPanel boxPanel = new
CheckBoxPanel(parent.getId(),id);
return boxPanel;
}
},
};
TreeDataProvider treedataProvider = new TreeDataProvider();
trtTest = new
TreeTable(trtTest,treedataProvider.getTreeModel(),columns);
trtTest.getTreeState().expandAll();
add(trtTest);
In Check box panel class:
public class CheckBoxPanel extends Panel
{
private CheckBox cbxName;
private Label lblName;
private Link lnkName;
public CheckBoxPanel(String id, String model)
{
super(id);
setMarkupId(id);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true);
cbxName = new CheckBox(cbxName, new AbstractCheckBoxModel());
add(cbxName);
}
}
Tree Data Provider class:
public class TreeDataProvider
{
private DefaultMutableTreeNode dmtRoot;
public TreeDataProvider()
{
dmtRoot = new DefaultMutableTreeNode(new TreeListVO(Test));
DefaultMutableTreeNode dmtBase1 = new DefaultMutableTreeNode(new
TreeListVO(Sakthi));
DefaultMutableTreeNode dmtChild1 = new
DefaultMutableTreeNode(new
TreeListVO(Computer));
dmtBase1.add(dmtChild1);
dmtRoot.add(dmtBase1);
}
public TreeModel getTreeModel()
{
DefaultTreeModel dtmTree = new DefaultTreeModel(dmtRoot);
return dtmTree;
}
}
In Model class:
public class TreeListVO
{
private String name;
public TreeListVO(String name)
{
this.name = name;
}
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
}
CheckBoxPanel Page class have correspoding html file
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Tree-table-with-check-box-tp26080852p26160113.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
Not what I try to mean.
So what's the way?
your report:
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
You can have your model, and you can have your component build logic.
you report:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
so i think you are working on diferent answer instances
can you send some buildForm(answer) lines?
Yes but's somewhat large, anyway answer has got from the code I sent
earlier. But it got not
updated because this code goes in the constructor that never gets
called.
Here goes the code:
public void buildForm(SurveyAnswer answer)
{
ListSurveyQuestion listQuestions = getQuestionList(1); //
FIXIT: How
do we get this questionaire?
if(listQuestions!=null listQuestions.size()0)
{
int category = -1;
QuestionCategoryComponent categoryComponent = null;
/*
* We add category containers to the component array and
* questions to the category containers.
*
*/
for(IteratorSurveyQuestion iter =
listQuestions.iterator();
iter.hasNext();)
{
SurveyQuestion question = iter.next();
// Check if we should start a new category
if(category !=
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory())
{
log.debug(Category: +
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
categoryComponent = new
QuestionCategoryComponent(surveyComponent,
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
components.add(categoryComponent);
category =
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory();
}
if(categoryComponent!=null)
{
SurveyQuestionResponse response = null;
if(answer!=null)
{
response =
surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question, answer);
if(response.getIdSurveyQuestionResponse()==null)
{
log.info(Creating a
new answer for this question);
surveyQuestionResponseDAO.save(response);
}
}
// Each question component holds
question and answer
try {
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
} catch (ComponentTypeException e) {
try {
warn(Response for
question: +
question.getSurveyQuestionDescription() + has incorrect response!);
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question));
} catch (ComponentTypeException
e1) {
log.error(Cannot
create component);
}
}
}
}
}
}
Re: DefaultObjectStreamFactory | Re: AccessControlException with Wicket on Google App Engine (GAE)
application init should be fine. -igor On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, A. Maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Igor, I have seen that the Objects class provides a static setter in order to use a different Implementation of IObjectStreamFactory instead of the DefaultObjectStreamFactory. Where would you recommend to place the code to set my own implementation of IObjectStreamFactory using the static setter provided by Objects. I am not sure if it is enough to place it in the init method of my class that derives from org.apache.wicket.Application. (i.e., may the Objects instance be cleared at some time by the GC?) thanks, andr On 02.11.2009 17:28, Igor Vaynberg wrote: that should most likely work without problems. -igor On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andreas Mazaandr.m...@gmail.com wrote: just to circumvent the problem for a while, I am thinking of the following workaround: what would be the implications if I change the implementation of IObjectStreamFactor.DefaultObjectStreamFactory so that newObjectInputStream() and newObjectOutputStream return the regular JDK ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream, respectively? To my mind, this would eliminate the AccessControlException problem since I am not subclassing ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream. thanks, andr On 30.10.2009 10:27, A. Maza wrote: yes, except the fact that I am trying to use a Memcache-based implementation of the IPageStore instead of the HTTPSessionStore (based on the TerracottaPageStore. However, in my case the exception occurs when I am trying to serialize the page using the provided method of the AbstractPageStore. The exception of the second stacktrace I posted was reported by another user in the GAE forum [1], but happening in a totally different scenario. In my initial post I forgot the link to the issue I have opened on the GAE project site. [2] I am using Wicket 1.4.3 (I have also tried it with 1.4.2) and the latest GAE SDK (1.2.6) regards, andr [1] http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/b80648c126778ef5/0a259ba5bba8078f?lnk=gstq=wicket+accesscontrolexception#0a259ba5bba8078f [2]http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2334 On 29.10.2009 21:56, Esteban Masoero wrote: I'm sure the answer is yes but to be sure: have you done everything that is said here http://stronglytypedblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/wicket-on-google-app-engine.html ? Also, what versions of gae sdk and wicket are you using? A. Maza escribió: Hi, I've encountered now (and have seen reported by other users) several different cases where Wicket on GAE throws an AccessControlException when serializing an object to a byte array. Although this is clearly an issue of GAE permissions, I would like to ask if someone could give me a hint, why this exception occurs or if someone may know a workaround. I've already filed an issue for this on the GAE project site [1] and would forward any findings of the wicket community. Below I include snippets of two