Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
I was trying to achieve the same thing to use one single web page to markup into any format desired. What I did was to store HTML markup scriptlet of popular components in a data source and using metadata on runtime to determine a view (from my current application architecture) On wicket side, I used MarkupResourceStreamProvider and StringResourceStream to construct the markup on runtime. The java components to manipulate these markups are being injected using guice. legolas wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14782785.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Yeah, that approach cleans up a lot enforcing the DRY principle rocks:) Sam Hough wrote: Thanks Nino, Went with your original suggestion but down a layer in our application so got rid of lots of similar code for introspection based CRUD type stuff etc... So can happily just do: horizontalPanel.add(new Button(Click me)); horizontalPanel.add(new HTML(Some text)); horizontalPanel.add(new Button(Another button)); Did wonder about making them smart enough to realise if they were meant to use their own HTML or parent HTML but that seemed like it could get very nasty. Even the brochure type parts of the site are getting more CSS and less HTML heavy so maybe they will move over to this new style. Presumably can optimise out the Panel wrapper if it starts to hurt performance. Just need bookmarking/history and end to page expired and will all be rosy ;) Cheers Sam Johan Compagner wrote: If you want default html for those things use panels. Make for all those components a panel part that has its own markup (so do that once) Then reuse those components everywhere. Not that you gain much in my eyes because you still need to have a span that places the panel at the right place On 1/7/08, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino.Martinez wrote: Using markup inheritance: one super class with a corresponding html and a sub class with corrosponding html, extending the super class to the special need. And maybe a mounted page that redirects to the wanted sub based on parameters. Dear Nino, Can you do this for components that don't extend http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup.html ? So say have an AjaxFallbackButton that you can just add to a Repeater? So can have all the goodness of large swathe of HTML managed by the HTML monkey but still let me, Java monkey, add components (without specific HTML)? I can only see how I would do that by wrapping the Button in a Panel but that seems like a lot of overhead and the object I would be returning would look like a Panel not a Button Re: Why not just use Echo - could be that 80% of app is perfect fit for Wicket but 20% would be nicer if just had default HTML for Button, Link, TextField etc...? Cheers Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14668784.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Thanks Nino, Went with your original suggestion but down a layer in our application so got rid of lots of similar code for introspection based CRUD type stuff etc... So can happily just do: horizontalPanel.add(new Button(Click me)); horizontalPanel.add(new HTML(Some text)); horizontalPanel.add(new Button(Another button)); Did wonder about making them smart enough to realise if they were meant to use their own HTML or parent HTML but that seemed like it could get very nasty. Even the brochure type parts of the site are getting more CSS and less HTML heavy so maybe they will move over to this new style. Presumably can optimise out the Panel wrapper if it starts to hurt performance. Just need bookmarking/history and end to page expired and will all be rosy ;) Cheers Sam Johan Compagner wrote: If you want default html for those things use panels. Make for all those components a panel part that has its own markup (so do that once) Then reuse those components everywhere. Not that you gain much in my eyes because you still need to have a span that places the panel at the right place On 1/7/08, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino.Martinez wrote: Using markup inheritance: one super class with a corresponding html and a sub class with corrosponding html, extending the super class to the special need. And maybe a mounted page that redirects to the wanted sub based on parameters. Dear Nino, Can you do this for components that don't extend http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup.html ? So say have an AjaxFallbackButton that you can just add to a Repeater? So can have all the goodness of large swathe of HTML managed by the HTML monkey but still let me, Java monkey, add components (without specific HTML)? I can only see how I would do that by wrapping the Button in a Panel but that seems like a lot of overhead and the object I would be returning would look like a Panel not a Button Re: Why not just use Echo - could be that 80% of app is perfect fit for Wicket but 20% would be nicer if just had default HTML for Button, Link, TextField etc...? Cheers Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14668784.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14691913.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Hi Martijn First of all I did not want to start a discussion. get rid of markup files, could be interpreted in serveral ways. One could be that he was wondering on having excess html pages, and I just wanted to tell him of panels and markup inheritance. And as I stated I do not know echo 2. I agree if people wants something that fits another framework they should use that. Unless they're ready for a mental change and do it the wicket way:) -Nino Martijn Dashorst wrote: How do you explain this *after* people have pointed him to Panels and stuff? He explicitly states: get rid of markup files, and wants an Echo2 model: I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Don't be afraid to tell people that Wicket is not for everybody. What legolas is asking goes against the very core Wicket has to offer. Wanting to turn wicket into something it is not is wrong for the framework and the result will be horrible. It would be like writing web applications with Wicket trying to emulate struts. What he is asking for is a programming model that fits Echo2 really well. And Wings or even GWT. Martijn On Jan 7, 2008 8:07 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree on what you guys say, but theres also the chance legolas dont know every tip of the framework. And just wanted to know about panels or markup inheritance... People doesnt always know how to ask a question if they arent familiar with the framework. An so sometimes questions just come out awkwardly and offending. -regards Nino Eelco Hillenius wrote: On Jan 4, 2008 7:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. +1! Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Nino.Martinez wrote: Using markup inheritance: one super class with a corresponding html and a sub class with corrosponding html, extending the super class to the special need. And maybe a mounted page that redirects to the wanted sub based on parameters. Dear Nino, Can you do this for components that don't extend http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup.html ? So say have an AjaxFallbackButton that you can just add to a Repeater? So can have all the goodness of large swathe of HTML managed by the HTML monkey but still let me, Java monkey, add components (without specific HTML)? I can only see how I would do that by wrapping the Button in a Panel but that seems like a lot of overhead and the object I would be returning would look like a Panel not a Button Re: Why not just use Echo - could be that 80% of app is perfect fit for Wicket but 20% would be nicer if just had default HTML for Button, Link, TextField etc...? Cheers Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14668784.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
If you want default html for those things use panels. Make for all those components a panel part that has its own markup (so do that once) Then reuse those components everywhere. Not that you gain much in my eyes because you still need to have a span that places the panel at the right place On 1/7/08, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino.Martinez wrote: Using markup inheritance: one super class with a corresponding html and a sub class with corrosponding html, extending the super class to the special need. And maybe a mounted page that redirects to the wanted sub based on parameters. Dear Nino, Can you do this for components that don't extend http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup.html ? So say have an AjaxFallbackButton that you can just add to a Repeater? So can have all the goodness of large swathe of HTML managed by the HTML monkey but still let me, Java monkey, add components (without specific HTML)? I can only see how I would do that by wrapping the Button in a Panel but that seems like a lot of overhead and the object I would be returning would look like a Panel not a Button Re: Why not just use Echo - could be that 80% of app is perfect fit for Wicket but 20% would be nicer if just had default HTML for Button, Link, TextField etc...? Cheers Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14668784.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
+1. If Echo (never used myself) fits use it. You could also use Java servlets to create dynamic HTML from the server. Personally, this is a backward trend and a pain to manage - all HTML modifications made in the servlet, harder for web designers to do their creative stuff etc. The beauty of Wicket is it separates the process from the presentation layer. Just my 2cents Martijn Dashorst wrote: then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. Martijn On Jan 4, 2008 12:32 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Thanks. Nino.Martinez wrote: Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp14399390p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14614650.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14679175.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Am I having déjà vu? Didn't someone already post this? -Original Message- From: Jon Laidler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 3:54 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? +1. If Echo (never used myself) fits use it. You could also use Java servlets to create dynamic HTML from the server. Personally, this is a backward trend and a pain to manage - all HTML modifications made in the servlet, harder for web designers to do their creative stuff etc. The beauty of Wicket is it separates the process from the presentation layer. Just my 2cents Martijn Dashorst wrote: then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. Martijn On Jan 4, 2008 12:32 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Thanks. Nino.Martinez wrote: Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp143993 90p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-p age--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-p age--tp14607438p14614650.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-p age--tp14607438p14679175.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
I agree on what you guys say, but theres also the chance legolas dont know every tip of the framework. And just wanted to know about panels or markup inheritance... People doesnt always know how to ask a question if they arent familiar with the framework. An so sometimes questions just come out awkwardly and offending. -regards Nino Eelco Hillenius wrote: On Jan 4, 2008 7:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. +1! Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14612909.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp14399390p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Thats only possible if you use panels for everything. Or generate als ther html dynamically based on your data On 1/4/08, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14612909.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
But for most common use cases a page will have a .html . You could use several different approaches to archive something like you talk about. But when it comes down to it you will at least have: Using markup inheritance: one super class with a corresponding html and a sub class with corrosponding html, extending the super class to the special need. And maybe a mounted page that redirects to the wanted sub based on parameters. Using panels: one page with corresponding html, consistent of panels where only the appropriate are visible for the specific request. I do not know echo2. Are you wanting for wicket to produce all html? This is not possible afaik. legolas wrote: I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Thanks. Nino.Martinez wrote: Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp14399390p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. Martijn On Jan 4, 2008 12:32 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Thanks. Nino.Martinez wrote: Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp14399390p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14614650.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
I am simple looking to know whether we can get rid of any markup files and just use java files to define and design our pages, something like echo2? Thanks. Nino.Martinez wrote: Hi legolas im not sure how familiar you are with wicket. But i'd go for having the html and just using the approach specified here: http://www.nabble.com/Ways-of-making-components-in-a-page-optional--tp14399390p14399390.html It's possible that I've misunderstood you, do you want to redirect to some old legacy jsp page or? legolas wrote: A web page, but it is completely dynamic and all components will be created based on user request content. Thanks igor.vaynberg wrote: what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14614650.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
On Jan 4, 2008 7:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then just use Echo2. Why make Wicket into Echo2 when you can use that? Wicket has a particular niche and Echo2 has its niche. There is no sense into turning one into the other. +1! Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page?
what would you like it to display? a web page or contents of some file/dynamic content? -igor On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, legolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Is it possible to use wicket without having any html page? Just writing java code and pointing the browser to some url and it goes forward? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-wicket-without-having-any-html-page--tp14607438p14607438.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
