Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-09 Thread Eelco Hillenius
  and Java web applications (what is a war, what is a web.xml file).

 Wicket, being component based, has great appeal for people with
 non-web GUI experience only.

You're right about that. I included a link to a primer on Java web
applications in the Wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Index#Index-FrameworkDocumentation).
If you think we should include that link in other places, please
share.

Cheers,

Eelco

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-09 Thread David Leangen

 All the opinions above are my own; not the wicket community,
 not the developers of wicket.  I really, really wish that
 users of open source software would show more respect to
 the developers who put so much time and effort into the
 products that those users use, however.


I second this.

Again, I'd like to express my thanks to all the Wicket devs for such a great
framework, and all the great help and patience they consistently show on
this list.


Cheers to you all!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Robo
Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in WAR layout. 
If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app border is extending 
WAR layout border.

Robo


- Originálna Správa -
Od: \Igor Vaynberg\  
Komu:  
Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:36 
Predmet: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
 what you all seem to not be able to comprehend is that applications DO NOT
 come in a WAR layout. the war file is packaged together by combining
 different things from different places, and this is what the build tools are
 for (whether it be ant or maven).
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 08 Sep 2007 22:33:06 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
 
  Jesus. Time spended at this endless talk read and write could be spent in
  writing one simple Demo app. Simple demo app reqest is very legitimate. And
  my vote is for demo app without Ant, Maven also. Demo App just based
  supposed basic knowledge of Servlet technologies, or just be familiar with
  WAR directory layout. Wicket is realy very simple so it would be good if
  this simplicity would be underscored also by demo app. Maven has its good
  points and also weak ones. But generaly it is used mostly on company levels
  and not on the levles of individial newbies. Most of them just know hov to
  write servlet, JSP and so on. and this I think major part of framework
  newbies needs to understand strength of wicket. Maven ads some virtual
  complication to the proces that not many newbies know maven and when seen
  first time they can be scared of it. So they can back off. IMHO one needs to
  firstly understand basic concepts, based just on very simple premises like
  beeign familiar with WAR and t
  hen this concept could be widened by using maven and point out some
  benefits of it. Maven + Wicket for firstimers can be simple too much and can
  leed to presumption that Wicket must be used with Maven. IMHO
  More didactic way maybe should be.
  1. Needed prereq of WAR file layout
  2. setup Wicket demo app on this knowledge.
  3. Descrivbe what is behind curtain of wicket app on one simple wicket
  tag decorator.
  4. describe how to enhance using Maven.
  Wicket is framework which is fast learnable and I beleave when getting the
  point you can write application within just one hour. More didactic aproach
  to demo could lead to greater adoption
 
  As soon as I finish my work of testing some frameworks, this could be
  within two weeks I can write some demo app with simple explanation taking
  more didactic aproach :-) just let me know to whom I can send it, and the
  format of the wiki.
 
  Confrontation at this thread is just useless ...
 
  Robo
 
  - Originálna Správa -
  Od: chickabee
  Komu:
  Poslaná: 08.09.2007 15:06
  Predmet: Re: First Day Disgust!
 
  
   Thanks for providing me the primer on web applications and Ant and for
  not
   trying to understand what point I am trying to make here.
  
   Yes, we are not dealing with nuclear science here and Yes again wicket
  is
   just another web application, Did someone disagree with that. I hope
  not.
  
   Once you are out in the market to try the new webapps then it always
  makes
   sense to have people be able to get up and running on the basics w/o
  efforts
   and not to have to deal with tricks necessary to get basic app to work.
  
   A common expectation is a simple standalone app without
   Maven/Spring/Hibernate etc unnecessary stuff. Run \\\'ant\\\' on the 
   command
  line
   and here u have the war file, now,  make a few changes to experiment and
   then run \\\'ant\\\' again to have modified war. Simple.
  
   Obviously the current example is for the comfort of wicket creators and
  not
   for the comfort of prospective users and that is the problem here.
  
   Any one with basic common sense will get this up and running after a
  day\\\'s
   tinkering around,  but that can be avoided by adding simple things here
  in
   the examples, that is the point I am trying to sell here only if there
  are
   buyers out there with open mind.
  
  
   
  
   Al Maw wrote:
   
chickabee wrote:
Thanks for the great idea.
   
Note that this is displayed fairly prominently on the web site at
http://wicket.apache.org under \\\QuickStart\\\.
   
It believe it will be good to put a few of the  examples application
  in
their own folders and war files so that they can be studied
  independently
without the clutter of 20 projects.
   
We used to have this, however, grouping all the examples into one
project has several big advantages:
   
  - Getting all the examples running in your IDE is much easier.
  - We don\\\'t have ten extra projects to manage the build files for.
  - We can easily link to all the examples from a single page.
   
Another thing I notice is that maven is  the default build tool used
  for
wicket, I guess it will be good to provide the ant build.xml, just in
case
someone does

Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Eelco Hillenius
 As soon as I finish my work of testing some frameworks, this could be within 
 two weeks I can write some demo app with simple explanation taking more 
 didactic aproach :-) just let me know to whom I can send it, and the format 
 of the wiki.

Put it on the WIKI or e.g. blog about it please. I'm interested to see
what you come up with.

Do note however, that we presume basic knowledge of Java programming
and Java web applications (what is a war, what is a web.xml file).
There are thousands of articles and books on that, and there is no
point for us to write yet another explanation on it.

Anyway, thanks upfront for your contribution.

Eelco

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i would if that made any sense...

-igor


On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in WAR
 layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app border is
 extending WAR layout border.

 Robo


 - Originálna Správa -
 Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
 Komu:
 Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:36
 Predmet: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
  what you all seem to not be able to comprehend is that applications DO
 NOT
  come in a WAR layout. the war file is packaged together by combining
  different things from different places, and this is what the build tools
 are
  for (whether it be ant or maven).
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 08 Sep 2007 22:33:06 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
  
   Jesus. Time spended at this endless talk read and write could be spent
 in
   writing one simple Demo app. Simple demo app reqest is very
 legitimate. And
   my vote is for demo app without Ant, Maven also. Demo App just based
   supposed basic knowledge of Servlet technologies, or just be familiar
 with
   WAR directory layout. Wicket is realy very simple so it would be good
 if
   this simplicity would be underscored also by demo app. Maven has its
 good
   points and also weak ones. But generaly it is used mostly on company
 levels
   and not on the levles of individial newbies. Most of them just know
 hov to
   write servlet, JSP and so on. and this I think major part of framework
   newbies needs to understand strength of wicket. Maven ads some virtual
   complication to the proces that not many newbies know maven and when
 seen
   first time they can be scared of it. So they can back off. IMHO one
 needs to
   firstly understand basic concepts, based just on very simple premises
 like
   beeign familiar with WAR and t
   hen this concept could be widened by using maven and point out some
   benefits of it. Maven + Wicket for firstimers can be simple too much
 and can
   leed to presumption that Wicket must be used with Maven. IMHO
   More didactic way maybe should be.
   1. Needed prereq of WAR file layout
   2. setup Wicket demo app on this knowledge.
   3. Descrivbe what is behind curtain of wicket app on one simple
 wicket
   tag decorator.
   4. describe how to enhance using Maven.
   Wicket is framework which is fast learnable and I beleave when getting
 the
   point you can write application within just one hour. More didactic
 aproach
   to demo could lead to greater adoption
  
   As soon as I finish my work of testing some frameworks, this could be
   within two weeks I can write some demo app with simple explanation
 taking
   more didactic aproach :-) just let me know to whom I can send it, and
 the
   format of the wiki.
  
   Confrontation at this thread is just useless ...
  
   Robo
  
   - Originálna Správa -
   Od: chickabee
   Komu:
   Poslaná: 08.09.2007 15:06
   Predmet: Re: First Day Disgust!
  
   
Thanks for providing me the primer on web applications and Ant and
 for
   not
trying to understand what point I am trying to make here.
   
Yes, we are not dealing with nuclear science here and Yes again
 wicket
   is
just another web application, Did someone disagree with that. I hope
   not.
   
Once you are out in the market to try the new webapps then it always
   makes
sense to have people be able to get up and running on the basics w/o
   efforts
and not to have to deal with tricks necessary to get basic app to
 work.
   
A common expectation is a simple standalone app without
Maven/Spring/Hibernate etc unnecessary stuff. Run \\\'ant\\\' on the
 command
   line
and here u have the war file, now,  make a few changes to experiment
 and
then run \\\'ant\\\' again to have modified war. Simple.
   
Obviously the current example is for the comfort of wicket creators
 and
   not
for the comfort of prospective users and that is the problem here.
   
Any one with basic common sense will get this up and running after a
   day\\\'s
tinkering around,  but that can be avoided by adding simple things
 here
   in
the examples, that is the point I am trying to sell here only if
 there
   are
buyers out there with open mind.
   
   

   
Al Maw wrote:

 chickabee wrote:
 Thanks for the great idea.

 Note that this is displayed fairly prominently on the web site at
 http://wicket.apache.org under \\\QuickStart\\\.

 It believe it will be good to put a few of the  examples
 application
   in
 their own folders and war files so that they can be studied
   independently
 without the clutter of 20 projects.

 We used to have this, however, grouping all the examples into one
 project has several big advantages:

   - Getting all the examples running in your IDE is much easier.
   - We don\\\'t have ten extra projects to manage the build files
 for.
   - We

Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/20/flowchart-is-it-fcke.html

^ somehow seems appropriate to this thread

-igor


On 9/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i would if that made any sense...

 -igor


 On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in WAR
  layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app border is
  extending WAR layout border.
 
  Robo
 
 
  - Originálna Správa -
  Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
  Komu:
  Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:36
  Predmet: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!
 
  
   what you all seem to not be able to comprehend is that applications DO
  NOT
   come in a WAR layout. the war file is packaged together by combining
   different things from different places, and this is what the build
  tools are
   for (whether it be ant or maven).
  
   -igor
  
  
   On 08 Sep 2007 22:33:06 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
   
Jesus. Time spended at this endless talk read and write could be
  spent in
writing one simple Demo app. Simple demo app reqest is very
  legitimate. And
my vote is for demo app without Ant, Maven also. Demo App just based
supposed basic knowledge of Servlet technologies, or just be
  familiar with
WAR directory layout. Wicket is realy very simple so it would be
  good if
this simplicity would be underscored also by demo app. Maven has its
  good
points and also weak ones. But generaly it is used mostly on company
  levels
and not on the levles of individial newbies. Most of them just know
  hov to
write servlet, JSP and so on. and this I think major part of
  framework
newbies needs to understand strength of wicket. Maven ads some
  virtual
complication to the proces that not many newbies know maven and when
  seen
first time they can be scared of it. So they can back off. IMHO one
  needs to
firstly understand basic concepts, based just on very simple
  premises like
beeign familiar with WAR and t
hen this concept could be widened by using maven and point out some
benefits of it. Maven + Wicket for firstimers can be simple too much
  and can
leed to presumption that Wicket must be used with Maven. IMHO
More didactic way maybe should be.
1. Needed prereq of WAR file layout
2. setup Wicket demo app on this knowledge.
3. Descrivbe what is behind curtain of wicket app on one simple
  wicket
tag decorator.
4. describe how to enhance using Maven.
Wicket is framework which is fast learnable and I beleave when
  getting the
point you can write application within just one hour. More didactic
  aproach
to demo could lead to greater adoption
   
As soon as I finish my work of testing some frameworks, this could
  be
within two weeks I can write some demo app with simple explanation
  taking
more didactic aproach :-) just let me know to whom I can send it,
  and the
format of the wiki.
   
Confrontation at this thread is just useless ...
   
Robo
   
- Originálna Správa -
Od: chickabee
Komu:
Poslaná: 08.09.2007 15:06
Predmet: Re: First Day Disgust!
   

 Thanks for providing me the primer on web applications and Ant and
  for
not
 trying to understand what point I am trying to make here.

 Yes, we are not dealing with nuclear science here and Yes again
  wicket
is
 just another web application, Did someone disagree with that. I
  hope
not.

 Once you are out in the market to try the new webapps then it
  always
makes
 sense to have people be able to get up and running on the basics
  w/o
efforts
 and not to have to deal with tricks necessary to get basic app to
  work.

 A common expectation is a simple standalone app without
 Maven/Spring/Hibernate etc unnecessary stuff. Run \\\'ant\\\' on
  the command
line
 and here u have the war file, now,  make a few changes to
  experiment and
 then run \\\'ant\\\' again to have modified war. Simple.

 Obviously the current example is for the comfort of wicket
  creators and
not
 for the comfort of prospective users and that is the problem here.
 

 Any one with basic common sense will get this up and running after
  a
day\\\'s
 tinkering around,  but that can be avoided by adding simple things
  here
in
 the examples, that is the point I am trying to sell here only if
  there
are
 buyers out there with open mind.


 

 Al Maw wrote:
 
  chickabee wrote:
  Thanks for the great idea.
 
  Note that this is displayed fairly prominently on the web site
  at
  http://wicket.apache.org under \\\QuickStart\\\.
 
  It believe it will be good to put a few of the  examples
  application
in
  their own folders and war files so that they can be studied

Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Robo
It will Igor, just go on ... 

Robo

- Originálna Správa -
Od: \Igor Vaynberg\  
Komu:  
Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:46 
Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
 i would if that made any sense...
 
 -igor
 
 
 On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
 
  Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in WAR
  layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app border is
  extending WAR layout border.
 
  Robo



__
http://www.tahaj.sk - Stiahnite si najnovsie verzie vasich oblubenych programov



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Robo
May be a little bit of respect and honesty to wicket newcomers, and also 
understand why there are their needs and be abowe the matter , would help you 
... Yet another useless atack ... teacher ...


- Originálna Správa -
Od: \Igor Vaynberg\  
Komu:  
Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:49 
Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
 http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/20/flowchart-is-it-fcke.html
 
 ^ somehow seems appropriate to this thread
 
 -igor
 
 



__




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Ayodeji Aladejebi
also, demos come in many fashions,
the starter demo for an eclipse user differs from a netbeans user and
differs from a maven user or notepad/vi/command line user

various demos to serve various build or IDE enviroment. it may not be
helpful when a maven only developer is trying to show a NB only developer
how to write a demo in wicket or otherwise.

IMO links to various build envrioments should be made open and am sure
sample demo projects are all over the place

On 08 Sep 2007 23:00:32 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It will Igor, just go on ...

 Robo

 - Originálna Správa -
 Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
 Komu:
 Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:46
 Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
  i would if that made any sense...
 
  -igor
 
 
  On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
  
   Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in
 WAR
   layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app
 border is
   extending WAR layout border.
  
   Robo



 __
 http://www.tahaj.sk - Stiahnite si najnovsie verzie vasich oblubenych
 programov



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
well thats the thing about maven. it generates setups for different ides. so

cd wicket
mvn eclipse:eclipse - builds eclipse config
mvn idea:idea - builds idea config
mvn netbeans:netbeans - builds netbeans config

after you do that all thats left is to import the created project into the
ide.

-igor


On 9/8/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 also, demos come in many fashions,
 the starter demo for an eclipse user differs from a netbeans user and
 differs from a maven user or notepad/vi/command line user

 various demos to serve various build or IDE enviroment. it may not be
 helpful when a maven only developer is trying to show a NB only developer
 how to write a demo in wicket or otherwise.

 IMO links to various build envrioments should be made open and am sure
 sample demo projects are all over the place

 On 08 Sep 2007 23:00:32 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It will Igor, just go on ...
 
  Robo
 
  - Originálna Správa -
  Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
  Komu:
  Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:46
  Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!
 
  
   i would if that made any sense...
  
   -igor
  
  
   On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:
   
Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in
  WAR
layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app
  border is
extending WAR layout border.
   
Robo
 
 
 
  __
  http://www.tahaj.sk - Stiahnite si najnovsie verzie vasich oblubenych
  programov
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Francis De Brabandere
if you use netbeans 6 you can just open the maven project without even
running that  netbeans:netbeans command

On 9/9/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 well thats the thing about maven. it generates setups for different ides. so

 cd wicket
 mvn eclipse:eclipse - builds eclipse config
 mvn idea:idea - builds idea config
 mvn netbeans:netbeans - builds netbeans config

 after you do that all thats left is to import the created project into the
 ide.

 -igor


 On 9/8/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  also, demos come in many fashions,
  the starter demo for an eclipse user differs from a netbeans user and
  differs from a maven user or notepad/vi/command line user
 
  various demos to serve various build or IDE enviroment. it may not be
  helpful when a maven only developer is trying to show a NB only developer
  how to write a demo in wicket or otherwise.
 
  IMO links to various build envrioments should be made open and am sure
  sample demo projects are all over the place
 
  On 08 Sep 2007 23:00:32 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   It will Igor, just go on ...
  
   Robo
  
   - Originálna Správa -
   Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
   Komu:
   Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:46
   Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!
  
   
i would if that made any sense...
   
-igor
   
   
On 08 Sep 2007 22:52:05 +0200 (CEST), Robo  wrote:

 Sorry Igor. I pack wicket app, simple wicket demo app, very well in
   WAR
 layout. If I`m not right please point me to point where wicket app
   border is
 extending WAR layout border.

 Robo
  
  
  
   __
   http://www.tahaj.sk - Stiahnite si najnovsie verzie vasich oblubenych
   programov
  
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 



-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i was raised on the principle that respect has to be earned, so far you have
only done the opposite. a big part of earning respect is shut up or put
up, look into it.

as far as honesty, i dont think i have been dishonest with you yet.

as far as me attacking you, i think you should grow some thicker skin if you
think you are under attack.

anyways, i think for a while everything from your address will go into my
bitbucket, because at this point i see you as nothing but a drain.

good day,

-igor

On 08 Sep 2007 23:07:35 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 May be a little bit of respect and honesty to wicket newcomers, and also
 understand why there are their needs and be abowe the matter , would help
 you ... Yet another useless atack ... teacher ...


 - Originálna Správa -
 Od: \Igor Vaynberg\
 Komu:
 Poslaná: 08.09.2007 23:49
 Predmet: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

 
  http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/20/flowchart-is-it-fcke.html
 
  ^ somehow seems appropriate to this thread
 
  -igor
 
 



 __




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Re: Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Philip A. Chapman
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 23:07 +0200, Robo wrote:
 May be a little bit of respect and honesty to wicket newcomers, and also 
 understand why there are their needs and be abowe the matter , would help you 
 ... Yet another useless atack ... teacher ...
 

I am not one of the core developers, but have been a member of the
wicket community for a long time.  I've seen newcomers come and go.
First, I'd like to say that this particular newcomer showed very little
respect for the developers.  The newcomer did not consider the fact that
just perhaps the developers knew a tiny bit about what they where doing
and that they standardized on maven and the examples layout for a
reason.  He either did not take the time to read the documentation on
the website, or completely misunderstood it.

If he did not take the time, then he seems to think that his time is so
much more important than theirs that they should code everything up so
that it is possible for him to understand how to set up an application
in the way that he expects.  It doesn't matter much that others
understand what we have just fine.  It doesn't fit for him, thus it must
be broken.

If he tried, but did not understand, then why didn't he ask questions
about the parts that he didn't understand?  Instead, he blasts a lot of
criticism over the fence towards the developers that have done a *great*
deal of work on a very fine framework.  Apparently, people such as he
think that the developers' time and effort is limitless and is there to
satisfy his own needs.

I submit that rather than attacking wicket and the methods of it's
developers out of hand, a few well-placed questions surrounding the
things that are really giving him trouble would serve him well.  Sadly,
we can't dump all the knowledge of wicket into someone's head.  Any
developer wanting to use any framework must invest time into learning
how to use it.  Wicket is really, really, easy compared to many other
frameworks, and IMHO, worth the time and effort.  But some effort is
required.

All the opinions above are my own; not the wicket community, not the
developers of wicket.  I really, really wish that users of open source
software would show more respect to the developers who put so much time
and effort into the products that those users use, however.

-- 
Philip A. Chapman
 
Desktop and Web Application Development:
Java, .NET, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL
Linux, Windows 2000, Windows XP



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Re: First Day Disgust!

2007-09-08 Thread Gabor Szokoli
With all due respect:

On 9/8/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do note however, that we presume basic knowledge of Java programming

...fair enough...

 and Java web applications (what is a war, what is a web.xml file).

Wicket, being component based, has great appeal for people with
non-web GUI experience only.
It does not make it your job to introduce them to this technology of course.


Gabor

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]