different stacktraces. Thanks in advance, andr snip1 java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.SerializablePermission enableSubclassImplementation) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:323) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerFactory$CustomSecurityManager.checkPermission(DevAppServerFactory.java:151) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.init(ObjectOutputStream.java:253) at org.apache.wicket.util.io.IObjectStreamFactory$DefaultObjectStreamFactory$2.init(IObjectStreamFactory.java:150) at org.apache.wicket.util.io.IObjectStreamFactory$DefaultObjectStreamFactory.newObjectOutputStream(IObjectStreamFactory.java:114) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects.objectToByteArray(Objects.java:) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore.serializePage(AbstractPageStore.java:203) /snip1 snip2 (java.io.SerializablePermission enableSubstitution) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission (AccessControlContext.java:264) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission (AccessController.java:427) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java: 532) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerFactory $CustomSecurityManager.checkPermission(DevAppServerFactory.java:122) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.enableReplaceObject (ObjectOutputStream.java:556) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects $ReplaceObjectOutputStream.init(Objects.java:179) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects $ReplaceObjectOutputStream.init(Objects.java:170) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Objects.cloneModel(Objects.java:442) at
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
Hi Gonzalo, I thought that with buildForm implementation I will see how you
create your form component. But seams that it is created on the line:
QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,response)
Instead of ask you for more code, I will try to explain myself:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to the new one.
Any build component logic will stop you from create an form with an dynamic
model on it. I thing you are updating an object instance that isn't the one
on your form model.
on lines:
response = surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question,
answer);
and then:
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
be sure of to work on the same response instance that is on your form model.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
Not what I try to mean.
So what's the way?
your report:
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
You can have your model, and you can have your component build logic.
you report:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
so i think you are working on diferent answer instances
can you send some buildForm(answer) lines?
Yes but's somewhat large, anyway answer has got from the code I sent
earlier. But it got not
updated because this code goes in the constructor that never gets
called.
Here goes the code:
public void buildForm(SurveyAnswer answer)
{
ListSurveyQuestion listQuestions = getQuestionList(1); //
FIXIT: How
do we get this questionaire?
if(listQuestions!=null listQuestions.size()0)
{
int category = -1;
QuestionCategoryComponent categoryComponent = null;
/*
* We add category containers to the component array
and
* questions to the category containers.
*
*/
for(IteratorSurveyQuestion iter =
listQuestions.iterator();
iter.hasNext();)
{
SurveyQuestion question = iter.next();
// Check if we should start a new category
if(category !=
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory())
{
log.debug(Category: +
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
categoryComponent = new
QuestionCategoryComponent(surveyComponent,
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
components.add(categoryComponent);
category =
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory();
}
if(categoryComponent!=null)
{
SurveyQuestionResponse response =
null;
if(answer!=null)
{
response =
surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question, answer);
if(response.getIdSurveyQuestionResponse()==null)
{
log.info(Creating
a new answer for this question);
surveyQuestionResponseDAO.save(response);
}
}
// Each question component holds
question and answer
try {
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
} catch (ComponentTypeException e) {
try {
warn(Response for
question: +
question.getSurveyQuestionDescription() + has incorrect response!);
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question));
} catch
(ComponentTypeException e1) {
log.error(Cannot
create component);
}
}
}
}
}
}
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Problem with IFormsubmitting
Hi!
I need to accomplish the following:
1. receive ajax onchange event from a formcomponent
2. receive defaultformprocesing=false style submit
3. repaint an area; I this is why I need the form to be really
submitted (=rawinput but not validated).
I have built a custom component FormSubmittingDropDownChoice.
The problem is that even if I press another submit component (button,
for example), the form allways assumes the formSubmitting component to
be FormSubmittingDropDownChoice. Why? Because the findSubmittingButton
is so simple that if FormSubmittingDropDownChoice has a value, it is
the submitting component.
Is there a workaround or fix? How could I achieve similar
functionality in a working manner? This works well if I click the
FormSubmittingDropDownChoice, otherwise it does not :(
package com.tustor.wicket.common.reusables.formcomponents;
public class FormSubmittingDropDownChoiceT extends DropDownChoiceT
implements IFormSubmittingComponent {
public FormSubmittingDropDownChoice(String id, various constructor options) {
super(id, choices, renderer);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmittingComponent#getDefaultFormProcessing()
*/
public boolean getDefaultFormProcessing() {
return false;
}
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmittingComponent#onSubmit()
*/
public void onSubmit() {
// override
}
/**
* wicket-ajax:
*
* if (submitButton != null) {
* s += Wicket.Form.encode(submitButton) + =1;
* }
*
* @see org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent#getInputAsArray()
*/
@Override
public String[] getInputAsArray() {
return MarkupUtils.filterSubmitIndicator(super.getInputAsArray());
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractSingleSelectChoice#getModelValue()
*/
@Override
public String getModelValue() {
String value = super.getModelValue();
if (1.equals(value)) {
throw new IllegalStateException(1 not supported because of
javaScript wicket-ajax:submitForm: function(form, submitButton));
}
return value;
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting
Hi!
