Re: [OT] thanks
Replying to myself: after having double-checked all the docs, it now works: there was an inconsistency in my configuration, it was enough to prevent the whole stuff to work. If anyone is curious, I can still give him more details. In the meantime, thanks to all, Pierre On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Pierre Goupil wrote: > Good evening, > > I finally have the need to use nginx, but can't figure out how to > configure it with Wicket and Atmosphere. > > I've provided the nginx configuration quoted above, and in my init() > method of WebApplication, I have: > > this.getFilterFactoryManager().add(new XForwardedRequestWrapperFactory()); > > But no way, the WebSocket connection returns an error. > > GET > http://me.net/?0-IResourceListener.2-&...ache-Date=0&X-atmo-protocol=true&_=1389644050464 > > > > > => Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at ws:// > me.net/?0-IResourceListener.2-&X-Atmosphere-tracking-id=0&X-Atmosphere-Framework=2.0.8-jquery&X-Atmosphere-Transport=websocket&X-Atmosphere-TrackMessageSize=true&X-Cache-Date=0&X-atmo-protocol=true > > Does anybody have an idea, please? > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@topicus.nl> wrote: > >> We depend heavily on ajp. Our application server needs to know the exact >> url the request was made to. This is very hard to get right with plain >> http >> proxying (if not impossible). The main reason we use httpd in front of our >> application server(s) is for load balancing and status information >> (serving >> a 503 when the application is down). Tomcat's (or JBoss in our case) >> performance has never been an issue. >> >> Best regards, >> Emond >> >> On Wednesday 14 August 2013 07:50:50 Dan Retzlaff wrote: >> > Have you considered nginx? We use httpd but our reverse-proxying >> needs are >> > pretty simple. I've been meaning to try nginx. >> > >> > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Goupil >> wrote: >> > > I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector >> and >> > > useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an >> httpd for >> > > the moment, but I'm not in production. >> > > >> > > I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate >> the >> > > results to you. >> > > >> > > As a side-note, on the Tomcat list, many people are starting to talk >> about >> > > better WebSockets support in Tomcat 8 and the dev seem to realize >> that >> > > there is a strong expectation for them, so maybe they'll try and >> convince >> > > to work hand-in-hand with the httpd / AJP people? >> > > >> > > Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work! >> > > >> > > And of course a big "thank you" to the people from the great Wicket, >> too! >> > > >> > > :-) >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > >> > > Pierre >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij < >> > > emond.papega...@topicus.nl >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi Pierre, >> > > > >> > > > Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for >> the >> > > >> > > rest >> > > >> > > > of >> > > > the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use >> it in >> > > > production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with >> > > >> > > jsr356) >> > > >> > > > maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to >> support >> > > > websockets as well. >> > > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Emond >> > > > >> > > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: >> > > > > Good morning, >> > > > > >> > > > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would >> like to >> > > > >> > > > say a >> > > > >> > > > > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. >> > > > > >> > > > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. >> > > > > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an >> > > > > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / >> WebSocket >> > > > >> > > > response. >> > > > >> > > > > Thanks again, man! >> > > > > >> > > > > Pierre >> > > >> > > -- >> > > "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as >> pas >> > > mal. >> > > Alors frappez-moi de musique ! >> > > Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" >> > > >> > > (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock") >> > > > > -- > "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas > mal. > Alors frappez-moi de musique ! > Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" > > (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock") > -- "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas mal. Alors frappez-moi de musique ! Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock")
Re: [OT] thanks
Good evening, I finally have the need to use nginx, but can't figure out how to configure it with Wicket and Atmosphere. I've provided the nginx configuration quoted above, and in my init() method of WebApplication, I have: this.getFilterFactoryManager().add(new XForwardedRequestWrapperFactory()); But no way, the WebSocket connection returns an error. GET http://me.net/?0-IResourceListener.2-&...ache-Date=0&X-atmo-protocol=true&_=1389644050464 => Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at ws:// me.net/?0-IResourceListener.2-&X-Atmosphere-tracking-id=0&X-Atmosphere-Framework=2.0.8-jquery&X-Atmosphere-Transport=websocket&X-Atmosphere-TrackMessageSize=true&X-Cache-Date=0&X-atmo-protocol=true Does anybody have an idea, please? Regards, Pierre On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote: > We depend heavily on ajp. Our application server needs to know the exact > url the request was made to. This is very hard to get right with plain http > proxying (if not impossible). The main reason we use httpd in front of our > application server(s) is for load balancing and status information (serving > a 503 when the application is down). Tomcat's (or JBoss in our case) > performance has never been an issue. > > Best regards, > Emond > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 07:50:50 Dan Retzlaff wrote: > > Have you considered nginx? We use httpd but our reverse-proxying > needs are > > pretty simple. I've been meaning to try nginx. > > > > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Goupil > wrote: > > > I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector > and > > > useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an > httpd for > > > the moment, but I'm not in production. > > > > > > I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate the > > > results to you. > > > > > > As a side-note, on the Tomcat list, many people are starting to talk > about > > > better WebSockets support in Tomcat 8 and the dev seem to realize > that > > > there is a strong expectation for them, so maybe they'll try and > convince > > > to work hand-in-hand with the httpd / AJP people? > > > > > > Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work! > > > > > > And of course a big "thank you" to the people from the great Wicket, > too! > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Pierre > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij < > > > emond.papega...@topicus.nl > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > > > > > Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the > > > > > > rest > > > > > > > of > > > > the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use > it in > > > > production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with > > > > > > jsr356) > > > > > > > maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to > support > > > > websockets as well. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Emond > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: > > > > > Good morning, > > > > > > > > > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like > to > > > > > > > > say a > > > > > > > > > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. > > > > > > > > > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. > > > > > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an > > > > > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / > WebSocket > > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > Thanks again, man! > > > > > > > > > > Pierre > > > > > > -- > > > "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as > pas > > > mal. > > > Alors frappez-moi de musique ! > > > Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" > > > > > > (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock") > -- "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas mal. Alors frappez-moi de musique ! Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock")
