Re: [Veritas-bu] MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-22 Thread Dominik Pietrzykowski


Could you mail out the binary 


-Original Message-
From: crhea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2007 7:41 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...


Known problem with MP5.

Engineering is looking at it now.

They say you can manually uncompress the *.f.Z file and edit the header file
(the file with the same name without the .f to change
FILES_FILE_COMPRESSED 1
to FILES_FILE_COMPRESSED 0.

This is a serious kludge since it's hard to find the name of the catalog
using the
restore GUI...

My case with Support is:  
Case 290-841-020

I'll post something when I know more

--- Cris

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-22 Thread crhea

Sorry, but the terms of support state that I cannot redistribute the code.

If you reference my case number (290-841-020), Support should be able to 
quickly find the code they sent to me.

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem

2007-08-22 Thread Abhishek . Dhingra
Dear All,

 I am installing Netbackup clinet on Ubuntu Linux running kernel 
version 2.6.15-28-686.
Installation went fine , without any error. But when i am trying to telnet 
the bpcd port of the clinet from the master server. I am getting the error 

bpcd: relocation error: bpcd: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined 
in fie libc.so.6 with link time reference

Please help in resolving the issues.

Rgds
Abhishek___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem

2007-08-22 Thread Justin Piszcz
What distribution are you running?  Ubuntu is not an officially supported 
client.  It appears your version of glibc is incompatible with the bpcd 
binary.  This can sometimes be fixed by upgrading to a different version 
of glibc.  Ultimately though you need to be running on a supported 
platform.

Justin.

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am installing Netbackup clinet on Ubuntu Linux running kernel
 version 2.6.15-28-686.
 Installation went fine , without any error. But when i am trying to telnet
 the bpcd port of the clinet from the master server. I am getting the error

 bpcd: relocation error: bpcd: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined
 in fie libc.so.6 with link time reference

 Please help in resolving the issues.

 Rgds
 Abhishek
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem

2007-08-22 Thread Abhishek . Dhingra
Justin,

   I was running fine earlier, after doing the hardware migration , it 
starts failing.

Rgds
Abhishek



Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/22/2007 04:01 PM

To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem






What distribution are you running?  Ubuntu is not an officially supported 
client.  It appears your version of glibc is incompatible with the bpcd 
binary.  This can sometimes be fixed by upgrading to a different version 
of glibc.  Ultimately though you need to be running on a supported 
platform.

Justin.

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am installing Netbackup clinet on Ubuntu Linux running kernel
 version 2.6.15-28-686.
 Installation went fine , without any error. But when i am trying to 
telnet
 the bpcd port of the clinet from the master server. I am getting the 
error

 bpcd: relocation error: bpcd: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not 
defined
 in fie libc.so.6 with link time reference

 Please help in resolving the issues.

 Rgds
 Abhishek
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] FW: NetBackup 6.5 Drive path

2007-08-22 Thread Keating, John
Hello,

I'm trying to add an NDMP drive to my robot in Veritas NB 6.5. The OS of
server Win2k3 SP2 and the robot is a Quantum M1500 w/ HP Ultrium drives.

 

I'm at the point where I can put in the path Information but cannot
find such info. 

How do I find what the drive path is???

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Regards,

John

 

 

image001.jpg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] error connecting to oprd on solaris : cannot connect to vmd

2007-08-22 Thread sonu

HI,
   Failed to configure tape drive connected to media server from msater server. 
Was able to add media server in master server without any error and is showing 
as connected in mediaserver tab

The error is 
error connecting to oprd on solaris : cannot connect to vmd(70)

My setup is 
Master server : win2 32bit
media server : solaris 9
Virtual tape library 
tape drive : IBM LTO4 

executed following command 
bash-2.05# ./vmglob -get_gdbhost
w2k-84

Kindly provide me some solution for this error

Thanks
Sunanda

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem

2007-08-22 Thread Abhishek . Dhingra
Peter,

   I am getting 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/dhingra# ldd /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpcd
 linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xe000)
 libnsl.so.1 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7fc8000)
 libresolv.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7fb5000)
 libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb7fb1000)
 libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7e82000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fe8000)

No package missing

Rgds
Abhishek



Peter DrakeUnderkoffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/22/2007 06:07 PM

To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem






-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Check to see if any libraries are missing as far as NetBackup bpcd is
concerned, run:

ldd /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpcd

and see what is missing.

