Re: [USRP-users] UHD installation, image download fails, unhandled exception

2020-01-22 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Thank you Marcus, I was able to fix it by changing my network, as you
suggested.

Regards,
Saeid

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:44 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> On 01/22/2020 03:37 PM, Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> During the installation of UHD, I get an unhandled exception when
> downloading images. The resulting output is shown below. Any advice or help
> would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you
> Saeid
>
>
>
>
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Suggested packages:
>   gnuradio
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   libuhd-dev libuhd003 uhd-host
> 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 238 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/10.6 MB of archives.
> After this operation, 51.3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Selecting previously unselected package libuhd-dev.
> (Reading database ... 195896 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../libuhd-dev_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking libuhd-dev (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package libuhd003:amd64.
> Preparing to unpack .../libuhd003_3.13.0.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking libuhd003:amd64 (3.13.0.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Replaced by files in installed package libuhd3.14.1:amd64
> (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Selecting previously unselected package uhd-host.
> Preparing to unpack .../uhd-host_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking uhd-host (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Setting up libuhd-dev (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Setting up uhd-host (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> net.core.rmem_max = 5000
> net.core.wmem_max = 1048576
> Setting up libuhd003:amd64 (3.13.0.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1) ...
> Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.27-3ubuntu1) ...
> Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.3-2ubuntu0.1) ...
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> uhd-host is already the newest version (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~bionic1).
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 238 not upgraded.
> [INFO] Images destination: /usr/share/uhd/images
> [INFO] No inventory file found at /usr/share/uhd/images/inventory.json.
> Creating an empty one.
> 6 kB / 6 kB (100%) usrp1_b100_fw_default-g6bea23d.zip
> 19756 kB / 19756 kB (100%) x3xx_x310_fpga_default-gbb85bdff.zip
> 02757 kB / 02757 kB (100%) usrp2_n210_fpga_default-g6bea23d.zip
> 02131 kB / 02131 kB (100%) n230_n230_fpga_default-gbb85bdff.zip
> 00522 kB / 00522 kB (100%) usrp1_b100_fpga_default-g6bea23d.zip
> [ERROR] Downloader raised an unhandled exception: HTTPConnectionPool(host='
> files.ettus.com', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url:
> /binaries/cache//b2xx/fpga-bb85bdff/b2xx_b200_fpga_default-gbb85bdff.zip
> (Caused by NewConnectionError(' 0x7f66b46ec890>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 110]
> Connection timed out',))
> You can run this again with the '--verbose' flag to see more information
> If the problem persists, please email the output to: supp...@ettus.com
> build have failed
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing 
> listUSRP-users@lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
> This looks like a network issue--it cannot connect to files.ettus.com
>
> Said issue must be local to you, since I just tried this and it's working
> fine--so the Ettus server is working properly, you have a local
>   networking issue.
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] Libuhd issues - "uhd_find_devices: error while loading shared libraries"

2019-12-09 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Thank you for your advice Fabian!

It seems there is no package called libuhd, just the following versions:
libuhd003 libuhd3.14.0  libuhd-dev

So I did:

$ sudo dpkg -P libuhd3.14.0
(Reading database ... 291299 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libuhd3.14.0:amd64 (3.14.0.0-0ubuntu1~trusty1) ...
Purging configuration files for libuhd3.14.0:amd64
(3.14.0.0-0ubuntu1~trusty1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-0ubuntu6.15) ...
$ sudo apt-get install libuhd3.14.1

And now UHD tools work, also within the LTE software, but they won't find
my B210 saying:

[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400;
UHD_3.14.1.1-release
Error: LookupError: KeyError: No devices found for ->
Empty Device Address

Regards,
Saeid




On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:58 AM Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> You have an old version of libuhd already installed. Uninstall it using:
> $ sudo dpkg -P libuhd
> Then retry installing it. Sometimes libraries are not found and you have
> to run
> $ sudo ldconfig
> but that is usually done by dpkg.
>
> Am 06.12.2019 um 00:31 schrieb Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have an Intel NUC running Ubuntu 16.04 and a low latency kernel which
> > I use for OAI LTE software on top of UHD.
> >
> > After updating my system repositories, UHD broke somehow with the
> > following result:
> >
> > nuc8-3@nuc83-NUC8i7BEH:~$ uhd_find_devices
> > uhd_find_devices: error while loading shared libraries:
> > libuhd.so.3.14.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
> >
> > Attempting to manually install the version cited in the error gives me
> this:
> >
> > Unpacking libuhd3.14.1:amd64 (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1) ...
> > dpkg: error processing archive
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libuhd3.14.1_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1_amd64.deb
> > (--unpack):
> >   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/uhd/rfnoc/blocks/keep_one_in_n.xml',
> > which is also in package libuhd3.14.0:amd64 3.14.0.0-0ubuntu1~trusty1
> > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/libuhd3.14.1_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1_amd64.deb
> > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> >
> >
> > Would anyone have any recommendations on what to do to make sure I have
> > the right version of everything present?
> >
> >
> > ___
> > USRP-users mailing list
> > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
> >
>
> --
> --
> M.-Sc. Fabian Schwartau
> Technische Universität Braunschweig
> Institut für Hochfrequenztechnik
> Schleinitzstr. 22
> 38106 Braunschweig
> Germany
>
> Tel.:   +49-(0)531-391-2017
> Fax:+49-(0)531-391-2045
> Email:  fabian.schwar...@ihf.tu-bs.de
> WWW:http://www.tu-braunschweig.de/ihf
> --
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


