Re: Illegal State Exception on DefaultTeeModel.removeNodeFromParent
I posted a bug (WICKET-2178) with a test case/source code. The last action I saw on it was it was assigned to Matej Knopp back in April. I tested the same code against the 1.4 code and it seemed to work. Leena wrote: Any resolution on this? Or may be some workaround? I am facing a similar issue, so thought this could be related. I am getting a NullPointerException while trying to move nodes within the tree (ajax requests) Partial Stack trace: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.tree.AbstractTree.treeNodesInserted(AbstractTree.java:790) at javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel.fireTreeNodesInserted(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel.nodesWereInserted(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel.insertNodeInto(Unknown Source) Please let me know if there is any solution/workaround to this. I am using wicket-1.3.5. +Leena skatz wrote: I have the same problem using 1.3.5, but not when using 1.3.3. I spent some time tracing the source code and it seems related to the addition of this line: getTreeState().selectNode((TreeNode)item.getModelObject(), false); at the very end of the function (line 835): AbstractTree.treeNodesRemoved() This line results (eventually) in a call to AbstractTree.invalidateNode() which on line 1295 calls: item.remove() which alters the state of item such that the call to item.remove() in AbstractTree.treeNodesRemoved() fails with the exception mentioned previously. I note that the IItemCallback() code, immediately above, calls two identical lines in the reverse order. I wonder reversing the later two would fix the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Illegal-State-Exception-on-DefaultTeeModel.removeNodeFromParent-tp20185042p23640768.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Illegal State Exception on DefaultTeeModel.removeNodeFromParent
I have the same problem using 1.3.5, but not when using 1.3.3. I spent some time tracing the source code and it seems related to the addition of this line: getTreeState().selectNode((TreeNode)item.getModelObject(), false); at the very end of the function (line 835): AbstractTree.treeNodesRemoved() This line results (eventually) in a call to AbstractTree.invalidateNode() which on line 1295 calls: item.remove() which alters the state of item such that the call to item.remove() in AbstractTree.treeNodesRemoved() fails with the exception mentioned previously. I note that the IItemCallback() code, immediately above, calls two identical lines in the reverse order. I wonder reversing the later two would fix the problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Illegal-State-Exception-on-DefaultTeeModel.removeNodeFromParent-tp20185042p22547387.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Help understaning AjaxCallDecorator problem
So the ultimate result of the onClick() method, in this case, is to move to a whole new page, i.e the last line is: setResponsePage(...);, so technically, it probably does not need to be an ajax request, but because of the way we are reusing some code it is. I commented out the setResponsePage() as a test and the Ajax Console still disappeared. Timo Rantalaiho wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007, skatz wrote: The Ajax debug console disappears before I can read what it is saying, and Hmm, I think that normally the ajax debug console should stay there for javascript executions and ajax requests. Could it be that the whole page gets loaded somehow? Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-understaning-AjaxCallDecorator-problem-tf4760426.html#a13635149 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help understaning AjaxCallDecorator problem
I have created an anonymous innner class of AjaxFallbackLink this overrides
onClick and getAjaxCallDecorator as such:
...
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new AjaxCallDecorator() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence pScript)
{
return saveAllForms(); + pScript;
}
};
}
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget pArg0) {
// update selected state of creatives to false
this results in HTML that looks like:
onclick=saveAllForms();var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:7:controlbar:right:3:item:1:IBehaviorListener:0:',null,null,
function() {return Wicket.$$(this)}.bind(this));return !wcall;
The problem is, the onClick() method does not seem to be getting called
(does not stop in eclipse debugger at the breakpoint, and observed behavior
is as if it is not being called). So my question is, what am I doing wrong?
I expected the onClick() method to be called. Is it possible for a
javascript function to fail in such a way that the rest of the script would
not be called? I put an alert() at the end of the saveAllForms() function
to be sure it was getting that far and it was. [I'm using 1.3 beta4, BTW]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Help-understaning-AjaxCallDecorator-problem-tf4760426.html#a13614038
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
enclosure and repeater
Is there a way to get an enclosure to work with a repeater. Perhaps I am missing something, but I can't get: ... ul class=someclass wicket:enclosure child=item li wicket:id=repeater /li /wicket:enclosure /ul to work. What I get is an exception telling me there is no component matching item. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/enclosure-and-repeater-tf4713620.html#a13473822 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: enclosure and repeater
Thats odd, when I posted, the anchor tag inside the list item tag does not show up. li wicket:id=repeatersomething wicket:id=item/something/li skatz wrote: Is there a way to get an enclosure to work with a repeater. Perhaps I am missing something, but I can't get: ... ul class=someclass wicket:enclosure child=item li wicket:id=repeater # /li /wicket:enclosure /ul to work. What I get is an exception telling me there is no component matching item. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/enclosure-and-repeater-tf4713620.html#a13473829 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repeaters' use of WebMarkupContainer question
Hi,
Could someone give me some insight into the use of WebMarkupContainers with
repeaters. In particular, I was wondering how come there does not need to
be markup that has the id of the interposed WebMarkupContainer? (Also, a
pointer to the code, if it exists, where repeaters do special handing of
their direct children.)
