Re: How to update a Component from Javascript

2011-10-26 Thread Julian Sinai
Hi Martin

Thanks for your reply. I've made the changes you suggested, but my ajax
update never happens. I think I am missing something in what wicketAjaxGet
can do, or how you are supposed to get the callback url. Here's a simplified
version of my label class, maybe I'm doing something wrong:

private class ComplianceLabel extends Label implements IHeaderContributor
{
private AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior b;

public ComplianceLabel(String id)
{
super(id, new AbstractReadOnlyModelString()
 {
private static final long serialVersionUID = - 7745806927016944636L;;

@Override
public String getObject()
{
 // Get the dynamic value of the label...I never see this update
}
});
 setOutputMarkupId(true);
b = new AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior()
{
 private static final long serialVersionUID = - 5672238144436563958L;

@Override
 protected void respond(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
}
 };
add(b);
}
 @Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
{
 String js = wary.push(' + b.getCallbackUrl() + ');
response.renderOnLoadJavascript(js);
 }
}

Thanks for any advice.

Julian




On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 Hi,

 On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  This should be easy, but I'm striking out...
 
  I want to use a new Javascript feature
  (EventSourcehttp://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/,
  part of HTML5 WebSockets) to push notifications from the server to the
  browser. Getting the basic mechanism to work was easy. What I can't
 figure
  out how to do is once I get the notification on the client, how to tell
  Wicket to update the relevant components via Ajax. In other words, the
  equivalent of AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(Component) in Javascript.
 
  This is how far I got, which didn't work. I was trying to use
 wicketAjaxGet:
 
  Script at the top of my page:
 
  var wary = new Array();
  var source = new EventSource(events);
  source.onmessage = function(event) {
  for (var i = 0, item; item = wary[i]; i++) {

 missing check for 'i  wary.length'

   wicketAjaxGet('+item+',
  function(){}.bind(this),function(){}.bind(this));

 The success and failure handlers can be omitted. Just do:
 wicketAjaxGet(url)

   }
  };
 
  Method in my Component subclass:
 
  public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
  {
   String js = wary.push(' + b.getCallbackUrl() + ');
   response.renderOnLoadJavascript(js);
  }
 
  Any help is appreciated.

 What exactly breaks ?
 Is the Ajax call made at all ? Verify with Firebug
 Also with Firebug dump the contents of wary array.

 
  Julian
 



 --
 Martin Grigorov
 jWeekend
 Training, Consulting, Development
 http://jWeekend.com



How to update a Component from Javascript

2011-10-24 Thread Julian Sinai
This should be easy, but I'm striking out...

I want to use a new Javascript feature
(EventSourcehttp://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/,
part of HTML5 WebSockets) to push notifications from the server to the
browser. Getting the basic mechanism to work was easy. What I can't figure
out how to do is once I get the notification on the client, how to tell
Wicket to update the relevant components via Ajax. In other words, the
equivalent of AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(Component) in Javascript.

This is how far I got, which didn't work. I was trying to use wicketAjaxGet:

Script at the top of my page:

var wary = new Array();
var source = new EventSource(events);
source.onmessage = function(event) {
for (var i = 0, item; item = wary[i]; i++) {
 wicketAjaxGet('+item+',
function(){}.bind(this),function(){}.bind(this));
 }
};

Method in my Component subclass:

public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
{
 String js = wary.push(' + b.getCallbackUrl() + ');
 response.renderOnLoadJavascript(js);
}

Any help is appreciated.

Julian


Wicket filter chain and other servlets

2011-08-08 Thread Julian Sinai
Hi, I really could use some advice on how to solve this problem:

In our webapp, we have a wicket filter as well as a couple of other
servlets. The url pattern for the wicket filter is the usual /*. The problem
is that because of this, all urls, including those of the other servlets, go
through the wicket filter, which is causing problems. Specifically, we are
using  spring, so wicket's SpringComponentInjector wraps the beans, which
sometimes results in the exception below.

The real solution is to separate the other servlets into another webapp, but
because of time constraints we can't do that. We also can't easily change
our urls to assign a unique pattern to the wicket urls (although the other
servlets do have unique patterns), because it will adversely affect users.
Is there a way to solve this problem in web.xml? Use wicket servlet instead
of wicket filter?

org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no application attached to
current thread http-8443-7
at org.apache.wicket.Application.get(Application.java:179)

...


at
WICKET_com.hytrust.arc.TrustedHostMgr$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$eded0a19.refreshAllPolicy(generated)

...


at
com.hytrust.proxy.vmware.VIMHandlerServlet.doPost(VIMHandlerServlet.java:47)


Any help is appreciated.
Julian


Re: Wicket filter chain and other servlets

2011-08-08 Thread Julian Sinai
Hi Dan

I don't understand the reason either, but clearly it's happening. My best
guess is what I said in my original post: the non-wicket servlets are going
through the wicket filter.
Julian
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Julian,

 I'm not quite understanding your setup. How did your non-Wicket servlet get
 a Wicket-proxied Spring bean?

 Dan


 On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi, I really could use some advice on how to solve this problem:

 In our webapp, we have a wicket filter as well as a couple of other
 servlets. The url pattern for the wicket filter is the usual /*. The
 problem
 is that because of this, all urls, including those of the other servlets,
 go
 through the wicket filter, which is causing problems. Specifically, we are
 using  spring, so wicket's SpringComponentInjector wraps the beans, which
 sometimes results in the exception below.

 The real solution is to separate the other servlets into another webapp,
 but
 because of time constraints we can't do that. We also can't easily change
 our urls to assign a unique pattern to the wicket urls (although the other
 servlets do have unique patterns), because it will adversely affect users.
 Is there a way to solve this problem in web.xml? Use wicket servlet
 instead
 of wicket filter?

 org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no application attached
 to
 current thread http-8443-7
at org.apache.wicket.Application.get(Application.java:179)

 ...


at

 WICKET_com.hytrust.arc.TrustedHostMgr$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$eded0a19.refreshAllPolicy(generated)

 ...


at

 com.hytrust.proxy.vmware.VIMHandlerServlet.doPost(VIMHandlerServlet.java:47)


 Any help is appreciated.
 Julian





Re: Wicket filter chain and other servlets

2011-08-08 Thread Julian Sinai
Dan, thanks for your reply. You may be right, though I can't imagine what
could be putting the proxy somewhere the servlet can access it. I'll take
another look. And your suggestion to put a breakpoint in the
SpringComponentInjector is a good one.

Julian
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:

 On second thought, both instantiating a Component and requesting injection
 would blow up immediately without an Application set. So I have to think
 something in your Wicket application is putting the proxy somewhere the
 servlet can access it.




Re: DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-22 Thread Julian Sinai
Martin, thanks for your help. Igor's hint helped me. After some
investigation I realized that I have a visitor in my button's submit handler
that visits all form components and adds them to the ajax target. That meant
it was visiting the inner fields of the DateTimeField, also, which was not
necessary. I fixed it by ignoring form fields in the visitor that don't have
outputMarkupId set.

Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 I don't see any problem.
 Put a break point in AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent() and see what is
 registered. If you see component with id hours then investigate the
 stacktrace.
 As last resort you can create a quickstart with plain Wicket
 components and if it still fails with this error send it to us in a
 ticket.

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Martin
  Thanks for looking at this. It's a bit complicated because we've built a
  form framework around Wicket, but here goes:
  In the page:
  HtFormPanel.DateFormField startField = new
  HtFormPanel.DateFormField(startField,
  new StringResourceModel(start, this, null), new
 PropertyModelDate(this,
  start), false);
  Where the constructor for HtFormPanel.DateFormField is:
  public DateFormField(String uniqueId, IModelString label, IModel m,
  boolean bShowTime)
  {
  // The DateTimeField is contained within the DateFormField
  super(uniqueId, FieldType.DATETEXTFIELD.toString(),
  (bShowTime ? new DateTimeField(FIELD_ID) :
  new DateField(FIELD_ID)), label, m);
  }
  Next, in the page:
  startField.setFieldOutputMarkupId(true);
  // The radio button that does the ajax update:
  final HtFormPanel.RadioFormFieldReportAction actionField = new
  HtFormPanel.RadioFormFieldReportAction(
  actionField,new ResourceModel(actionField),actionTypes,new
  LocalizedChoiceRendererReportAction(this),
  new PropertyModelReportAction(this,action));
  Finally, the update code that causes the problem:
  actionField.getFormComponent().add(
  new HtAjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 8574977146235850631L;
  protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
  if (getAction() != null
   getAction().equals(ReportAction.VIEW)) {
  startField.setRequired(false);
  } else {
  startField.setRequired(true);
  }
  // We update the startField and the DateTimeField inside it.
  target.addComponent(startField);
  target.addComponent(startField.getComponent());
  }
  });
 
  Julian
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
  Show some code.
 
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Nothing is adding it, we add the DateTimeField itself to the target.
  
   Julian
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg
   igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
  
   what is adding that to the target?
  
   -igor
  
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
   wrote:
It is the hours component of the DateTimeField. From
DateTimeField.html:
   
input type=text wicket:id=hours size=2 /nbsp;:
   
Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg
igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
   
wrote:
   
what is hours ?
   
