Re: Draggable multiple containment

[Maxim Solodovnik]

Hello Sebastien,

It's about jqueryui draggable.
According to my tests it only works on first element being selected by
selector provided i.e. in case two elements on the page has class="drop
target", only one will work as containment

setting containment to empty string helps, but 

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Sebastien  wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Is it about jQuery or Kendo draggable?
>
> Sebastien.
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Sebastien,
> >
> > I'm trying to use Draggable,
> > everything works as expected as long as I'm using single selector for the
> > "containment" (for ex: ".drop.target" or ".drop.target1")
> >
> > but fails if I'm using both ".drop.target, .drop.target1"
> > Maybe you know are there any limitations?
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: upgrade to wicket 7.2 append javascript to AjaxRequestTarget

[Sven Meier]

Hi,

> clickButtonWithId('id2fb')

this is not Wicket's JavaScript.

Show us the source of this method or even better create a quickstart.

Regards
Sven


On 26.04.2016 22:51, fachhoch wrote:

I upgraded   from 6.19 to  7.2.

append javascript to ajaxrequesttarget  results  error in client side

Ib54b:1 Wicket.Ajax:  Wicket.Ajax.Call.processEvaluation: Exception
evaluating javascript: TypeError: Cannot read property 'toUpperCase' of
undefined, text: (function(){clickButtonWithId('id2fb')})();


I have two ajax links one hidden and other visible, click on visible  it
does some loading at server side  then call append js to ajaxrequestatrget
which clicks the hidden btn, no issues it works, but at client side I see
the error.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/upgrade-to-wicket-7-2-append-javascript-to-AjaxRequestTarget-tp4674447.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Panel.this always giving previous version of the object but not the modified one.

[durairaj t]

Hi Martin,

event.getPayload() giving AjaxRequestTarget not the GridValueChangeEvent.

If I change the "IEventSink" as *FieldSearchTextField.this *in
send(--,--,--)  it gives GridValueChangeEvent, but it is not working in
WindowClosedCallback().

FieldSearchTextField is a customized text component not a page. so whenever
I tried to get page by PageReference its always giving parent page.





On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You need:
>
> Page openerPage = getPageReference().getPage();
> openerPage.send(openerPage, Broadcast.BREADTH, new
> GridValueChangeEvent(target, selectedRow));
>
> Then any component inside 'openerPage' will receive this event and can read
> and store the selected row from it.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:53 PM, durairaj t 
> wrote:
>
> >  Please refer the below formatted code snippet.
> >
> > I'm setting selectedRow value in page creator and expecting the same
> > in window close call back (Line number 24), I tried with the Inter
> > component communication examples as you suggested. But I don't know how
> to
> > update the selectedRow in line #24 with onEven(IEvent event).
> >
> >
> >
> > Paste Bin URL: http://pastebin.com/Y2KA2LNn
> >
> >
> >
> >1.
> >2. public class FieldSearchTextField  extends MaskedTextField{
> >3.ResultRow selectedRow;
> >4.
> >5./* other business code here*/
> >6.
> >7./*   page creator */
> >8.   modalWindow.setPageCreator (new ModalWindow.PageCreator() {
> >9.  public Page createPage() {
> >10.  FieldSearchModalPage casePartyModalPage = new
> > FieldSearchModalPage(searchOption, modalWindow){
> >11.@Override
> >12.  public void updateValue(ResultRow row, AjaxRequestTarget
> >target) {
> >13.   selectedRow = row; /* selectedRow is not null here*/
> >14.   getPageReference().getPage().send( getPage(),
> >Broadcast.BREADTH,new   GridValueChangeEvent(target));
> >15.}
> >16.  }
> >17.}
> >18.  }
> >19.
> >20./* window close call back*/
> >21. modalWindow.setWindowClosedCallback(new
> >ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback()  {
> >22.  @Override
> >23.  public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget target){
> >24. /* how to get the selectedRow value here? */
> >25.  onFieldSearchWindowClose(selectedRow, target);*// selectedRow
> >is null here.*
> >26.   }
> >27.  }
> >28.
> >29.  /*onEvent implementation*/
> >30. @Override
> >31. public void onEvent(IEvent event) {
> >32. super.onEvent(event);
> >33. if(event.getPayload() instanceof GridValueChangeEvent) {
> >34. GridValueChangeEvent gridValueChangeEvent =
> >((GridValueChangeEvent) event.
> >35. getPayload());
> >36. gridValueChangeEvent.getTarget().add(this);
> >37. }
> >38. }
> >39.   /* Grid value change event class*/
> >40.public class GridValueChangeEvent {
> >41. private final AjaxRequestTarget target;
> >42.
> >43. public GridValueChangeEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
> >44. this.target = target;
> >45. }
> >46. public AjaxRequestTarget getTarget() {
> >47. return target;
> >48. }
> >49.  }
> >50.
> >51.   }
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please use some pastebin service.
> > > It is hard to read and follow this code.
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:43 PM, durairaj t 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you Martin. I tried with examples but those are not working in
> my
> > > > case. I don't know how to call the onEvent in line number 19 in the
> > below
> > > > code snippet. Please share me if you have any examples.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1. public class FieldSearchTextField  extends MaskedTextField{
> > > > 2.  ResultRow selectedRow;
> > > > 3. /*   page creator */
> > > > 4.   modalWindow.setPageCreator (new ModalWindow.PageCreator() {
> > > > 5.public Page createPage() {
> > > > 6. FieldSearchModalPage casePartyModalPage = new
> > > >  FieldSearchModalPage(searchOption, modalWindow){
> > > > 7. @Override
> > > > 8.public void updateValue(ResultRow row, AjaxRequestTarget
> target)
> > {
> > > > 9. selectedRow = row;* //selectedRow is not null here*
> > > > 10. getPageReference().getPage().send( getPage(),
> Broadcast.BREADTH,new
> > > >  GridValueChangeEvent(target));
> > > > 11. }
> > > > 12.}
> > > > 13.   