[USRP-users] Libuhd issues - "uhd_find_devices: error while loading shared libraries"

2019-12-05 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hello everyone,

I have an Intel NUC running Ubuntu 16.04 and a low latency kernel which I
use for OAI LTE software on top of UHD.

After updating my system repositories, UHD broke somehow with the following
result:

nuc8-3@nuc83-NUC8i7BEH:~$ uhd_find_devices
uhd_find_devices: error while loading shared libraries: libuhd.so.3.14.1:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Attempting to manually install the version cited in the error gives me this:

Unpacking libuhd3.14.1:amd64 (3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libuhd3.14.1_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/uhd/rfnoc/blocks/keep_one_in_n.xml', which
is also in package libuhd3.14.0:amd64 3.14.0.0-0ubuntu1~trusty1
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libuhd3.14.1_3.14.1.1-0ubuntu1~trusty1_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Would anyone have any recommendations on what to do to make sure I have the
right version of everything present?
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-30 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Okay, now I'm seeing this:

nuc03@nuc03:~$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 44, in 
from gnuradio import eng_notation
ImportError: No module named gnuradio


On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:31 PM Ettus Research Support 
wrote:

> It now looks like you need to install "python-qt4" to get around this
> issue. Same basic method as "python-six", whatever that was that you did
> successfully. - MLD
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:37 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
>> Yes, I did those steps as well to install gnuradio from source.
>> Installed the binary for python-sip, now I'm getting another error:
>>
>> nuc03@nuc03:~/gnuradio/build$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 43, in 
>> from PyQt4 import Qt
>> ImportError: No module named PyQt4
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:19 PM Ettus Research Support <
>> supp...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Saeid - Not sure what's going on with your GR install ... did you do
>>> "sudo make install" after doing "make"? Did you do "sudo ldconfig" after
>>> installing?
>>>
>>> It looks like you need to install "python-sip" to get around this latest
>>> issue. Same basic method as "python-six", whatever that was that you did
>>> successfully. - MLD
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:19 PM Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users <
>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, so installing python-six fixed that, and I was able to install
>>>> 3.7.13.5 from source.
>>>> The sample apps like uhd_fft are not in the path like they used to be
>>>> with binary installation. And trying it from the apps folder gives me:
>>>>
>>>> nuc03@nuc03:/usr/local/bin$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>   File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 39, in 
>>>> import sip
>>>> ImportError: No module named sip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:26 AM Michael Dickens <
>>>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes sorry about the GR37 release version: 3.7.13.5 is the correct on.
>>>>> Installing Py27-six should be pretty straight forward & should allow you 
>>>>> to
>>>>> proceed with that install. GR38 has it's own set of dependencies, some of
>>>>> which overlap with GR37 and some of which don't. You'll want to follow the
>>>>> install guide for your OS to get those dependencies. Good luck! - MLD
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:02 PM Saeid Hashemi 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The gnuradio git repository does not have a tag for v3.17.14.5, and
>>>>>> using v3.7.13.5 gives me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library
>>>>>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library -
>>>>>> not found
>>>>>> CMake Error at volk/CMakeLists.txt:98 (message):
>>>>>>   six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library required to build VOLK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>>>>>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
>>>>>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checking out tag v3.8.0.0 results in Cmake dependency of 3.8 and up,
>>>>>> so I need to install that manually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:02 AM Michael Dickens <
>>>>>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK. Thanks for the info Saeid. I'll look into creating a VM using
>>>>>>> Ubuntu 16.04.1 to see what happens. - MLD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM Saeid Hashemi 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's Ubuntu 16.04.1, bu

Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-24 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Yes, I did those steps as well to install gnuradio from source.
Installed the binary for python-sip, now I'm getting another error:

nuc03@nuc03:~/gnuradio/build$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 43, in 
from PyQt4 import Qt
ImportError: No module named PyQt4


On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:19 PM Ettus Research Support 
wrote:

> Hi Saeid - Not sure what's going on with your GR install ... did you do
> "sudo make install" after doing "make"? Did you do "sudo ldconfig" after
> installing?
>
> It looks like you need to install "python-sip" to get around this latest
> issue. Same basic method as "python-six", whatever that was that you did
> successfully. - MLD
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:19 PM Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> Okay, so installing python-six fixed that, and I was able to install
>> 3.7.13.5 from source.
>> The sample apps like uhd_fft are not in the path like they used to be
>> with binary installation. And trying it from the apps folder gives me:
>>
>> nuc03@nuc03:/usr/local/bin$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 39, in 
>> import sip
>> ImportError: No module named sip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:26 AM Michael Dickens <
>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes sorry about the GR37 release version: 3.7.13.5 is the correct on.
>>> Installing Py27-six should be pretty straight forward & should allow you to
>>> proceed with that install. GR38 has it's own set of dependencies, some of
>>> which overlap with GR37 and some of which don't. You'll want to follow the
>>> install guide for your OS to get those dependencies. Good luck! - MLD
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:02 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> The gnuradio git repository does not have a tag for v3.17.14.5, and
>>>> using v3.7.13.5 gives me:
>>>>
>>>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library
>>>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library - not
>>>> found
>>>> CMake Error at volk/CMakeLists.txt:98 (message):
>>>>   six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library required to build VOLK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>>>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
>>>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking out tag v3.8.0.0 results in Cmake dependency of 3.8 and up, so
>>>> I need to install that manually.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:02 AM Michael Dickens <
>>>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK. Thanks for the info Saeid. I'll look into creating a VM using
>>>>> Ubuntu 16.04.1 to see what happens. - MLD
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM Saeid Hashemi 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's Ubuntu 16.04.1, but yes, I will follow the source build
>>>>>> instructions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:11 PM Michael Dickens <
>>>>>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Saeid - Thanks for the followup. I totally agree that if you just
>>>>>>> "sudo apt install gnuradio", compatible versions should be installed. 
>>>>>>> Are
>>>>>>> you using Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)? If you choose to install 
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> source, you can follow instructions such as the GR recommended way here 
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/UbuntuInstall#Xenial_Xerus_.2816.04.29
>>>>>>> >. I have an Ubuntu 18.04 install that went very smoothly using this 
>>>>>>> >guide,
>>>>>>> but maybe the guide is outdated for older Ubuntu; or, our packages need 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be updated for that OS version ... Cheers! - MLD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Saeid Hashemi 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will follow your advice, but it's worth mentioning I simply did
>>>>>>>> apt-get gnuradio and should therefore have a compatible version of uhd
>>>>>>>> installed automatically as a dependency. I did not install uhd 
>>>>>>>> separately.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Michael Dickens
>>>>>>> Ettus Research Technical Support
>>>>>>> Email: supp...@ettus.com
>>>>>>> Web: https://ettus.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Dickens
>>>>> Ettus Research Technical Support
>>>>> Email: supp...@ettus.com
>>>>> Web: https://ettus.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Dickens
>>> Ettus Research Technical Support
>>> Email: supp...@ettus.com
>>> Web: https://ettus.com/
>>>
>> ___
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-18 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Okay, so installing python-six fixed that, and I was able to install
3.7.13.5 from source.
The sample apps like uhd_fft are not in the path like they used to be with
binary installation. And trying it from the apps folder gives me:

nuc03@nuc03:/usr/local/bin$ /home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/gr-uhd/apps/uhd_fft", line 39, in 
import sip
ImportError: No module named sip


On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:26 AM Michael Dickens 
wrote:

> Yes sorry about the GR37 release version: 3.7.13.5 is the correct on.
> Installing Py27-six should be pretty straight forward & should allow you to
> proceed with that install. GR38 has it's own set of dependencies, some of
> which overlap with GR37 and some of which don't. You'll want to follow the
> install guide for your OS to get those dependencies. Good luck! - MLD
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:02 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> The gnuradio git repository does not have a tag for v3.17.14.5, and using
>> v3.7.13.5 gives me:
>>
>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library
>> -- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library - not
>> found
>> CMake Error at volk/CMakeLists.txt:98 (message):
>>   six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library required to build VOLK
>>
>>
>> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
>> See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
>>
>>
>> Checking out tag v3.8.0.0 results in Cmake dependency of 3.8 and up, so I
>> need to install that manually.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:02 AM Michael Dickens <
>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> OK. Thanks for the info Saeid. I'll look into creating a VM using Ubuntu
>>> 16.04.1 to see what happens. - MLD
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>>
 It's Ubuntu 16.04.1, but yes, I will follow the source build
 instructions.

 On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:11 PM Michael Dickens <
 michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:

> Hi Saeid - Thanks for the followup. I totally agree that if you just
> "sudo apt install gnuradio", compatible versions should be installed. Are
> you using Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)? If you choose to install from
> source, you can follow instructions such as the GR recommended way here <
> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/UbuntuInstall#Xenial_Xerus_.2816.04.29
> >. I have an Ubuntu 18.04 install that went very smoothly using this 
> >guide,
> but maybe the guide is outdated for older Ubuntu; or, our packages need to
> be updated for that OS version ... Cheers! - MLD
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Saeid Hashemi 
> wrote:
>
>> I will follow your advice, but it's worth mentioning I simply did
>> apt-get gnuradio and should therefore have a compatible version of uhd
>> installed automatically as a dependency. I did not install uhd 
>> separately.
>>
> --
> Michael Dickens
> Ettus Research Technical Support
> Email: supp...@ettus.com
> Web: https://ettus.com/
>

>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Dickens
>>> Ettus Research Technical Support
>>> Email: supp...@ettus.com
>>> Web: https://ettus.com/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Michael Dickens
> Ettus Research Technical Support
> Email: supp...@ettus.com
> Web: https://ettus.com/
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-16 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hi Michael,

The gnuradio git repository does not have a tag for v3.17.14.5, and using
v3.7.13.5 gives me:

-- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library
-- Python checking for six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library - not
found
CMake Error at volk/CMakeLists.txt:98 (message):
  six - python 2 and 3 compatibility library required to build VOLK


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/home/nuc03/gnuradio/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".


Checking out tag v3.8.0.0 results in Cmake dependency of 3.8 and up, so I
need to install that manually.


On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:02 AM Michael Dickens 
wrote:

> OK. Thanks for the info Saeid. I'll look into creating a VM using Ubuntu
> 16.04.1 to see what happens. - MLD
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
>> It's Ubuntu 16.04.1, but yes, I will follow the source build instructions.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:11 PM Michael Dickens <
>> michael.dick...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Saeid - Thanks for the followup. I totally agree that if you just
>>> "sudo apt install gnuradio", compatible versions should be installed. Are
>>> you using Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)? If you choose to install from
>>> source, you can follow instructions such as the GR recommended way here <
>>> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/UbuntuInstall#Xenial_Xerus_.2816.04.29
>>> >. I have an Ubuntu 18.04 install that went very smoothly using this guide,
>>> but maybe the guide is outdated for older Ubuntu; or, our packages need to
>>> be updated for that OS version ... Cheers! - MLD
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>>
 I will follow your advice, but it's worth mentioning I simply did
 apt-get gnuradio and should therefore have a compatible version of uhd
 installed automatically as a dependency. I did not install uhd separately.

>>> --
>>> Michael Dickens
>>> Ettus Research Technical Support
>>> Email: supp...@ettus.com
>>> Web: https://ettus.com/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Michael Dickens
> Ettus Research Technical Support
> Email: supp...@ettus.com
> Web: https://ettus.com/
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-11 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
It's Ubuntu 16.04.1, but yes, I will follow the source build instructions.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:11 PM Michael Dickens 
wrote:

> Hi Saeid - Thanks for the followup. I totally agree that if you just "sudo
> apt install gnuradio", compatible versions should be installed. Are you
> using Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)? If you choose to install from
> source, you can follow instructions such as the GR recommended way here <
> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/UbuntuInstall#Xenial_Xerus_.2816.04.29
> >. I have an Ubuntu 18.04 install that went very smoothly using this guide,
> but maybe the guide is outdated for older Ubuntu; or, our packages need to
> be updated for that OS version ... Cheers! - MLD
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
>> I will follow your advice, but it's worth mentioning I simply did apt-get
>> gnuradio and should therefore have a compatible version of uhd installed
>> automatically as a dependency. I did not install uhd separately.
>>
> --
> Michael Dickens
> Ettus Research Technical Support
> Email: supp...@ettus.com
> Web: https://ettus.com/
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-11 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
I will follow your advice, but it's worth mentioning I simply did apt-get
gnuradio and should therefore have a compatible version of uhd installed
automatically as a dependency. I did not install uhd separately.


On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:27 AM Michael Dickens 
wrote:

> Hi Saeid - The error shows that the version of UHD as installed isn't
> fully compatible with the version of GR. GR 3.7.9.1 is quite old  ...
> unless you need that specific version of GR, I'd recommend uninstalling
> that GR and installing 3.7.14.5 from source. There are install guides
> around for doing this build on Ubuntu of various versions. Hope this is
> useful! - MLD
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:40 PM Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I've been having some problems running the uhd_fft function recently. I
>> did a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04, then installed gnuradio using the
>> package manager. When I run uhd_fft this is what I get. Would anyone have
>> an idea as to where the problem is?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Saeid
>>
>> nuc03@nuc03:~$ apt-show-versions gnuradio
>> gnuradio:amd64/xenial 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1 uptodate
>>
>>
>> nuc03@nuc03:~$ uhd_fft
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/bin/uhd_fft", line 48, in 
>> from gnuradio import uhd
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/__init__.py", line
>> 135, in 
>> _prepare_uhd_swig()
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/__init__.py", line
>> 38, in _prepare_uhd_swig
>> import uhd_swig
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/uhd_swig.py", line
>> 28, in 
>> _uhd_swig = swig_import_helper()
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/uhd_swig.py", line
>> 24, in swig_import_helper
>> _mod = imp.load_module('_uhd_swig', fp, pathname, description)
>> ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/_
>> uhd_swig.x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol:
>> _ZN3uhd11time_spec_t15get_system_timeEv
>>
>> ___
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Dickens
> Ettus Research Technical Support
> Email: supp...@ettus.com
> Web: https://ettus.com/
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


[USRP-users] uhd_fft failure

2019-10-10 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hello everyone,

I've been having some problems running the uhd_fft function recently. I did
a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04, then installed gnuradio using the package
manager. When I run uhd_fft this is what I get. Would anyone have an idea
as to where the problem is?

Thanks,
Saeid

nuc03@nuc03:~$ apt-show-versions gnuradio
gnuradio:amd64/xenial 3.7.9.1-2ubuntu1 uptodate


nuc03@nuc03:~$ uhd_fft
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/uhd_fft", line 48, in 
from gnuradio import uhd
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/__init__.py", line
135, in 
_prepare_uhd_swig()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/__init__.py", line
38, in _prepare_uhd_swig
import uhd_swig
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/uhd_swig.py", line
28, in 
_uhd_swig = swig_import_helper()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/uhd_swig.py", line
24, in swig_import_helper
_mod = imp.load_module('_uhd_swig', fp, pathname, description)
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/uhd/_
uhd_swig.x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol:
_ZN3uhd11time_spec_t15get_system_timeEv
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] UHD install from source with Pybombs failed

2019-08-02 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Following the build from source instructions also gives me the exact same
errors:



:~/uhd/host/build$ cmake ../
> --
> -- Configuring the Python interpreter...
> -- Manually determining build Python version...
> -- Python interpreter: /usr/bin/python3 Version: 3.4.3
> -- Override with: -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=
> -- Manually determining runtime Python version...
> -- Python runtime interpreter: /usr/bin/python3 Version: 3.4.3
> -- Override with: -DRUNTIME_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=
> -- Finding Python Libraries...
> -- Could not find Python Libraries.
> -- Operating on master branch.
> -- Using UHD Images Directory: /usr/local/share/uhd/images
> -- Build type not specified: defaulting to release.
> --
> -- Configuring Boost C++ Libraries...
> -- Looking for optional Boost components...
> -- Could NOT find Boost
> -- Looking for required Boost components...

-- Could NOT find Boost
> -- Boost include directories: /usr/include
> -- Boost library directories: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> -- Boost libraries:
> --
> -- Python checking for Python version 2.7 or greater
> -- Python checking for Python version 2.7 or greater - found
> --
> -- Python checking for Mako templates 0.4.2 or greater
> -- Python checking for Mako templates 0.4.2 or greater - found
> --
> -- Python checking for requests 2.0 or greater
> -- Python checking for requests 2.0 or greater - found
> --
> -- Python checking for numpy 1.7 or greater
> -- Python checking for numpy 1.7 or greater - "import numpy" failed
> --
> -- Configuring LibUHD support...
> --   Dependency Boost_FOUND = 0
> --   Dependency HAVE_PYTHON_PLAT_MIN_VERSION = TRUE
> --   Dependency HAVE_PYTHON_MODULE_MAKO = TRUE
> CMake Error at cmake/Modules/UHDComponent.cmake:59 (message):
>   Dependencies for required component LibUHD not met.
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
>   CMakeLists.txt:392 (LIBUHD_REGISTER_COMPONENT)
>
> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
> See also "/home/saeid/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
> See also "/home/saeid/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:03 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:

> Thanks for your suggestion, I did that and it says numpy is already the
> latest version, 1.8.2.
> Specifically, printing it out on the terminal gives me:
>
> $ python
> Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 13 2018, 12:45:42)
> [GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> import numpy
> >>> numpy.version.version
> '1.8.2'
>
>
> Is there some reason Pybombs can't see it? Should I just revert to
> installing from source?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Saeid
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:24 PM Robin Coxe  wrote:
>
>> It looks like UHD didn't build because it's missing the Python library
>> numpy.   You can try "pip install numpy" and rerunning PyBombs, but to be
>> honest you might have better luck starting over and installing from source
>> by following these instructions--
>>
>> https://kb.ettus.com/Building_and_Installing_the_USRP_Open-Source_Toolchain_(UHD_and_GNU_Radio)_on_Linux
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:28 PM Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users <
>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Attempting to install boost libraries shows that they are already the
>>> latest version:
>>>
>>> libboost-dev is already the newest version.
>>> libboost-all-dev is already the newest version.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:26 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I've attempted to install UHD using Pybombs, following up on a previous
>>>> issue I had due to my first binary install, but this is failing.
>>>>
>>>> $ pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R gnuradio-default
>>>>
>>>> Results in:
>>>>
>>>> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>>>> See also
>>>> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
>>>> See also
>>>> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
>>>> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Configuration failed after running at
>>>> least twice.
>>>> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Problem occurred while building
>>>> package uhd:
>>>> Configuration failed
>>>> PyBOMBS.install_manager - ERROR - Error installing package uhd.
>>>> Aborting.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the

Re: [USRP-users] UHD install from source with Pybombs failed

2019-08-02 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Thanks for your suggestion, I did that and it says numpy is already the
latest version, 1.8.2.
Specifically, printing it out on the terminal gives me:

$ python
Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 13 2018, 12:45:42)
[GCC 4.8.4] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import numpy
>>> numpy.version.version
'1.8.2'


Is there some reason Pybombs can't see it? Should I just revert to
installing from source?


Thanks,
Saeid

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:24 PM Robin Coxe  wrote:

> It looks like UHD didn't build because it's missing the Python library
> numpy.   You can try "pip install numpy" and rerunning PyBombs, but to be
> honest you might have better luck starting over and installing from source
> by following these instructions--
>
> https://kb.ettus.com/Building_and_Installing_the_USRP_Open-Source_Toolchain_(UHD_and_GNU_Radio)_on_Linux
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:28 PM Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> Attempting to install boost libraries shows that they are already the
>> latest version:
>>
>> libboost-dev is already the newest version.
>> libboost-all-dev is already the newest version.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:26 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I've attempted to install UHD using Pybombs, following up on a previous
>>> issue I had due to my first binary install, but this is failing.
>>>
>>> $ pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R gnuradio-default
>>>
>>> Results in:
>>>
>>> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>>> See also
>>> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
>>> See also
>>> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
>>> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Configuration failed after running at
>>> least twice.
>>> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Problem occurred while building
>>> package uhd:
>>> Configuration failed
>>> PyBOMBS.install_manager - ERROR - Error installing package uhd. Aborting.
>>>
>>> I have attached the full results, and it seems that it's not finding the
>>> boost library, however I'm not entirely sure.
>>>
>>> ___
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] UHD install from source with Pybombs failed

2019-07-26 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Attempting to install boost libraries shows that they are already the
latest version:

libboost-dev is already the newest version.
libboost-all-dev is already the newest version.

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:26 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I've attempted to install UHD using Pybombs, following up on a previous
> issue I had due to my first binary install, but this is failing.
>
> $ pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R gnuradio-default
>
> Results in:
>
> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
> See also
> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
> See also
> "/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Configuration failed after running at
> least twice.
> PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Problem occurred while building package
> uhd:
> Configuration failed
> PyBOMBS.install_manager - ERROR - Error installing package uhd. Aborting.
>
> I have attached the full results, and it seems that it's not finding the
> boost library, however I'm not entirely sure.
>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


[USRP-users] UHD install from source with Pybombs failed

2019-07-26 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hello everyone,

I've attempted to install UHD using Pybombs, following up on a previous
issue I had due to my first binary install, but this is failing.

$ pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R gnuradio-default

Results in:

-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also
"/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also
"/home/saeid/prefix/default/src/uhd/host/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Configuration failed after running at
least twice.
PyBOMBS.Packager.source - ERROR - Problem occurred while building package
uhd:
Configuration failed
PyBOMBS.install_manager - ERROR - Error installing package uhd. Aborting.

I have attached the full results, and it seems that it's not finding the
boost library, however I'm not entirely sure.
saeid@nuc03:~$ pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R 
gnuradio-default

pybombs prefix init -a default prefix/default/ -R gnuradio-default
PyBOMBS.ConfigManager - INFO - Prefix Python version is: 2.7.6
PyBOMBS - INFO - PyBOMBS Version 2.3.3
PyBOMBS.prefix - WARNING - There already is a prefix in 
`/home/saeid/prefix/default'.
Continue using this path Y/[N]? y
PyBOMBS.ConfigManager - INFO - Prefix Python version is: 2.7.6
Alias `default' already exists, overwrite Y/[N]? y
PyBOMBS.ConfigManager - INFO - Creating new config file 
/home/saeid/prefix/default/.pybombs/config.yml
PyBOMBS.ConfigManager - INFO - Prefix Python version is: 2.7.6
PyBOMBS.prefix - INFO - Installing default packages for prefix...
PyBOMBS.prefix - INFO - 
  - gnuradio
PyBOMBS.install_manager - INFO - Phase 1: Creating install tree and installing 
binary packages:
[sudo] password for saeid: 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  gtk2-engines-xfce hddtemp libdbusmenu-gtk4 libgsoap4 libgtksourceview2.0-0
  libgtksourceview2.0-common libtagc0 libunique-1.0-0 libxfce4ui-utils
  libxfcegui4-4 linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  linux-signed-image-generic-lts-xenial mousepad orage ristretto
  tango-icon-theme thunar thunar-archive-plugin thunar-media-tags-plugin
  thunar-volman xfburn xfce4-appfinder xfce4-artwork xfce4-battery-plugin
  xfce4-clipman xfce4-clipman-plugin xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
  xfce4-cpugraph-plugin xfce4-datetime-plugin xfce4-dict xfce4-diskperf-plugin
  xfce4-fsguard-plugin xfce4-genmon-plugin xfce4-mailwatch-plugin xfce4-mixer
  xfce4-mount-plugin xfce4-netload-plugin xfce4-notes xfce4-notes-plugin
  xfce4-panel xfce4-places-plugin xfce4-quicklauncher-plugin
  xfce4-screenshooter xfce4-sensors-plugin xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin
  xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-taskmanager xfce4-timer-plugin
  xfce4-verve-plugin xfce4-wavelan-plugin xfce4-weather-plugin
  xfce4-xkb-plugin
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libzmq3
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libzmq3 libzmq3-dev
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded.
Need to get 383 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,700 kB of additional disk space will be used.
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libzmq3 libzmq3-dev
E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes
PyBOMBS.PackageManager - ERROR - Something went wrong while trying to install 
zeromq using apt: Process returned value: 100
Install tree:
|
\- gnuradio
   |
   +- uhd
   |
   +- apache-thrift
   |
   \- zeromq
PyBOMBS.install_manager - INFO - Phase 2: Recursively installing source 
packages to prefix:
PyBOMBS.install_manager - INFO - Installing package: zeromq
PyBOMBS.Fetcher.wget - ERROR - Download using requests failed: hostname 
'ia800401.us.archive.org' doesn't match either of '*.archive.org', 'archive.org'
PyBOMBS.Fetcher.wget - WARNING - Attempting to download using wget...
--2019-07-26 13:52:33--  http://download.zeromq.org/zeromq-3.2.4.tar.gz
Resolving download.zeromq.org (download.zeromq.org)... 54.194.235.52, 
54.72.108.52, 52.17.181.235, ...
Connecting to download.zeromq.org (download.zeromq.org)|54.194.235.52|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
Location: https://archive.org/download/zeromq_3.2.4/zeromq-3.2.4.tar.gz 
[following]
--2019-07-26 13:52:34--  
https://archive.org/download/zeromq_3.2.4/zeromq-3.2.4.tar.gz
Resolving archive.org (archive.org)... 207.241.224.2
Connecting to archive.org (archive.org)|207.241.224.2|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: 
https://ia800401.us.archive.org/0/items/zeromq_3.2.4/zeromq-3.2.4.tar.gz 
[following]
--2019-07-26 13:52:34--  
https://ia800401.us.archive.org/0/items/zeromq_3.2.4/zeromq-3.2.4.tar.gz
Resolving ia800401.us.archive.org (ia800401.us.archive.org)... 207.241.230.41
Connecting to ia800401.us.archive.org 
(ia800401.us.archive.org)|207.241.230.41|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, 

Re: [USRP-users] Command uhd_fft throwing seg fault (core dumped)

2019-07-17 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Can I modify it to link against the current version?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:18 PM Marcus D Leech 
wrote:

> Yes so it’s very likely a compatibility issue.
>
> Your GNURadio install would have installed uhd_fft and likely linked
> against a different UHD version
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 16, 2019, at 4:30 PM, Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
> I appreciate your reply,
>
> I did some digging, and it seems I only have this instance of UHD
> installed. How would I troubleshoot this?
> Would the best solution be to simply reinstall?
>
> My setup is that I installed Open Air Interface, and UHD has been
> installed automatically by that.
> The other commands work, such as uhd_usrp_probe, as well as Open Air
> Interface's radio software, softmodem UE and eNB.
>
> Regards,
> Saeid
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:47 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/09/2019 04:41 PM, Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users wrote:
>>
>> To include context, the uhd_config_info command shows the following:
>>
>> linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400; UHD_003.010.002.000-release
>>
>> And uname -a:
>>
>> Linux nuc03 3.19.0-61-lowlatency #69~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 9
>> 10:15:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> The command line output from uhd_fft only shows the following:
>>
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>>
>> My guess is that your uhd_fft was linked against a different version of
>> the UHD library than you currently have on your system.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:10 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Running the command "uhd_fft" has been giving this result for me, would
>>> anyone have a recommendation on how to fix the issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Saeid
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> USRP-users mailing 
>> listUSRP-users@lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] Command uhd_fft throwing seg fault (core dumped)

2019-07-16 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hi Marcus,
I appreciate your reply,

I did some digging, and it seems I only have this instance of UHD
installed. How would I troubleshoot this?
Would the best solution be to simply reinstall?

My setup is that I installed Open Air Interface, and UHD has been installed
automatically by that.
The other commands work, such as uhd_usrp_probe, as well as Open Air
Interface's radio software, softmodem UE and eNB.

Regards,
Saeid

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:47 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> On 07/09/2019 04:41 PM, Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users wrote:
>
> To include context, the uhd_config_info command shows the following:
>
> linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400; UHD_003.010.002.000-release
>
> And uname -a:
>
> Linux nuc03 3.19.0-61-lowlatency #69~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 9
> 10:15:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> The command line output from uhd_fft only shows the following:
>
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
>
> My guess is that your uhd_fft was linked against a different version of
> the UHD library than you currently have on your system.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:10 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Running the command "uhd_fft" has been giving this result for me, would
>> anyone have a recommendation on how to fix the issue?
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Saeid
>>
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing 
> listUSRP-users@lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] Command uhd_fft throwing seg fault (core dumped)

2019-07-09 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
To include context, the uhd_config_info command shows the following:

linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400; UHD_003.010.002.000-release

And uname -a:

Linux nuc03 3.19.0-61-lowlatency #69~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 9
10:15:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

The command line output from uhd_fft only shows the following:

Segmentation fault (core dumped)



On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:10 PM Saeid Hashemi  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Running the command "uhd_fft" has been giving this result for me, would
> anyone have a recommendation on how to fix the issue?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Saeid
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


[USRP-users] Command uhd_fft throwing seg fault (core dumped)

2019-07-09 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hi all,

Running the command "uhd_fft" has been giving this result for me, would
anyone have a recommendation on how to fix the issue?

Thanks and regards,
Saeid
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


[USRP-users] UHD from source on Linux - Setup the library path

2018-08-08 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Hello all,

Upon installing UHD from source, the instructions mention to "Make sure
that libuhd.so is in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH".

How can I verify this? The env command does not display LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Regards,
Saeid
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


Re: [USRP-users] N200 dropping samples in Vbox

2018-05-17 Thread Saeid Hashemi via USRP-users
Scott,
Are you getting that throughput between the VM and host machine? Or between
the VM and external network?



On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:27 AM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> On 05/17/2018 09:35 AM, Scott H via USRP-users wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am currently trying to figure out why my N200 will only support data
> rates of 5 Msps inside a VM.
> System Details:
> Host: Ubuntu 16.04
>
> Guest: Centos7
> Processors: 8
> RAM: 16 GB
> Network: Bridged Adapter, virtio
>
> I have used iperf3 to test and verify my network speeds.  Speeds going
> into and out of the VM are both ~900 Mbps.  I have also tested the N200 on
> the host machine, and can achieve 20 Msps without any drops (not sure why I
> can't hit 25 Msps, but that is a different issue).  To test the USRP speeds
> I am using the built in UHD benchmark_rate example.
>
> benchmark_rate --rx_rate XXe6 --args "num_recv_frames=256"
>
> Any ideas as to why the VM would be killing the data rate?  I have had
> similar issues with USB USRPs, but my understanding was those took a big
> hit due to the virtualization of the actual USB hardware interface.  It
> seems that with a networked USRP, that as long as the network can handle
> the speeds (which supposedly it can using iperf3), then I shouldn't see any
> hit in the data rate.
>
> Thanks for your time and please let me know of any other outputs/commands
> you would like to see.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> Are you only allocating a single CPU core to the VM?  How much memory?
>
> Performance inside a VM will generally be somewhat less, or significantly
> less, than on the host machine.
>
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com