Thanks
Peter


Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
Xinupro, LLC
617-834-2352



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Justin,
 
I was running fine earlier, after doing the hardware migration ,
 it starts failing.
 
 Rgds
 Abhishek
 
 
 *Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
 Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 08/22/2007 04:01 PM
 
 
 To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 cc
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux client telnet problem
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 What distribution are you running?  Ubuntu is not an officially 
supported
 client.  It appears your version of glibc is incompatible with the bpcd
 binary.  This can sometimes be fixed by upgrading to a different version
 of glibc.  Ultimately though you need to be running on a supported
 platform.
 
 Justin.
 
 On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Dear All,

 I am installing Netbackup clinet on Ubuntu Linux running kernel
 version 2.6.15-28-686.
 Installation went fine , without any error. But when i am trying to 
telnet
 the bpcd port of the clinet from the master server. I am getting the 
error

 bpcd: relocation error: bpcd: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not 
defined
 in fie libc.so.6 with link time reference

 Please help in resolving the issues.

 Rgds
 Abhishek
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGzC4Pl+lekZRM55oRAhPpAJ9nWevInVJ/CFC57aIUB+JLH9LoHwCgrEYX
+dZ1Pjg2yHVCmINZcXlElH4=
=xsc6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-22 Thread Tim Hoke
As for platforms affected, it's only UNIX.  Windows uses built in API
calls to the native file system compression.

Just call support, they ought to had it out no problem.

-Tim

On 8/22/07, crhea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry, but the terms of support state that I cannot redistribute the code.

 If you reference my case number (290-841-020), Support should be able to 
 quickly find the code they sent to me.

 +--
 |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
 |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +--


 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

2007-08-22 Thread Martin, Jonathan
BPARCHIVE will not remove the data unless the backup completes
successfully - Status 0.
 
Even a Status 1 (skipped file or the like) and the archive completes but
the data is not removed.
 
-Jonathan
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:33 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] bparchive



Quick Q all

 

Does bparchive wait until successful completion before deleting the data
its archived, or does it delete as it in progress ?

 

Dave





Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

2007-08-22 Thread Clooney, David
Thanks Jonathan

 



From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 August 2007 14:50
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

 

BPARCHIVE will not remove the data unless the backup completes
successfully - Status 0.

 

Even a Status 1 (skipped file or the like) and the archive completes but
the data is not removed.

 

-Jonathan

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:33 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

Quick Q all

 

Does bparchive wait until successful completion before deleting the data
its archived, or does it delete as it in progress ?

 

Dave

 



Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading 5.x servers

2007-08-22 Thread Martin Ruslan
The same as your master..
go to the latest MP, install the ICS, upgrade the netbackup, install the MP4
convert the catalog.
Make sure there's no backup run when you upgrade with deactivate your
policies, and other media servers.

Regards,
mTz


On 8/20/07, Kenneth W Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I have successfully upgraded my master server to 6.0mp4 and I left my
 media servers at 5.1.  Is there a technote somewhere on how to properly
 upgrade 5.x media servers after the master has been upgraded?



 Kenneth

 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

2007-08-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
For the truly paranoid you can set it to delete after the 2nd time it is
archived.   That way you have it on tape twice before the first
deletion.

 

We used to do a rotating thing with Oracle archive logs to insure we
could roll forward if necessary.   We'd run an archive ever 6 hours and
the logs would only be deleted on the second pass so that we'd always
have 12 hours worth of logs on line and all the remaining logs on tape.

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:00 AM
To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

 

Thanks Jonathan

 



From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 August 2007 14:50
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

 

BPARCHIVE will not remove the data unless the backup completes
successfully - Status 0.

 

Even a Status 1 (skipped file or the like) and the archive completes but
the data is not removed.

 

-Jonathan

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:33 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

Quick Q all

 

Does bparchive wait until successful completion before deleting the data
its archived, or does it delete as it in progress ?

 

Dave

 



Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.



--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or use of the 
contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in 
error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the 
message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

2007-08-22 Thread Martin, Jonathan
My policy is that if this is going to be the last copy of this data on
any form of media it needs to be written twice, to two separate tapes.
I usually do this via archive policy and simultaneous duplication.  The
consequence of not doing that sits on my desk to this day.  A $5000
restore of media IN3111 from ontrak. =)
 
-Jonathan



From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:29 AM
To: Clooney, David; Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bparchive



For the truly paranoid you can set it to delete after the 2nd time it is
archived.   That way you have it on tape twice before the first
deletion.

 

We used to do a rotating thing with Oracle archive logs to insure we
could roll forward if necessary.   We'd run an archive ever 6 hours and
the logs would only be deleted on the second pass so that we'd always
have 12 hours worth of logs on line and all the remaining logs on tape.

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:00 AM
To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

 

Thanks Jonathan

 



From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 August 2007 14:50
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

 

BPARCHIVE will not remove the data unless the backup completes
successfully - Status 0.

 

Even a Status 1 (skipped file or the like) and the archive completes but
the data is not removed.

 

-Jonathan

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:33 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] bparchive

Quick Q all

 

Does bparchive wait until successful completion before deleting the data
its archived, or does it delete as it in progress ?

 

Dave

 



Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.

If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.



--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the 
contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this electronic transmission in 
error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the
message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] error connecting to oprd on solaris : cannot connect to vmd

2007-08-22 Thread sreekanth adari
Hi Sonu,

Pretty basic but easy to forget,

Did you restarted services on both Master and Media Servers ?

Did you checked any firewall are on on any of the servers ?

Did you checked weather the server list contains the correct host names
under

bp.conf ?

Host Properties ?

Netbackup Machines and policy types ?


You may have did these , if you miss any do it ,so it may help you .

With Regards :-)
-Sree
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Unit Recommendations

2007-08-22 Thread Chris Freemantle
Is you backup speed limited by the drives, or by the speed of the 
clients and or network?

I don't know what drives you have, but using a very simplistic view, 
your backup of 14TB in 2 1/2 days only averages out to 68MB/sec, or 17 
MB/sec spread evenly over 4 drives. Obviously it won't be spread evenly 
either in time or drives, but we can do a similar sized full backup in a 
similar time using one LTO-3 drive. The killer is the incrementals. Data 
transfer rate for the incrementals are really quite poor, down to about 
2MB/sec for some clients, in contrast to to the fulls where they are 
limited by their 100Mb network connection.

best

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm getting it done right now, about 14 TB starting friday at 6 pm till
 Monday at 6:00 am but it is tight. We only have a few Oracle RMAN backups
 right now but we are getting ready to move about 4 TB of Oracle from being
 a cold file level backup to RMAN.
 
 
 
 
 Brian Hesseling
 Storage Administrator
 American Modern Insurance Group
 7000 Midland Blvd.
 Amelia, OH 45103
 PH: 513.947.6821
 FX:513.388.5117
 
 
 

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  net   
 To 
  08/21/2007 01:32  [EMAIL PROTECTED],   
  PMveritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu   
 cc 

Subject 
Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Unit   
Recommendations 






 
 
 
 
 You are about 12 tape drives short for backing up that number of clients
 with SQL and Oracle and 250 clients.
 
 If your datamover can back up straight to tape, you are much better off
 attaching it direct and getting the NDMP agent.
 
 You will be in a constant fight to get your backups done.
 
 Bobby.
 
 
 
  -- Original message --
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
   I am looking for recommendations are configuring storage units. Right
  now
   the setup is:
  
   Master server is directly fiber attached to the library as the robotic
   control, and directly fiber attached to 2 drives in the library. Media
   server is directly fiber attached to the other 2 drives in the library.
  My
   storage units are one for the master with two drives in it and one for
  the
   media with the other two drives. All of my policies are defined for
  their
   storage units as Any Available. I am looking to improve the performance
  of
   my backups, I have 250 clients, with some SQL, Oracle, and NDMP agents
   sprinkled in.
  
   Should I break these up in to individual storage units for each drive
  and
   the n recombine them into storage groups of one 4 unit group, two 2 unit
 
   groups, and four 1 unit groups. Then assign the groups directly to the
   policies? Does that gain me anything?
  
   If I want to begin using disk staging do I need to change all of the
   policies from any available to either the disk storage unit or a tape
  unit?
  
  
   Brian H.
  
