Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users 
Ok! Thank you :)

El jue., 13 dic. 2018 a las 20:26, Marcus D. Leech ()
escribió:

> On 12/13/2018 02:24 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote:
> > My problem is that I use the USRPX310 with: default blocks + 1 custom
> > rfnoc blocks.
> >
> > And I am sharing the USRP with a co-worker who uses the python API
> > with defautl blocks.
> >
> > Could we share the same custom FPGA image?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> Yes, I think this should work -- the multi_usrp abstraction will only
> use the "default" blocks, and will likely safely ignore any blocks
>that it doesn't "care" about.
>
>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 

On 12/13/2018 02:24 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote:
My problem is that I use the USRPX310 with: default blocks + 1 custom 
rfnoc blocks.


And I am sharing the USRP with a co-worker who uses the python API 
with defautl blocks.


Could we share the same custom FPGA image?

Thank you.


Yes, I think this should work -- the multi_usrp abstraction will only 
use the "default" blocks, and will likely safely ignore any blocks

  that it doesn't "care" about.



___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users 
My problem is that I use the USRPX310 with: default blocks + 1 custom rfnoc
blocks.

And I am sharing the USRP with a co-worker who uses the python API with
defautl blocks.

Could we share the same custom FPGA image?

Thank you.
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 

On 12/13/2018 02:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote:

Thanks for the reply.

If I add a rfnoc block but keep the others, could I use UHD python API?
You'd need to use the C++ API--the Python API currently only supports 
the multi_usrp abstraction, and not the

  device3 abstraction (which supports RFNoC).




El jue., 13 dic. 2018 a las 19:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 
(mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>) 
escribió:


On 12/13/2018 01:21 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it is posible use UHD python API with a custom USRP X310 image?
>
> Thank you.
>
It very much depends on what type of customization you do.

Obviously, if you remove functionality that UHD expects to be
there, UHD
won't work.

If you add functionality that you want to be accessible to UHD,
you'll
have to modify the host-side UHD libraries to
   "understand" said functionality.

The usual way people do "custom" things with X310 is using RFNoC:

https://kb.ettus.com/Getting_Started_with_RFNoC_Development




___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com 
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com



___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users 
Thanks for the reply.

If I add a rfnoc block but keep the others, could I use UHD python API?

El jue., 13 dic. 2018 a las 19:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users (<
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>) escribió:

> On 12/13/2018 01:21 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > it is posible use UHD python API with a custom USRP X310 image?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> It very much depends on what type of customization you do.
>
> Obviously, if you remove functionality that UHD expects to be there, UHD
> won't work.
>
> If you add functionality that you want to be accessible to UHD, you'll
> have to modify the host-side UHD libraries to
>"understand" said functionality.
>
> The usual way people do "custom" things with X310 is using RFNoC:
>
> https://kb.ettus.com/Getting_Started_with_RFNoC_Development
>
>
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users 

On 12/13/2018 01:21 PM, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users wrote:

Hello,

it is posible use UHD python API with a custom USRP X310 image?

Thank you.


It very much depends on what type of customization you do.

Obviously, if you remove functionality that UHD expects to be there, UHD 
won't work.


If you add functionality that you want to be accessible to UHD, you'll 
have to modify the host-side UHD libraries to

  "understand" said functionality.

The usual way people do "custom" things with X310 is using RFNoC:

https://kb.ettus.com/Getting_Started_with_RFNoC_Development




___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] UHD Python API with custom FPGA image

2018-12-13 Thread Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo via USRP-users 
Hello,

it is posible use UHD python API with a custom USRP X310 image?

Thank you.
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com