-igor
   
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
   wrote:
 Igor,
 We do update  the DateTimeField itself, and this is what we see:
 SEVERE: cannot update component that does not have
 setOutputMarkupId
 property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id
 =
 hours]]
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot update component that
 does
 not
 have setOutputMarkupId property set to true. Component:
   [MarkupContainer
 [Component id = hours]]
 at


  
  
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:346)

 Julian
 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg
 igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 cant update the DateTimeField itself?

 -igor

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Julian Sinai 
 jsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its
  fields
   are
  private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them.
  The
  result
  is
  an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other
 than
  cloning
  and
  owning DateTimeField?
 
  We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just
  yet).
 
  Any help is appreciated.
  Julian
 


   
   
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Martin Grigorov
  jWeekend
  Training, Consulting, Development
  http://jWeekend.com
 
 



 --
 Martin Grigorov
 jWeekend
 Training, Consulting, Development
 http://jWeekend.com



DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-21 Thread Julian Sinai
We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its fields are
private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them. The result is
an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other than cloning and
owning DateTimeField?

We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just yet).

Any help is appreciated.
Julian


Re: DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-21 Thread Julian Sinai
Igor,

We do update  the DateTimeField itself, and this is what we see:

SEVERE: cannot update component that does not have setOutputMarkupId
property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = hours]]
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot update component that does not
have setOutputMarkupId property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer
[Component id = hours]]
at
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:346)

Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 cant update the DateTimeField itself?

 -igor

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its fields are
  private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them. The result
 is
  an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other than cloning
 and
  owning DateTimeField?
 
  We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just yet).
 
  Any help is appreciated.
  Julian
 



Re: DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-21 Thread Julian Sinai
It is the hours component of the DateTimeField. From DateTimeField.html:

input type=text wicket:id=hours size=2 /nbsp;:

Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 what is hours ?

 -igor

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  Igor,
  We do update  the DateTimeField itself, and this is what we see:
  SEVERE: cannot update component that does not have setOutputMarkupId
  property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = hours]]
  java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot update component that does not
  have setOutputMarkupId property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer
  [Component id = hours]]
  at
 
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:346)
 
  Julian
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
 
  cant update the DateTimeField itself?
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its fields are
   private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them. The
 result
   is
   an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other than
 cloning
   and
   owning DateTimeField?
  
   We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just yet).
  
   Any help is appreciated.
   Julian
  
 
 



Re: DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-21 Thread Julian Sinai
Nothing is adding it, we add the DateTimeField itself to the target.

Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 what is adding that to the target?

 -igor

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  It is the hours component of the DateTimeField. From DateTimeField.html:
 
  input type=text wicket:id=hours size=2 /nbsp;:
 
  Julian
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
 
  what is hours ?
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Igor,
   We do update  the DateTimeField itself, and this is what we see:
   SEVERE: cannot update component that does not have setOutputMarkupId
   property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id =
   hours]]
   java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot update component that does
   not
   have setOutputMarkupId property set to true. Component:
 [MarkupContainer
   [Component id = hours]]
   at
  
  
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:346)
  
   Julian
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg
   igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   cant update the DateTimeField itself?
  
   -igor
  
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
   wrote:
We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its fields
 are
private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them. The
result
is
an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other than
cloning
and
owning DateTimeField?
   
We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just yet).
   
Any help is appreciated.
Julian
   
  
  
 
 



Re: DateTimeField and setOutputMarkupId()

2011-07-21 Thread Julian Sinai
Hi Martin

Thanks for looking at this. It's a bit complicated because we've built a
form framework around Wicket, but here goes:

In the page:

HtFormPanel.DateFormField startField = new
HtFormPanel.DateFormField(startField,
new StringResourceModel(start, this, null), new PropertyModelDate(this,
 start), false);

Where the constructor for HtFormPanel.DateFormField is:

public DateFormField(String uniqueId, IModelString label, IModel m,
boolean bShowTime)
{
 // The DateTimeField is contained within the DateFormField
super(uniqueId, FieldType.DATETEXTFIELD.toString(),
 (bShowTime ? new DateTimeField(FIELD_ID) :
new DateField(FIELD_ID)), label, m);
}

Next, in the page:

startField.setFieldOutputMarkupId(true);

// The radio button that does the ajax update:

final HtFormPanel.RadioFormFieldReportAction actionField = new
HtFormPanel.RadioFormFieldReportAction(
 actionField,new ResourceModel(actionField),actionTypes,new
LocalizedChoiceRendererReportAction(this),
 new PropertyModelReportAction(this,action));

Finally, the update code that causes the problem:

actionField.getFormComponent().add(
new HtAjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {

private static final long serialVersionUID = 8574977146235850631L;

protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
 if (getAction() != null
 getAction().equals(ReportAction.VIEW)) {
 startField.setRequired(false);
} else {
 startField.setRequired(true);
}
 // We update the startField and the DateTimeField inside it.
target.addComponent(startField);
 target.addComponent(startField.getComponent());
}
 });


Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 Show some code.

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
  Nothing is adding it, we add the DateTimeField itself to the target.
 
  Julian
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  what is adding that to the target?
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   It is the hours component of the DateTimeField. From
 DateTimeField.html:
  
   input type=text wicket:id=hours size=2 /nbsp;:
  
   Julian
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Igor Vaynberg 
 igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
  
   wrote:
  
   what is hours ?
  
   -igor
  
   On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
  wrote:
Igor,
We do update  the DateTimeField itself, and this is what we see:
SEVERE: cannot update component that does not have
 setOutputMarkupId
property set to true. Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id =
hours]]
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot update component that
 does
not
have setOutputMarkupId property set to true. Component:
  [MarkupContainer
[Component id = hours]]
at
   
   
 
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addComponent(AjaxRequestTarget.java:346)
   
Julian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg
igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
   
cant update the DateTimeField itself?
   
-igor
   
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Julian Sinai jsi...@gmail.com
wrote:
 We have a need to update a DateTimeField via Ajax, but its
 fields
  are
 private, and they don't have setOutputMarkupId() set on them.
 The
 result
 is
 an exception upon Ajax update. Is there any solution other than
 cloning
 and
 owning DateTimeField?

 We are using Wicket 1.4.17 (and we can't upgrade to 1.5 just
 yet).

 Any help is appreciated.
 Julian

   
   
  
  
 
 



 --
 Martin Grigorov
 jWeekend
 Training, Consulting, Development
 http://jWeekend.com



OutputStreams and Panels

2011-07-08 Thread Julian Sinai
I am using the BIRT Report Engine API. It generates html that I want to
display in a Panel or a WebMarkupContainer. The API requires me to hand it a
java.io.OutputStream, which it then writes to. How do I obtain a stream from
Wicket in a way that the BIRT output can be inserted in my Panel?

Any help is appreciated.
Julian


ModalWindow form, autocomplete, and default button.

2010-03-08 Thread Julian Sinai
Hi,


I'm having some trouble with modal forms. As advised by Matej in this post: 
http://markmail.org/thread/kmrsg2kvywpyf5dh, I am nesting my modal form inside 
another form. That works fine, but I now have two other problems: because 
Form.onComponentTag() rewrites my inner form tag as a div, my 
autocomplete=off attribute has no effect, and the default button that I set 
has no effect. How can I fix these two things?

I'm using Wicket 1.4.0.

If someone can help, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,
Julian

AutoCompleteTextField stops showing completions

2009-10-01 Thread Julian Sinai
I'm having trouble with AutoCompleteTextField. It works great most of the time, 
but occasionally the autocompletions won't show up. This seems to be more of a 
problem on Safari and IE6. It happens either when the page first renders, or 
after clicking OK to take action based on the user's selection (there's an ajax 
button next to my AutoCompleteTextField). 

I've tried manually reinitializing the autocomplete JS code by calling 
target.appendJavascript(initialize()).

I've also tried re-rendering the AutoCompleteTextField using 
target.addComponent(field).

None of these techniques work.

I'm using Wicket 1.4.0.

If someone can help, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,
Julian

CheckGroup and AjaxPagingNavigator

2009-05-29 Thread Julian Sinai

I'm having trouble with my usage of CheckGroup and AjaxPagingNavigator.

If the user checks one or more checkboxes on one page of my data table, then 
navigates to the next page, the choices on the first page are forgotten. In my 
application, they need to be remembered. This was not a problem before I 
switched to Ajax paging navigation.

If someone can help, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks,
Julian

More detail:

I'm using the DataView/IDataProvider pattern for my data table. 
I'm using CheckGroup, Check, and CheckGroupSelector for the checkboxes in my 
data table.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Defer call to preDecorateScript() till onSubmit() is called?

2009-04-21 Thread Julian Sinai

Hi, I need to display a confirmation message to the user before submitting a 
form. It's pretty standard to use the code below when the message is known at 
the time of button or link construction. But what about when the message must 
be synthesized at the time of the button click? I've tried using a model, but 
that didn't help. I would appreciate any help.

Thanks,
Julian


@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new AjaxPreprocessingCallDecorator(super.getAjaxCallDecorator())
{
@Override
public CharSequence preDecorateScript(CharSequence script)
{
 return if(!confirm(' + message
  + ')) return false; + script; 
}
};
}


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org