Re: No javascript wicket 6.14.0
Hi,
Can you reproduce this in a quickstart ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Mathias Nilsson
wicket.program...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, read that Jquery only is included when needed. I can't even add a
simple
Link?
add(new LinkVoid(link){
@Override
public void onClick() {
setResponsePage(TestPage.class);
}
});
The code above redirects me to Apache root. If I comment out the add link
everything works!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/No-javascript-wicket-6-14-0-tp4665128p4665129.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: No javascript wicket 6.14.0
Sorry this was not a Wicket thing. I used ProxyPass in httpd and when the url /?1 appeared it could not be handled. When using localhost:9090 thrue Jetty ajax works. // Mathias -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/No-javascript-wicket-6-14-0-tp4665128p4665131.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: calling downloadLink.onClick() directly
Thanks Martin,
I guess what I am more curious in, is how come when I call the
downloadLink.onClick(), or do:
public void onPostProcessTarget(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
final File file = excelFile;
IResourceStream resourceStream = new FileResourceStream(
new
org.apache.wicket.util.file.File(file));
ResourceStreamRequestHandler handler = new
ResourceStreamRequestHandler(resourceStream, file.getName());
handler.setContentDisposition(ContentDisposition.ATTACHMENT);
getPage().getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(handler);
I get the ajax error as shown above thread. It's only on onClick() call, or
when
getPage().getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(handler);
is called..
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/calling-downloadLink-onClick-directly-tp4665125p4665133.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: calling downloadLink.onClick() directly
Hi,
You should not write the binary response in the Ajax response.
The ajax response should return a redirect that will point to a url where
the binary data will be written back.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:25 PM, eaglei22 jchojnack...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Martin,
I guess what I am more curious in, is how come when I call the
downloadLink.onClick(), or do:
public void onPostProcessTarget(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
final File file = excelFile;
IResourceStream resourceStream = new FileResourceStream(
new
org.apache.wicket.util.file.File(file));
ResourceStreamRequestHandler handler = new
ResourceStreamRequestHandler(resourceStream, file.getName());
handler.setContentDisposition(ContentDisposition.ATTACHMENT);
getPage().getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(handler);
I get the ajax error as shown above thread. It's only on onClick() call, or
when
getPage().getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(handler);
is called..
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/calling-downloadLink-onClick-directly-tp4665125p4665133.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: calling downloadLink.onClick() directly
I am not familar on how to perform a redirect from AJAX. I tried: new RedirectPage(excelFile.getPath()); and, target.appendJavaScript(location.hash='excelFile.getPath()'); Can you give me a simple example? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/calling-downloadLink-onClick-directly-tp4665125p4665136.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
E-Commerce and Open Source projects
Hi, I've been nurturing and evolving a project for 4 years (approx), that grew to a CMS and then an E-Commence among other capabilities. The core motivation and intent of this platform I have explained here: http://javabitch.blogspot.in/2014/03/java-e-commerce-platform.html http://javabitch.blogspot.in/2014/03/java-e-commerce-platform.html I have a major licensing decision to make, and though this is NOT a WICKET question I feel close to this community to discuss it here. Licensing Questions: To release it I have to decide the licensing and thats why I am here. Various modules have various commercial / community appeal. Q1) For a large project with multiple sub-modules can we mix licensing types. I'm assuming anything thats Apache 2 is compatible into an LGPL or GPL or Proprietary project. Q2) A lot of discussion pitch LGPL for licensing the library; however using it as a Library forces constraints over the calling API/module to make those parts Open Source as well. Is this true? Q3) Is it possible to apply GPL license for anyone using it for free, but for commercial purposes they have to pay and have an independent license agreement? ..this implies that GPL code is dual licensed can be used in a Proprietary product. Is that possible? .. in a way it alters the FREE DNA, So I doubt. Q4) Does that even help and would anyone even pay for whats already free (as in freedom) under a GPL? Q5) Most open projects I see are not GPL but rather Apache 2. Is there is a commercial reluctance to adopt GPL? ..if so, maybe its not wise to release under GPL even is the spirit is community driven. Eg. http://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2007/11/why-google-chose-the-apache-software-license-over-gplv2/ http://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2007/11/why-google-chose-the-apache-software-license-over-gplv2/ Q6) I do not want to have a CE/EE version. I feel most CE version are CON JOB's and extract more from the community than give back. Infact, technically Im of the opinion the same architecture can serve Enterprise as well as standard needs. This whole Enterprise label this is an eye wash. ...hence I'd rather make the more DOMAIN specific modules proprietary and the common ones absolutely free. GPL poses issues if I myself want to monetize higher order modules or cloud based services over the core modules. .. so whats really my best alternative? Q7) Is there any credibility in the community to take an existing apache, GPL, BSD lisence and tweak certain terms. Just as LGPL definition is a tweak over the GPL definition. Is it worth my time to customize an Apache or LGPL further .. or will that scare off people? Q8) How does multiple licensing work? Example: http://ckeditor.com/about/license http://ckeditor.com/about/license So the user is free to choose which license they want to apply? Q9) I'm ok with people using the source code, linking, extending for just about any purpose. However its NOT OK for people to exploit the code commercially to take it , modify/tweak it and then call it their own. That means if a core library is modified for commercial purpose then it should be contributed back or paid for. However in terms of usage, debugging, learning I don't want to impose any restriction. Q10) I'm ok with sponsored help as long as the intention of sponsorship is to enhance the code for everyone including themselves. thanks - Software documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is still better than nothing! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/E-Commerce-and-Open-Source-projects-tp4665137.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