upgrade to wicket 7.2 append javascript to AjaxRequestTarget

[fachhoch]

I upgraded   from 6.19 to  7.2.

append javascript to ajaxrequesttarget  results  error in client side  

Ib54b:1 Wicket.Ajax:  Wicket.Ajax.Call.processEvaluation: Exception
evaluating javascript: TypeError: Cannot read property 'toUpperCase' of
undefined, text: (function(){clickButtonWithId('id2fb')})();


I have two ajax links one hidden and other visible, click on visible  it
does some loading at server side  then call append js to ajaxrequestatrget
which clicks the hidden btn, no issues it works, but at client side I see
the error.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/upgrade-to-wicket-7-2-append-javascript-to-AjaxRequestTarget-tp4674447.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Draggable multiple containment

[Sebastien]

Hi Maxim,

Is it about jQuery or Kendo draggable?

Sebastien.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Hello Sebastien,
>
> I'm trying to use Draggable,
> everything works as expected as long as I'm using single selector for the
> "containment" (for ex: ".drop.target" or ".drop.target1")
>
> but fails if I'm using both ".drop.target, .drop.target1"
> Maybe you know are there any limitations?
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Storing Pages

[Martin Grigorov]

Wicket already does this.
Please check
https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/7.x/guide/internals.html#pagestoring
In short:
The stateful page(s) used in the last request cycle are stored in the http
session as live instances, because the chance to reuse it/them is high,
e.g. clicking a link.
Additionally the same page(s) are also stored on the disk as byte[]. If you
use browser's back button then Wicket will deserialize the page from the
disk.
So you can just keep the page id around and use
getSession().getPageManager().getPage(pageId) to get a reference to a page.
The size of the file for storing session's pages on disk is limited (see
StoreSettings), so after some time a page expires, i.e. it is removed from
the disk. You can "touch" it from time to time (e.g. on every request) to
keep it in the file.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Lon Varscsak 
wrote:

> To be clearer, I just basically want to take a page that the user is on,
> keep a reference to it, and return the user back to it at some point in the
> future.  It seems to work fine (I’m used to doing this since Apple’s
> WebObjects is similar), but I just wanted to make sure I didn’t paint
> myself into a corner. :P
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Lon Varscsak 
> wrote:
>
> > So by sending me there are you suggesting that storing an iVar to a page
> > object is bad?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/single-page-instance and the
> >> discussion about it at http://markmail.org/message/ofyvgybcjp5cvf75
> >> Might be useful for you!
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Lon Varscsak 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being
> that
> >> > for a given page, I only want one instance per session.
> >> >
> >> > -Lon (Wicket Newb)
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: Storing Pages

