Re: Invoking Component#updateModel
see iformcomponentvalidator, or use component.getconvertedvalue() -igor On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Mauro Ciancio maurocian...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm coding a form validator that validates some condition in a form. This validator needs the value from two textfields, but the model's value isn't set when the validators run. Is a bad practice calling Component#updateModel to get the updated value from the model? I could get the component's value using #getInput but I'd need convert the raw value. Cheers. -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Invoking Component#updateModel
Igor: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: see iformcomponentvalidator, or use component.getconvertedvalue() Thanks for the advice. But my textfield's model is a chained model. I mean, I construct the textfield like this: DateTextField dateTextField = new DateTextField(id, new Date2LocalDateAdapterModel(new propertymodel(...) )); So, if i call getconvertedvalue I would get a Date and not a LocalDate. If I call updateModel the value is propagated through the chained models and i dont need an extra conversion. Is this too ugly? Thanks. -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Invoking Component#updateModel
you are forcing an update without validation..up to you. -igor On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Mauro Ciancio maurocian...@gmail.com wrote: Igor: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: see iformcomponentvalidator, or use component.getconvertedvalue() Thanks for the advice. But my textfield's model is a chained model. I mean, I construct the textfield like this: DateTextField dateTextField = new DateTextField(id, new Date2LocalDateAdapterModel(new propertymodel(...) )); So, if i call getconvertedvalue I would get a Date and not a LocalDate. If I call updateModel the value is propagated through the chained models and i dont need an extra conversion. Is this too ugly? Thanks. -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Invoking Component#updateModel
thanks! On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: you are forcing an update without validation..up to you. -igor On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Mauro Ciancio maurocian...@gmail.com wrote: Igor: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: see iformcomponentvalidator, or use component.getconvertedvalue() Thanks for the advice. But my textfield's model is a chained model. I mean, I construct the textfield like this: DateTextField dateTextField = new DateTextField(id, new Date2LocalDateAdapterModel(new propertymodel(...) )); So, if i call getconvertedvalue I would get a Date and not a LocalDate. If I call updateModel the value is propagated through the chained models and i dont need an extra conversion. Is this too ugly? Thanks. -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Mauro Ciancio maurociancio at gmail dot com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
