Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Cedric Gatay
Hi,
You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
translations and register it in front of the list through the IInitializer
mechanism.

Regards,
Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a écrit :

 Hi all,

 I am developing a framework library with wicket components and utility
 classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed by our
 company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages (e.g.
 wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).

 I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties file with
 the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
 wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to their
 alphabetic order.

 Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If not, is
 there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a place that
 can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
 WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).

 Thanks
 Marios



Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Marios Skounakis
Not sure if this is what you mean but in Application.init I replaced the
InitializerStringResourceLoader in
application.getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders() with my own
MyInitializerStringResourceLoader which resorts the initializers list and
puts my own initializer in the first position.

It works.

Thanks


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
 translations and register it in front of the list through the IInitializer
 mechanism.

 Regards,
 Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a écrit :

  Hi all,
 
  I am developing a framework library with wicket components and utility
  classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed by our
  company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages (e.g.
  wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).
 
  I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties file
 with
  the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
  wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to their
  alphabetic order.
 
  Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If not, is
  there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a place that
  can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
  WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).
 
  Thanks
  Marios
 



Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Martin Grigorov
The order of the initializers depends on the order of the jars in the
classpath.
Depending on the order is not recommended.

I think Cedric's idea was to roll your own ISRL that knows exactly where is
your resource bundle and knows how to load it.


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not sure if this is what you mean but in Application.init I replaced the
 InitializerStringResourceLoader in
 application.getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders() with my own
 MyInitializerStringResourceLoader which resorts the initializers list and
 puts my own initializer in the first position.

 It works.

 Thanks


 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
  You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
  translations and register it in front of the list through the
 IInitializer
  mechanism.
 
  Regards,
  Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a écrit :
 
   Hi all,
  
   I am developing a framework library with wicket components and
 utility
   classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed by
 our
   company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages (e.g.
   wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).
  
   I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties file
  with
   the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
   wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to their
   alphabetic order.
  
   Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If not,
 is
   there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a place
 that
   can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
   WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).
  
   Thanks
   Marios
  
 



Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Marios Skounakis
Martin,

What I meant is that now I have my own
class MyInitializerStringResourceLoader extends
InitializerStringResourceLoader

and its constructor calls

super(sort(initializers));

and sort() puts my own Initializer first in the initializers list. Is this
not safe? It does seem to work (whereas before it wasn't working).


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 The order of the initializers depends on the order of the jars in the
 classpath.
 Depending on the order is not recommended.

 I think Cedric's idea was to roll your own ISRL that knows exactly where is
 your resource bundle and knows how to load it.


 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Not sure if this is what you mean but in Application.init I replaced the
  InitializerStringResourceLoader in
  application.getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders() with my own
  MyInitializerStringResourceLoader which resorts the initializers list and
  puts my own initializer in the first position.
 
  It works.
 
  Thanks
 
 
  On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Hi,
   You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
   translations and register it in front of the list through the
  IInitializer
   mechanism.
  
   Regards,
   Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a écrit :
  
Hi all,
   
I am developing a framework library with wicket components and
  utility
classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed by
  our
company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages
 (e.g.
wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).
   
I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties file
   with
the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to their
alphabetic order.
   
Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If not,
  is
there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a place
  that
can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).
   
Thanks
Marios
   
  
 



Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Martin,

 What I meant is that now I have my own
 class MyInitializerStringResourceLoader extends
 InitializerStringResourceLoader


 and its constructor calls

 super(sort(initializers));

 and sort() puts my own Initializer first in the initializers list. Is this
 not safe? It does seem to work (whereas before it wasn't working).


I understood what you said.
I just explained why it didn't work the first time.

Your solution is a custom ISRL. It is a bit inefficient but it is working.
It is inefficient because now your application class uses both
InitializerSRL and MyInitializerSRL, and both of them keep a list of same
initializers.
MyISRL doesn't need the list. It needs to use just the class of your
IInitializer implementation. See the code of InitializerSRL to realize what
you can cut from your MyISRL.



 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
 wrote:

  The order of the initializers depends on the order of the jars in the
  classpath.
  Depending on the order is not recommended.
 
  I think Cedric's idea was to roll your own ISRL that knows exactly where
 is
  your resource bundle and knows how to load it.
 
 
  On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Not sure if this is what you mean but in Application.init I replaced
 the
   InitializerStringResourceLoader in
   application.getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders() with my
 own
   MyInitializerStringResourceLoader which resorts the initializers list
 and
   puts my own initializer in the first position.
  
   It works.
  
   Thanks
  
  
   On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
Hi,
You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
translations and register it in front of the list through the
   IInitializer
mechanism.
   
Regards,
Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a
 écrit :
   
 Hi all,

 I am developing a framework library with wicket components and
   utility
 classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed
 by
   our
 company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages
  (e.g.
 wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).

 I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties
 file
with
 the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
 wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to
 their
 alphabetic order.

 Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If
 not,
   is
 there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a
 place
   that
 can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
 WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).

 Thanks
 Marios

   
  
 



Re: IInitializer order

2013-06-24 Thread Marios Skounakis
I replace the standard InitializerSRL with MYInitializerSRL so there's no
efficiency problem. It seems better to me to replace the standard
InitializerSRL rather than add an extra SRL but that's just me.

Thanks for your answers, everything is more clear now.


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Martin,
 
  What I meant is that now I have my own
  class MyInitializerStringResourceLoader extends
  InitializerStringResourceLoader


  and its constructor calls
 
  super(sort(initializers));
 
  and sort() puts my own Initializer first in the initializers list. Is
 this
  not safe? It does seem to work (whereas before it wasn't working).
 
 
 I understood what you said.
 I just explained why it didn't work the first time.

 Your solution is a custom ISRL. It is a bit inefficient but it is
 working.
 It is inefficient because now your application class uses both
 InitializerSRL and MyInitializerSRL, and both of them keep a list of same
 initializers.
 MyISRL doesn't need the list. It needs to use just the class of your
 IInitializer implementation. See the code of InitializerSRL to realize what
 you can cut from your MyISRL.


 
  On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
   The order of the initializers depends on the order of the jars in the
   classpath.
   Depending on the order is not recommended.
  
   I think Cedric's idea was to roll your own ISRL that knows exactly
 where
  is
   your resource bundle and knows how to load it.
  
  
   On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
Not sure if this is what you mean but in Application.init I replaced
  the
InitializerStringResourceLoader in
application.getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders() with my
  own
MyInitializerStringResourceLoader which resorts the initializers list
  and
puts my own initializer in the first position.
   
It works.
   
Thanks
   
   
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   
 Hi,
 You can write your own IStringResourceLoader providing your set of
 translations and register it in front of the list through the
IInitializer
 mechanism.

 Regards,
 Le 24 juin 2013 07:12, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com a
  écrit :

  Hi all,
 
  I am developing a framework library with wicket components and
utility
  classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps
 developed
  by
our
  company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages
   (e.g.
  wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).
 
  I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties
  file
 with
  the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
  wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to
  their
  alphabetic order.
 
  Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If
  not,
is
  there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a
  place
that
  can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
  WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties
 file).
 
  Thanks
  Marios
 

   
  
 



IInitializer order

2013-06-23 Thread Marios Skounakis
Hi all,

I am developing a framework library with wicket components and utility
classes that is intended to be reused in all wicket apps developed by our
company. I wish to override some of the standard wicket messages (e.g.
wicket-extensions datatable.no-records-found=No Records Found).

I have created an Initializer class and a Initializer.properties file with
the overriden messages. However wicket seems to first load the
wicket-extensions property file and then my own, perhaps due to their
alphabetic order.

Is there a way to specify the order in which Initilizers run? If not, is
there another way to override some of the wicket messages in a place that
can be reused across multiple applications (i.e. not in
WicketApplication.properties or a component/page properties file).

Thanks
Marios