  
   -
   CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
   This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to
   be confidential. It is intended only for the addressee named
   above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read,
   copy, or disseminate it. If you are not the intended recipient,
   any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
   this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message
   immediately by informing the sender that the message was
   misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer
   system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.
   ___
   Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
   http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
 

-- 

Chris Freemantle
Data Manager
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
+44 (0)207 833 7496
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

2007-08-22 Thread Martin, Jonathan
Fyi to all, putting the media into the library and moving it out of the scratch 
pool did the trick.  No Stage 1 import required.

-Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: rcarlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

It should 


 
 
Reneé Carlisle
ServerWare Corporation
 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:41 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

Whoops - forgot to set the failover restore server.

Now I'm getting - requested media id was not found in the EMM database

Will a phase 1 import of the media take care of this?

-Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jonathan 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:27 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Restoring Data to a Separate Master

Windows 2003
NBU 6.0 MP4

I'm trying to restore data to a remote master server of data that was
backed up here.  My plan is to take a backup, fedex the media to the
remote site and copy the image files to the site into the images folder.
I'm testing this now, and I can see the server in the backup and restore
GUI just fine.  When I go to restore this information I get the
following error: access to server backup restore manager denied.  I
was expecting the server to create a job and look for the tape to be
mounted.  Is this an issue with the volume manager database?  The remote
master does not have this media in its volume database.  I'm missing
something here and I'm just wondering if anyone else can point me in the
right direction.

TIA,

-Jonathan

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Unit Recommendations

2007-08-22 Thread Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\)
We had a very similar situation where we have backups running for 3
days.  We were getting very good thru put but just the volume of data
getting backed up was killing us.  We had Mutliplexing enable which
helped but still running for days.  We just implemented Multisteaming on
our bigger servers, assuming you have the data carved up by drive
letters, mutlisteaming works GREAT, what NBU will do is takes each drive
letter and creates separate jobs so C: / D: / E: etc all get backed up
simultaneously. It took our 3 day backup down to only 21 hours.

Now if you are looking into Disk Staging, then you will need to assign
your policies to the disk storage group.  Then subsequently use the
Staging Schedule under that storage unit to send the disk staged data to
tape.  You will want to ensure you have enough disk storage to handle
the task.  Once the data is sent to tape, NBU will assign each image
with a ds prefix.  This way NBU knows that the data was sent to tape and
in the event your disk becomes full or hits your high water mark, NBU
will remove the oldest .ds file first.  The .ds is also used when your
job retention period has come and gone.  NBU will go in a delete the .ds
files when they expire.

Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Freemantle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Unit Recommendations

Is you backup speed limited by the drives, or by the speed of the 
clients and or network?

I don't know what drives you have, but using a very simplistic view, 
your backup of 14TB in 2 1/2 days only averages out to 68MB/sec, or 17

MB/sec spread evenly over 4 drives. Obviously it won't be spread evenly 
either in time or drives, but we can do a similar sized full backup in a

similar time using one LTO-3 drive. The killer is the incrementals. Data

transfer rate for the incrementals are really quite poor, down to about 
2MB/sec for some clients, in contrast to to the fulls where they are 
limited by their 100Mb network connection.

best

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm getting it done right now, about 14 TB starting friday at 6 pm
till
 Monday at 6:00 am but it is tight. We only have a few Oracle RMAN
backups
 right now but we are getting ready to move about 4 TB of Oracle from
being
 a cold file level backup to RMAN.
 
 
 
 
 Brian Hesseling
 Storage Administrator
 American Modern Insurance Group
 7000 Midland Blvd.
 Amelia, OH 45103
 PH: 513.947.6821
 FX:513.388.5117
 
 
 


  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  net


To 
  08/21/2007 01:32  [EMAIL PROTECTED],

  PM
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu   

cc 



Subject 
Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Unit

Recommendations













 
 
 
 
 You are about 12 tape drives short for backing up that number of
clients
 with SQL and Oracle and 250 clients.
 
 If your datamover can back up straight to tape, you are much better
off
 attaching it direct and getting the NDMP agent.
 
 You will be in a constant fight to get your backups done.
 
 Bobby.
 
 
 
  -- Original message --
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
   I am looking for recommendations are configuring storage units.
Right
  now
   the setup is:
  
   Master server is directly fiber attached to the library as the
robotic
   control, and directly fiber attached to 2 drives in the library.
Media
   server is directly fiber attached to the other 2 drives in the
library.
  My
   storage units are one for the master with two drives in it and one
for
  the
   media with the other two drives. All of my policies are defined for
  their
   storage units as Any Available. I am looking to improve the
performance
  of
   my backups, I have 250 clients, with some SQL, Oracle, and NDMP
agents
   sprinkled in.
  
   Should I break these up in to individual storage units for each
drive
  and
   the n recombine them into storage groups of one 4 unit group, two 2
unit
 
   groups, and four 1 unit groups. Then assign the groups directly to
the
   policies? Does that gain me anything?
  
   If I want to begin using disk staging do I need to change all of
the
   policies from any available to either the disk storage unit or a
tape
  unit?
  
  
   Brian H.
  
  
   -
   CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
   This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to
   be confidential. It is intended only for the addressee named
   above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read,
   copy, or disseminate it. If you are not the intended recipient,
   any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
   this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message
   immediately by informing the sender that the message was
   misdirected. After replying, please erase it 

Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread ckstehman
What OS is on your clients.  This is usually a network problem.
Check all your NIC settings.  Be sure they are all 100 full no auto neg, 
if running 100MB, it Gig set to auto.

Just a place to start.

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/22/2007 08:33 AM

To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc

Subject
[Veritas-bu] Error 41






Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status 
code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I can 
not figure out what is wrong?any ideas
 
Cruicer.
 
 
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and 
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).  This Email is
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed.  If
you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies.  PHI
policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email
communication.  PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such
communications.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
They are both W2K3 and are both VMs, so the local NICs settings are
controlled by the ESX host.  The NIC in that host is 1GB / Full.  If it
indeed was a network issue I would suspect that every VM that is using
the NIC would be have the same issue.  Only two out of about 200 are
having this issue.

 

Thanks

Dan



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

 


What OS is on your clients.  This is usually a network problem. 
Check all your NIC settings.  Be sure they are all 100 full no auto neg,
if running 100MB, it Gig set to auto. 

Just a place to start. 

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

08/22/2007 08:33 AM 

To

veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 

cc

 

Subject

[Veritas-bu] Error 41

 

 

 




Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status
code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I
can not figure out what is wrong...any ideas 
  
Cruicer. 
  

  
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to
copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).
This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it
is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies
expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by
Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of
such communications. 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread MJ de Sousa
Daniel,

Try disabling Volume Shadow copy service - I found it impacted the 
backup of the Shadow copy Components



Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
 Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status 
 code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I 
 can not figure out what is wrong…any ideas
 
  
shnipper
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Forever Assigned Media

2007-08-22 Thread Martin, Jonathan

I've found something interesting on a few of my media from this week.
It looks like if a NDMP backup fails, after writing a tape or two the
media kind of just sit there with invalid images.

I've got two media this week from a 3 way NDMP backup that failed
Saturday.  The Media Lists report says they have 2 images on them, but 0
valid images.  I'm not sure that this data can be restored, or that my
NDMP box can restart a failed backup?  I've restarted the failed backup
and its already completed it's 2nd attempt, and I've found I can
bpexpdate these media, but what a pain in the future.  I wonder if this
is by design?

I smell a support call...

-Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: Preston, Douglas L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:34 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Forever Assigned Media

I just found the solution to my 96 media that would not expire.
I have followed this technote to expire 2 of them so far.


http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/280181.htm 


Doug Preston
Systems Engineer
Land America Tax and Flood Services
Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 1104
Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication
that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or
receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this
electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system
without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our
address record can be corrected.






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:39 AM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Forever Assigned Media

NBU 6.0 MP4 running on Windows 2003

I've got a growing list of media in the robot that stay perma-assigned.
If I run a vmquery on the media id it shows no expiration date, and
bpimmedia shows no images on the media.  Yet, the media never revert to
scratch or ever get written to again.  Some of them bpexpdate (even with
no images?) and some come back as media id not found in EMM database.  I
thought all this media nonsense was over and done with but I guess not.
Anyone else having similar issues / is there a fix I'm not aware of?

-Jonathan

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread ckstehman
Does this happen every time you run a  backup? Do they run awhile before 
erroring out?
 We get 41's occaisionally, but a re-runs usually go OK.  It is hard to 
say not knowing how
your network is configured.

Were these recently added to ESX.?  Netbackup is very fussy about TCP/IP 
connections
We recently had issues backing up through a firewall, I ended up doing a 
regristry hack
to alllow more TCP retransmissions.  .

This can be a tough one.  Probably best to open a case with Symantec.

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/22/2007 02:57 PM

To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41






They are both W2K3 and are both VMs, so the local NICs settings are 
controlled by the ESX host.  The NIC in that host is 1GB / Full.  If it 
indeed was a network issue I would suspect that every VM that is using the 
NIC would be have the same issue.  Only two out of about 200 are having 
this issue.
 
Thanks
Dan

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41
 

What OS is on your clients.  This is usually a network problem. 
Check all your NIC settings.  Be sure they are all 100 full no auto neg, 
if running 100MB, it Gig set to auto. 

Just a place to start. 

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
08/22/2007 08:33 AM 


To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
cc
 
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Error 41
 


 
 




Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status 
code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I can 
not figure out what is wrong?any ideas 
  
Cruicer. 
 
  
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and 
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is 
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright 
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI). This Email is 
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If 
you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any 
copies. PHI policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory 
or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal 
right by Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect 
of such communications. ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).  This Email is
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed.  If
you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies.  PHI
policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email
communication.  PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such
communications.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
It's hit or miss on them...They are not new w/ regards to ESX, probably
about 6 months old.

 

Thanks

Dan



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:09 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

 


Does this happen every time you run a  backup? Do they run awhile before
erroring out? 
 We get 41's occaisionally, but a re-runs usually go OK.  It is hard to
say not knowing how 
your network is configured. 

Were these recently added to ESX.?  Netbackup is very fussy about TCP/IP
connections 
We recently had issues backing up through a firewall, I ended up doing a
regristry hack 
to alllow more TCP retransmissions.  . 

This can be a tough one.  Probably best to open a case with Symantec. 

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

08/22/2007 02:57 PM 

To

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

cc

veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Subject

Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

 

 

 




They are both W2K3 and are both VMs, so the local NICs settings are
controlled by the ESX host.  The NIC in that host is 1GB / Full.  If it
indeed was a network issue I would suspect that every VM that is using
the NIC would be have the same issue.  Only two out of about 200 are
having this issue. 
  
Thanks 
Dan 

 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41 
  

What OS is on your clients.  This is usually a network problem. 
Check all your NIC settings.  Be sure they are all 100 full no auto neg,
if running 100MB, it Gig set to auto. 

Just a place to start. 

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

08/22/2007 08:33 AM 

 

To

veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 

cc

  

Subject

[Veritas-bu] Error 41


  

 

  

 





Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status
code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I
can not figure out what is wrong...any ideas 
 
Cruicer. 
  

  
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to
copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).
This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it
is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies
expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by
Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of
such communications. ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to
copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).
This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it
is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies
expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right 

Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41

2007-08-22 Thread Major, Rusty
Create the logging directories on your client and set your logging on
the client to the maximum. Run a test backup or wait for the scheduled
backup to run and then look at your BPBKAR log. If that log contains TCP
100052 or 100053 delays, you may have a bad network card or network card
driver. if this is the case, I would start with upgrading the driver. If
that doesn't fix it, Veritas Support has an application you can run that
will examine the network and can tell you if you have any strange things
happening on the path between the client and media server.
 
Also, a 41 can occur if the box is rebooting or loosing the network
connection during backups. Verify that isn't happening. There's also a
Troubleshooting Guide for EC41 you can use - google for that and it
should come up.
 
Good luck
-Rusty



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:50 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41



What OS is on your clients.  This is usually a network problem. 
Check all your NIC settings.  Be sure they are all 100 full no auto neg,
if running 100MB, it Gig set to auto. 

Just a place to start. 

=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

08/22/2007 08:33 AM 

To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Error 41






Running NBU 6.0 MP4, and I have two clients where I am getting a status
code of 41 on.  Both clients are running W2K3 and for the life of me I
can not figure out what is wrong...any ideas 
  
Cruicer. 
  


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to
copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).
This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it
is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies
expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by
Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of
such communications. 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Backup failing - VERITAS

2007-08-22 Thread Hunter_Thompson

Wow, this forum has a lot of posts!

Anyway, if anyone gives a crap, as much as I don't want to believe it is a 
dirty head problem, it would be silly to try any other troubleshooting or 
diagnostic tests without out first going a pass of cleaning tape. BTW, the past 
two days have been backing up and verifying without incident. Last failed 
backup was Monday.

Let's sit back and wait for the next fail.

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu