RE: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Bob Stump


"frequency is measured from when the backup ends"

Will someone please provide me the documentation that states this?
I have been looking for it for literally YEARS...





 "Tristan Ball" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2006 10:07 PM 

Yes - and be aware that the frequency is measured from when the backup ends!

I use 5 days on my "weekly" backups, and 12 hours on my nightly's. :-)

t.


---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, TimSent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:48 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how this actually works as I think it works a little differently from how I thought it worked. We have a couple of polices that do a full backup weekly, with the frequency set to 1 week. However, the jobs didn't run on the weekend; there were no errors, they just didn't run.
The only reason I can think of this happening is the job falling outside of the start window. From what I've read, the frequency is the minimum amount of tim that must pass before the next schedule runs, which means that we should probably set the weekly jobs to having a frequency of 6 days to avoid it falling outside the start window. Would this be correct?

Cheers,

- Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support Officer Science Corporate Information Systems Defence Science  Technology Organisation Department of Defence 
Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 96921562 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Steve
I hate to send this out 3 times in a row but it does address the question. Freq ONLY depends on when the backup ends for INTERVAL based schedules. This is what used to cause sliding windows of old. Freq based Freq schedules do not care when the backup last finished.

Below is a small write-up concerning the 2 processing types that NBU uses for Freq. based schedules. Freq based schedules can use either Freq or Interval mode depending on the Interval setting that is chosen.
Frequency based Sched vs Interval
Interval = 24 hour frequency(24 hours, 1 day, 7days ect.)
Frequency = Any non-24 hour frequency (12 hours, 27, hours 80 hours ect.)
If Interval mode scheduling is used the time of the backup is calculated from when the windows was initially open. So if the window opens for a class-sched at 8pm on a Monday and the frequency is 24 hours but the backup does not start until Midnight the job will be available to run at 8pm the next day. But if the sched was setup to run every 26 hours then that same job would not be available to run until 2am the next day. 

Hope that helps
Steve
On 5/18/06, Bob Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




frequency is measured from when the backup ends


Will someone please provide me the documentation that states this?
I have been looking for it for literally YEARS...





 Tristan Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2006 10:07 PM 



Yes - and be aware that the frequency is measured from when the backup ends!

I use 5 days on my weekly backups, and 12 hours on my nightly's. :-)

t.


---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, TimSent:
 Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:48 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
 [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how this actually works as I think it works a little differently from how I thought it worked. We have a couple of polices that do a full backup weekly, with the frequency set to 1 week. However, the jobs didn't run on the weekend; there were no errors, they just didn't run.

The only reason I can think of this happening is the job falling outside of the start window. From what I've read, the frequency is the minimum amount of tim that must pass before the next schedule runs, which means that we should probably set the weekly jobs to having a frequency of 6 days to avoid it falling outside the start window. Would this be correct?


Cheers,

- Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support Officer
 Science Corporate Information Systems Defence Science  Technology Organisation Department of Defence
 
Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 96921562 Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Steve

Sorry, I had the INTERVAL and FREQ parts backwards and it was not very clear. The write-up below may make more sense:
Freq is measured when the backup ends if you are using Freq based scheduling. If you are using Interval mode scheduling when the backup ends does not matter. Its a bit confusing but as everyone knows there are only 2 types of schedules, calendar and freq. But if you chose freq based schedules then bpsched has 2 processing modes it can use and that is freq and interval. Here are a few snips from a verbose bpsched that shows this.


06:03:03 [2116.2240] 4 in_interval_mode: IN INTERVAL MODE
.
15:31:26 [1820.1800] 4 in_interval_mode: NOT INTERVAL MODE -- not an integral number of days15:31:26 [1820.1800] 4 backup_due: using frequency-only mode
Hope that helps
Steve
On 5/18/06, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I hate to send this out 3 times in a row but it does address the question. I hate to send this out 3 times in a row but it does address the question. Freq ONLY depends on when the backup ends for INTERVAL based schedules. This is what used to cause sliding windows of old. Freq based Freq schedules do not care when the backup last finished.

Below is a small write-up concerning the 2 processing types that NBU uses for Freq. based schedules. Freq based schedules can use either Freq or Interval mode depending on the Interval setting that is chosen.
Frequency based Sched vs Interval
Interval = 24 hour frequency(24 hours, 1 day, 7days ect.)
Frequency = Any non-24 hour frequency (12 hours, 27, hours 80 hours ect.)
If Interval mode scheduling is used the time of the backup is calculated from when the windows was initially open. So if the window opens for a class-sched at 8pm on a Monday and the frequency is 24 hours but the backup does not start until Midnight the job will be available to run at 8pm the next day. But if the sched was setup to run every 26 hours then that same job would not be available to run until 2am the next day. 

Hope that helps

Steve

On 5/18/06, Bob Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 




frequency is measured from when the backup ends


Will someone please provide me the documentation that states this?
I have been looking for it for literally YEARS...





 Tristan Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2006 10:07 PM  



Yes - and be aware that the frequency is measured from when the backup ends!

I use 5 days on my weekly backups, and 12 hours on my nightly's. :-)

t.