[Lon Varscsak]

To be clearer, I just basically want to take a page that the user is on,
keep a reference to it, and return the user back to it at some point in the
future.  It seems to work fine (I’m used to doing this since Apple’s
WebObjects is similar), but I just wanted to make sure I didn’t paint
myself into a corner. :P

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Lon Varscsak 
wrote:

> So by sending me there are you suggesting that storing an iVar to a page
> object is bad?
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/single-page-instance and the
>> discussion about it at http://markmail.org/message/ofyvgybcjp5cvf75
>> Might be useful for you!
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Lon Varscsak 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being that
>> > for a given page, I only want one instance per session.
>> >
>> > -Lon (Wicket Newb)
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Storing Pages

[Martin Grigorov]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Lon Varscsak 
wrote:

> So by sending me there are you suggesting that storing an iVar to a page
> object is bad?
>

I haven't re-read the discussion soon, so I am not sure what you relate to.
I just gave you a link to a similar discussion and a possible
implementation.
The discussion explains pros and cons.


>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/single-page-instance and the
> > discussion about it at http://markmail.org/message/ofyvgybcjp5cvf75
> > Might be useful for you!
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Lon Varscsak 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being
> that
> > > for a given page, I only want one instance per session.
> > >
> > > -Lon (Wicket Newb)
> > >
> >
>

Re: Storing Pages

[Lon Varscsak]

So by sending me there are you suggesting that storing an iVar to a page
object is bad?

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/single-page-instance and the
> discussion about it at http://markmail.org/message/ofyvgybcjp5cvf75
> Might be useful for you!
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Lon Varscsak 
> wrote:
>
> > Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being that
> > for a given page, I only want one instance per session.
> >
> > -Lon (Wicket Newb)
> >
>

Re: [wicketstuff-restannotations] How to automatically generate Swagger definitions.

[Andrea Del Bene]

Hi,

at the moment we don't have such kind of integration with Swagger. You 
may obtain some results if you use Spring in your application: 
https://dzone.com/articles/swagger-make-developers-love.

However I've never tried this kind of solution.

On 25/04/2016 16:08, Fabio Fioretti wrote:

Hi all,

I have been successfully using wicketstuff-restannotations to create some
REST web services in my Wicket 6.22.0 application - thanks for that, very
straightforward.

Now that my REST resources and methods are complete and correctly
annotated, I would need to generate the related Swagger definitions.

Is there an easy way to do so?

Many thanks,
Fabio




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Storing Pages

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/single-page-instance and the
discussion about it at http://markmail.org/message/ofyvgybcjp5cvf75
Might be useful for you!

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Lon Varscsak 
wrote:

> Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being that
> for a given page, I only want one instance per session.
>
> -Lon (Wicket Newb)
>

Draggable multiple containment

[Maxim Solodovnik]

Hello Sebastien,

I'm trying to use Draggable,
everything works as expected as long as I'm using single selector for the
"containment" (for ex: ".drop.target" or ".drop.target1")

but fails if I'm using both ".drop.target, .drop.target1"
Maybe you know are there any limitations?


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Storing Pages

[Lon Varscsak]

Is it bad to store pages in the session for re-use?  The idea being that
for a given page, I only want one instance per session.

-Lon (Wicket Newb)

Re: WicketTester + DateTimeField

[Zbynek Vavros]

Hey,

good point, thanks a lot !
I was using the inner workings of DateTextField to get the formatted string
with locale

DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.SHORT,
Locale.getDefault()).format(date)

but setting the locale on request is much better, thanks again !

Zbynek

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> WicketTester simulates browser behavior, so it sends String that is
> converted to a Date by the Wicket component.
> You can use tester.getRequest().setLocale(aLocale) to simulate localized
> browser.
> On Apr 26, 2016 4:22 PM, "Zbynek Vavros"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> whats the proper way to work with WicketTester and DateTimeFields ?
> I am using
>
> FormTester.setValue("myDateTimeField". "formattedDateTime");
>
> is there any way using proper date instead of string (that differs with
> locales) ?
> using DateTimeField.setModelObject() or DateTimeField.setDefaultModejObject
> breaks our validator that works with getConvertedInput...
>
> Thanks,
> Zbynek
>

Re: WicketTester + DateTimeField

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

WicketTester simulates browser behavior, so it sends String that is
converted to a Date by the Wicket component.
You can use tester.getRequest().setLocale(aLocale) to simulate localized
browser.
On Apr 26, 2016 4:22 PM, "Zbynek Vavros"  wrote:

Hi,

whats the proper way to work with WicketTester and DateTimeFields ?
I am using

FormTester.setValue("myDateTimeField". "formattedDateTime");

is there any way using proper date instead of string (that differs with
locales) ?
using DateTimeField.setModelObject() or DateTimeField.setDefaultModejObject
breaks our validator that works with getConvertedInput...

Thanks,
Zbynek

WicketTester + DateTimeField

[Zbynek Vavros]

Hi,

whats the proper way to work with WicketTester and DateTimeFields ?
I am using

FormTester.setValue("myDateTimeField". "formattedDateTime");

is there any way using proper date instead of string (that differs with
locales) ?
using DateTimeField.setModelObject() or DateTimeField.setDefaultModejObject
breaks our validator that works with getConvertedInput...

Thanks,
Zbynek

Re: Palette - AJAX functionality

[Sven Meier]

Hi,

have you checked whether an Ajax is triggered, possibly losing the 
current selection?


A quickstart would help :)

Sven

On 26.04.2016 15:19, PDiefent wrote:

Hello,
I've migrated my Wicket 6 application to Wicket 7 and I got some problems
with a modal window containing a palette component.
In Wicket 7 no updates are visible between the two lists
(available/selected). If I try to move one entry to the opposite list there
is only a short flicker but no entry will be moved.
Unfortunaletly there is no AJAX related example available for Wicket 7 ...
Thanks for any hints
Peter

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Palette-AJAX-functionality-tp4674433.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Palette - AJAX functionality

[PDiefent]

Hello,
I've migrated my Wicket 6 application to Wicket 7 and I got some problems
with a modal window containing a palette component.
In Wicket 7 no updates are visible between the two lists
(available/selected). If I try to move one entry to the opposite list there
is only a short flicker but no entry will be moved.
Unfortunaletly there is no AJAX related example available for Wicket 7 ...
Thanks for any hints
Peter

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Palette-AJAX-functionality-tp4674433.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to extends repeater.data.table.HeadersToolbar (How to resolve CssAttributeBehavior) ?

[Sven Meier]

Hi,

then I'd suggest you just extend AbstractToolbar and do your own thing.
CssAttributeBehavior isn't magic, it's just appending a css class.

Have fun
Sven

On 26.04.2016 01:47, andre seame wrote:

Thanks,

But it no so easy, because the idea is to modify the populateItem of 
refreshingView.

Thanks,
PHL.


De : Sven Meier 
Envoyé : lundi 25 avril 2016 07:22
À : users@wicket.apache.org
Objet : Re: How to extends repeater.data.table.HeadersToolbar (How to resolve 
CssAttributeBehavior) ?

Hi,

HeadersToolbar already creates a RefreshingView in its constructor, you should 
not repeat that.
The following should do:

  public  THHeadersToolbar(final DataTable table, final 
ISortStateLocator stateLocator)
  {
  // inherited stuff
  super(table);

  // ... do custom stuff
  }

Have fun
Sven



On 25.04.2016 00:45, andre seame wrote:

I would like to modify

org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.HeadersToolbar.html
 and 
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.HeadersToolbar.java.


So I would to create myHeadersToolbar that extends 
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.HeadersToolbar.


But, I have a problem :


public  THHeadersToolbar(final DataTable table, final 
ISortStateLocator stateLocator)
   {
  super(table);

  RefreshingView> headers = new RefreshingView>("headers")
  { 


@Override
  protected void populateItem(Item> item)
  {  ...
  if (column instanceof IStyledColumn)
  {

CssAttributeBehavior cssAttributeBehavior = new 
DataTable.CssAttributeBehavior() ...


Therefore, Eclipse propose to

import 
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.table.DataTable.CssAttributeBehavior;


But this fails :


Eclipse says : CssAttributeBehavior cannot be resolved to a type


And Eclipse is right :


public class DataTable extends Panel implements IPageableItems
{
  static abstract class CssAttributeBehavior extends Behavior


How to modify the HeadersToolbar ? Is "extends" the good idea ? Other Solution ?


Thanks,

PHL.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org