Re: Invisible Page Notification?
log.warn would be annoying to people who are actually setting the visibility to false -igor On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:40 AM, jbrookover jbrooko...@cast.org wrote: Hey all, I just had a long debugging session regarding the difference between these two lines in a WebPage: add(component).setVisible(getUser() != null); // Typo add(component.setVisible(getUser() != null)); The first processes the page and very silently returns a completely empty Response object to the browser. The second is what I meant to do, but the mistake was hard to discover. Per a post in 2006 (http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Nice-stupid-thing-page-setVisible-false-td1898368.html), the decision was made regarding this behavior, but is setting a Page's visibility common enough to do so without warning? Perhaps a log.warn? Thanks! Jake -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Invisible-Page-Notification-tp2247626p2247626.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Invisible Page Notification?
That's why I'm wondering how common it is. Based on that e-mail discussion from 2006, a WicketRuntimeException was on the table, implying that a Page object should never be invisible. I guess a better question would be, what are the reasons for making a page invisible? Jake Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote: log.warn would be annoying to people who are actually setting the visibility to false -igor -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Invisible-Page-Notification-tp2247626p2247742.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Invisible Page Notification?
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM, jbrookover jbrooko...@cast.org wrote: That's why I'm wondering how common it is. Based on that e-mail discussion from 2006, a WicketRuntimeException was on the table, implying that a Page object should never be invisible. I guess a better question would be, what are the reasons for making a page invisible? I've spend a few hours trying to find what was wrong when i accidently set the page invisible aswel, also would be interested to know what a valid use case would be for that - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