Maybe this is the solution:
String url =
getRequest().getParameter(getHiddenFieldId());
if (!Strings.isEmpty(url))
{
dispatchEvent(getPage(), url);
}
??
Attach a change listener with ajax form submit?
**
Martin
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I need to accomplish the following:
1. receive ajax onchange event from a formcomponent
2. receive defaultformprocesing=false style submit
3. repaint an area; I this is why I need the form to be really
submitted (=rawinput but not validated).
I have built a custom component FormSubmittingDropDownChoice.
The problem is that even if I press another submit component (button,
for example), the form allways assumes the formSubmitting component to
be FormSubmittingDropDownChoice. Why? Because the findSubmittingButton
is so simple that if FormSubmittingDropDownChoice has a value, it is
the submitting component.
Is there a workaround or fix? How could I achieve similar
functionality in a working manner? This works well if I click the
FormSubmittingDropDownChoice, otherwise it does not :(
package com.tustor.wicket.common.reusables.formcomponents;
public class FormSubmittingDropDownChoiceT extends DropDownChoiceT
implements IFormSubmittingComponent {
public FormSubmittingDropDownChoice(String id, various constructor options) {
super(id, choices, renderer);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmittingComponent#getDefaultFormProcessing()
*/
public boolean getDefaultFormProcessing() {
return false;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmittingComponent#onSubmit()
*/
public void onSubmit() {
// override
}
/**
* wicket-ajax:
*
* if (submitButton != null) {
* s += Wicket.Form.encode(submitButton) + =1;
* }
*
* @see org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent#getInputAsArray()
*/
�...@override
public String[] getInputAsArray() {
return MarkupUtils.filterSubmitIndicator(super.getInputAsArray());
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractSingleSelectChoice#getModelValue()
*/
�...@override
public String getModelValue() {
String value = super.getModelValue();
if (1.equals(value)) {
throw new IllegalStateException(1 not supported because of
javaScript wicket-ajax:submitForm: function(form, submitButton));
}
return value;
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Glue for composing panels
Michal, I adopted your idea, but with a variation. It is something like:
// Use this instead of WebPage for any base page whose component-tree
// construction relies on abstract or overridable methods.
//
abstract class DelayedConstructionWebPage extends WebPage {
private Boolean componentsAssembled = false;
...(preserve the standard constructors of WebPage)...
// This method's implementation will build the component tree.
// It may freely call abstract or overridable methods.
//
abstract protected void assembleComponents();
// If you have any method which accesses a component,
// and which might be called before the first rendering,
// to ensure that the component exists you should insert
// a one-line call to assembleComponentsIfNecessary()
//
protected assembleComponentsIfNecessary() {
if ( !componentsAssembled ) {
assembleComponents();
componentsAssembled = true;
}
}
@Override
void onBeforeRender() {
assembleComponentsIfNecessary();
super.onBeforeRender();
}
}
I believe this will minimize the boilerplate code in the classes that provide
the actual business value.
-Original Message-
From: Michal Kurtak [mailto:michal.kur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:08 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Glue for composing panels
Yes Frank, model-setting method was just an example how to access a
component before onBeforeRender() executes.
I've only tried to point out that we set componentsAssembled = true in
assembleComponents() method. We call assembleComponents() from
get-method (for referenced component) to ensure that referenced
component has been created.
michal
...
/Frank
-Original Message-
From: Michal Kurtak [mailto:michal.kur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 3:39 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Glue for composing panels
Hi Frank,
We use the same approach as you. We have found one disadvantage, which
relates to references to components created by subclasses.
I'll demostrate it (problem and solution) in the following example:
class BasePage extends Page
{
/** Component created by subclass */
private Component component;
private boolean componentsAssembled = false;
/** Let the assemple method to set componentsAssembled flag */
private void assembleComponents()
{
component = createComponent();
...
componentsAssembled = true;
}
protected abstract Component createComponent();
@Override
void onBeforeRender() {
if ( !componentsAssembled ) {
assembleComponents();
}
super.onBeforeRender(); // Or whatever else is needed
}
/** Method uses assambelComponents() to ensure, that component is created */
public Component getComponent()
{
if(component == null)
{
assembleComponents();
}
return component;
}
/** public method delegete to referenced component. Uses safe
getComponent() method */
public void setComponentModel(IModel? model)
{
getComponent().setModel(model);
}
michal
2009/10/29 Frank Silbermann frank.silberm...@fedex.com:
I was discussing glue for composing reusable panels into web pages on
the blog of Erik van Oosten
(http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/09/16/wicket-dos-and-donts/).
I told him that my approach had been to create an abstract base page
that constructs the common elements while leaving place-holders for
page-specific panels by defining methods such as:
abstract Panel createUpperLeftPanel (String wicketID);
abstract Panel createLowerRightPanel(String wicketID);
and having the base page's constructor say things like:
Panel p1 = createUpperLeftPanel(a_wicket_id);
add(p1);
...
Add( createUpperRightPanel(another_wicket_id) );
The child page's contribution would be the implementation of the
abstract methods.
I explained that I preferred this to mark-up inheritance because I could
add to the base page in any number places (not just one place), the
compiler would tell the child-page writer exactly what panels were
needed, and most importantly, no additional mark-up whatsoever would
need to be associated with any of the child pages. (Panel classes used
by the child page would of course have their associated mark-up.)