---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, TimSent:
 Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:48 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
 [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how this actually works as I think it works a little differently from how I thought it worked. We have a couple of polices that do a full backup weekly, with the frequency set to 1 week. However, the jobs didn't run on the weekend; there were no errors, they just didn't run. 

The only reason I can think of this happening is the job falling outside of the start window. From what I've read, the frequency is the minimum amount of tim that must pass before the next schedule runs, which means that we should probably set the weekly jobs to having a frequency of 6 days to avoid it falling outside the start window. Would this be correct? 


Cheers,

- Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support Officer
 Science Corporate Information Systems Defence Science  Technology Organisation Department of Defence
 
Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 96921562 Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Bob Stump


bpimagelist returns withthe "start time" of the image.
The image name contains the ctime of the start of the image.
Because of these reasons, I believe that "Freq is measured when the backup STARTS if you are using Freq based scheduling."
But I have no proof and I have read conflicting posts from users using different versions of Netbackup. 

Again I ask for documentationfrom:
OpenVision
VERITAS Software
symantec

So, is it midnight on the first stoke of midnight or the last stroke of midnight?
I have been looking for said "official" documentation for almost a decade.




 Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/18/2006 9:08 AM 


Sorry, I had the INTERVAL and FREQ parts backwards and it was not very clear. The write-up below may make more sense:
Freq is measured when the backup ends if you are using Freq based scheduling. If you are using Interval mode scheduling when the backup ends does not matter. Its a bit confusing but as everyone knows there are only 2 types of schedules, calendar and freq. But if you chose freq based schedules then bpsched has 2 processing modes it can use and that is freq and interval. Here are a few snips from a verbose bpsched that shows this. 

06:03:03 [2116.2240] 4 in_interval_mode: IN INTERVAL MODE
.
15:31:26 [1820.1800] 4 in_interval_mode: NOT INTERVAL MODE -- not an integral number of days15:31:26 [1820.1800] 4 backup_due: using frequency-only mode
Hope that helps
Steve
On 5/18/06, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 


I hate to send this out 3 times in a row but it does address the question. I hate to send this out 3 times in a row but it does address the question. Freq ONLY depends on when the backup ends for INTERVAL based schedules. This is what used to cause sliding windows of old. Freq based Freq schedules do not care when the backup last finished. 
Below is a small write-up concerning the 2 processing types that NBU uses for Freq. based schedules. Freq based schedules can use either Freq or Interval mode depending on the Interval setting that is chosen.
Frequency based Sched vs Interval
Interval = 24 hour frequency(24 hours, 1 day, 7days ect.)
Frequency = Any non-24 hour frequency (12 hours, 27, hours 80 hours ect.)
If Interval mode scheduling is used the time of the backup is calculated from when the windows was initially open. So if the window opens for a class-sched at 8pm on a Monday and the frequency is 24 hours but the backup does not start until Midnight the job will be available to run at 8pm the next day. But if the sched was setup to run every 26 hours then that same job would not be available to run until 2am the next day. 
Hope that helps

Steve

On 5/18/06, Bob Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 




"frequency is measured from when the backup ends"


Will someone please provide me the documentation that states this?
I have been looking for it for literally YEARS...





 "Tristan Ball" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2006 10:07 PM  


Yes - and be aware that the frequency is measured from when the backup ends!

I use 5 days on my "weekly" backups, and 12 hours on my nightly's. :-)

t.


---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, TimSent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:48 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how this actually works as I think it works a little differently from how I thought it worked. We have a couple of polices that do a full backup weekly, with the frequency set to 1 week. However, the jobs didn't run on the weekend; there were no errors, they just didn't run. 
The only reason I can think of this happening is the job falling outside of the start window. From what I've read, the frequency is the minimum amount of tim that must pass before the next schedule runs, which means that we should probably set the weekly jobs to having a frequency of 6 days to avoid it falling outside the start window. Would this be correct? 

Cheers,

- Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support Officer Science Corporate Information Systems Defence Science  Technology Organisation Department of Defence 
Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 96921562 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




[Veritas-bu] Nbwin.exe crashing

2006-05-18 Thread Brooks, Jason
I've been trying to peruse a restore tree for our NDMP mail device.
When I attempt to expand the folder containing the use folders (around
600 sub-folders), nbwin will eventually die.  I've successfully
navigated into the structure before.  And I've even opened one that
contains around 5000 sub-folders.

Has anyone seen something like this before?  A mitigation/work around?

Thanks,
Jason


Jason Brooks
Computer Systems Engineer
IITS - Longwood University
voice - (434) 395-2916
fax - (434) 395-2035
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Question with bpduplicate.

2006-05-18 Thread Robert.Thelen
Justin -

NetBackup keeps track of the Primary Copy.  All restores are performed from 
this Primary Copy.

In order to perform restores from another copy (not always number 2...), you 
need to change the Primary Copy to the other copy number.  One way to do this 
is with the following command :
bpduplicate -npc new primary copy -backupid backup id

Or you could use this command :
bpimage -npc copy # -backupid backup_id

You can check your Primary Copy number by running bpimagelist -L -backupid 
backup id and looking for the phrase Primary Copy:.  The phrase Number of 
Copies: will tell you how many copies you have.

Rob Thelen
Storage Management
Chase Card Services.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 5:10 AM
To: List Veritas List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question with bpduplicate.


After you run bpduplicate on a backup image, server_12029394 etc and
it dupes the tapes to another set, where/how do you restore from the
second set of duplicated tapes?

When I go to the client in restore mode, I only see the originals
backup image (with original tapes), thanks.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


**
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Nbwin.exe crashing

2006-05-18 Thread Brooks, Jason
I just found that all 5600 or so are in the same directory.  It finally
rendered in nbwin.  Not sure why it's crashed recently, though.

Jason 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Brooks, Jason
 Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:37 AM
 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Nbwin.exe crashing
 
 I've been trying to peruse a restore tree for our NDMP mail device.
 When I attempt to expand the folder containing the use 
 folders (around 600 sub-folders), nbwin will eventually die.  
 I've successfully navigated into the structure before.  And 
 I've even opened one that contains around 5000 sub-folders.
 
 Has anyone seen something like this before?  A mitigation/work around?
 
 Thanks,
 Jason
 
 
 Jason Brooks
 Computer Systems Engineer
 IITS - Longwood University
 voice - (434) 395-2916
 fax - (434) 395-2035
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Question with bpduplicate.

2006-05-18 Thread Justin Piszcz

Thanks!

On 5/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Justin -

NetBackup keeps track of the Primary Copy.  All restores are performed from 
this Primary Copy.

In order to perform restores from another copy (not always number 2...), you 
need to change the Primary Copy to the other copy number.  One way to do this 
is with the following command :
bpduplicate -npc new primary copy -backupid backup id

Or you could use this command :
bpimage -npc copy # -backupid backup_id

You can check your Primary Copy number by running bpimagelist -L -backupid backup id and looking 
for the phrase Primary Copy:.  The phrase Number of Copies: will tell you how 
many copies you have.

Rob Thelen
Storage Management
Chase Card Services.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 5:10 AM
To: List Veritas List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question with bpduplicate.


After you run bpduplicate on a backup image, server_12029394 etc and
it dupes the tapes to another set, where/how do you restore from the
second set of duplicated tapes?

When I go to the client in restore mode, I only see the originals
backup image (with original tapes), thanks.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


**
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Bob Stump wrote:
 bpimagelist returns with the start time of the image.  The image
 name contains the ctime of the start of the image.  Because of these
 reasons, I believe that Freq is measured when the backup STARTS if
 you are using Freq based scheduling. But I have no proof and I have
 read conflicting posts from users using different versions of
 Netbackup. 

I believe I've done the calculations before for the VMS client - the
relevant data is logged - and the date used is measured from when the
last backup STARTS, not ENDS.  If you think about it, it *has* to be
this way or you will miss files.

eg. differential starts at 12:00 and ends at 18:00.  A file is created
at 16:00 but the directory it is in was processed at 13:00.  If you
started your next differential and selected all files since 18:00, you'd
skip the file and this would be bad.  If you start your next backup and
selected the files created since 12:00, you'd be okay.  Now of course
you could select the same file twice (e.g. if the file was created at
12:05 and the directory was processed at 13:00)) but that's a far better
problem than not backing it up at all.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 6.0

2006-05-18 Thread Dmitri Smirnov

During the test restore we found that we may face data corruption on
media since our environment matches to conditions described below:
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/280140.htm 

at the end we found that issues with restore were related to bad SCSI
cable (backups are 100% good, restores are 100% bad - bad image header
reported).
But during the troubleshooting we migrated to 5.1 MP5.

Next day we noticed an increased number of invalid images reported by
'bpdbm -consistancy 2'. Started to have troubles with bpexpdate and
bpimagelist for certain images... Investigation showed that bpdbm dumps
core during the attempt to process certain entries in catalog.
Solutions: wait until Symantec will fix the daemon with positibilty to
have increased number of broken images, downgrade to MP3/MP4 and face
potential data corruption on tapes or move on to 6.0 (were ready,
internally trained and prepared).

To clarify - I'm not 100% sure if MP5 introduced the problem with
catalog or we had one before with MP3.. Sorry, had no time to
investigate, was too scary to lose data in catalog ...

Dmitri

-Original Message-
From: Jack Forester, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:06 AM
To: Dmitri Smirnov
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 6.0

DB corruption with 5.1 MP5?  I must be living in a shell as I hadn't
heard about that.  We're getting ready to install MP5 in a couple of
weeks.  Can you elaborate?

Dmitri Smirnov wrote:

Still working on this one ... Overall impression - not worth it - too 
many changes, too many bugs, documentation and support site are
useless.
But between 5.1 MP3/4 data corruption and MP5 with DB corruption 
Symantec leaves not much choice.

Few questions:
- nbpem is dying every 2-5  mins with segmentation fault (Linux 2.4). I

may be wrong but it can be related to attempts to forward email using 
clients... should be fixed in MP3 - is anyone had same problem or have 
a fix?
- few libraries transferred w/o problem to EMM, one finished with all 
tapes in Netbackup pool... Is anyway to assign tapes correctly to right

pools and recover the rest of mediaDB information?
- Jobs are going bananas... Bytes are growing on jobs in 'Queued' 
state, they go to 'Completed' state after backup is finished and 
restart after that once again...How to fix that one?
- Firewalling changed big time.. Hope I'll fix that based on Symantec 
documentation.
- Is only 'root' allowed to use Java admin interface remotely w/o NBAC?

Dmitri

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
  



--
Jack L. Forester, Jr.
UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
(304) 625-3946




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0MP2 BMR

2006-05-18 Thread Karl . Rossing

Hi,

I'd just like to verify something. As
it relates to windows servers, SRT's are kept on the windows boot server
but driver/servicepack packages are kept on the netbackup master.

I'm thinking that in the event of a
DR, netbackup master is cloned and all i have to do is install a BMR boot
server on any computer and add the SRT's. Then the packages should flow
from the netbackup master.

I know this is changing with winpe boot
sometime in the future.









Karl-Frédéric
Rossing,



Technical
Services











phone:

204-786-6431



fax:
204-784-6755



toll free: 
1-800-665-1934



www.federated.ca









CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE 
The information in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged.
This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual(s) or organization(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative
of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination
or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information
contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email
and its attachments from your system. Thank you. 


RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



LOL...not far...based on features, those are the two we are going to 
start looking at soon.

Paul


-- 

  
  -Original Message-From: Hampus Lind 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 18, 2006 2:05 
  PMTo: Paul Keating; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: SV: [Veritas-bu] 
  Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..
  
  Ok..
  
  How fare have you 
  come in you evaluation with diligent and falconstor? Have you found any big 
  difference between the two?
  We have looked at 
  diligent for some time now, the down side right now is that there is only one 
  test installation here in Sweden which results little 
  knowledge and no local support/service organisation.
  Falconstor I think 
  have a couple of installation and some more OEM installations. But I havent 
  looked that much at them yet.


La version française suit le texte anglais.



This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of 
this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately 
from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 



Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute 
diffusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous 
recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
délai à
l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de 
votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.


SV: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Hampus Lind
Title: Message









J



Do you have any thoughts
on how you would use tapes in a diligent or falconstor environment? Or are you
looking at only use disk as a backup media?

For safety reasons one
could mirror the disk and replicate the servers to different sites, but yet I dont
know if its enough.



Basically with these
products you only have one generation of a fullbackup (if you dont make
some more of curse, but then you need more disk capacity), which means if you
lose that disk all backups are gone. Do you see any risks with this? Of course
if you mirror the disk to one or more sites you are much safer.



I think the tape vendors
have brainwashed me!! J







Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Frn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fr Paul Keating
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 20:07
Till:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
mne: RE: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..





LOL...not
far...based on features, those are the two we are going to start looking at
soon.











Paul















-- 



-Original Message-
From: Hampus Lind
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: May 18, 2006 2:05 PM
To: Paul Keating;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: SV: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

Ok..



How fare have you come in you evaluation with diligent and
falconstor? Have you found any big difference between the two?

We have looked at diligent for some time now, the down side right
now is that there is only one test installation here in Sweden which results
little knowledge and no local support/service organisation.

Falconstor I think have a couple of installation and some more OEM
installations. But I havent looked that much at them yet.










RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



My 
intent is to backup to VTLat night, and duplicate to tape during the day, 
every day.
we'll 
keep at least 2 weekly FULLs plus subsequent incrementals on 
disk

we're using the disk primarily as a means of getting 
away from multiplexing, as we have so many slow clients, that even with 8+ 
multiplexing, we can't stream our LTO3 driveswith VTL, we have don't have to 
deal with the performance hit of shoeshining, and we will get much better performance from SATA 
array to LTO3 during our duplication, than from network clients direct to 
Tape.

Also, because of pools and policies we're required to 
have, we can just create more virtual drives than we have physical drives, and 
the virtual drive doesn't care that there's only a single 10Mb/s client on the 
end of an encrypted link, whereas with physical tape, you're shoeshining from 
here to tomorrow, and tying up a $20,000 tape drive for 24 hours to backup one 
machine.later on, after that backup is done, it types up a physical drive 
for 5 minutes to duplicate.

that's my rational 
anyway.

Paul



-Original Message-From: Hampus 
Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 18, 2006 2:38 
PMTo: Paul Keating; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: SV: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 
PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

  
  J
  
  Do you have any 
  thoughts on how you would use tapes in a diligent or falconstor environment? 
  Or are you looking at only use disk as a backup media?
  For safety reasons 
  one could mirror the disk and replicate the servers to different sites, but 
  yet I dont know if its enough.
  
  Basically with these 
  products you only have one generation of a fullbackup (if you dont make some 
  more of curse, but then you need more disk capacity), which means if you lose 
  that disk all backups are gone. Do you see any risks with this? Of course if 
  you mirror the disk to one or more sites you are much safer.
  
  I think the tape 
  vendors have brainwashed me!! J


La version française suit le texte anglais.



This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of 
this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately 
from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 



Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute 
diffusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous 
recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
délai à
l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de 
votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.


SV: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Hampus Lind
Title: Message









I have been going through
falconstor homepage and cant find anything about de-deuplication
or compression which some call it, like the one diligent offers.
Do they have these functions?







Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Frn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fr Paul Keating
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 20:07
Till:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
mne: RE: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..





LOL...not
far...based on features, those are the two we are going to start looking at
soon.











Paul















-- 



-Original Message-
From: Hampus Lind
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: May 18, 2006 2:05 PM
To: Paul Keating;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: SV: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

Ok..



How fare have you come in you evaluation with diligent and
falconstor? Have you found any big difference between the two?

We have looked at diligent for some time now, the down side right
now is that there is only one test installation here in Sweden which results
little knowledge and no local support/service organisation.

Falconstor I think have a couple of installation and some more OEM
installations. But I havent looked that much at them yet.










RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Ashby, Andrew



We have DD200's here and they have beentrue to our 
expectations. We push all of our non-critical, short 
expiration, jobs to them.
We have been happy with the compression and reliability - 
though we have had a few issues. Nothing we couldn't get 
fixed.
If its not already out there - their newest model allows 
you to connect to your own back end storage.

Would we buy again? 
Yes.

Andrew


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus 
LindSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:24 PMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 
PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..


Hi,

I am looking datadomain and diligent 
products and have noticed that Netbackup are doing something similar with its 
PurDisk function. Have anyone looked at Netbackup PureDisk?

Best regards,

Hampus 
LindRikspolisstyrelsenNational Police BoardTel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 
99 43Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



are 
you referring to Diligent's ProtecTIER, content based screening, that only backs 
up the changed blocks, minimizing the amount of data on 
disk??

Falconstor, IIRC, does software based compression before writing to the 
virtual tape, and that's it.

Paul


-- 

  
  -Original Message-From: Hampus Lind 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 18, 2006 2:55 
  PMTo: Paul Keating; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: SV: [Veritas-bu] 
  Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..
  
  I have been going 
  through falconstor homepage and cant find anything about de-deuplication or 
  compression which some call it, like the one diligent offers. Do they have 
  these functions?


La version française suit le texte anglais.



This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of 
this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately 
from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 



Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute 
diffusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous 
recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
délai à
l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de 
votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.


RE: [Veritas-bu] backup_exit_notify script question

2006-05-18 Thread Mark.Donaldson



You can't do this with stream number because there's no 
guarantee what inorder the streams will complete. Most of us have 
nasty hacks for this.

My version has every stream that ends write a line to the 
same file. Then it checks the size of the file, if the number of lines 
matches the STREAM_COUNT variable, then I assume its the last stream to exit and 
it runs the cleanup routine.

The line it writes to the file, by the way, is the return 
code for that stream. The cleanup routine checks for all zeros  sends 
warnings if any of the streams were non-zero exits.

-M


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pero, 
GregSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:19 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] 
backup_exit_notify script question


Running Netbackup 5.1 mp4 on W3K  
have backup_exit_notify.cmd configured to send email alerts (based on the status 
code) via blat to the NB Sys Admin. I need to figure out a way to send a 
single email to a user after a specific scheduled policy has completed (the job 
runs from the master server  not the client). Filtering out the policy 
and schedule is straight-forward  problem Im having is the policy spawns 
multiple jobs and emails get sent when each job completes. I would assume 
someone has already figured out how to do this using the stream number  any 
help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Greg



Greg Pero
NetSys Systems Engineer 
Senior
Downey 
Savings
(949) 509-4488 - 
office
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - pager/text 
message
(714) 200-3420 - 
cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message and any attachments are for the intended 
recipient(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential and/or proprietary 
information about Downey Savings or its customers, which Downey Savings does not 
intend to disclose to the public. 
If you received this message by mistake, please notify the sender by 
reply e-mail and delete the message and attachments.


[Veritas-bu] EMM Database error 196

2006-05-18 Thread Fernandes, Eustace
Title: EMM Database error 196 






After upgrading to MP2 I am unable to vmadd or vmpool add any ideas ?


Eustace Fernandes

Technical Support

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

voice (403) 237-1534







RE: [Veritas-bu] New Search Solution from Symantec Enterprise Technical Services

2006-05-18 Thread Jim Peppas



Hi.

Maybe we should sign a email all together and sent it to 
them

Jim


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahnmiller, 
BryanSent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:24 PMTo: Bob Stump; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] New Search 
Solution from Symantec Enterprise Technical Services


Bob,
 Ive tried 
your link. It looks like they have finally broken the keyword search completely. 
I and my co-workers have found the new search completely useless. I think Ive 
managed to find 1 answer out of maybe 100 queries. 
 I have sent my 
feedback to Symantec. I told them that the natural language query might work for 
Joe average user of NAV, but when Im trying to do a keyword search off of a 
specific error message, it is useless.
 Maybe Im just 
to old to get used to change, but this change in the support site has completely 
thrown me.


Bryan 
Bahnmiller
ISD Business 
Continuity
Pier 1 Imports, 
Inc
817-252-8570




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob StumpSent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:55 
AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] New Search Solution 
from Symantec Enterprise Technical Services


If you don't like the engine touted 
in technote 282968 below, you can still access the Boolean search engine at this 
link:

http://seer.support.veritas.com/NAV_BAR/clustersearch.asp?ddProduct=NBUESVRcrumb=on









New Search Solution from Symantec 
Enterprise Technical Services

http://support.veritas.com/docs/282968



Details:

Enterprise Support 
Customers- We are pleased to announce the release of the first phase of 
a new era of enterprise level technical support. As a result of customer 
satisfaction surveys and feedback collected from various customer channels we 
are building a more robust self-service experience for you, our enterprise 
support customers. The first, and most visible, part of this new experience is 
the introduction of an entirely new search engine designed to bring you the 
right answer faster and more reliably than ever before. This new search 
engine is based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology. Unlike an 
imprecise keyword search engine, our new NLP works best when it has more 
details. For example, in the past, a search for drivers might have 
yielded a range of documents related to the download, installation, update, or 
driver related errors on a target system. There were too many results, and the 
required document may have been far down the list, requiring valuable time and 
effort scanning results. With the new search engine, you are free to ask 
for exactly what you want and limit the results to only those that matter. For 
example, if you are looking to download drivers ask Where can I download tape 
device drivers for Backup Exec version 10? and get just a few very specific 
documents in return. As mentioned above, our new search is a Natural 
Language Processing search engine and works better with questions or phrases 
than with a keyword style search. Providing more words is better, and questions 
or multiple keywords will elicit better results than one or two key 
words.For further tips please click on the Search Tips link on the 
Enterprise Support landing page.In the end, our mission is to deliver 
the right answer as the top result for your specific question. Your issue - your 
words - your answer. Quick and painless problem resolution at a pace we expect 
will set a new industry standard.On behalf of the Engineers and 
Management at Symantec Corporation, thank you again for your loyalty and 
patience as we undertake this ambitious project. Symantec Software 
Enterprise 
Technical Support


Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Database error 196

2006-05-18 Thread Justin Piszcz

Did you run the nbdata (dont have docs in front of me) -push  command
to populate the database?


On 5/18/06, Fernandes, Eustace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




After upgrading to MP2 I am unable to vmadd or vmpool add any ideas ?

 Eustace Fernandes
Technical Support
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice (403) 237-1534




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] EMM Database error 196

2006-05-18 Thread Fernandes, Eustace
Why do I need to populate the database, I am just applying MP2 patch no
upgrading from another release? 
Anyway what is the command is it nbdata or nbdb_upgrade
Nbdb_upgrade -dbn NBDB was run successfully during the MP2 patch
Eustace

-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:37 PM
To: Fernandes, Eustace
Cc: List Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Database error 196

Did you run the nbdata (dont have docs in front of me) -push  command to
populate the database?


On 5/18/06, Fernandes, Eustace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 After upgrading to MP2 I am unable to vmadd or vmpool add any ideas ?

  Eustace Fernandes
 Technical Support
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 voice (403) 237-1534



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Fwd: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2

2006-05-18 Thread Justin Piszcz

Here is a thread of another person having a similar issue and what he found.

Brooks, Jason   
to veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I am trying to add another volume pool to my environment today, and it
failed with an EMM Database Error(196).  I've searched through google
and support, but don't anything that pertains to this.  What I did find
with vxlogview is this:

4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049
[MachineConfigImpl::helperQueryNbpushdataConfig] EMMServer generic error
= nbpushdata must be run to complete the upgrade
4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049 [MediaPoolImpl::CreateMediaPool]
EMMServer generic error = cannot add media pools until nbpushdata has
been run

I've been running for a while at MP2.  Why would I need to run
nbpushdata?  I've been dealing with this for several days, and earlier
ran nbpushdata, which created more problems that it fixed.  I'm back
today with a catalog restore, but back with the Volume Pool error.

Suggestions?

Thanks,
Jason


Jason Brooks
Computer Systems Engineer
IITS - Longwood University
voice - (434) 395-2916
fax - (434) 395-2035
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(What he found out)


Brooks, Jason   
to me, veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I also have just found from where my headaches came: the voldb in
volmgr\database has some old volume information in it.  There are old
volume pools with tapes assigned that we long ago deleted.  That's where
my messed up media came from.  Any ideas of how to run nbpushdata
without corrupting all I have now?

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE:[Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Koping Wang
Hi,
We are also looking in D2D solution which work with netbackup. We are
going to make decision between DataDomain and Dilligent. This is my
thought about these two products.
Dillignet:
Pro:  VTL - low impact on configuration.
faster - it use fiber channel.
more add on functions - there are some good add-on functions you
can buy from diligent. 
Con:  costly - Software: Netbackup VTL license, Diligent license, Redhat
RHEL 64-bit license.
   Hardware: 64 bit AMD server, disk storage. If you
don't have san, you might need a fiber switch.
Datadomain:
Pro:Simple, no software license needed.
Con:  Not expendable, if you run out of space, you screw up.

Netbackup PureDisk: PureDisk is like a separate software from Netbackup.
You can have a lot of choice if you want to look into different D2D
products. PureDisk only support windows client.

Koping Wang
ESRI
Backup/Systems Administrator
380 New York St
Redlands CA, 92373





Message: 2
From: Hampus Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:24:02 +0200
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0008_01C67AB0.9F36F690
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

=20

I am looking datadomain and diligent products and have noticed that
Netbackup are doing something similar with its PurDisk function. Have =
anyone looked at Netbackup PureDisk?

=20

Best regards,

=20

Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=20




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Wilkinson, Tim



Bob,

I've got this from the 
VERITAS Netbackup 6.0 Administration course manual :

"Frequency
Select the frequency radio 
button to enable administrators to specify how much time must elapse between the 
successful completion of a scheduled task and the next attempt at the 
task"

Cheers,

Tim


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob 
StumpSent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:28 PMTo: Wilkinson, 
Tim; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Tristan BallSubject: RE: 
[Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

"frequency is measured from when the backup 
ends"

Will someone please provide me the 
documentation that states this?
I have been looking for it for literally 
YEARS...





 "Tristan Ball" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
5/17/2006 10:07 PM 

Yes - and be aware that the frequency is measured from when the 
backup ends!

I use 5 days on my "weekly" backups, and 12 hours on my nightly's. 
:-)

t.


---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, 
TimSent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 10:48 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' 
schedule type

Hi,

I'm trying to understand 
how this actually works as I think it works a little differently from how I 
thought it worked. We have a couple of polices that do a full backup weekly, 
with the frequency set to 1 week. However, the jobs didn't run on the weekend; 
there were no errors, they just didn't run.
The only reason I can think 
of this happening is the job falling outside of the start window. From what I've 
read, the frequency is the minimum amount of tim that must pass before the next 
schedule runs, which means that we should probably set the weekly jobs to having 
a frequency of 6 days to avoid it falling outside the start window. Would this 
be correct?

Cheers,

  - 
  Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support 
  Officer Science Corporate Information 
  Systems Defence Science  Technology 
  Organisation Department of Defence 
  Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 
  96921562 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



RE: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2

2006-05-18 Thread Fernandes, Eustace
Thanks does not sound like a good idea to run nbpushdata, will just have
to wait for Veritas to call
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:10 PM
To: Fernandes, Eustace; List Veritas List
Subject: Fwd: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2

Here is a thread of another person having a similar issue and what he
found.

Brooks, Jason   
to veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I am trying to add another volume pool to my environment today, and it
failed with an EMM Database Error(196).  I've searched through google
and support, but don't anything that pertains to this.  What I did find
with vxlogview is this:

4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049
[MachineConfigImpl::helperQueryNbpushdataConfig] EMMServer generic error
= nbpushdata must be run to complete the upgrade
4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049 [MediaPoolImpl::CreateMediaPool]
EMMServer generic error = cannot add media pools until nbpushdata has
been run

I've been running for a while at MP2.  Why would I need to run
nbpushdata?  I've been dealing with this for several days, and earlier
ran nbpushdata, which created more problems that it fixed.  I'm back
today with a catalog restore, but back with the Volume Pool error.

Suggestions?

Thanks,
Jason


Jason Brooks
Computer Systems Engineer
IITS - Longwood University
voice - (434) 395-2916
fax - (434) 395-2035
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(What he found out)


 Brooks, Jason  
to me, veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I also have just found from where my headaches came: the voldb in
volmgr\database has some old volume information in it.  There are old
volume pools with tapes assigned that we long ago deleted.  That's where
my messed up media came from.  Any ideas of how to run nbpushdata
without corrupting all I have now?

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2

2006-05-18 Thread Fernandes, Eustace
Java worked fine before I upgraded to MP2

-Original Message-
From: Dmitri Smirnov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:30 PM
To: Justin Piszcz; Fernandes, Eustace; List Veritas List
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2


Some stupid ideas:
- try to use Java gui to add pool
- make sure your filesystems are not full
- ... No more ideas

Dmitri

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; List Veritas List
Subject: Fwd: [Veritas-bu] Add Volume Pool - EMM 196 w/ NBU 6.0MP2

Here is a thread of another person having a similar issue and what he
found.

Brooks, Jason   
to veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I am trying to add another volume pool to my environment today, and it
failed with an EMM Database Error(196).  I've searched through google
and support, but don't anything that pertains to this.  What I did find
with vxlogview is this:

4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049
[MachineConfigImpl::helperQueryNbpushdataConfig] EMMServer generic error
= nbpushdata must be run to complete the upgrade
4/13/2006 09:20:35.385 V-111-1049 [MediaPoolImpl::CreateMediaPool]
EMMServer generic error = cannot add media pools until nbpushdata has
been run

I've been running for a while at MP2.  Why would I need to run
nbpushdata?  I've been dealing with this for several days, and earlier
ran nbpushdata, which created more problems that it fixed.  I'm back
today with a catalog restore, but back with the Volume Pool error.

Suggestions?

Thanks,
Jason


Jason Brooks
Computer Systems Engineer
IITS - Longwood University
voice - (434) 395-2916
fax - (434) 395-2035
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(What he found out)


 Brooks, Jason  
to me, veritas-bu
 More options Apr 13
I also have just found from where my headaches came: the voldb in
volmgr\database has some old volume information in it.  There are old
volume pools with tapes assigned that we long ago deleted.  That's where
my messed up media came from.  Any ideas of how to run nbpushdata
without corrupting all I have now?

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

2006-05-18 Thread Tristan Ball
Not necessarilly. :-)

We can calculate the time to start our job based on the end time of the
last job, while still using the start time of the last job for
calculating which files to backup. And the SysAdmin Manual for Unix, Vol
1, Page 108 says:

Using the Frequency schedule type, administrators specify how much time
must elapse between the successful completion of a scheduled task and
the next attempt at the task.

Bob, I was very interested in you comments about the magical Interval
based backups, and Steve, I believe your tests - but how did you guys
find out about this? Is it documented somewhere?

Thanks,
Tristan
 
---
Tristan Ball
System Administrator
Vision Systems
+61-3-9211-7064
 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 19 May 2006 2:34 AM
To: Bob Stump
Cc: Steve; Tim Wilkinson; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Tristan
Ball
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Bob Stump wrote:
 bpimagelist returns with the start time of the image.  The image 
 name contains the ctime of the start of the image.  Because of these 
 reasons, I believe that Freq is measured when the backup STARTS if 
 you are using Freq based scheduling. But I have no proof and I have 
 read conflicting posts from users using different versions of 
 Netbackup.

I believe I've done the calculations before for the VMS client - the
relevant data is logged - and the date used is measured from when the
last backup STARTS, not ENDS.  If you think about it, it *has* to be
this way or you will miss files.

eg. differential starts at 12:00 and ends at 18:00.  A file is created
at 16:00 but the directory it is in was processed at 13:00.  If you
started your next differential and selected all files since 18:00, you'd
skip the file and this would be bad.  If you start your next backup and
selected the files created since 12:00, you'd be okay.  Now of course
you could select the same file twice (e.g. if the file was created at
12:05 and the directory was processed at 13:00)) but that's a far better
problem than not backing it up at all.

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


SV: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

2006-05-18 Thread Hampus Lind
Title: Message









Yes, I am referring to ProtecTIER.







Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Frn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fr Paul Keating
Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 20:59
Till: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
mne: RE: [Veritas-bu]
Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..





are
you referring to Diligent's ProtecTIER, content based screening, that only
backs up the changed blocks, minimizing the amount of data on disk??











Falconstor,
IIRC, does software based compression before writing to the virtual tape, and
that's it.











Paul















-- 



-Original Message-
From: Hampus Lind
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: May 18, 2006 2:55 PM
To: Paul Keating;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: SV: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup
PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..

I have been going through falconstor homepage and cant find
anything about de-deuplication or compression which
some call it, like the one diligent offers. Do they have these functions?










Re: [Veritas-bu] 'Frequency' schedule type--let's get it right

2006-05-18 Thread bob944
 frequency is measured from when the backup ends

Many posters have made this statement; please state your sources as this
is demonstrably false.

 Policy Name:   DEMO-prod-std
 Include:   /
 Schedule:  full
   Frequency:   every 1 hour
   Daily Windows:
 Thursday   09:00:00  --  Thursday   19:00:00
 
 Backup ID: someserver_1147969653
 Policy:DEMO-prod-std
 Sched Label:   full
 Backup Time:   05/18/2006 11:27:33
 Elapsed Time:  000:04:16
 
 Backup ID: someserver_1147973257
 Policy:DEMO-prod-std
 Sched Label:   full
 Backup Time:   05/18/2006 12:27:37
 Elapsed Time:  000:03:04

The reason schedules slip in NetBackup (pre-NetBackup 6) is the
scheduler wake-up interval of ten minutes (default) and scheduler
workload.  The time from the ideal frequency plus last start time (say,
24 hours and 18:01:33) until the next time the scheduler wakes up after
18:01:33 the next day is the earlies the job can be scheduled.  On
average, a schedule would slip five minutes per day (potentially missing
a window).  This (and the I ran it as a test yesterday morning so it
didn't run last night oversight) are why setting the frequency to the
window size became popular.  support.veritas.com/docs/209227

This was addressed in two ways that I know of:
1.  logic was added (4.5? 5.x?) to check the frequency for exact
multiples of a day, and start those backups at the beginning of the
window each time--it's interval mode which another poster spoke to
this earlier.  (I believe this is covered in a technote but I don't have
it.)
2.  NetBackup 6 sets an alarm in advance for when backups are due rather
than check for this every ten minutes, IIRC from training materials.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu