RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Piszcz, Justin
Title: Message








Will check on that, thanks.











From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005
10:23 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which
backups ran on tape L00123?







Justin





If the tape is known by NBU, will the
Reports Module provide any useful details about the streams or clients (Media
Contents or Images on Media)?















Simon
Weaver
Technical
Support
Windows
Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Piszcz, Justin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2005 15:20
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Which
backups ran on tape L00123?

Hello,



What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a
particular tape?

I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I
need to know which clients wrote on this tape).

Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not
writing?

I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole
bunch of stuff on that tape.



Thanks,



Justin.








This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Dave Markham

I think you want this dont you ?

bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'

This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not 
be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span 
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.


Dave



Piszcz, Justin wrote:


Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.

 




*From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
*To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

 

The images on media report is the best option that I can think of to 
see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending it


 


Steve

 




*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
*Piszcz, Justin

*Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
*To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

Hello,

 

What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a particular 
tape?


I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I need to 
know which clients wrote on this tape).


Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not writing?

I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
stuff on that tape.


 


Thanks,

 


Justin.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Piszcz, Justin
What do you guys think about this?

I can eject the tape, lock it manually (on the cartridge), so it cannot
be written to, then, when it expires according to its retention period I
will remove the bad tape.

CommentS?

Justin.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

I think you want this dont you ?

bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'

This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not

be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span 
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.

Dave



Piszcz, Justin wrote:

 Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.

  




 *From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
 *To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

  

 The images on media report is the best option that I can think of to 
 see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending
it

  

 Steve

  




 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
 *Piszcz, Justin
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
 *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

 Hello,

  

 What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a particular

 tape?

 I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I need to 
 know which clients wrote on this tape).

 Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not writing?

 I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
 stuff on that tape.

  

 Thanks,

  

 Justin.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Piszcz, Justin
Thanks, this works.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

I think you want this dont you ?

bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'

This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not

be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span 
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.

Dave



Piszcz, Justin wrote:

 Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.

  




 *From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
 *To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

  

 The images on media report is the best option that I can think of to 
 see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending
it

  

 Steve

  




 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
 *Piszcz, Justin
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
 *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

 Hello,

  

 What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a particular

 tape?

 I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I need to 
 know which clients wrote on this tape).

 Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not writing?

 I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
 stuff on that tape.

  

 Thanks,

  

 Justin.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Piszcz, Justin
Steve,

I will put it back in  re-inventory but the tape itself would be
locked, that should not cause any issues, should it?

Justin.

-Original Message-
From: Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:04 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

That works, when you eject it NBU will not be aware of its location and
will not use it. The only problem is that if you ever put it back in for
a restore you will have to tell nbu where it is to complete the restore
and there would be nothing stopping NBU from using it again if left in.

Steve 

-Original Message-
From: Piszcz, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

What do you guys think about this?

I can eject the tape, lock it manually (on the cartridge), so it cannot
be written to, then, when it expires according to its retention period I
will remove the bad tape.

CommentS?

Justin.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

I think you want this dont you ?

bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'

This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not

be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.

Dave



Piszcz, Justin wrote:

 Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.

  




 *From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
 *To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

  

 The images on media report is the best option that I can think of to 
 see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending
it

  

 Steve

  




 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
 *Piszcz, Justin
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
 *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

 Hello,

  

 What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a particular

 tape?

 I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I need to 
 know which clients wrote on this tape).

 Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not writing?

 I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
 stuff on that tape.

  

 Thanks,

  

 Justin.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Keating
If the tape isn't ful, you'll get jobs trying to write to it, failing
because the cart is write protected, then restarting.

If that's ok with you, then go for itI'd suspend it.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Piszcz, Justin
 Sent: December 9, 2005 11:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?
 
 
 What do you guys think about this?
 
 I can eject the tape, lock it manually (on the cartridge), so 
 it cannot
 be written to, then, when it expires according to its 
 retention period I
 will remove the bad tape.
 
 CommentS?
 
 Justin.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
 To: Piszcz, Justin
 Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?
 