Re: [OT] thanks
We depend heavily on ajp. Our application server needs to know the exact url the request was made to. This is very hard to get right with plain http proxying (if not impossible). The main reason we use httpd in front of our application server(s) is for load balancing and status information (serving a 503 when the application is down). Tomcat's (or JBoss in our case) performance has never been an issue. Best regards, Emond On Wednesday 14 August 2013 07:50:50 Dan Retzlaff wrote: > Have you considered nginx? We use httpd but our reverse-proxying needs are > pretty simple. I've been meaning to try nginx. > > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Goupil wrote: > > I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector and > > useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an httpd for > > the moment, but I'm not in production. > > > > I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate the > > results to you. > > > > As a side-note, on the Tomcat list, many people are starting to talk about > > better WebSockets support in Tomcat 8 and the dev seem to realize that > > there is a strong expectation for them, so maybe they'll try and convince > > to work hand-in-hand with the httpd / AJP people? > > > > Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work! > > > > And of course a big "thank you" to the people from the great Wicket, too! > > > > :-) > > > > Regards, > > > > Pierre > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij < > > emond.papega...@topicus.nl > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > > > Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the > > > > rest > > > > > of > > > the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in > > > production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with > > > > jsr356) > > > > > maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to support > > > websockets as well. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Emond > > > > > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: > > > > Good morning, > > > > > > > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to > > > > > > say a > > > > > > > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. > > > > > > > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. > > > > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an > > > > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / WebSocket > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > Thanks again, man! > > > > > > > > Pierre > > > > -- > > "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas > > mal. > > Alors frappez-moi de musique ! > > Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" > > > > (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock")
Re: [OT] thanks
Have you considered nginx? We use httpd but our reverse-proxying needs are pretty simple. I've been meaning to try nginx. http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Pierre Goupil wrote: > I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector and > useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an httpd for > the moment, but I'm not in production. > > I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate the > results to you. > > As a side-note, on the Tomcat list, many people are starting to talk about > better WebSockets support in Tomcat 8 and the dev seem to realize that > there is a strong expectation for them, so maybe they'll try and convince > to work hand-in-hand with the httpd / AJP people? > > Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work! > > And of course a big "thank you" to the people from the great Wicket, too! > :-) > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@topicus.nl > > wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > > > Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the > rest > > of > > the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in > > production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with > jsr356) > > maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to support > > websockets as well. > > > > Best regards, > > Emond > > > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: > > > Good morning, > > > > > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to > > say a > > > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. > > > > > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. > > > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an > > > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / WebSocket > > response. > > > > > > Thanks again, man! > > > > > > Pierre > > > > > > -- > "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas > mal. > Alors frappez-moi de musique ! > Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" > > (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock") >
Re: [OT] thanks
I use only Tomcat (7.0.40) and I must admit that with NIO connector and useNative=true, the performance looks nice. I have no use for an httpd for the moment, but I'm not in production. I plan to load test my app, if you're interested, I can communicate the results to you. As a side-note, on the Tomcat list, many people are starting to talk about better WebSockets support in Tomcat 8 and the dev seem to realize that there is a strong expectation for them, so maybe they'll try and convince to work hand-in-hand with the httpd / AJP people? Anyway, thanks again and keep up the good work! And of course a big "thank you" to the people from the great Wicket, too! :-) Regards, Pierre On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the rest > of > the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in > production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with jsr356) > maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to support > websockets as well. > > Best regards, > Emond > > On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to > say a > > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. > > > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. > > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an > > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / WebSocket > response. > > > > Thanks again, man! > > > > Pierre > -- "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas mal. Alors frappez-moi de musique ! Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock")
Re: [OT] thanks
Hi Pierre, Good to hear you like it! Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the rest of the server stack to support websockets before we can actually use it in production applications. Hopefully, with the release of jee7 (with jsr356) maintainers of httpd and ajp will finally realize they need to support websockets as well. Best regards, Emond On Wednesday 14 August 2013 12:01:05 Pierre Goupil wrote: > Good morning, > > All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to say a > big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. > > His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. > According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an > AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / WebSocket response. > > Thanks again, man! > > Pierre
[OT] thanks
Good morning, All apologies for this totally off-topic message, but I would like to say a big "THANK YOU" to Emond for his work on wicket-atmosphere. His code is far from trivial, yet it is a real pleasure to use it. According to me, the killer-feature is the fact that we have an AjaxRequestTarget to work with which triggers a Comet / WebSocket response. Thanks again, man! Pierre -- "Un truc bien avec la musique, c'est que quand elle te frappe, tu n'as pas mal. Alors frappez-moi de musique ! Frappez-moi de musique, maintenant !" (Bob Marley : "Trenchtown Rock")