Eric and others explained what a bad idea it is for constructors to call
overridable methods -- they execute before the child-page's properties
have been set. I usually got away with this, but I admit I was burnt a
few times. Recently, I wondered whether there might be a simple fix for
the constructor-calls-overridable-method problem, such as:
(a) Move the base page's component tree construction out of the
constructor, and put it into the method:
private void assembleComponents()
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
But Pedro,
Everything works well. The form got created and everything gets sent and
updated when I click the submit button.
So in this aspect everything works well.
The only problem is that I need to get a render parameter that actually
I only get in constructor so never gets updated
and I want to know what's the correct way to do this.
I don't think I'm updating a object instance that isn't the one from my
model. I took this into account.
Tnx
El mar, 03-11-2009 a las 14:15 -0200, Pedro Santos escribió:
Hi Gonzalo, I thought that with buildForm implementation I will see how you
create your form component. But seams that it is created on the line:
QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,response)
Instead of ask you for more code, I will try to explain myself:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to the new one.
Any build component logic will stop you from create an form with an dynamic
model on it. I thing you are updating an object instance that isn't the one
on your form model.
on lines:
response = surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question,
answer);
and then:
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
be sure of to work on the same response instance that is on your form model.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
Not what I try to mean.
So what's the way?
your report:
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on page.
You can have your model, and you can have your component build logic.
you report:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
so i think you are working on diferent answer instances
can you send some buildForm(answer) lines?
Yes but's somewhat large, anyway answer has got from the code I sent
earlier. But it got not
updated because this code goes in the constructor that never gets
called.
Here goes the code:
public void buildForm(SurveyAnswer answer)
{
ListSurveyQuestion listQuestions = getQuestionList(1); //
FIXIT: How
do we get this questionaire?
if(listQuestions!=null listQuestions.size()0)
{
int category = -1;
QuestionCategoryComponent categoryComponent = null;
/*
* We add category containers to the component array
and
* questions to the category containers.
*
*/
for(IteratorSurveyQuestion iter =
listQuestions.iterator();
iter.hasNext();)
{
SurveyQuestion question = iter.next();
// Check if we should start a new category
if(category !=
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory())
{
log.debug(Category: +
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
categoryComponent = new
QuestionCategoryComponent(surveyComponent,
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
components.add(categoryComponent);
category =
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory();
}
if(categoryComponent!=null)
{
SurveyQuestionResponse response =
null;
if(answer!=null)
{
response =
surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question, answer);
if(response.getIdSurveyQuestionResponse()==null)
{
log.info(Creating
a new answer for this question);
surveyQuestionResponseDAO.save(response);
}
}
// Each question component holds
question and answer
try {
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
} catch (ComponentTypeException e) {
try {
Re: uploaded files in page instance
Is there any open source utility to write and manage files to temp folder , handle deletion , signle thread access etc ? Newgro wrote: Igor Vaynberg schrieb: you guys ever hear of transactional isolation? :) databases handle all this kind of neat stuff for you. -igor Oh, i didn't saw that he tried it in one transaction. I thought it are multiple stateless steps. Sorry Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/uploaded-files-in-page-instance-tp25962716p26160637.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting
Hi!
I hope I found a solution usin IOnChangeListener.
Please try this out and let me know if it works for you. Maybe it
should be incorporated into Wicket?
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter = Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
try {
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(
';).append(arg0);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
public abstract class AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox extends
CheckBox {
/**
* @param id
* @param model
*/
public AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox(String id,
IModelBoolean model) {
super(id, model);
add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(JavaScriptConstants.ONCHANGE) {
@Override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onError(target);
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onSubmit(target);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#getAjaxCallDecorator()
*/
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator() {
@Override
public CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl() {
return urlFor(IOnChangeListener.INTERFACE);
}
@Override
public Form? getForm() {
return AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.getForm();
}
};
}
});
}
/**
* @param target
*/
protected abstract void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target);
/**
* @param target
*/
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
onSubmit(target);
}
/**
* @param id
*/
public AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox(String id) {
this(id, null);
}
}
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
Maybe this is the solution:
String url =
getRequest().getParameter(getHiddenFieldId());
if (!Strings.isEmpty(url))
{
dispatchEvent(getPage(), url);
}
??
Attach a change listener with ajax form submit?
**
Martin
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I need to accomplish the following:
1. receive ajax onchange event from a formcomponent
2. receive defaultformprocesing=false style submit
3. repaint an area; I this is why I need the form to be really
submitted (=rawinput but not validated).
I have built a custom component FormSubmittingDropDownChoice.
The problem is that even if I press another submit component (button,
for example), the form allways assumes the formSubmitting component to
be FormSubmittingDropDownChoice. Why? Because the findSubmittingButton
is so simple that if FormSubmittingDropDownChoice has a value, it is
the submitting component.
Is there a workaround or fix? How could I achieve similar
functionality in a working manner? This works well if I click the
FormSubmittingDropDownChoice, otherwise it does not :(
package com.tustor.wicket.common.reusables.formcomponents;
public class FormSubmittingDropDownChoiceT extends DropDownChoiceT
implements IFormSubmittingComponent {
public FormSubmittingDropDownChoice(String id, various constructor options)
{
super(id, choices, renderer);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.IFormSubmittingComponent#getDefaultFormProcessing()
*/
public boolean getDefaultFormProcessing() {
return false;
}
/**
* @see
Re: Page model returning null
Oh. That is embarrassing. Sorry for taking your time. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.comwrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Loren Cole loren.c...@gmail.com wrote: HomePage hp = (HomePage) this.findPage(); ModelEntity account = (ModelEntity) parent.getInnermostModel(); Is this just a typo? You're getting the home page and then getting the innermost model from something else? Shouldn't it be hp.getModel()? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting
Hi!
One finishing touch is needed. The hidden field should be cleared
after ajax submit. It seems to work now.. feel free to critisize.
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter = Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(arg0);
}
/**
* @param hiddenFieldId
* @param value
* @return
*/
private AppendingStringBuffer getSetHiddenFieldValue(CharSequence value) {
try {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(value).append(
';);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
**
Martin
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I hope I found a solution usin IOnChangeListener.
Please try this out and let me know if it works for you. Maybe it
should be incorporated into Wicket?
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter = Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
try {
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(
';).append(arg0);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
public abstract class AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox extends
CheckBox {
/**
* @param id
* @param model
*/
public AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox(String id,
IModelBoolean model) {
super(id, model);
add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(JavaScriptConstants.ONCHANGE) {
�...@override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onError(target);
}
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onSubmit(target);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#getAjaxCallDecorator()
*/
�...@override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator() {
�...@override
public CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl() {
return urlFor(IOnChangeListener.INTERFACE);
}
�...@override
public Form? getForm() {
return AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.getForm();
}
};
}
});
}
/**
* @param target
*/
protected abstract void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target);
/**
* @param target
*/
protected void
Re: Dynamic Rendering and Common Paramenters
ok, how this parameter get updated? You receive it on every request? If so,
the usual way of to build your render logic dynamically is to implement
component onBeforeRender method, rather than on your component constructor.
See the ListView code for example: based on the model object (an list) the
list items are dynamically add to component. And that render logic is tested
based on list every component render. Similarly, you can have your render
logic executed based on a parameter every component render...
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
But Pedro,
Everything works well. The form got created and everything gets sent and
updated when I click the submit button.
So in this aspect everything works well.
The only problem is that I need to get a render parameter that actually
I only get in constructor so never gets updated
and I want to know what's the correct way to do this.
I don't think I'm updating a object instance that isn't the one from my
model. I took this into account.
Tnx
El mar, 03-11-2009 a las 14:15 -0200, Pedro Santos escribió:
Hi Gonzalo, I thought that with buildForm implementation I will see how
you
create your form component. But seams that it is created on the line:
QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,response)
Instead of ask you for more code, I will try to explain myself:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to the new one.
Any build component logic will stop you from create an form with an
dynamic
model on it. I thing you are updating an object instance that isn't the
one
on your form model.
on lines:
response =
surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question,
answer);
and then:
categoryComponent.add(QuestionComponentFactory.getComponent(question,
response));
be sure of to work on the same response instance that is on your form
model.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com wrote:
I should build the form inside a component instead the page. And I
should keep a reference
to the dynamic model inside this component.
Not what I try to mean.
So what's the way?
your report:
But as I have to build the form I do not have a dynamic model on
page.
You can have your model, and you can have your component build logic.
you report:
So no matter what's the value it will get not updated to
the new one.
so i think you are working on diferent answer instances
can you send some buildForm(answer) lines?
Yes but's somewhat large, anyway answer has got from the code I sent
earlier. But it got not
updated because this code goes in the constructor that never gets
called.
Here goes the code:
public void buildForm(SurveyAnswer answer)
{
ListSurveyQuestion listQuestions = getQuestionList(1);
//
FIXIT: How
do we get this questionaire?
if(listQuestions!=null listQuestions.size()0)
{
int category = -1;
QuestionCategoryComponent categoryComponent =
null;
/*
* We add category containers to the component
array
and
* questions to the category containers.
*
*/
for(IteratorSurveyQuestion iter =
listQuestions.iterator();
iter.hasNext();)
{
SurveyQuestion question = iter.next();
// Check if we should start a new
category
if(category !=
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory())
{
log.debug(Category: +
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
categoryComponent = new
QuestionCategoryComponent(surveyComponent,
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getQuestionCategoryDescription());
components.add(categoryComponent);
category =
question.getSurveyQuestionCategory().getIdSurveyQuestionCategory();
}
if(categoryComponent!=null)
{
SurveyQuestionResponse response
=
null;
if(answer!=null)
{
response =
surveyAnswerFactory.getResponse(question, answer);
Dynamically insert/remove WizardSteps based on user input ?
Hi all : It seems the WizardSteps are added into WizardModel in the constructor time. I wonder if it is possible to dynamically insert/remove WizardSteps based on user input ? (wicket-1.3.6) Thanks a lot.
Re: London Wicket Event at Foyles Bookshop, November 21st, 2009
Bring your copy of Wicket in Action Martijn On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:11 AM, jWeekend jweekend_for...@cabouge.com wrote: We will hold our next London Wicket Event on Saturday, 21st November, from 14:45. This time we have hired The Gallery at the iconic Foyles Bookshop in central London. We again welcome guests and speakers from several countries, including at least 3 core committers, Matej, Jeremy and of course, Alastair, as well as the founders of WiQuery (Wicket-jQuery integration), Lionel Armanet and his team. Join us for some very interesting, high quality presentations and to chat with fellow Wicket users and developers at all levels. We're expecting this to be another popular event and since places are limited book and confirm early if you can make it. Details and registration are at the usual place [1]. There is a cool little Jazz cafe at Foyles too, where there'll be a live act (Femi Temowo) at 13:00 if you enjoy some Jazz guitar relaxation before your intellectual stimulation. They offer a decent range of food and drink there too. The event schedule looks like: Cemal Bayramoglu: Introduction Jeremy Thomerson (USA): Custom JavaScript Integrations with Wicket + Auto Resolvers Lionel Armanet (FR): Announcing WiQuery 1.0: Introduction Demo Matej Knopp (SK): BRIX CMS + Wicket 1.5 Developments QA Alastair Maw (UK): The Al Talk Our Regular General Wicket QA with Al and Cemal We expect to formally finish by around 19:00. I would expect the usual suspects will be heading somewhere in the neighbourhood for refreshments straight after the event, and of course you are more than welcome to join us. Regards - Cemal jWeekend http://jWeekend.com Training, Consulting, Development [1] http://jweekend.com/dev/LWUGReg/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Tree table with check box
You add a single column to your tree. But you overlay the default cell
component by the checkboxpanel.
So you don't get all the stuff from parent component (Like link and node
icon etc).
Check TreeTable.TreeFragment for details.
You have two opportunities:
1. If you want to add your checkbox directly beside the tree structure
components you have to copy the code from the treetable class
2. If you only want the treestructure in one column (with a link label)
and the combobox in the second column then you have to add
another column on which you don't overwrite newCell (see below)
HTH
Per
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private final TreeTable trtTest;
/**
* Constructor that is invoked when page is invoked without a session.
*
* @param parameters
*Page parameters
*/
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
IColumn columns[] = new IColumn[] { col1(), col2() };
TreeDataProvider treedataProvider = new TreeDataProvider();
trtTest = new TreeTable(trtTest, treedataProvider.getTreeModel(),
columns);
trtTest.getTreeState().expandAll();
add(trtTest);
}
private PropertyTreeColumn col1() {
return new PropertyTreeColumn(new
ColumnLocation(Alignment.MIDDLE, 5,
Unit.PROPORTIONAL), Check, userObject.name);
}
private PropertyTreeColumn col2() {
return new PropertyTreeColumn(new ColumnLocation(Alignment.LEFT,
7, Unit.EM), L2,
userObject.name) {
@Override
public Component newCell(MarkupContainer parent, String id,
TreeNode node, int level) {
DefaultMutableTreeNode n = (DefaultMutableTreeNode) node;
CheckBoxPanel boxPanel = new CheckBoxPanel(parent.getId(), n
.getUserObject());
return boxPanel;
}
};
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 508 accessibility support
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable we add columns, I use PropertyColumn , can I add any attributemodifier to it ? ryantxu wrote: takes values for alt attribute . Like the sortable columns , If I can set value for alt attribute that would be really nice. how about: div.add( new AttributeModifier( alt, true, new ModelString( what it should say... )) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/508-accessibility-support-tp26119812p26160605.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
javax.crypto.BadPaddingException on expired sessions using CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy
I am getting a WicketRuntimeException whenever a user clicks a session based url after the session has expired. I noticed there was a previous thread about this here: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-Crypted-URL-to20533640.html#a20542221. I was hoping since I upgraded my application to use the latest 1.4.3 that this problem was solved, but I see that it is still occurring (You can recreate it by opening a browser and starting a new session, restarting your server, and then clicking a link - or just wait half an hour and try to click a session link). For my application this is a pretty common scenario since users may read bookmarkable urls leisurely and then click a modal window link later, and instead of redirecting to the homepage with a nice expiration message they get a hard error which clogs the logs up pretty bad. Is there any plans to fix this, or anything I can do to prevent it while maintaining crypted urls?
Re: problem with generation text in javascript code
Hello, Thank you Igor. it is what I've looked for. Another solution is using VelocityPanel, which I did not wanted to use.. - paul igor.vaynberg wrote: you can use TextTemplateHeaderContributor to externalize the template and define replacement vars. -igor On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:09 AM, paul wolanski mikola...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Martin, Hmmm it looks like a little bit dirty trick, because I will have to print out whole initialization between script tags... I'll try to find another way to resolve that. Thank you for help Martin. I appreciate that. Cheers, Paul martin-g wrote: make script element a Wicket citizen :-) script wicket:id=myScript.../script El vie, 30-10-2009 a las 14:32 +0100, pawel wolanski escribió: Hello, Yesterday I've faced with problem with generating javascript code. On page I've inserted code: i.e.: wicket:extend formscript type=text/javascript appInitialize(here should be generated string); // generated string should be pasted as a param /wicket:extend I want to mention, that I would not mix my application with velocity, which IMHO could be here the easiest solution.. Thank you in advance for all answers. Cheers, Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problem-with-generation-text-in-javascript-code-tp26130184p26133706.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problem-with-generation-text-in-javascript-code-tp26130184p26163580.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting
The power of this list is amazing - it seems you just had an entire thread
with yourself and answered your own question. SYNERGY! :)
But seriously, did you have any remaining questions on this that we could
assist with?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
One finishing touch is needed. The hidden field should be cleared
after ajax submit. It seems to work now.. feel free to critisize.
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter = Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(arg0);
}
/**
* @param hiddenFieldId
* @param value
* @return
*/
private AppendingStringBuffer getSetHiddenFieldValue(CharSequence value) {
try {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(value).append(
';);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
**
Martin
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I hope I found a solution usin IOnChangeListener.
Please try this out and let me know if it works for you. Maybe it
should be incorporated into Wicket?
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter =
Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
try {
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new
AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(
';).append(arg0);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
public abstract class AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox extends
CheckBox {
/**
* @param id
* @param model
*/
public AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox(String id,
IModelBoolean model) {
super(id, model);
add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(JavaScriptConstants.ONCHANGE) {
@Override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onError(target);
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onSubmit(target);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#getAjaxCallDecorator()
*/
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator() {
Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting
Tnx. I would like to ask (myself?) whether it could be formulated
simply into a behavior that can be attached into any formcomponent.
Probably. I will work on this next.
Ofcourse if more people try the code in their applications we will
soon learn if it breaks something.
**
Martin
2009/11/4 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
The power of this list is amazing - it seems you just had an entire thread
with yourself and answered your own question. SYNERGY! :)
But seriously, did you have any remaining questions on this that we could
assist with?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
One finishing touch is needed. The hidden field should be cleared
after ajax submit. It seems to work now.. feel free to critisize.
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter = Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue().append(arg0);
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
return getSetHiddenFieldValue(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(arg0);
}
/**
* @param hiddenFieldId
* @param value
* @return
*/
private AppendingStringBuffer getSetHiddenFieldValue(CharSequence value) {
try {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(value).append(
';);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
**
Martin
2009/11/3 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I hope I found a solution usin IOnChangeListener.
Please try this out and let me know if it works for you. Maybe it
should be incorporated into Wicket?
public abstract class FormSubmitAjaxChangeListenerCallDecorator
implements IAjaxCallDecorator {
private final static Method hiddenFieldGetter;
static {
try {
hiddenFieldGetter =
Form.class.getDeclaredMethod(getHiddenFieldId);
hiddenFieldGetter.setAccessible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnFailureScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateOnSuccessScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(
CharSequence arg0) {
return arg0;
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.IAjaxCallDecorator#decorateScript(java.lang.CharSequence)
*/
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence arg0) {
Form? root = getForm().getRootForm();
String hiddenFieldId;
try {
hiddenFieldId = (String) hiddenFieldGetter.invoke(root);
return new
AppendingStringBuffer(document.getElementById(').append(
hiddenFieldId).append(').value=').append(getChangeListenerUrl()).append(
';).append(arg0);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
/**
* @return Form?
*/
public abstract Form? getForm();
/**
* @return CharSequence
*/
public abstract CharSequence getChangeListenerUrl();
}
public abstract class AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox extends
CheckBox {
/**
* @param id
* @param model
*/
public AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox(String id,
IModelBoolean model) {
super(id, model);
add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(JavaScriptConstants.ONCHANGE) {
�...@override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerCheckBox.this.onError(target);
}
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
Re: Problems with displaying modal window
WHy not fix your doctype first? ** Martin 2009/11/4 Anders Sørensen aisz...@gmail.com: Hello everybody. I have a webpage under development where I use modal windows. This has so fare not caused any problems - but now I get an error on one of my pages. I have just added the modal window capability to the page - so this has not worked before. When I click the button I get the following errors in Firefox (and the pages just reloads) Line 1: Error: undefined entity Source File: Line: 1, Column: 61 Source Code: div xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;bINFO: /bUsingnbsp;XMLHttpRequestnbsp;transport/ (here there is a green error under nbsp;) Line 2: Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80004003 (NS_ERROR_INVALID_POINTER) [nsIDOMNSHTMLElement.innerHTML] nsresult: 0x80004003 (NS_ERROR_INVALID_POINTER) location: JS frame :: http://localhost:8080/resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/wicket-ajax-debug.js:: anonymous :: line 64 data: no] My guess to why I get this error is, that my page is defined as: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/dtd/xhtml-math11-f.dtd; html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; The reason for this is, that I display MathML on the page. The modal window however does not contain MathML - it's just regular html. Environment: Wicket 1.4.3 JDK 1.6.0_16 Firefox 3.5.4 Does anybody have any input on this? -- Med venlig hilsen/Best regards Anders Sørensen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Migrating wivket app from 1.2.4 to 1.4.3
Hello all, I had build an application on wicket 1.2.4, spring and hibernate some about 2 years before. Now i think, i need to upgrade wicket. Since there are number of releases in between those version, I think there are many modifications to be done. Please show me the way.. Thanks in advance Regards shankar
Re: Migrating wivket app from 1.2.4 to 1.4.3
our wiki contains migration pages for 1.2 to 1.3 and 1.3 to 1.4 -igor On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Shankar Subedi shankar.sub...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I had build an application on wicket 1.2.4, spring and hibernate some about 2 years before. Now i think, i need to upgrade wicket. Since there are number of releases in between those version, I think there are many modifications to be done. Please show me the way.. Thanks in advance Regards shankar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Tree table with check box
Hello again, My requirement is exactly related to the point 1. you specified 1. If you want to add your checkbox directly beside the tree structure components you have to copy the code from the treetable class If you could elaborate a bit, it will be very much useful to try out. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Tree-table-with-check-box-tp26080852p26191699.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/wicket/util/lang/PropertyResolver
My environment: . Apache Tomcat/6.0.18 . JDK 1.6.0_12-b04 I got this weird message in tomcat log, too: Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig checkResources INFO: Reloading context [/acm] Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[AppServlet] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[jsp] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[default] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor processChildren SEVERE: Exception invoking periodic operation: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/wicket/util/lang/PropertyResolver at org.apache.wicket.Application.internalDestroy(Application.java:887) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.internalDestroy(WebApplication.java:448) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.destroy(WicketFilter.java:143) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.release(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:332) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStop(StandardContext.java:3744) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.stop(StandardContext.java:4513) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.checkResources(HostConfig.java:1108) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.check(HostConfig.java:1214) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(HostConfig.java:293) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:117) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.backgroundProcess(ContainerBase.java:1337) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1601) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.run(ContainerBase.java:1590) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext reload INFO: Reloading this Context has started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[AppServlet] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[jsp] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase stop INFO: Container org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/acm].[default] has not been started Nov 4, 2009 12:13:03 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor processChildren SEVERE: Exception invoking periodic operation: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/wicket/util/lang/PropertyResolver at org.apache.wicket.Application.internalDestroy(Application.java:887) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.internalDestroy(WebApplication.java:448) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.destroy(WicketFilter.java:143) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.release(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:332) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStop(StandardContext.java:3744) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.stop(StandardContext.java:4513) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.reload(StandardContext.java:3093) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappLoader.backgroundProcess(WebappLoader.java:404) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.backgroundProcess(ContainerBase.java:1309) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1601) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.processChildren(ContainerBase.java:1610) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$ContainerBackgroundProcessor.run(ContainerBase.java:1590) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) I checked wicket jar file, and org/apache/wicket/util/lang/PropertyResolver class does exist. Is it tomcat bug? Any one has any suggestion?
Serialization Error
I'm getting a serialization error in my logs:
Nov 03 23:00:01 ERROR [TP-Processor34] lang.Objects - Error serializing object
class com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage
[object=[Page class =
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage, id = 120, version
= 0, ajax = 4]]
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
Unable to serialize class:
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup$1
Field hierarchy is:
120 [class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage,
path=120]
java.lang.Object org.apache.wicket.Component.data
[class=[Ljava.lang.Object;]
private org.apache.wicket.markup.html.IHeaderContributor
org.apache.wicket.behavior.HeaderContributor.headerContributor[7]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage$1]
final org.apache.wicket.Component
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage$1.val$leftList
[class=org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebMarkupContainer,
path=120:contentPart:leftList]
private java.lang.Object org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.children
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1,
path=120:contentPart:leftList:topicBlocks]
final java.util.List
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1.val$sorted
[class=java.util.ArrayList]
final java.util.List
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1.val$sorted[write:1]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup]
private final java.util.Set
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup.monitors
[class=java.util.TreeSet]
private final java.util.Set
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup.monitors[write:1]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup$1]
- field that is not serializable
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker.check(SerializableChecker.java:346)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker.access$500(SerializableChecker.java:63)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$1InterceptingObjectOutputStream.replaceObject(SerializableChecker.java:494)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(Unknown Source)
It seems to be complaining about this:
private final SetMonitor monitors = new TreeSetMonitor(new
ComparatorMonitor() {
@Override
public int compare(Monitor o1, Monitor o2) {
return o1.getDescription().compareTo(o2.getDescription());
}
});
Shouldn't a comparator for a serializable also be serializable?
If this is in face not serializable, how do I work around this?
D/
Re: Serialization Error
comparator does not extend serializable.
make an inner class that extends serializable.
-igor
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
I'm getting a serialization error in my logs:
Nov 03 23:00:01 ERROR [TP-Processor34] lang.Objects - Error serializing
object class com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage
[object=[Page class =
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage, id = 120,
version = 0, ajax = 4]]
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
Unable to serialize class:
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup$1
Field hierarchy is:
120 [class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage,
path=120]
java.lang.Object org.apache.wicket.Component.data
[class=[Ljava.lang.Object;]
private org.apache.wicket.markup.html.IHeaderContributor
org.apache.wicket.behavior.HeaderContributor.headerContributor[7]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage$1]
final org.apache.wicket.Component
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManagePage$1.val$leftList
[class=org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebMarkupContainer,
path=120:contentPart:leftList]
private java.lang.Object org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.children
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1,
path=120:contentPart:leftList:topicBlocks]
final java.util.List
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1.val$sorted
[class=java.util.ArrayList]
final java.util.List
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.manage.MonitorsManageParts$ContentPart$1.val$sorted[write:1]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup]
private final java.util.Set
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup.monitors
[class=java.util.TreeSet]
private final java.util.Set
com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup.monitors[write:1]
[class=com.conducive.ui.userPages.monitor.support.SortedTopicsAndMonitors$TopicGroup$1]
- field that is not serializable
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker.check(SerializableChecker.java:346)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker.access$500(SerializableChecker.java:63)
at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$1InterceptingObjectOutputStream.replaceObject(SerializableChecker.java:494)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(Unknown Source)
It seems to be complaining about this:
private final SetMonitor monitors = new TreeSetMonitor(new
ComparatorMonitor() {
@Override
public int compare(Monitor o1, Monitor o2) {
return o1.getDescription().compareTo(o2.getDescription());
}
});
Shouldn't a comparator for a serializable also be serializable?
If this is in face not serializable, how do I work around this?
D/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Migrating wivket app from 1.2.4 to 1.4.3
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=dsource=s_dsaddr=wicket+1.2daddr=wicket+1.4hl=engeocode=mra=lsdirflg=wsll=35.50998,-81.271745sspn=0.010428,0.016093ie=UTF8z=19 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: our wiki contains migration pages for 1.2 to 1.3 and 1.3 to 1.4 -igor On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Shankar Subedi shankar.sub...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I had build an application on wicket 1.2.4, spring and hibernate some about 2 years before. Now i think, i need to upgrade wicket. Since there are number of releases in between those version, I think there are many modifications to be done. Please show me the way.. Thanks in advance Regards shankar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
