Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan, I just posted [1]. Let's see if someone answers... and is willing to fix the issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1- http://forum.jquery.com/topic/drag-and-drop-problems-after-ajax-refresh-on-ie On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: Hi Ernesto, yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that stops the re-registration of the behavior. The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem. So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again. Good luck! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AW: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Ernesto, thank you for doing it. I was to busy during the last few days. Best, Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 15:53 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, I just posted [1]. Let's see if someone answers... and is willing to fix the issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1- http://forum.jquery.com/topic/drag-and-drop-problems-after-ajax-refresh-on-ie On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: Hi Ernesto, yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that stops the re-registration of the behavior. The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem. So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again. Good luck! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Bernard,
Thanks for your comments. I'm not 100% sure this is the same as 4996 but one
thing is clear: after an AJAX update of the page Droppables stop to work. On
the other hand it seems Stefan was able to fix this patching jquery for
issue 4996 so it must be the same issue. Somehow it is clear o me that the
problem is that they are holding references to object that do not exists and
this is producing exception on IE. Patching jquery myself do not seem to be
an option, not in the long run, because then I''l have to take car of
testing this local fix on future versions of jquery. So, probably I'll file
a new issue and attach what I have to reproduce it (a small Wicket test
application).
Thanks again,
Ernesto
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:46 AM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
Ernesto,
Possibly not enough. I would create a testcase as a web page with no
reference to Wicket as a start.
It is good to avoid any technical distraction because any distraction
causes friction and loss of energy.
You can of course mention that you are a Wicket developer, and give
some context to support your case, even mentioning that this is being
discussed in this group.
If you are 100% sure that your scenario is the same as in 4996, then I
would attach the testcase to that ticket. Otherwise I would open a new
one, without any reference to the old one.
If you are sure about the previous code snippet being not much
different from your attached testcase, then why not mention it,
pointing out that you are just trying to be helpful. You can then ask
what else they need to avoid any further delays.
In case it is the same issue then I would subscribe to the jQuery dev
mailing list (not user mailing list) and notify them that you are
trying to re-start the issue ...
Technically, the issue surprises me from this perspective:
jQuery is fault tolerant in a way that if you run a query that returns
an empty jQuery object and call methods on that empty object, then the
query does not fail. In this case however it fails. I would try to
emphasize this point if possible, concluding that this is in conflict
with jQuery's own apparent design principles.
Regards,
Bernard
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:24:39 +0100, you wrote:
Do you think would it be enough if I provide a wicket quick-start and
instructions on how to get it running and so on? It would be very easy to
create one reproducing the issue on a DD scenario. Or create a new
issues
and link it to the 4996?
Ernesto
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:54 PM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
I don't know, in the header I read: Needs: Test Case
The bug still has status new, neither confirmed nor assigned.
I am referring to http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
What am I missing? They might need a complete standalone page,
preferably zipped that loads jquery.js from the web and displays an
error message. You might get some progress if you do that. At least
you put the ball back into their court. I did this more than once but
it did not help. Nevertheless at least I know what to expect.
The outcome could be that a bug needs to be filed against IE. But most
importantly the bug needs to be fixed in jQuery because jQuery is
crosss-platform and jQuery's existence is based on eliminating these
quirks.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:44:22 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Bernard,
there is a testcase in the attachments:
$(document.createElement('div')).offset();
It's a real simple testcase.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: b...@actrix.gen.nz [mailto:b...@actrix.gen.nz]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 20:23
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue.
Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was
supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has
been done.
But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code
is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then
the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX
apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please
refer to
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during
a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element.
Regards
Bernard
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to
the
ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to
calculate
it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an
exception
that stops the re-registration of the behavior.
The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus
are
open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
So I put together some hints and proposals
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Ernesto, yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that stops the re-registration of the behavior. The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem. So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again. Good luck! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan, Thanks very much for the info! I'll check out your fix. I has tested it and this only happens with droppables (only draggables is not an issue). I had experienced similar issues with other DD libraries and IE: before I was using YUI and I had some issues with AJAX replacements and DD But I could get around it generating unique IDs for every AJAX replacement. This trick didn't work for jquery. Thanks again, Best, Ernesto On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: Hi Ernesto, yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that stops the re-registration of the behavior. The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem. So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again. Good luck! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue. Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem. I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has been done. But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please refer to http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element. Regards Bernard On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote: Hi Ernesto, yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that stops the re-registration of the behavior. The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem. So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again. Good luck! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0 Hi Stefan, My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery? Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your project, and still find this issue. Best, Ernesto References, 1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Bernard,
there is a testcase in the attachments:
$(document.createElement('div')).offset();
It's a real simple testcase.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: b...@actrix.gen.nz [mailto:b...@actrix.gen.nz]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 20:23
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue.
Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was
supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has
been done.
But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code
is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then
the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX
apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please
refer to
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during
a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element.
Regards
Bernard
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the
ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate
it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception that
stops the re-registration of the behavior.
The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are open
in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you need
the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again.
Good luck!
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan,
My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery?
Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your
project, and still find this issue.
Best,
Ernesto
References,
1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff
Changes:
- jQuery update to Version 1.4.2
- jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2
- drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or
in LazyLoad panels
- drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js
code generation
- Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects
- Effects now support a chain of multiple effects
Known Issues
- Example application not very attractive
- Example applicatioin contains some debugging code
Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
I don't know, in the header I read: Needs: Test Case
The bug still has status new, neither confirmed nor assigned.
I am referring to http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
What am I missing? They might need a complete standalone page,
preferably zipped that loads jquery.js from the web and displays an
error message. You might get some progress if you do that. At least
you put the ball back into their court. I did this more than once but
it did not help. Nevertheless at least I know what to expect.
The outcome could be that a bug needs to be filed against IE. But most
importantly the bug needs to be fixed in jQuery because jQuery is
crosss-platform and jQuery's existence is based on eliminating these
quirks.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:44:22 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Bernard,
there is a testcase in the attachments:
$(document.createElement('div')).offset();
It's a real simple testcase.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: b...@actrix.gen.nz [mailto:b...@actrix.gen.nz]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 20:23
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue.
Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was
supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has
been done.
But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code
is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then
the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX
apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please
refer to
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during
a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element.
Regards
Bernard
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the
ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate
it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception
that stops the re-registration of the behavior.
The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are
open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you
need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me again.
Good luck!
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan,
My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to jquery?
Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your
project, and still find this issue.
Best,
Ernesto
References,
1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff
Changes:
- jQuery update to Version 1.4.2
- jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2
- drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or
in LazyLoad panels
- drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js
code generation
- Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects
- Effects now support a chain of multiple effects
Known Issues
- Example application not very attractive
- Example applicatioin contains some debugging code
Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Do you think would it be enough if I provide a wicket quick-start and
instructions on how to get it running and so on? It would be very easy to
create one reproducing the issue on a DD scenario. Or create a new issues
and link it to the 4996?
Ernesto
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:54 PM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
I don't know, in the header I read: Needs: Test Case
The bug still has status new, neither confirmed nor assigned.
I am referring to http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
What am I missing? They might need a complete standalone page,
preferably zipped that loads jquery.js from the web and displays an
error message. You might get some progress if you do that. At least
you put the ball back into their court. I did this more than once but
it did not help. Nevertheless at least I know what to expect.
The outcome could be that a bug needs to be filed against IE. But most
importantly the bug needs to be fixed in jQuery because jQuery is
crosss-platform and jQuery's existence is based on eliminating these
quirks.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:44:22 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Bernard,
there is a testcase in the attachments:
$(document.createElement('div')).offset();
It's a real simple testcase.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: b...@actrix.gen.nz [mailto:b...@actrix.gen.nz]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 20:23
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue.
Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was
supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has
been done.
But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code
is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then
the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX
apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please
refer to
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during
a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element.
Regards
Bernard
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the
ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate
it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception
that stops the re-registration of the behavior.
The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are
open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you
need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me
again.
Good luck!
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan,
My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to
jquery?
Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your
project, and still find this issue.
Best,
Ernesto
References,
1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de
wrote:
I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff
Changes:
- jQuery update to Version 1.4.2
- jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2
- drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update
or
in LazyLoad panels
- drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js
code generation
- Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects
- Effects now support a chain of multiple effects
Known Issues
- Example application not very attractive
- Example applicatioin contains some debugging code
Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Ernesto,
Possibly not enough. I would create a testcase as a web page with no
reference to Wicket as a start.
It is good to avoid any technical distraction because any distraction
causes friction and loss of energy.
You can of course mention that you are a Wicket developer, and give
some context to support your case, even mentioning that this is being
discussed in this group.
If you are 100% sure that your scenario is the same as in 4996, then I
would attach the testcase to that ticket. Otherwise I would open a new
one, without any reference to the old one.
If you are sure about the previous code snippet being not much
different from your attached testcase, then why not mention it,
pointing out that you are just trying to be helpful. You can then ask
what else they need to avoid any further delays.
In case it is the same issue then I would subscribe to the jQuery dev
mailing list (not user mailing list) and notify them that you are
trying to re-start the issue ...
Technically, the issue surprises me from this perspective:
jQuery is fault tolerant in a way that if you run a query that returns
an empty jQuery object and call methods on that empty object, then the
query does not fail. In this case however it fails. I would try to
emphasize this point if possible, concluding that this is in conflict
with jQuery's own apparent design principles.
Regards,
Bernard
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:24:39 +0100, you wrote:
Do you think would it be enough if I provide a wicket quick-start and
instructions on how to get it running and so on? It would be very easy to
create one reproducing the issue on a DD scenario. Or create a new issues
and link it to the 4996?
Ernesto
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:54 PM, b...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
I don't know, in the header I read: Needs: Test Case
The bug still has status new, neither confirmed nor assigned.
I am referring to http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
What am I missing? They might need a complete standalone page,
preferably zipped that loads jquery.js from the web and displays an
error message. You might get some progress if you do that. At least
you put the ball back into their court. I did this more than once but
it did not help. Nevertheless at least I know what to expect.
The outcome could be that a bug needs to be filed against IE. But most
importantly the bug needs to be fixed in jQuery because jQuery is
crosss-platform and jQuery's existence is based on eliminating these
quirks.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:44:22 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Bernard,
there is a testcase in the attachments:
$(document.createElement('div')).offset();
It's a real simple testcase.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: b...@actrix.gen.nz [mailto:b...@actrix.gen.nz]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 20:23
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks for the link to the issue.
Re: I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
I think the jQuery developer asks for a testcase. No testcase was
supplied, so I am not surprised that even after 7 months, nothing has
been done.
But when there is a testcase, and when even the offending line of code
is identified in jQuery and it is clear that it is a jQuery bug then
the author of jQuery likes to close issues with status WONTFIX
apparently with the purpose to hide them from the community. Please
refer to
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5743 where jQuery updates the DOM during
a call that is supposed to only get the dimensions of an element.
Regards
Bernard
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:17:54 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
yes, I added a patch to jquery1.4.2.js. The DD problem is relatet to the
ticket you cited (4996). After a DOM replacement IE is unable to calculate
it's bounding rect in the way jQuery does and IE then throws an exception
that stops the re-registration of the behavior.
The problem seems to be present since jQuery 1.3 and many related bus are
open in jQuery's trac. I don't know why they don't fix the problem.
So I put together some hints and proposals and modified jQuery.js. If you
need the patch try to check it out from wickststuff trunk or contect me
again.
Good luck!
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro [mailto:reier...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. März 2010 19:07
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan,
My I ask what was your solution to the DD problem? Added a patch to
jquery?
Was this related to [1] and using jquery 1.4.2, independently of your
project, and still find this issue.
Best,
Ernesto
References,
1-http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4996
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de
wrote:
I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff
Changes:
- jQuery update to Version 1.4.2
- jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2
- drag/drop/resize improvements
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Thanks!
DD works on IE without crashing IE's JS engine.
The approach, to pass component to
someEffect.fire(target,component...)
is more simpler/cheaper than adding behavior to
a component and invoking bahavior's method to apply effect.
Regarding effects, to preserve my approach
(I was forked jwicket 0.4 ...) I had to use
(by example) something like:
public class FadeEffect extends AbstractJqueryUiEffect {
public FadeEffect() {
super(new JQueryJavascriptResourceReference(
SlideEffect.class, jquery.effects.fade-1.8.min.js));
}
public void fadeOut(final AjaxRequestTarget target,
final int speedMs, final Component component) {
target.appendJavascript(jQuery('# + component.getMarkupId()
+ ').fadeOut( + String.valueOf(speedMs) + ););
}
public void fadeIn(final AjaxRequestTarget target,
final int speedMs, final Component component) {
target.appendJavascript(jQuery('# + component.getMarkupId()
+ ').fadeIn( + String.valueOf(speedMs) + ););
}
@Override
void appendOptions(StringBuilder jsString) {
// required by abstract super
}
@Override
String getEffectName() {
// required by abstract super
return fade;
}
}
All in all,
thanks once again.
Stefan
--- On Fri, 2/26/10, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote:
From: Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de
Subject: jWicket release 0.5.0
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 3:57 PM
I have committed jWicket version
0.5.0 to wicketstuff
Changes:
- jQuery update to Version 1.4.2
- jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2
- drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after
AJAX update or
in LazyLoad panels
- drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML,
smaller js
code generation
- Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects
- Effects now support a chain of multiple effects
Known Issues
- Example application not very attractive
- Example applicatioin contains some debugging code
Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jWicket release 0.5.0
Hi Stefan, I'm a bit lost in the wicketstuff maven repository - when I browse I only see 1.4.1 and 1.4.2-SNAPSHOT. Any idea when this version will be in the maven repo? But for now it would be great if you could send me the pre-build jar. Thanks! Antoine On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Lindner lind...@visionet.de wrote: I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- take your photos everywhere you go - https://www.memolio.com follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Memolio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
jWicket release 0.5.0
I have committed jWicket version 0.5.0 to wicketstuff Changes: - jQuery update to Version 1.4.2 - jQuery UI update to 1.8RC2 - drag/drop/resize improvements to work in IE 6/7/8 after AJAX update or in LazyLoad panels - drag/drop/resize improvements for less footprint in HTML, smaller js code generation - Effects rewritten completely, now covering all effects - Effects now support a chain of multiple effects Known Issues - Example application not very attractive - Example applicatioin contains some debugging code Let me know if someone needs prebuild jar files. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