Here is a code snippet from the examples:
...
RepeatingView repeating = new RepeatingView(repeating);
add(repeating);
int index = 0;
while (contacts.hasNext())
{
WebMarkupContainer item = new
WebMarkupContainer(repeating.newChildId());
repeating.add(item);
Contact contact = (Contact)contacts.next();
item.add(new ActionPanel(actions, new
DetachableContactModel(contact)));
item.add(new Label(contactid,
String.valueOf(contact.getId(;
item.add(new Label(firstname, contact.getFirstName()));
item.add(new Label(lastname, contact.getLastName()));
item.add(new Label(homephone, contact.getHomePhone()));
item.add(new Label(cellphone, contact.getCellPhone()));
...
How come the markup parser doesn't get upset that there is no component with
the wicket:id=repeating.newChildId()?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Repeaters%27-use-of-WebMarkupContainer-question-tf4704749.html#a13448018
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointer to example use of non-deprecated Fragment contructor
Hi, The examples seem to use the deprecated constructor for Fragment. Is there an example/explanation of the non-deprecated ones? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pointer-to-example-use-of-non-deprecated--Fragment-contructor-tf4704754.html#a13448026 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with Modal Dialog/Firefox problem
Can anyone give me some pointers on debugging a problem with the JavaScript that gets appended and sent to the browser when you call ModalDialog#close? I'm getting TypeError exceptions. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-with-Modal-Dialog-Firefox-problem-tf4602285.html#a13140654 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ModalWindow.close() results in ERROR: Exception evaluating javascript: TypeError: window.parent.setTimeout is not a function
More information. It works as expected in IE7. The problem occurs with
Firefox 2.0.0.7
skatz wrote:
I am trying to use the ModalWindow as a confirmation dialog and it works
fine on one page but the same code on a different page produces the above
error.
Closing the ModalWindow with the X in the corner work fine. The error
occurs when the AjaxCallbackLink onClick handler calls
ModalWindow.close(); On the page that isn't working the following code is
called as the last thing in the page constructor.
// The delete dialog
ModalWindow deleteDialog = new ModalWindow(deleteDialog);
mConfirmationPanel = new
ConfirmationPanel(deleteDialog.getContentId(), new
WUIResourceModel(CampaignManagerPage.class, deleteDialogQuestion), this,
deleteDialog);
deleteDialog.setContent(mConfirmationPanel);
deleteDialog.setInitialWidth(260);
deleteDialog.setInitialHeight(80);
deleteDialog.setResizable(false);
deleteDialog.setTitle(Delete Campaign(s) Confirmation);
deleteDialog.setWindowClosedCallback(
new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget pRequestTarget) {
...
}
}
}
}
);
add(deleteDialog);
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ModalWindow.close%28%29-results-in-ERROR%3A-Exception-evaluating-javascript%3A-TypeError%3A-window.parent.setTimeout-is-not-a-function-tf4573096.html#a13058356
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ModalWindow.close() results in ERROR: Exception evaluating javascript: TypeError: window.parent.setTimeout is not a function
I am trying to use the ModalWindow as a confirmation dialog and it works fine
on one page but the same code on a different page produces the above error.
Closing the ModalWindow with the X in the corner work fine. The error
occurs when the AjaxCallbackLink onClick handler calls ModalWindow.close();
On the page that isn't working the following code is called as the last
thing in the page constructor.
// The delete dialog
ModalWindow deleteDialog = new ModalWindow(deleteDialog);
mConfirmationPanel = new
ConfirmationPanel(deleteDialog.getContentId(), new
WUIResourceModel(CampaignManagerPage.class, deleteDialogQuestion), this,
deleteDialog);
deleteDialog.setContent(mConfirmationPanel);
deleteDialog.setInitialWidth(260);
deleteDialog.setInitialHeight(80);
deleteDialog.setResizable(false);
deleteDialog.setTitle(Delete Campaign(s) Confirmation);
deleteDialog.setWindowClosedCallback(
new ModalWindow.WindowClosedCallback() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public void onClose(AjaxRequestTarget pRequestTarget) {
...
}
}
}
}
);
add(deleteDialog);
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ModalWindow.close%28%29-results-in-ERROR%3A-Exception-evaluating-javascript%3A-TypeError%3A-window.parent.setTimeout-is-not-a-function-tf4573096.html#a13053366
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket consulting/contracting/outsourcing
Boston, MA Dan Syrstad-2 wrote: In what area of the world and what are you looking to do? -Dan On 9/18/07, skatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Can anyone provide me with pointers to individuals or companies providing Wicket consulting/contracting or outsourced personnel? TIA, skatz -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-consulting-contracting-outsourcing-tf4476525.html#a12764265 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-consulting-contracting-outsourcing-tf4476525.html#a12797023 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket consulting/contracting/outsourcing
Hi, Can anyone provide me with pointers to individuals or companies providing Wicket consulting/contracting or outsourced personnel? TIA, skatz -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-consulting-contracting-outsourcing-tf4476525.html#a12764265 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
