[xwiki-users] Need programming rights on MyXwiki.org
Hi All, I need to empty recycle bin (both pages and attchments) but I'm not authorized to do so. Page: http://tutos.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs?view=deletedAttachments Returns: This document requires programming rights and needs to be saved by an administrator of this Wiki Thanks for your help I'm not in a hurry :-). Best regards ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Need programming rights on MyXwiki.org
Should be ok now. On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Ldm Publicwrote: > Hi All, > > I need to empty recycle bin (both pages and attchments) but I'm not > authorized to do so. > > Page: > http://tutos.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs?view=deletedAttachments > > Returns: > This document requires programming rights and needs to be saved by an > administrator of this Wiki > > Thanks for your help I'm not in a hurry :-). > > Best regards > ___ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Thomas Mortagne ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] saveandcontinue space in xwiki 7.2?
Hi, after fresh new installation of xwiki 7.2, I noticed that there's new space called 'saveandcontinue'. It can be found on the dashboard/welcome page. It is also shown in My Recent Modifications panel and in Activity stream, after modification of xwiki preferences and mail settings. This is probably some bug. It seems to me that this is something internal which should not be shown and should not be treated as my modification. The shown pages inside saveandcontinue space are just empty pages. What's wrong? ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] saveandcontinue space in xwiki 7.2?
Hi, after a fresh new installation of xwiki 7.2, I noticed that there's new space called 'saveandcontinue'. It can be found on the dashboard/welcome page in pages tree. It is also shown in My Recent Modifications panel and in Activity stream, after modification of xwiki preferences and mail settings. This is probably some bug. It seems to me that this is something internal which should not be shown and should not be treated as my modification. The shown pages inside saveandcontinue space are just empty pages. What’s wrong? Mirec ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Defining a macro for the confluence syntax
Hello Vincent, > What failed? Reading the content. > I was just saying that our Confluence parser should support macros. I’ve just > tried writing a page in Confluence syntax using an existing XWiki macro and > it worked: > > {html}hello{html} I can't explain why this one works but I presume there's a switch internally to it that automatically converts the html macro into a closing html macro (and indeed, it's nonsense to nest html). > This worked too: > > {documentTree} > This worked too (showing we can pass one parameter): > {documentTree:checkboxes=true} Yes, parameters reading (single and multiple) worked fine (but they need escaping). I tried a tick more formally to see if I could make a macro with content and failed. Here's how. Page: {testmacro} this is the content {testmacro} Macro: (Tools.TestMacro, object XWiki.WikiMacroClass) id: testmacro inline: no (I tried yes too, with inlined macro in the page) visibility: global macro content type: optional macro code: testMacroStart{{velocity}}$!xcontext.macro.content{{/velocity}}testMacroEnd The resulting page gives: testMacroStarttestMacroEnd this is the content testMacroStarttestMacroEnd I tried to adjust the content type to mandatory but this bragged... having no content! If macro content was thinkable, then there should be somewhere in the grammar a different mark for start and end macro or? I don't see the latter. Since, according to https://developer.atlassian.com/confdev/tutorials/macro-tutorials-for-confluence/creating-a-new-confluence-macro, "there are three available body types for macros: PLAIN_TEXT, RICH_TEXT, and NONE. ", I suppose the only solution is to make the scanner read the macro content type and fork differently if mandatory (and optional?) or no content type. Maybe these two levels are a bit far from each other... Paul ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users