Re[2]: suggestion for future release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 10:27:32 PM, you wrote: I don't understand what you folks are saying about the mysql stuff. you can use the mysql replication feature to run a master database that handles all the updates, and as many slave databases that are read-only. What's wrong with that? I think he wants to have the possibility to use more than one distinct mail server setup on one machine for which he needs to beable to specify the name of the vpopmail db for each of the setups. Best regards, Gabriel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7Q1QcZa2WpymlDxAQH9FQf/clqu2P10k9HvQiRIa8Zmp9I9HiAojkRf k/oh3teGKdvPBTwbVIimwWtVfzhd9p/gLpLIMS57F3xEMvmtrTcVORsfAL17ru/Q VwVILLFGVoSc8UYRWaJun/xPE+DAgScQorCxEz5ee1CG3XzW2YvHMY+mLYRgraHL e83ZIzm8zEuJ7d6bIQ7qrlZDGwGp02WqwMV15uU7hp0ICNwxNGcHkq8KGu0XgA8p Kl75nb4Yz9F99pahoGAsfsnP8CvZPUR05V+hCjnSF+AZWjf8JMbb2bRqBeddgf0m 2TNrsCOZ5rUTs/1fRdgRAk8UuOxPlwLcW46d8no0C5UvT1UMNL44bg== =zgyA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello alexus, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 2:02:10 AM, you wrote: let user specify database inside for mysql for replication so i can have vpopmail + replication on same mysql .. not meanin that i'm goin run same info .. but i have remote server which runs vpopmail by itself plus i'd replicate my database there.. but i can't since it uses vpopmail db only.. I agree, it would make sense to let the user specify the DB/ tables (perhaps even the row name in which the individual data is located). [1] You could, of course, run two different MySQL instances on the same server to achieve the desired effect. Best regards, Gabriel [1] I don't use MySQL so I have no idea whether it would be possible today. gA|¢HÌ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7HuOMZa2WpymlDxAQF7GAgAuzojtb+pGFMGwcjsUNYKGlVZOAHPyB9t 2YSUVvVVB5phr+sycAjqqnmygUAGu2755Ds+WQJuNv+2IbGoLiUxh50yr7adN6LW nKm2IXttUoRyr/JATdR0n3YceJNec2t45rswwpKfnSh+lzdEspag7QpYrwKDR9xM AX1J0bwPMIMChmCIYCyo947lxFKQIBnkqKBV3xIHwFPkG5vaP2PJJG314cTStAY/ Sx2crKakiqtWMR9md1AQtDOhXpq2D2aex+0kogqBivo4qGxR7iDMVS9DhiOxBig0 UCgVfGR8i8MaTfGC/7VEnxGwxifTDkGtv3V/HlN92AMiYqX5mBhxNQ== =3XVz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
- Original Message - From: Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: vchkpw @ inter7 . com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:03 PM Subject: Re: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello alexus, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 2:02:10 AM, you wrote: let user specify database inside for mysql for replication so i can have vpopmail + replication on same mysql .. not meanin that i'm goin run same info .. but i have remote server which runs vpopmail by itself plus i'd replicate my database there.. but i can't since it uses vpopmail db only.. I agree, it would make sense to let the user specify the DB/ tables (perhaps even the row name in which the individual data is located). [1] You could, of course, run two different MySQL instances on the same server to achieve the desired effect. what if i run 5 mail servers? i can't run 5 mysql just for that.. Best regards, Gabriel [1] I don't use MySQL so I have no idea whether it would be possible today. ogA|¢HÌ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7HuOMZa2WpymlDxAQF7GAgAuzojtb+pGFMGwcjsUNYKGlVZOAHPyB9t 2YSUVvVVB5phr+sycAjqqnmygUAGu2755Ds+WQJuNv+2IbGoLiUxh50yr7adN6LW nKm2IXttUoRyr/JATdR0n3YceJNec2t45rswwpKfnSh+lzdEspag7QpYrwKDR9xM AX1J0bwPMIMChmCIYCyo947lxFKQIBnkqKBV3xIHwFPkG5vaP2PJJG314cTStAY/ Sx2crKakiqtWMR9md1AQtDOhXpq2D2aex+0kogqBivo4qGxR7iDMVS9DhiOxBig0 UCgVfGR8i8MaTfGC/7VEnxGwxifTDkGtv3V/HlN92AMiYqX5mBhxNQ== =3XVz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re[2]: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello alexus, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 7:46:12 PM, you wrote: You could, of course, run two different MySQL instances on the same server to achieve the desired effect. what if i run 5 mail servers? i can't run 5 mysql just for that.. What's wrong with having all the data in one DB, anyway? Best regards, Gabriel B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7IH1cZa2WpymlDxAQHQBQgAxo2FwI9uyyMIQALHJIPcej/4JGBlKKJJ I6yRF2nlDJk4CAV7Ve2Ky7DdOqoqhc/Nrl1fLu1jKlZUgwsNWaefL50EzIZAf91n OdOhWz6T5wbc9lTfMXlALaXy8aoEQQwdaFexw1o4serxnCmMq9Xuvwz3zFki9zoB HlsR1C5gutkDh72wf0M7LY4DBetu7UntrjV9uO1jsaqVety5wE3bQYRcowDREUqT KFXDRPOPfzfWBrgLCRXH9/iQPEnexSXeiBN4eaViSCt8yvSebySPz97qZVQJvkwL W4jznT3Mj1jox3uKVgxmpWvXP3by1aZfLKL0iZ/20sENNqEQf0BswQ== =/cAp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Re[2]: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
- Original Message - From: Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: vchkpw @ inter7 . com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:52 PM Subject: Re[2]: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello alexus, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 7:46:12 PM, you wrote: You could, of course, run two different MySQL instances on the same server to achieve the desired effect. what if i run 5 mail servers? i can't run 5 mysql just for that.. What's wrong with having all the data in one DB, anyway? eh.. nothin i guess.. i just don't want to run into any issues 'cause of that... Best regards, Gabriel B -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7IH1cZa2WpymlDxAQHQBQgAxo2FwI9uyyMIQALHJIPcej/4JGBlKKJJ I6yRF2nlDJk4CAV7Ve2Ky7DdOqoqhc/Nrl1fLu1jKlZUgwsNWaefL50EzIZAf91n OdOhWz6T5wbc9lTfMXlALaXy8aoEQQwdaFexw1o4serxnCmMq9Xuvwz3zFki9zoB HlsR1C5gutkDh72wf0M7LY4DBetu7UntrjV9uO1jsaqVety5wE3bQYRcowDREUqT KFXDRPOPfzfWBrgLCRXH9/iQPEnexSXeiBN4eaViSCt8yvSebySPz97qZVQJvkwL W4jznT3Mj1jox3uKVgxmpWvXP3by1aZfLKL0iZ/20sENNqEQf0BswQ== =/cAp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Re[4]: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
oh.. ok i'll try that - Original Message - From: Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: vchkpw @ inter7 . com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:19 PM Subject: Re[4]: vpopmail5 suggestion for future release -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello alexus, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 7:54:44 PM, you wrote: What's wrong with having all the data in one DB, anyway? eh.. nothin i guess.. i just don't want to run into any issues 'cause of that... You shouldn't as the data in the DB is used only for authentication (AFAIK at least) cause the qmail config is stored in the qmail control files anyway. Best regards, Gabriel d,CÈàÁÅ04 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO7IOO8Za2WpymlDxAQGoRAf7BPxwKhpDiCifDMyveSz0ICk1CDL+jPcA SAGl40cxzOOYxC7omZmn1rjTYXJUjitzLEvH8a2AM5XJ7Q5hPkz3WLQ/2y4uo/5W 9pd8iFDoG+MNK94xQ86uAaDFokCS14TXZQdW5dnPZNRZqmaIt6waRh8oP9y1M6Ye JPrfAgXSYw/CvaGqY2HG+hjNsU1SuhPlxSl2gG+8rdntO8JS3K7XNLmxf3vYXL0A UIXKGIkdqspJJqbQtkj50kKk2FFL/jUyTR/CakB+euK8cz4asRrEAmFgO4I43rZ0 mHI9xLljxUE296agDqOMfAuNHf0Q6+5PtjGxvqnRT9iAY/6Q3D/3Hw== =hqBC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: suggestion for future release
I don't understand what you folks are saying about the mysql stuff. you can use the mysql replication feature to run a master database that handles all the updates, and as many slave databases that are read-only. What's wrong with that? Ken Jones
vpopmail5 suggestion for future release
let user specify database inside for mysql for replication so i can have vpopmail + replication on same mysql .. not meanin that i'm goin run same info .. but i have remote server which runs vpopmail by itself plus i'd replicate my database there.. but i can't since it uses vpopmail db only..
