Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
I already had checked all the options I used. They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds: --enable-ip-alias-domains=y maillog however shows no domain... I guess the option --enable-ip-alias-domains=y is not really being compiled into the code... Apr 9 11:20:02 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97337]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:06 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97339]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:10 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97341]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:21:38 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97386]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x *** Changed back to 4.9 *** Apr 9 11:21:52 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97392]: vchkpw: password fail [EMAIL PROTECTED]:192.168.x.x password (Got the password wrong with 4.9) Thanks! Jan Jan Knepper wrote: Hi, I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not seem to work after that. Once I restored the original ~/bin directory everything worked fine. Any ideas? Thanks Jan
Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
Nop! I just checked around a little more and found vipmap and wondered why it does not work through DNS anymore... Jan Tim Hunter wrote: You just missed a thread on this, do you have the ~vpopmail/bin/vipmap setup properly? -Original Message- From: Jan Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10 I already had checked all the options I used. They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds: --enable-ip-alias-domains=y maillog however shows no domain... I guess the option --enable-ip-alias-domains=y is not really being compiled into the code... Apr 9 11:20:02 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97337]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:06 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97339]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:10 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97341]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:21:38 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97386]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x *** Changed back to 4.9 *** Apr 9 11:21:52 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97392]: vchkpw: password fail [EMAIL PROTECTED]:192.168.x.x password (Got the password wrong with 4.9) Thanks! Jan Jan Knepper wrote: Hi, I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not seem to work after that. Once I restored the original ~/bin directory everything worked fine. Any ideas? Thanks Jan
RE: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
I don't know the exact reason but I think it was a major pain to teach everyone to setup dns properly rather than maintain a config file. -Original Message- From: Jan Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:36 PM To: Tim Hunter Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10 Nop! I just checked around a little more and found vipmap and wondered why it does not work through DNS anymore... Jan Tim Hunter wrote: You just missed a thread on this, do you have the ~vpopmail/bin/vipmap setup properly? -Original Message- From: Jan Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10 I already had checked all the options I used. They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds: --enable-ip-alias-domains=y maillog however shows no domain... I guess the option --enable-ip-alias-domains=y is not really being compiled into the code... Apr 9 11:20:02 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97337]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:06 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97339]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:20:10 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97341]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x Apr 9 11:21:38 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97386]: vchkpw: password fail user@:192.168.x.x *** Changed back to 4.9 *** Apr 9 11:21:52 digitaldaemon vpopmail[97392]: vchkpw: password fail [EMAIL PROTECTED]:192.168.x.x password (Got the password wrong with 4.9) Thanks! Jan Jan Knepper wrote: Hi, I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not seem to work after that. Once I restored the original ~/bin directory everything worked fine. Any ideas? Thanks Jan
