Re: make varnish don't start a subprocess

2009-03-26 Thread Harald Friessnegger
hi des

thanks for your reply.

in order to get an idea how to optimize my setup and get a better 
understanding i'd like to recap to make sure i understood correctly: 

Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 17:10:56 schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
 If you're using a storage file, varnishd will use a relatively small
 amount of memory + address space roughly equal to the size of the file.


-s file,/home/zope/parts/varnish/storage,500M 
will make the varnishd use around 750M RAM (see my comment on the next block), 
a storage file with 700M will result in around 950M RAM used.


if that address space needs roughly the same amout of RAM as the storage 
file's size - and the cache is not persisted (lost when varnishd is 
restarted) - why do we need a storage file at all?


  whilst the file itself is exactly 500 megabyte in size, varnish
  uses 1115M memory - 44% of the total available 2,5GB RAM (1,5GB RAM, 1GB
  disk-swap) after 5 days of uptime. see `figure 1` below.

 It's not that simple.  The file is mapped into varnishd's address space,
 so the VIRT number you get from top includes the size of the file (as
 well as the size of the program itself and all libraries it uses).  RES
 is how much of that is actually in RAM.  The OS may swap unused parts of
 the cache to the storage file, but never to the swap partition.

using the sizes given in the RES column varnish uses 673+81=754M RAM::

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 1344 nobody15   0 1349m 673m 133m S0 44.5   0:08.38 varnishd
 1244 zope  15   0  637m 461m 3428 S0 30.5  40:41.93 python2.4
 1245 root  15   0 98196  81m  81m S0  5.4   0:00.02 varnishd

so the relatively small amount of ram varnish uses in addition to the 
address space is about 200M.

are these usual numbers?



 You should probably look at /proc/$pid/map instead of using top, BTW.

i tried out /proc/$pid/maps but did not really succeed in calculating memory 
usage out of the address blocks (i think this is what needs to be done here?)
this is an example from the manpage http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc

  address   perms offset  dev   inode  pathname
  08048000-08056000 r-xp  03:0c 64593  /usr/sbin/gpm
  08056000-08058000 rw-p d000 03:0c 64593  /usr/sbin/gpm

probably the RES column in top is enough to get an idea how much RAM is 
consumed by a process.




regards, harald


-- 
Webmeisterei GmbH - Büro für Netzfragen
Tel: +43 5572 908877,  Fax: +43 5572 908877-66
Steinebach 18, A-6850 Dornbirn

http://www.webmeisterei.com
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc


Re: Intermittent latency issues on Solaris10

2009-03-26 Thread Igor Minar

On Mar 17, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:

 Igor Minar wrote:
 Hi Folks!

 I'm trying set up a Varnish instance on Solaris 10 and I'm facing  
 some
 weird issue there. I was wondering if anyone could give me some
 insight into what's going on.

 After applying a few patches (I submited all of them to Trac), I was
 able compile Varnish 2.0.2 and 2.0.3 with Sun Studio compiler.  
 Varnish
 starts and is able to handle requests, but from time to time, I see
 multi-second latency when executing requests. As if varnish hung  
 for
 a few seconds. This latency occurs for cache hits and is not caused  
 by
 the backed app.

 You should look into using DTrace to figure out what is going on.   
 Do a
 search on dtrace at blogs.sun.com, there are many useful scripts and
 snippets of dtrace code there.

 --Patrick

I tried truss and dtrace but I don't see anything suspicious.

However what I did notice was an occurrence of SessionClose c  
timeout in varnishlog just before every stalled response:

 0 CLI  - Rd ping
 0 CLI  - Wr 0 200 PONG 1238102801 1.0
 0 CLI  - Rd ping
 0 CLI  - Wr 0 200 PONG 1238102804 1.0
11 SessionClose c timeout
11 StatSess c 192.18.43.225 43205 0 1 2 0 0 0 814 677
 8 SessionClose c timeout
 8 StatSess c 192.18.43.225 54410 0 1 3 0 0 0 1221 1275
 4 SessionClose c timeout
 4 StatSess c 192.18.43.225 9008 3 1 5 0 0 1 2310 45105
 9 SessionClose c timeout
 9 StatSess c 192.18.43.225 45298 0 1 3 0 0 0 1304 1986
 4 SessionOpen  c 192.18.43.225 13094 0.0.0.0:8080
 4 ReqStart c 192.18.43.225 13094 1500381747
 4 RxRequestc GET

Does anyone know what this means and what I can do to get rid of it?

thanks,
Igor


___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc


How to let varnishncsa to log the realserver ip

2009-03-26 Thread suran007
nbsp;hello!
nbsp;I have a questtion, that is How to let varnishncsa log the backend 
realserver ip to varnish.log?I search in google,but no result,anyone can help 
me ?
nbsp;thanks!!

新浪空间——与朋友开心分享网络新生活!

---
新浪空间——与朋友开心分享网络新生活!(http://space.sina.com.cn/ )___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc