[Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Hi we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server. Client is on Solaris 10. we found client's Backup status error 41 on active monitor. we attach client's log (bpbkar) and master server's error log. 01:35:53.185 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar compress_file: INF - Compression: 42% /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - cwd = /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = libjvm.so 01:36:18.712 [24934] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno = 32: Broken pipe 01:36:18.721 [24934] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status = 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.721 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - EXIT STATUS 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.722 [24934] 2 bpbkar Exit: INF - Close of stdout complete 01:36:18.722 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - setenv FINISHED=0 For troubleshooting this error I have checked bp.config file on client and It's OK I have checked link speed on both (client and server). It's 100 MBPS/Full Duplex. How to resolve this error - Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Good day, Are both the switch and the server set to full duplex? Make sure that reverse lookup on the domain is working correctly. Regards, Clem Kruger 'Plan, Plan, Plan - Train hard, expect the worst and you'll be surprised at how you grow and what one's team can achieve.' Telkom SA Ltd ITS Infrastructure Storage Management : +27 (12) 680 3102 : +27 (12) 680 3299 : +27 (83) 326 2260 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murtuja Khokhar Sent: 20 February 2007 14:13 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Hi we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server. Client is on Solaris 10. we found client's Backup status error 41 on active monitor. we attach client's log (bpbkar) and master server's error log. 01:35:53.185 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar compress_file: INF - Compression: 42% /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - cwd = /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = libjvm.so 01:36:18.712 [24934] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno = 32: Broken pipe 01:36:18.721 [24934] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status = 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.721 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - EXIT STATUS 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.722 [24934] 2 bpbkar Exit: INF - Close of stdout complete 01:36:18.722 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - setenv FINISHED=0 For troubleshooting this error I have checked bp.config file on client and It's OK I have checked link speed on both (client and server). It's 100 MBPS/Full Duplex. How to resolve this error Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http:/tools.search.yahoo.com/toolba r/features/mail/ alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. ~~ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited e-mail legal notice available at http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF ~~attachment: image001.jpg attachment: image002.jpg attachment: image003.jpg attachment: image004.jpg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Are you at MP4? That is the only thing that fixed it for me, when I was getting the same errors. Steve _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clem Kruger (C) Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:50 AM To: Murtuja Khokhar; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Good day, Are both the switch and the server set to full duplex? Make sure that reverse lookup on the domain is working correctly. Regards, Clem Kruger 'Plan, Plan, Plan - Train hard, expect the worst and you'll be surprised at how you grow and what one's team can achieve.' Telkom SA Ltd ITS Infrastructure Storage Management : +27 (12) 680 3102 : +27 (12) 680 3299 : +27 (83) 326 2260 : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murtuja Khokhar Sent: 20 February 2007 14:13 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Hi we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server. Client is on Solaris 10. we found client's Backup status error 41 on active monitor. we attach client's log (bpbkar) and master server's error log. 01:35:53.185 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar compress_file: INF - Compression: 42% /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - cwd = /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = libjvm.so 01:36:18.712 [24934] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno = 32: Broken pipe 01:36:18.721 [24934] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status = 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.721 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - EXIT STATUS 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.722 [24934] 2 bpbkar Exit: INF - Close of stdout complete 01:36:18.722 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - setenv FINISHED=0 For troubleshooting this error I have checked bp.config file on client and It's OK I have checked link speed on both (client and server). It's 100 MBPS/Full Duplex. How to resolve this error _ Never http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http:/tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/feat ures/mail/ miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. ~~ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited e-mail legal notice available at http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF ~~ attachment: image001.jpg attachment: image002.jpg attachment: image003.jpg attachment: image004.jpg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Steve,
We have not installed any MP.
Clem,
Yes,Both swith and server set to full duplex.
lookup means below commands ?? If yes then It's working fine on client.
bpclntcmd -sv
bpclntcmd -self
bpclntcmd -pn
bpclntcmd -hn master_server_hostname
bpclntcmd -hn client_server_hostname
bpclntcmd -ip master_server_ip_address
bpclntcmd -ip client_server_ip_address
Steve Fogarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } o\:* { BEHAVIOR:
url(#default#VML) } w\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } .shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } st1\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#ieooui)
} @font-face { font-family: Tahoma; } @font-face { font-family:
Comic Sans MS; } @font-face { font-family: Monotype Corsiva; } @page
Section1 {size: 595.3pt 841.9pt; margin: 72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Times New
Roman } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Times New Roman } DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;
FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman } A:link { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION:
underline } SPAN.MsoHyperlink { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline }
A:visited { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline }
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline } P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt;
MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman;
mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto } SPAN.EmailStyle20 {
FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: navy; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Comic Sans
MS; TEXT-DECORATION: none; mso-style-type: personal-reply } DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1 } OL { MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0cm } UL { MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0cm }
Are you at MP4? That is the only thing that fixed it for me, when I was
getting the same errors.
Steve
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clem Kruger (C)
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:50 AM
To: Murtuja Khokhar; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Good day,
Are both the switch and the server set to full duplex?
Make sure that reverse lookup on the domain is working correctly.
Regards,
Clem Kruger
'Plan, Plan, Plan Train hard, expect the worst and youll be surprised at
how you grow and what one's team can achieve.
Telkom SA Ltd
ITS Infrastructure Storage Management
: +27 (12) 680 3102
: +27 (12) 680 3299
: +27 (83) 326 2260
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murtuja Khokhar
Sent: 20 February 2007 14:13 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Hi
we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server.
Client is on Solaris 10.
we found client's Backup status error 41 on active monitor.
we attach client's log (bpbkar) and master server's error log.
01:35:53.185 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = Xusage.txt
01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar compress_file: INF - Compression: 42%
/usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt
01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar PrintFile:
/usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt
01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - cwd =
/usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server
01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = libjvm.so
01:36:18.712 [24934] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno
= 32: Broken pipe
01:36:18.721 [24934] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status = 24:
socket write failed
01:36:18.721 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - EXIT STATUS 24: socket write failed
01:36:18.722 [24934] 2 bpbkar Exit: INF - Close of stdout complete
01:36:18.722 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - setenv FINISHED=0
For troubleshooting this error
I have checked bp.config file on client and It's OK
I have checked link speed on both (client and server). It's 100 MBPS/Full
Duplex.
How to resolve this error
-
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
jpgAQEBagv7mb.jpg
Description: JPEG image
jpgOog1jClQcA.jpg
Description: JPEG image
jpgCcwsXmcvcK.jpg
Description: JPEG image
jpgLPi5gXwtXQ.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Better go 4...or you might be into more problems then this one. The MPs have fixed allot of issues. Steve _ From: Murtuja Khokhar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:42 AM To: Steve Fogarty; 'Clem Kruger (C)'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Steve, We have not installed any MP. Clem, Yes,Both swith and server set to full duplex. lookup means below commands ?? If yes then It's working fine on client. bpclntcmd -sv bpclntcmd -self bpclntcmd -pn bpclntcmd -hn master_server_hostname bpclntcmd -hn client_server_hostname bpclntcmd -ip master_server_ip_address bpclntcmd -ip client_server_ip_address Steve Fogarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you at MP4? That is the only thing that fixed it for me, when I was getting the same errors. Steve _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clem Kruger (C) Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:50 AM To: Murtuja Khokhar; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Good day, Are both the switch and the server set to full duplex? Make sure that reverse lookup on the domain is working correctly. Regards, Clem Kruger 'Plan, Plan, Plan - Train hard, expect the worst and you'll be surprised at how you grow and what one's team can achieve.' Telkom SA Ltd ITS Infrastructure Storage Management : +27 (12) 680 3102 : +27 (12) 680 3299 : +27 (83) 326 2260 : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murtuja Khokhar Sent: 20 February 2007 14:13 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Hi we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server. Client is on Solaris 10. we found client's Backup status error 41 on active monitor. we attach client's log (bpbkar) and master server's error log. 01:35:53.185 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar compress_file: INF - Compression: 42% /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server/Xusage.txt 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - cwd = /usr/j2se/jre/lib/sparc/server 01:35:53.188 [24934] 2 bpbkar SelectFile: INF - path = libjvm.so 01:36:18.712 [24934] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno = 32: Broken pipe 01:36:18.721 [24934] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status = 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.721 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - EXIT STATUS 24: socket write failed 01:36:18.722 [24934] 2 bpbkar Exit: INF - Close of stdout complete 01:36:18.722 [24934] 4 bpbkar Exit: INF - setenv FINISHED=0 For troubleshooting this error I have checked bp.config file on client and It's OK I have checked link speed on both (client and server). It's 100 MBPS/Full Duplex. How to resolve this error _ Never http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http:/tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/feat ures/mail/ miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://us.f327.mail.yahoo.com/ym/%0d%0ahttp:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49937/*htt p:/tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ Check it out. ~~ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited e-mail legal notice available at http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF ~~ _ Everyone is raving about the http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. attachment: ATT00021.jpg attachment: ATT00024.jpg attachment: ATT00027.jpg attachment: ATT00030.jpg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option (SSO)
Hi, Currently we are running NB 5.0 and doing LAN-based backups. We have one tape library (StorageTek L180) that is directly connected to the master server. We'll be upgrading our backup infrastructure to Netbackup 6.0 and move from LAN-based backup to SAN-based backup using NetBackup's SSO option. Even though I did do my homework and read through Shared Storage Option (SSO) Topics of Veritas NetBackup 6.0 Media Manager SA's Guide page by page, I still have a few questions: 1) How does Veritas license SSO? Is it based on tape drives? 2) Does each master/media server that will be sharing the tape drives need an individual SSO license, or only one single SSO license is needed and can be installed on all the servers? 3) We'll be connecting the tape library (StorageTek L180) to the SAN switch during the upgrade. Do we just connect the robot to the FC switch, or we need to connect the robot and all of the tape drives that are in it to the FC switch? 4) We'll be running EMM on the master servers which will act as the host allocating and deallocating tap drives. In this case, do the master servers need to be connected to the SAN? Thanks, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Hello Khokhar, it seems you are using compression for the backup, 1) value for CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT ? 2) please do increase the client read timeout value on the client. looking forward to your response in these regards. Warmest Regards Ankur Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
Hi, Try updating following parameters in bp.conf file of your Netbackup master server CLIENT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT Refire the backup and see...hope things will work fine for you now Thanks Regards, Gaurav Rakheja, Retail Technology Group, ICICI Bank Ltd, Netbackup Admin Team, Zenith House, Mahalaxmi Mumbai +91-22-2490 6087 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.icicibank.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ankur kumar Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:04 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ?? Hello Khokhar, it seems you are using compression for the backup, 1) value for CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT ? 2) please do increase the client read timeout value on the client. looking forward to your response in these regards. Warmest Regards Ankur Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient acknowledges that ICICI Bank or its subsidiaries and associated companies, (collectively ICICI Group), are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of ICICI Group.Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option(SSO)
To clarify SSO licensing.. You need one SSO license for each tape drive you plan to dynamically share. I.e. if you have 10 tape drives connected to the SAN and plan to share 6 of them between 20 servers, you would need 6 SSO licenses. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:00 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] RES: Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option(SSO) 1 - Yes 2 - On each media you need a SSO license and SAN Media license. 3 - You can connect only the tapes, and the arm control stay with the master, but particularly I preffer connect the robot and tapes, is more easy to configure using the wizard if you has many tapes. 4 - If you want to make backups using the SAN or to maintain the arm control with the master, yes. T+ Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos Eng. Computação - Jundiaí SP-BR * [EMAIL PROTECTED] H https://www.linkedin.com/in/carlostoca skype carlostoca msn only [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Rongsheng Fang Enviada em: terça-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2007 12:51 Para: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option (SSO) Hi, Currently we are running NB 5.0 and doing LAN-based backups. We have one tape library (StorageTek L180) that is directly connected to the master server. We'll be upgrading our backup infrastructure to Netbackup 6.0 and move from LAN-based backup to SAN-based backup using NetBackup's SSO option. Even though I did do my homework and read through Shared Storage Option (SSO) Topics of Veritas NetBackup 6.0 Media Manager SA's Guide page by page, I still have a few questions: 1) How does Veritas license SSO? Is it based on tape drives? 2) Does each master/media server that will be sharing the tape drives need an individual SSO license, or only one single SSO license is needed and can be installed on all the servers? 3) We'll be connecting the tape library (StorageTek L180) to the SAN switch during the upgrade. Do we just connect the robot to the FC switch, or we need to connect the robot and all of the tape drives that are in it to the FC switch? 4) We'll be running EMM on the master servers which will act as the host allocating and deallocating tap drives. In this case, do the master servers need to be connected to the SAN? Thanks, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! Experimente já e veja as novidades. http://br.yahoo.com/mailbeta/tudonovo/ ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] encryption and offhost
One or the other. The client in this case would be whichever system ultimately does the backup. Media Server Encryption Option provides key management and compression, which are extremely nice features. But with one client, it is not a huge benefit. If your plan is to add other clients to be encrypted at some point, MSEO is the right way to go, otherwise, Client encryption is probably more cost effective. Steve _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthews, Gary Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:57 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] encryption and offhost A quick query. We've been asked to look at encryption for one of our systems. The client that needs encryption is currently being backed up with vss/clariion snapshot integration to off-host backup on the media server. In this case what would be the process for encryption and restoring from those backups ,? Should encryption be set on the client, media server or both? TIA Gary This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
Amen Brotha! Good catch! Media Sharing The media sharing feature allows multiple NetBackup media servers to actively share a given tape media for write purposes. Media sharing reduces tape media-related expenses by enabling increased media utilization which in turn reduces amounts of partially full media and total number of tape media required to store a given amount of backup data. Media sharing reduces the vaulting related expenses because fewer pieces of media will need to be vaulted and fewer pieces of empty media will need to be placed into the scratch pool. Media sharing also provides the ability to hand off a mounted tape to another media server, eliminating mount time for backup to different media servers. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:29 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
I thought 6.0 could do that, since the media servers don't hold any media info. or is the new part the hand off of a mounted tape to another media server which is a logical extension of the 6.0 functionality? Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) Sent: February 20, 2007 1:41 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek Amen Brotha! Good catch! Media Sharing The media sharing feature allows multiple NetBackup media servers to actively share a given tape media for write purposes. Media sharing reduces tape media-related expenses by enabling increased media utilization which in turn reduces amounts of partially full media and total number of tape media required to store a given amount of backup data. Media sharing reduces the vaulting related expenses because fewer pieces of media will need to be vaulted and fewer pieces of empty media will need to be placed into the scratch pool. Media sharing also provides the ability to hand off a mounted tape to another media server, eliminating mount time for backup to different media servers. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:29 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
6.0 can not doit Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/20/2007 1:47 PM I thought 6.0 could do that, since the media servers don't hold any media info. or is the new part the hand off of a mounted tape to another media server which is a logical extension of the 6.0 functionality? Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) Sent: February 20, 2007 1:41 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek Amen Brotha! Good catch! Media SharingThe media sharing feature allows multiple NetBackup media servers to activelyshare a given tape media for write purposes. Media sharing reduces tapemedia-related expenses by enabling increased media utilization which in turnreduces amounts of partially full media and total number of tape media requiredto store a given amount of backup data. Media sharing reduces the vaultingrelated expenses because fewer pieces of media will need to be vaulted and fewerpieces of empty media will need to be placed into the scratch pool. Media sharingalso provides the ability to hand off a mounted tape to another media server,eliminating mount time for backup to different media servers. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:29 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 La version française suit le texte anglais.This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank ofCanada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of thisemail or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient isunauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately fromyour system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle.La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion,utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par unepersonne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevezce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai àl'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votreordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
6.0 introduced the shared DB (EMM) so all media is tracked in a combined location vs each media server having its own MediaDB. However 6.0 could not share media between Media Servers. this is a new feature in 6.5 Steve On 2/20/07, Bob Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6.0 can not doit Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/20/2007 1:47 PM I thought 6.0 could do that, since the media servers don't hold any media info. or is the new part the hand off of a mounted tape to another media server which is a logical extension of the 6.0 functionality? Paul -- -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) *Sent:* February 20, 2007 1:41 PM *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek Amen Brotha! Good catch! Media Sharing The media sharing feature allows multiple NetBackup media servers to actively share a given tape media for write purposes. Media sharing reduces tape media-related expenses by enabling increased media utilization which in turn reduces amounts of partially full media and total number of tape media required to store a given amount of backup data. Media sharing reduces the vaulting related expenses because fewer pieces of media will need to be vaulted and fewer pieces of empty media will need to be placed into the scratch pool. Media sharing also provides the ability to hand off a mounted tape to another media server, eliminating mount time for backup to different media servers. -- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bob Stump *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:29 PM *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
*cough* thats a pretty big list of enhancements. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/20/2007 01:42:37 PM: NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Sort of OT: Aptare/HBSM/3rd Party NBU Reporting Users MUST READ
Just a heads up for those using 3rd party reporting/trending tools who are on or plan to upgrade to 5.1MP6: There is a bug in a library file in 5.1 MP6 that will cause Aptare StorageConsole/HBSM (Hitachi's rebranded name of the product), possibly other reporting tools and maybe even the included NBU tools (bpdbjobs, etc.) to not collect, at a minimum, total MB, MB/s, and tapes written for all/most jobs. To my knowledge this has only affected a couple of other Aptare customers, but it has certainly caused me lots of pain and I still have several weeks of missing info. Quoting the engineer when I asked him about any data loss, The data is stored correctly in the appropriate NetBackup databases. Any reporting tools that rely on libVcom such as bpdbjobs, will truncate date and time output information until the fix is applied. My case number with Veritas/Symantec for this issue was 280-994-548. If you plan on upgrading to 5.1 MP6 and use any 3rd party reporting tool, especially Aptare/HBSM, make sure you get the updated library file from Veritas. Since applying the Veritas fix, all data has been gathered correctly. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP Sr. Data Assurance Engineer (281) 584-4693 VeriCenter, Inc. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Mysteriously down tape drives
System is Veritas Netbackup 5.1 MP6 1 Master/Media server running on Windows 2003 standard edition, SP1 Library is a Qualstar TLS-8466 with 4 drives. 2 LTOII that are attached to our Fibre Channel SAN via a SCSI to fibre bridge, 2 LTOIII that are directly fibre attached to our SAN. All are going through a McData Spherion 4500. Seemingly random issue that is occuring is that on occasion our LTOIII drives will be reported in Netbackup as down. What I am looking for is, what are the correct Netbackup processes to activate logging on to get some troubleshooting information? The drive doesn't report as having any problems from the library's perspective, and there are no error messages on the fabric switches. The Netbackup server is zoned to each fibre port in the library individually, so there are 3 zones: Netbackup server to SCSI to fibre bridge (Controls robotic arm, and 2 LTOII drives) Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 1 Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 2. We never have any issues with the LTOII drives or the robotic arm, but the LTOIII drives go down for seemingly no reason whatsoever. Any assistance with troubleshooting this issue is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Matt Ungaro -- After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say I want to see the manager. - William S. Burroughs ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] encryption and offhost
On 2/20/2007 12:03 PM, Steve Dvorak wrote: A quick query. We’ve been asked to look at encryption for one of our systems. The client that needs encryption is currently being backed up with vss/clariion snapshot integration to off-host backup on the media server. In this case what would be the process for encryption and restoring from those backups ,? Should encryption be set on the client, media server or both? One or the other. The client in this case would be whichever system ultimately does the backup. Media Server Encryption Option provides key management and compression, which are extremely nice features. But with one client, it is not a huge benefit. If your plan is to add other clients to be encrypted at some point, MSEO is the right way to go, otherwise, Client encryption is probably more cost effective. For a single client that has extra CPU power, client-side encryption is not too bad. For a handful of clients, MSEO might be the right way to go. If you're going to do everything, purchase an encryption appliance like a Decru/NetApp Cryptostor. We decided to go the Decru approach - we don't have to worry about which clients are encrypted and which aren't, or if data was copied from a server that has encrypted backups to a server that doesn't. We know that if the tape goes offsite, it's encrypted. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] How to resolve error 41 error 24 ??
On 2/20/2007 7:42 AM, Murtuja Khokhar wrote: we have Netbackup v 6.0 on Windows 2003 as Master server. We have not installed any MP. This is a *very* bad combination. You should install 6.0 MP4 at the earlier possible time. There are serious, critical issues with 6.0 that can cause some backups simply not to be scheduled and it won't tell you either. There are hundreds of bugs that have been fixed. Do not expect any support from Symantec on an unpatched 6.0 installation. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Mysteriously down tape drives
In case it's not obvious, it may be important to recall that DOWN is a NetBackup status, not an operating system or hardware state. The robot and drive may be in perfect health, but still NetBackup may set the drive status to DOWN. I'd first look in the (v5.1) error file. On Unix servers this is /usr/openv/netbackup/db/media/errors ... probably similar in Win2003. Then I'd look at the bptm logs. See the troubleshooting guide for instructions on setting up logging, if not already setup. cheers, wayne Matt Ungaro wrote, in part, on 2/20/2007 4:52 PM: System is Veritas Netbackup 5.1 MP6 1 Master/Media server running on Windows 2003 standard edition, SP1 Library is a Qualstar TLS-8466 with 4 drives. 2 LTOII that are attached to our Fibre Channel SAN via a SCSI to fibre bridge, 2 LTOIII that are directly fibre attached to our SAN. All are going through a McData Spherion 4500. Seemingly random issue that is occuring is that on occasion our LTOIII drives will be reported in Netbackup as down. What I am looking for is, what are the correct Netbackup processes to activate logging on to get some troubleshooting information? The drive doesn't report as having any problems from the library's perspective, and there are no error messages on the fabric switches. The Netbackup server is zoned to each fibre port in the library individually, so there are 3 zones: Netbackup server to SCSI to fibre bridge (Controls robotic arm, and 2 LTOII drives) Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 1 Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 2. We never have any issues with the LTOII drives or the robotic arm, but the LTOIII drives go down for seemingly no reason whatsoever. Any assistance with troubleshooting this issue is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Mysteriously down tape drives
Ok so the problems seem to be linked with the LTO3 drives - have you enabled BPTM logging at max on the server? Also, may sound daft, are you running the latest firmware for these drives? Also latest drivers? Netbackup relies on communication between the OS and the hardware - if it detects something is wrong, it can mark the device as down, even if it looks ok. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Matt Ungaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 February 2007 21:53 To: Veritas-Mail-List Subject: [Veritas-bu] Mysteriously down tape drives System is Veritas Netbackup 5.1 MP6 1 Master/Media server running on Windows 2003 standard edition, SP1 Library is a Qualstar TLS-8466 with 4 drives. 2 LTOII that are attached to our Fibre Channel SAN via a SCSI to fibre bridge, 2 LTOIII that are directly fibre attached to our SAN. All are going through a McData Spherion 4500. Seemingly random issue that is occuring is that on occasion our LTOIII drives will be reported in Netbackup as down. What I am looking for is, what are the correct Netbackup processes to activate logging on to get some troubleshooting information? The drive doesn't report as having any problems from the library's perspective, and there are no error messages on the fabric switches. The Netbackup server is zoned to each fibre port in the library individually, so there are 3 zones: Netbackup server to SCSI to fibre bridge (Controls robotic arm, and 2 LTOII drives) Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 1 Netbackup server to LTOIII drive 2. We never have any issues with the LTOII drives or the robotic arm, but the LTOIII drives go down for seemingly no reason whatsoever. Any assistance with troubleshooting this issue is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Matt Ungaro -- After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say I want to see the manager. - William S. Burroughs This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option (SSO)
Hello Rongsheng Hopefully the following pointers will assist: Q1: The Shared Storage option is based on the number of tape drives you wish to share in your Netbackup environment Q2: Each NetBackup Media Server will require a Media License / SSO License. You may also know this as a SAN MEDIA Server, which is what I refer to them as. They are licensed to communicate with the Master Server, and also the SSO License allows them to share the Tape Drive or Drives. Q3: Well, what I have done is connected the drives and robot to the Fabric. I run Win2k3, and essentially what Windows does is detects a Medium Changer and the relevant Tape drives that are present on the fabric. Doing this also allows you to run the Device Configuration Wizard quite easily in windows. Of course you can do this task manually by adding a robot and tape drives. Q4: I do not know much about the EMM, but essentially, the Master needs to be connected to the SAN, and I would say very likely in your case. Of course my answers could be wrong :-) but this is my understanding and how my setup works. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rongsheng Fang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 February 2007 14:51 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Questions about NetBackup Shared Storage Option (SSO) Hi, Currently we are running NB 5.0 and doing LAN-based backups. We have one tape library (StorageTek L180) that is directly connected to the master server. We'll be upgrading our backup infrastructure to Netbackup 6.0 and move from LAN-based backup to SAN-based backup using NetBackup's SSO option. Even though I did do my homework and read through Shared Storage Option (SSO) Topics of Veritas NetBackup 6.0 Media Manager SA's Guide page by page, I still have a few questions: 1) How does Veritas license SSO? Is it based on tape drives? 2) Does each master/media server that will be sharing the tape drives need an individual SSO license, or only one single SSO license is needed and can be installed on all the servers? 3) We'll be connecting the tape library (StorageTek L180) to the SAN switch during the upgrade. Do we just connect the robot to the FC switch, or we need to connect the robot and all of the tape drives that are in it to the FC switch? 4) We'll be running EMM on the master servers which will act as the host allocating and deallocating tap drives. In this case, do the master servers need to be connected to the SAN? Thanks, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek
Hm not good. do not see any option to upgrade from 5.1 to 6.5. So looks like either an in-trim 5.1 - 6.0 - 6.5 or migrate from 5.1 - 6.0 ! Trouble is I still run NT clients too. When is 6.5 meant to be released Bob ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 February 2007 18:29 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sneak Peek NetBackup 6.5 BETA version of the Symantec Veritas NetBackup (tm) Release Notes for UNIX, Windows, and Linux (last updated 2/16/2007) http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 http://support.veritas.com/docs/287075 This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