 I think you want this dont you ?
 
 bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'
 
 This should list the client images which are on that tape. 
 These may not
 
 be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span 
 media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.
 
 Dave
 
 
 
 Piszcz, Justin wrote:
 
  Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.
 
   
 
 
 --
 --
 
  *From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
  *To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?
 
   
 
  The images on media report is the best option that I can 
 think of to 
  see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending
 it
 
   
 
  Steve
 
   
 
 
 --
 --
 
  *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
  *Piszcz, Justin
  *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
  *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?
 
  Hello,
 
   
 
  What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a 
 particular
 
  tape?
 
  I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, 
 I need to 
  know which clients wrote on this tape).
 
  Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and 
 not writing?
 
  I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
  stuff on that tape.
 
   
 
  Thanks,
 
   
 
  Justin.
 
 
 
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Restore

2005-12-09 Thread Chapman, Scott
Yes, the file does have spaces, the name of the file is Who Has Access
to CoC_Shr.txt.  What I had done originally was to rename the original
to Who Has Access to CoC_Shr-Backup.txt which cause the backup to not
restore anything.  When I changed the file to Backup-Who Has Access to
CoC_Shr.txt the file restored just fine . . .

I am running NBU 5.0mp5.


Scott Chapman
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia - Victoria
ph: 250.414.7650  cell: 250.213.9295


-Original Message-
From: K Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:32 AM
To: Chapman, Scott; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Restore




--- Chapman, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am having a problem restoring files where the
 first 8 characters of
 the file name match a file that already exists.  The
 problem is similar
 to 
 (http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/272314.htm),
 however, some of
 the log entries aren't exactly the same, but the
 result is!
 
 My concern is that if I restore a directory that
 contains a couple
 versions of the same file (maybe with a v1 or v2 at
 the end of the
 filename) I will only have the first one restored. 
 Has anyone seen
 this?  I just had our local EMC CE upgrade the NAS
 appliance to 5.4.18
 so that is just about as current as possible.
 
 EMC NS702G NAS appliance running 5.4.18
 
 Any ideas?  Thanks!

running netbackup 5.1mp3.
we also have a ns702g (5.3.10-4).  i just created few
files with the first 8+ chars the same and was able to
restore fine.  do the files you are trying to restore
have spaces in them?  the example file that is in the
support doc does and i havent tried spaces in the
filename to see if it makes a difference.

aaarrrggghhh
FreeBSD rocks

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Technology question

2005-12-09 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:22:40AM -0500, Bobby R Windle wrote:
 Does anyone know if Netbackup 50 or 60 will run under Solaris10 fully 
 supported by Veritas?  

According to this:  http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
you've got this level of support:

1)  Sun Solaris 10 support* begins with NetBackup 5.0 Maintenance Pack 4
and NetBackup 5.1 Maintenance Pack 2 as follows:

 
Version RequiredHardware   NBU SupportPatch Level
Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Client5.0 MP4 / 5.1 MP2
Solaris 10  X86   NetBackup Client5.1 MP2
Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Server5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP2
Solaris 10  Opteron   NetBackup Client5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP3**

This document directly contradicts the 5.0 compatibility document even
though it predates.  I would suggest you log a formal support call and
get a formal response if this is important to you.

.../Ed
-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

2005-12-09 Thread Simon Weaver
Justin
I had to do this when importing LTO1 Tapes into a new NBU Database
(Painful story!!) but yes, this ensures its not over-written! However,
the BAD side is this..

IF the tape expires, it goes into scratch... A job will grab the tape
and try to write!

NO NO NO! You cannot write to me as I am write protected!
Netbackup reports error!

The suspend / freeze method is good if you want to manually do it, with
the need to EJECT the physical media!

Hope this helps!
Simon

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Piszcz,
Justin
Sent: 09 December 2005 16:16
To: Simon.Weaver
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

What do you guys think about this?

I can eject the tape, lock it manually (on the cartridge), so it cannot
be written to, then, when it expires according to its retention period I
will remove the bad tape.

CommentS?

Justin.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

I think you want this dont you ?

bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'

This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not

be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.

Dave



Piszcz, Justin wrote:

 Hmm, never heard of suspending a tape, will look into that.

  




 *From:* Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 10:40 AM
 *To:* Piszcz, Justin; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

  

 The images on media report is the best option that I can think of to 
 see whats on it. To stop backups from writting to it, try suspending
it

  

 Steve

  




 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
 *Piszcz, Justin
 *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 9:20 AM
 *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?

 Hello,

  

 What is the easiest way to find out what clients wrote on a particular

 tape?

 I have a tape that is going bad (keeps freezing, same one, I need to 
 know which clients wrote on this tape).

 Also, is there a way to mark a tape for reading only and not writing?

 I use multiplexed backups, so I am sure it wrote a whole bunch of 
 stuff on that tape.

  

 Thanks,

  

 Justin.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Technology question

2005-12-09 Thread Darren Dunham
 According to this:  http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
 you've got this level of support:
 
 1)  Sun Solaris 10 support* begins with NetBackup 5.0 Maintenance Pack 4
 and NetBackup 5.1 Maintenance Pack 2 as follows:
 
  
 Version RequiredHardware   NBU SupportPatch Level
 Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Client5.0 MP4 / 5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  X86   NetBackup Client5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Server5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  Opteron   NetBackup Client5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP3**

While the document mentions zone issues, I would doubt that any of those
releases support Solaris 10 ACLs.  My suspicion is that they will be
ignored.

Most folks won't be using them, but some places might.  I don't have a
good testbed for that at the moment.

-- 
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
  This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Technology question

2005-12-09 Thread David Rock
* Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-09 11:41]:
 On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:22:40AM -0500, Bobby R Windle wrote:
  Does anyone know if Netbackup 50 or 60 will run under Solaris10 fully 
  supported by Veritas?  
 
 According to this:  http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
 you've got this level of support:
 
 1)  Sun Solaris 10 support* begins with NetBackup 5.0 Maintenance Pack 4
 and NetBackup 5.1 Maintenance Pack 2 as follows:
 
  
 Version RequiredHardware   NBU SupportPatch Level
 Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Client5.0 MP4 / 5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  X86   NetBackup Client5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  Sparc NetBackup Server5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP2
 Solaris 10  Opteron   NetBackup Client5.0 MP5 / 5.1 MP3**
 
 This document directly contradicts the 5.0 compatibility document even
 though it predates.  I would suggest you log a formal support call and
 get a formal response if this is important to you.

Unfortunately, this is the norm lately with NetBackup :-(

-- 
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpmfAgmnJ3lm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Veritas-bu] VxSS 4.1.2.7 console won't start

2005-12-09 Thread Klein, Adam L








Im testing VxSS (Veritas Security Services) 4.1.2.7
in a lab environment. Ive got the master / media server running
NetBackup 5.1MP3.



Following the VxSS docs, I installed Java 1.4.2.10, perl
5.8.



My environment is as follows:



# echo $PATH

/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/opt/VRTSat/bin:/opt/VRTSaz/bin:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/goodies

# echo $CLASSPATH

/opt/VRTSat/lib/AtWrapper.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/VxHelpViewer.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/VxHelpViewerl10n.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/vssatgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/vssazgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/AzWrapper.jar

# echo
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH

/usr/openwin/lib:/opt/VRTSat/lib:/opt/VRTSaz/lib





But when I try to start the console, I get:



#
./runvssatgui.sh

Exception in
thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: vrts/vss/gui/ui/Vssgui



Any thoughts? I opened a case with Veritas support and
other than having me check my CLASSPATH, they came up with nothing (though the
case was just escalated, so they may still help).



Adam Klein

--

Adam Klein

Unix Systems
Administrator

XEROX
The Document Company

Office Printing Business

503.367.3857

[EMAIL PROTECTED]










RE: [Veritas-bu] VxSS 4.1.2.7 console won't start

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



good 
luck.

we had 
a consultant in from our veritas var, who worked for 2 months with his support 
reps, and veritasended up dumping it.

from 
what I've seen it's not worth the headaches.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klein, 
  Adam LSent: December 9, 2005 3:17 PMTo: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] VxSS 4.1.2.7 
  console won't start
  
  Im testing VxSS (Veritas Security 
  Services) 4.1.2.7 in a lab environment. Ive got the master / media 
  server running NetBackup 5.1MP3.
  
  Following the VxSS docs, I 
  installed Java 1.4.2.10, perl 5.8.
  
  My environment is as 
  follows:
  
  # echo 
  $PATH
  /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/opt/VRTSat/bin:/opt/VRTSaz/bin:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/goodies
  # echo 
  $CLASSPATH
  /opt/VRTSat/lib/AtWrapper.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/VxHelpViewer.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/VxHelpViewerl10n.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/vssatgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/vssazgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/AzWrapper.jar
  # echo 
  $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
  /usr/openwin/lib:/opt/VRTSat/lib:/opt/VRTSaz/lib
  
  
  But when I try to start the 
  console, I get:
  
  # 
  ./runvssatgui.sh
  Exception in 
  thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
  vrts/vss/gui/ui/Vssgui
  
  Any thoughts? I opened a 
  case with Veritas support and other than having me check my CLASSPATH, they 
  came up with nothing (though the case was just escalated, so they may still 
  help).
  
  Adam 
  Klein
  --
  Adam Klein
  Unix Systems 
  Administrator
  XEROX 
  The Document Company
  Office Printing 
  Business
  503.367.3857
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  


RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Restore

2005-12-09 Thread K Chapman


--- Chapman, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, the file does have spaces, the name of the file
 is Who Has Access
 to CoC_Shr.txt.  What I had done originally was to
 rename the original
 to Who Has Access to CoC_Shr-Backup.txt which
 cause the backup to not
 restore anything.  When I changed the file to
 Backup-Who Has Access to
 CoC_Shr.txt the file restored just fine . . .
 
 I am running NBU 5.0mp5.

i created a few files with the same name (diff ending
before the file extension, including spaces in the
name).  i was able to restore the file ok.

aaarrrggghhh
FreeBSD rocks

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Disaster recovery configuration

2005-12-09 Thread Ed Wilts
We're starting the process of building out another data center as a
disaster recovery facility.  One of the things I don't yet know how to
configure is NetBackup.  We've got a single Solaris master server today
and will obviously be putting a Solaris backup server at the DR site.
We will also have a tape library there that will be doing regular
backups as well as handle any disaster recovery restorations.

Should I do a global cluster configuration for NetBackup?  If not, and I
configure the 2nd server as just a media server, how do I promote it to
be a master?  What support mechanisms are there to keep the catalog up
to date at the DR site?

I've had a quick look through the Veritas web site but haven't found
anything that documents best practises for cases like this.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
.../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Disaster recovery configuration

2005-12-09 Thread Karl . Rossing

We have are a small company.

We only have 1 Master Server with 14
clients. Our master server runs on Solaris.

This is what we do for our cold dr process(no
available hardware) and our warm dr process(availible hardware).

Protecting the server
==
Solaris allows you to create an image
(or flash archive) of your server. We create the flash archive(down all
the daemons) and burn it onto a Dual Layer DVD.

The Solaris OS Installer is what allows
you to apply the flash archive to a server. After the system is booted
we run tpconfig and fix up what broke. Works great for Solaris 8 and 10.

Protecting the Clients
==
We run BMR. It's a great product for moving servers around. The only issue
we have is the lack of support for Solaris 10 BMR clients. It's great for
moving servers onto different hardware.

We currently don't have a HOT DR solution.
It sounds like that is what your trying to do. I'd love to hear what you
come up with.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/09/2005
04:06:11 PM:

 We're starting the process of building out another data center as
a
 disaster recovery facility. One of the things I don't yet know
how to
 configure is NetBackup. We've got a single Solaris master server
today
 and will obviously be putting a Solaris backup server at the DR site.
 We will also have a tape library there that will be doing regular
 backups as well as handle any disaster recovery restorations.
 
 Should I do a global cluster configuration for NetBackup? If
not, and I
 configure the 2nd server as just a media server, how do I promote
it to
 be a master? What support mechanisms are there to keep the catalog
up
 to date at the DR site?
 
 I've had a quick look through the Veritas web site but haven't found
 anything that documents best practises for cases like this.
 
 Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 .../Ed
 
 -- 
 Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
 
 


[Veritas-bu] NDMP question (drive sharing)

2005-12-09 Thread Mark . Donaldson
I've been crawling the NDMP manual for an hour but haven't found a
black-and-white answer yet.

I have a number of Netapp Filers and we're looking at implementing NDMP
backups (we currently just backup NFS mounts).  I know I cannot share a set
of drives between my NDMP hosts  my other media servers.  We're OK with the
idea of carving out a set of drives exclusively for NDMP backups (yes, I
know about v6.0 - we're not quite ready to convert yet).

What I can't figure out is if a single SAN-connected drive can be shared
directly with more than one filer.  I can see that if I do a 3rd-party NDMP
backup, the a single NDMP host can be used to backup the others.  I'd rather
not load one filer or media server with the backups of another.  I'd like
the blocks to go as directly to media as possible.

The drive setup seems to specify which NDMP host has direct access to the
drive, I guess to do what I want, I'd have to define the same robotic drive
on more than one NDMP host.  My initial goal is to remove 4 drives from my
regular drive config  share them between the 7 filers, each grabbing any
drive as required.

Baring this, an option would be to define a directly attached drive for each
filer, utilizing more drives, then build storage unit groups where each
filer would use their own storage unit first, failing to another 3rd-party
host only if their drive is already too busy.  So, can NDMP storage units be
grouped?

For those with v6.0, are your SSO sharing your drives with your filers and
how's it working out?

-M



+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  Mark Donaldson - Systems Administrator - 303-664-2040
  Corporate Express - Broomfield, Colorado
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  We have enough youth.  How about a fountain of smart?
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Disaster recovery configuration

2005-12-09 Thread Dean
EdI haven't played with NBU clustering but it sounds like an interesting option.To promote the media server to a master,
you'd effectively have to rename the server to the master's name and
recover the catalog. You'd lose any mediadb info from the media server, but you would still be able to recover from the media server's tapes I believe - just not write new backups to them.Have you considered making the NBU server at the DR site the Master and demoting your existing master to a media server? I have seen this done before and it certainly makes DR faster and easier.
Cheers,DeanOn 12/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have are a small company.

We only have 1 Master Server with 14
clients. Our master server runs on Solaris.

This is what we do for our cold dr process(no
available hardware) and our warm dr process(availible hardware).

Protecting the server
==
Solaris allows you to create an image
(or flash archive) of your server. We create the flash archive(down all
the daemons) and burn it onto a Dual Layer DVD.

The Solaris OS Installer is what allows
you to apply the flash archive to a server. After the system is booted
we run tpconfig and fix up what broke. Works great for Solaris 8 and 10.

Protecting the Clients
==
We run BMR. It's a great product for moving servers around. The only issue
we have is the lack of support for Solaris 10 BMR clients. It's great for
moving servers onto different hardware.

We currently don't have a HOT DR solution.
It sounds like that is what your trying to do. I'd love to hear what you
come up with.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/09/2005
04:06:11 PM:

 We're starting the process of building out another data center as
a
 disaster recovery facility. One of the things I don't yet know
how to
 configure is NetBackup. We've got a single Solaris master server
today
 and will obviously be putting a Solaris backup server at the DR site.
 We will also have a tape library there that will be doing regular
 backups as well as handle any disaster recovery restorations.
 
 Should I do a global cluster configuration for NetBackup? If
not, and I
 configure the 2nd server as just a media server, how do I promote
it to
 be a master? What support mechanisms are there to keep the catalog
up
 to date at the DR site?
 
 I've had a quick look through the Veritas web site but haven't found
 anything that documents best practises for cases like this.
 
 Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 .../Ed
 
 -- 
 Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu