Wicket 1.5 and ExceptionHandling
In Wicket 1.4 we used our custom RequestCycle and the onRuntimeException method to add/change the exception handling. How do we change the exception handling in Wicket 1.5? The Migration Guide says: Exception handling In Wicket 1.4 it was needed to extend org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.onRuntimeException(Page, RuntimeException). Wicket 1.5 gives even better control, by overriding org.apache.wicket.Application.newExceptionMapper() it is possible to change even the default processing of error pages. For information on how the request cycle handles exceptions see RequestCycle in Wicket 1.5 for more information But with Wicket 1.5.1 it is not possible to override the newExceptionMapper() method. What is the preffered way now? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-ExceptionHandling-tp3877300p3877300.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.5 and ExceptionHandling
you can create ExceptionListener which implements IRequestCycleListener ,define its onexception method and in your webapplication init you can do getRequestCycleListeners().add(new ExceptionListener()) On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.com wrote: In Wicket 1.4 we used our custom RequestCycle and the onRuntimeException method to add/change the exception handling. How do we change the exception handling in Wicket 1.5? The Migration Guide says: Exception handling In Wicket 1.4 it was needed to extend org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.onRuntimeException(Page, RuntimeException). Wicket 1.5 gives even better control, by overriding org.apache.wicket.Application.newExceptionMapper() it is possible to change even the default processing of error pages. For information on how the request cycle handles exceptions see RequestCycle in Wicket 1.5 for more information But with Wicket 1.5.1 it is not possible to override the newExceptionMapper() method. What is the preffered way now? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-ExceptionHandling-tp3877300p3877300.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- thank you, regards, Vineet Semwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.5 and ExceptionHandling
I just updated the migration page. The page for RequestCycle looks clear to me. Feel free to improve it, the wiki is editable by everyone, you just need to create an account. On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:43 AM, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote: you can create ExceptionListener which implements IRequestCycleListener ,define its onexception method and in your webapplication init you can do getRequestCycleListeners().add(new ExceptionListener()) On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.com wrote: In Wicket 1.4 we used our custom RequestCycle and the onRuntimeException method to add/change the exception handling. How do we change the exception handling in Wicket 1.5? The Migration Guide says: Exception handling In Wicket 1.4 it was needed to extend org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.onRuntimeException(Page, RuntimeException). Wicket 1.5 gives even better control, by overriding org.apache.wicket.Application.newExceptionMapper() it is possible to change even the default processing of error pages. For information on how the request cycle handles exceptions see RequestCycle in Wicket 1.5 for more information But with Wicket 1.5.1 it is not possible to override the newExceptionMapper() method. What is the preffered way now? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-ExceptionHandling-tp3877300p3877300.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- thank you, regards, Vineet Semwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WicketTester#startComponentInPage and tester#assertModelValue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4112 I will provide a patch this evening. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WicketTester-startComponentInPage-and-tester-assertModelValue-tp3874269p3877347.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
PropertyModel not refreshing
Hi, I have a form with labels that use PropertyModel. They work fine when I test them locally - when I click on submit button I get proper refreshed values in labels. But when I deploy my app it does not work, I still get old values. Where can be the problem? I am using Wicket 1.4.17 and deploying on Google AppEngine. My code: FormString buildHousesForm = new FormString(buildHousesForm, new ModelString()) ... ... add(new Label(houses_amount, new PropertyModel(MySession.get().getUser(), village))); ... ... -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-not-refreshing-tp3877389p3877389.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
DateTimeField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
In wicket 1.4.17 I want to have AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on a
DateTimeFiled for all its components (text field, hours field, minutes
field).
I can do this only on date text field :
DateTimeField txtTime = new DateTimeField(txtTime, generalModel) {
@Override
protected DateTextField newDateTextField(String id, PropertyModel
dateFieldModel) {
DateTextField f = super.newDateTextField(id,
dateFieldModel);
f.add( new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
target) {...}
});
return f;
}
};
But TextField's for hours and minutes are private and do not have similar
methods to overwrite.
Does anyone use another approach instead of rewriting the hole class again?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DateTimeField-and-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tp3877416p3877416.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTimeField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:27 AM, dpmihai dpmi...@yahoo.com wrote:
In wicket 1.4.17 I want to have AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on a
DateTimeFiled for all its components (text field, hours field, minutes
field).
I can do this only on date text field :
DateTimeField txtTime = new DateTimeField(txtTime, generalModel) {
@Override
protected DateTextField newDateTextField(String id, PropertyModel
dateFieldModel) {
DateTextField f = super.newDateTextField(id,
dateFieldModel);
f.add( new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange) {
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
target) {...}
});
return f;
}
};
But TextField's for hours and minutes are private and do not have similar
methods to overwrite.
Does anyone use another approach instead of rewriting the hole class again?
No need to rewrite.
You can get the field with:
dateTimeField.get(DateTimeField.HOURS).add(new
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior() ...)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DateTimeField-and-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tp3877416p3877416.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTimeField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Thank you. But I had to look inside the source to see the index of component children: dateTimeField.get(1).add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior() ...) dateTimeField.get(2).add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior() ...) Is DateTimeField.HOURS a constant defined in wicket 1.5? (I use 1.4.17) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DateTimeField-and-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tp3877416p3877501.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DateTimeField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
its the id of hours field ;) i think there should always be getter methods for the fields in class/component when developer thinks its ok for users to access them like getHoursField getMinutesField in current case On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM, dpmihai dpmi...@yahoo.com wrote: Thank you. But I had to look inside the source to see the index of component children: dateTimeField.get(1).add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior() ...) dateTimeField.get(2).add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior() ...) Is DateTimeField.HOURS a constant defined in wicket 1.5? (I use 1.4.17) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DateTimeField-and-AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-tp3877416p3877501.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- thank you, regards, Vineet Semwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel not refreshing
Hi,
you're probably holding on an outdated user object, use this instead:
add(new Label(houses_amount,
new AbstractReadOnlyModelString() {
public String getObject() {
return MySession.get().getUser().getVillage();
}
}));
Sven
On 10/06/2011 10:17 AM, Zeldor wrote:
Hi,
I have a form with labels that use PropertyModel. They work fine when I test
them locally - when I click on submit button I get proper refreshed values
in labels. But when I deploy my app it does not work, I still get old
values. Where can be the problem? I am using Wicket 1.4.17 and deploying on
Google AppEngine.
My code:
FormString buildHousesForm = new FormString(buildHousesForm, new
ModelString())
...
...
add(new Label(houses_amount, new PropertyModel(MySession.get().getUser(),
village)));
...
...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-not-refreshing-tp3877389p3877389.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel not refreshing
Why would there be a difference between local and deployed versions? And won't it negatively affect performance? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-not-refreshing-tp3877389p3877621.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel not refreshing
Might have something to do with when the session is created and/or serialized. And won't it negatively affect performance? I'm not sure what you mean by it, but the AbstractReadOnlyModel is faster than a PropertyModel (no reflection involved). HTH Sven On 10/06/2011 12:02 PM, Zeldor wrote: Why would there be a difference between local and deployed versions? And won't it negatively affect performance? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-not-refreshing-tp3877389p3877621.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel not refreshing
Thanks, I will give it a try :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-not-refreshing-tp3877389p3877636.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
set a TextField Componet to readonly
I want to set a TextField Componet to readonly. I have overriden isEnabled and
onDisabled methods. but it did'nt work
private TextField vehicleTypeField(final String id, final TBPosition
position)
{
final TextField field = new TextField(id, vehicleTypeModel(position))
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7101271673345103957L;
@Override
public boolean isVisible()
{
return isVehicleTypeVisible();
}
@Override
protected void onDisabled(final ComponentTag tag)
{
String vehicleType = E; //only for Test
if (vehicleType.equalsIgnoreCase(E))
tag.put(readonly, readonly);
}
@Override
public boolean isEnabled()
{
// return position.getVehicleType().equalsIgnoreCase(E);
// only for test
String vehicleType = E;
return !vehicleType.equalsIgnoreCase(E);
}
};
field.add(new ValueHelperOnDoubleClickBehavior(popupPanelVehicleType,
HelperValues.VEHICLE_TYPES));
return field;
}
could you please help me.
best regards
Mehmet
Re: set a TextField Componet to readonly
The interesting part is not visible in your source, the Method: vehicleTypeModel(position) You could use some kind of readOnlyModel here - Please check ReadOnlyPropertyModel for example. regards Martin -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/set-a-TextField-Componet-to-readonly-tp3877659p3877723.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AW: set a TextField Componet to readonly
here vehicleTypeModel(position):
private IModel vehicleTypeModel(final TBPosition position)
{
return new Model()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public Object getObject()
{
return position.getVehicleType();
}
@Override
public void setObject(final Object object)
{
position.setVehicleType((String) object);
}
};
}
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: splitshade [mailto:martin.dil...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2011 12:54
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: set a TextField Componet to readonly
The interesting part is not visible in your source, the Method:
vehicleTypeModel(position)
You could use some kind of readOnlyModel here - Please check
ReadOnlyPropertyModel for example.
regards
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/set-a-TextField-Componet-to-readonly-tp3877659p3877723.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: set a TextField Componet to readonly
Hi,
ReadOnlyPropertyModel will be problematic, because than the TextFiled always
has to be readonly. But I do have the need that the TextFiled only has to be
readonly in the case of vehicleType = E.
Please find again the code:
private TextField vehicleTypeField(final String id, final TBPosition position)
{
final TextField field = new TextField(id, vehicleTypeModel(position))
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7101271673345103957L;
@Override
public boolean isVisible()
{
return isVehicleTypeVisible();
}
@Override
protected void onDisabled(final ComponentTag tag)
{
String vehicleType = E; //only for Test
if (vehicleType.equalsIgnoreCase(E))
tag.put(readonly, readonly);
}
@Override
public boolean isEnabled()
{
// return position.getVehicleType().equalsIgnoreCase(E);
// only for test
String vehicleType = E;
return !vehicleType.equalsIgnoreCase(E);
}
};
field.add(new ValueHelperOnDoubleClickBehavior(popupPanelVehicleType,
HelperValues.VEHICLE_TYPES));
return field;
}
private IModel vehicleTypeModel(final TBPosition position)
{
return new Model()
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public Object getObject()
{
return position.getVehicleType();
}
@Override
public void setObject(final Object object)
{
position.setVehicleType((String) object);
}
};
}
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: splitshade [mailto:martin.dil...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2011 12:54
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: set a TextField Componet to readonly
The interesting part is not visible in your source, the Method:
vehicleTypeModel(position)
You could use some kind of readOnlyModel here - Please check
ReadOnlyPropertyModel for example.
regards
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/set-a-TextField-Componet-to-readonly-tp3877659p3877723.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Jump to specific page of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Hello all, I would like to ask, if there is a built-in functionality to display a particular page of an AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable when displaying the table, i.e. instead of page 1 of 5 I would like to have it display page 3 of 5 initially because an entry of interest is on that page? Thanks in advance, Philip
Re: Jump to specific page of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
DataTable.setCurrentPage(int) - -- Regards, Hans http://cantaa.de -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jump-to-specific-page-of-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3878357p3878396.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: set a TextField Componet to readonly
input type=text readonly=true wicket:id=whatever / Works in most major browsers ... -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/set-a-TextField-Componet-to-readonly-tp3877659p3879930.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax form submit, loading gif and swap panels
Thanks guys..I overrided the methots and it worked. When I submit the form,
animated gif appears until ajax request is completed. But I dont know
javascripting so much so I couldnt
remove animated gif and fade out form div block at the same time..I want to
fade out the form area slowly and display a new message at the same place.
Any tip?
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new AjaxCallDecorator()
{
@Override
public CharSequence decorateScript(Component c,
CharSequence script)
{
return
document.getElementById('loading').style.display='inline'; + script;
}
@Override
public CharSequence decorateOnSuccessScript(Component c,
CharSequence script)
{
return
document.getElementById('loading').style.display='none';
*document.getElementById('container').fadeOut();* + script;
}
@Override
public CharSequence decorateOnFailureScript(Component c,
CharSequence script)
{
return alert('Failed');;
}
};
};
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ajax-form-submit-loading-gif-and-swap-panels-tp3876326p3879973.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Jump to specific page of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Am 06.10.2011 um 16:08 schrieb Hans Lesmeister 2: DataTable.setCurrentPage(int) Thanks. When would be the best moment to call that method if I wanted to accomplish the following: I add a new entry to the table and afterwards want to display the page where the new entry appears in the table taking into account the sort state of the table. Someone got an example for that by chance? Thanks in advance. - -- Regards, Hans http://cantaa.de -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jump-to-specific-page-of-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3878357p3878396.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Remove Sort on SortableDataProvider
I have a SortableDataProvider and have set a sort on it. It sorts fine. Now, I would like to remove the sort so no sorting occurs. Is there a way to remove the sort? Thanks in advance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Community tools
First of all, I love wicket. I think it's a very effective framework, with an active community. But ... I regret that some tools reduce its visibility. I think, in particular, the mode of exchange based on a mailing list is quite outdated. This mailing list which requires subscription limits the number of participants. Moreover, research on old messages are poorly referenced. I have recently experienced it one more time during the migration of my project on Wicket 1.5. The solution to my problem has already been discussed and resolved but it took me a long time to find it. Why not drop this mailing list and discuss all questions onStackOverflow. The business community would be more visible. Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. My 2 cents, Gaetan
Re: Community tools
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com wrote: First of all, I love wicket. I think it's a very effective framework, with an active community. Great, thanks! But ... I regret that some tools reduce its visibility. I think, in particular, the mode of exchange based on a mailing list is quite outdated. This mailing list which requires subscription limits the number of participants. Heh. You just said we have a very active community. While I do like Stack Overflow for many things, it's not a true way of building a community. It's a way of asking questions. (Yes, this is just my opinion - not meaning to start a flamewar). We have a vibrant community here - I don't think the mailing list is limiting the community. Plus, mailing lists are still THE way to communicate in open source. Especially is this true with Apache projects. Moreover, research on old messages are poorly referenced. I have recently experienced it one more time during the migration of my project on Wicket 1.5. The solution to my problem has already been discussed and resolved but it took me a long time to find it. Why not drop this mailing list and discuss all questions onStackOverflow. The business community would be more visible. How can we quantify such a statement? If you can provide some kind of proof that it's easier to find an answer by searching SO rather than mailing list archives, we could look into alternatives. But such a statement just isn't easily (if at all) quantifiable. Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. Github is awesome. I don't care about the issue management on it. JIRA has a ton more features and support. It works for us. I think that we would like to move to git at some point - but it's not (yet) supported for all projects at the ASF. There is a public beta running of git for one project at the ASF right now. If it succeeds, I think we'll be one of the first projects to switch as soon as they make it available to all projects. My 2 cents, Gaetan Thanks! Hope to see you around this antiquated mailing list :) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
Re: Community tools
Hi! 2011/10/7 Gaetan Zoritchak g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com Why not drop this mailing list and discuss all questions onStackOverflow. The business community would be more visible. It might make sense to join the stackoverflow network with www.WicketRuntimeException.com or similar as a better subsitute for users@wicket ;) he business community would be more visible. How can we quantify such a statement? +1 true hard to quantify, but apparently SO-style has better usability and readability simply because of possibility to have styled posts. I guess search engines will find your solutions just the same regardless of their style. ** Martin Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
Heh. You just said we have a very active community. While I do like Stack Overflow for many things, it's not a true way of building a community. It's a way of asking questions. (Yes, this is just my opinion - not meaning to start a flamewar). We have a vibrant community here - I don't think the mailing list is limiting the community. I think but it's just an opinion, that the need of subscribe to a mailing list is a little barrier. Some people won't do the effort which means less interactions. Plus, mailing lists are still THE way to communicate in open source. Especially is this true with Apache projects. Moreover, research on old messages are poorly referenced. I have recently experienced it one more time during the migration of my project on Wicket 1.5. The solution to my problem has already been discussed and resolved but it took me a long time to find it. Why not drop this mailing list and discuss all questions onStackOverflow. The business community would be more visible. How can we quantify such a statement? If you can provide some kind of proof that it's easier to find an answer by searching SO rather than mailing list archives, we could look into alternatives. But such a statement just isn't easily (if at all) quantifiable. Difficult to quantify but the nable mailing list is flat. There no way for google to know which question is more important. For the reader it's not very obvious neither. In a system like StackOverflow, the votes on questions, on answers, the use of comments rather than answer allow the filtering of the noise. I think the links beetween questions take the votes in count and as a result google shows you rapidly the best question/answer. Moreover when you are reading a question, you see the other questions in relation. I don't exactly how SO works but I find it very very efficient for me (not for wicket questions ;) ) Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. Github is awesome. I don't care about the issue management on it. JIRA has a ton more features and support. It works for us. I think that we would like to move to git at some point - but it's not (yet) supported for all projects at the ASF. There is a public beta running of git for one project at the ASF right now. If it succeeds, I think we'll be one of the first projects to switch as soon as they make it available to all projects. Good news. Thanks! Hope to see you around this antiquated mailing list :) :) Of course!!!
RE: Community tools
Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Remove Sort on SortableDataProvider
Have you tried: provider.setSort(null); ? If you don't provide a sort property to your provider, that's what it starts with. On 06/10/2011 6:16 PM, Jensen, Bob wrote: I have a SortableDataProvider and have set a sort on it. It sorts fine. Now, I would like to remove the sort so no sorting occurs. Is there a way to remove the sort? Thanks in advance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Community tools
I like the mail. Atleast i can get the answers even on my not so smart phone. Josh. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote: Source management and bugs are also outdated. The version on github is much better. I recently had to get up to speed with github. Not sure what all the fuss is about. The learning curve was about 20x that of Subversion and I'm still not confident about how to do things or whether what I'm doing is the 'right' thing to be doing. Subversion on the other hand is really easy to understand (and most developers already know it) and even though it has 'theoretical' shortcomings compared to a distributed VCS like git in practice I never saw any difference in performance or usage apart from git being a lot 'weirder' ;) My 2 cents, Gaetan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
