[Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP4: Number of jobs shown in activity monitor

2008-03-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello.

Having a look at the Activity Monitor, I see that there are only 34
Jobs listed, with the oldest job from 03/07/2008.

I'm using the 6.0 MP4 Java GUI on Solaris.

Why are there only so few jobs listed?

Thanks,

Alexander

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

2008-03-10 Thread Justin Piszcz
1204936626 1 132 16 media-server-name 2429907 2429907 0 client-name bptm 
FREEZING media id CA1234, External event caused rewind during write, all 
data on media is lost

Anyone ever seen this before?  What is this usually caused by, bad/old 
media, or?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] bpexpdate Could not deassign .. could not deassign media

2008-03-10 Thread Justin Piszcz
Anyone ever seen this one as well?

1204908353 1 2 16 master-server 0 0 0 bpexpdate bpexpdate Could not 
deassign media-id CA2479, host media-server: could not deassign media due 
to Media Manager error (177)
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] VxSS/NBAC

2008-03-10 Thread LTejas

Eric, 

Is full client auth overkill?

Depends the level of security desired. If you want to disallow 
Root/Administrators from doing local backup and restore on client systems, then 
you would need complete NBAC.

 certificates expiry

Certificates that are issued via the ‘bpnbat –LoginMachine’ command get 
(automatically) renewed periodically. So in most cases you would not need to 
log into the client and issue the command again to request another cert.

HTH,
Tejas

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] bptm read error on media .. Cannot allocate memory

2008-03-10 Thread Justin Piszcz
1204923666 1 132 8 media-server 2428993 2428993 0 client-name bptm read 
error on media id CA0415, drive index 3 reading header block, Cannot 
allocate memory

Anyone ever seen this one before?  The memory segments/etc are set 
properly..

Running Linux/RHEL3.

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Mailbox backup error?

2008-03-10 Thread Lawler, Michael C.
I recently started doing brick level backups of my exchange data and I'm
getting an odd error message in my logs, the error is:

 

3/9/20089:45:08 PM   aua077  from client aua077: WRN -
MBOX:OpenCurMbox() HrMailboxLogon() returned 0x80004005

 

I'm getting a lot of these and my backup is only taking up about 34gb
worth of space on the tape...this can't be right since I've got closer
to 500gb worth of exchange data.

 

Does anyone know what this error means, and how to correct it?  I'm
worried that its telling me that it couldn't get into a mailbox to back
it up so its skipping it...

 

I'm currently running NBU 6.5.1 and Exchange 2003.

 

 

Michael Lawler

Systems Administrator, I

  http://www.cooperstandard.com/ 

+ Address: 207 South West Street, Auburn, IN 46706
* E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Phone: 260.927.3477
* Fax: 260.927.1348

 

image001.jpg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Mailbox backup error?

2008-03-10 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)

If you are using Ex2k3, then why bother with Mailbox backups? Why are
you not using the Built-in tools to help you move away from BLB ??
 
Simon



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawler,
Michael C.
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 12:44 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Mailbox backup error?



I recently started doing brick level backups of my exchange data and I'm
getting an odd error message in my logs, the error is:

 

3/9/20089:45:08 PM   aua077  from client aua077: WRN -
MBOX:OpenCurMbox() HrMailboxLogon() returned 0x80004005

 

I'm getting a lot of these and my backup is only taking up about 34gb
worth of space on the tape...this can't be right since I've got closer
to 500gb worth of exchange data.

 

Does anyone know what this error means, and how to correct it?  I'm
worried that its telling me that it couldn't get into a mailbox to back
it up so its skipping it...

 

I'm currently running NBU 6.5.1 and Exchange 2003.

 

 

Michael Lawler

Systems Administrator, I

  http://www.cooperstandard.com/ 

+ Address: 207 South West Street, Auburn, IN 46706
* E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Phone: 260.927.3477
* Fax: 260.927.1348

 



This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, Englandimage001.jpg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Netbackup client failing on daily incremental but ok on the

2008-03-10 Thread bruceephx

Not sure why this thread is getting split apart on the replies.  I advised him 
that there is a VSS update rollup he might look at.  More info here if you are 
interested:

http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/symantec-netbackup-18/netbackup-client-failing-on-daily-incremental-but-ok-on-the-87070/

Bruce R. Ellefritz
Lead User Technology Specialist
LAN  Email Administrator
Computer Services Bureau
Phoenix Police Dept.
City of Phoenix, Arizona
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

2008-03-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
We've seen it and it appears to be the drive itself (LTO-1/Ultrium).

FYI:  This corrupts the backup so when you try to restore later it will
give you messages about bad tar headers.  Do NOT rely on this backup
even if you later see 0 exit status.

We even had one drive that it appeared it corrupted EXISTING backups on
a tape when it mounted it and experienced this issue.   It appears the
vendor actually sent the drive back to us without correcting this
behavior so we had to send it back.  We now record the Serial Number and
problem for all drives we send back so we'll know if we get a
refurbished drive back later and experience the same problem we'll be
able to gig the support vendor.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:33 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

1204936626 1 132 16 media-server-name 2429907 2429907 0 client-name bptm

FREEZING media id CA1234, External event caused rewind during write, all

data on media is lost

Anyone ever seen this before?  What is this usually caused by, bad/old 
media, or?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

2008-03-10 Thread Justin Piszcz


On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Jeff Lightner wrote:

 We've seen it and it appears to be the drive itself (LTO-1/Ultrium).

 FYI:  This corrupts the backup so when you try to restore later it will
 give you messages about bad tar headers.  Do NOT rely on this backup
 even if you later see 0 exit status.

 We even had one drive that it appeared it corrupted EXISTING backups on
 a tape when it mounted it and experienced this issue.   It appears the
 vendor actually sent the drive back to us without correcting this
 behavior so we had to send it back.  We now record the Serial Number and
 problem for all drives we send back so we'll know if we get a
 refurbished drive back later and experience the same problem we'll be
 able to gig the support vendor.
Nasty problem, thanks for the heads up!

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0MP5: cannot add fragment to image database

2008-03-10 Thread Justin Piszcz


On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:



 On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:

 We are getting the following error on a big catalog backup:
 
 Error bptm (pid=16757) cannot add fragment to image database, error = 
 network connection timed out
 
 Running two identical 6.0MP5 server configurations, one has a bigger 
 catalog (more files than the other) and we get this error.  Recently I have 
 also migrated the openv installation to a fast RAID10 array--yet the 
 catalog backup still fails.  Anyone know of any tweaks or work-arounds to 
 get around this?
 
 Yes I have tried upping the timeouts to no avail.
 
 Justin.
 
 

 Other poster:
 http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/symantec-netbackup-18/error-code-233-premature-eof-encountered-62464/

 Similar issue.



Believe I may have found the issue, adding policies that contain images 
for thousands/millions of files into the critical policies section for the 
catalog backup appeared to be the culprit, after removing all 
policies from critical polices section from the catalog backup 
configuration my catalog backups work once again!

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.x and LTO4 drives

2008-03-10 Thread smpt1
You may have driver installation problems with Win2k3.
If you run into problems you have to ask a special patch form Microsoft, or
wait for Sp3.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Kiles
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:06 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.x and LTO4 drives

Hi

Any issues with using HP LTO4 drives with NBU6.x on
Win2K3 servers? Are there many people using it, with
or without encryption?

TIA


 


Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Lets hear about your upgrade experience! 5.x - 6.5

2008-03-10 Thread rascal
ok, so we found an interesting issue now with our upgrades.  Right now our
master/media server is experiencing issues with hot catalog backups (to
tape).  Here are some interesting, fun facts:

1.  our master server is an aix box with multiple interfaces
2.  its an upgrade from 5.1mp5 to 6.5.1
3.  everything BUT catalog works just peachy
4.  Error codes in include 252 (800), and 134.

Anyone have this problem out there?

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:31 AM, rascal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We are going through the upgrade process right now (5.1 to 6.5.1. on
 multiple servers/clients spanning aix5, solaris9/10, w2k3).  So far we have
 run into a couple of hiccups:

 1.  DB inconsistency:  Call Symantec!!!  Save your sanity, lol!
 2.  If you have multiple interfaces that you are using (pub, private,
 backup, extra, etc...) keep an eye on this as this caused some issues with
 our configuration and forced us to rollback to 5.1 at one site to resolve
 (simply rebuilding the device base and re-inventory the library).
 3.  VxSS:  nno issues thus far...
 4.  Catalog backup change:  We noticed that the EMM becomes unavailable
 during a backup; anyone else see this or this part of the new approach that
 netbackup is taking with catalogs?

 Other than that, everything seems to be running good.  Anyone else?

 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Weber, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

   We upgraded our environment a couple of weeks ago, from 5.1 to 6.5.1.
  Follow the instructions, and make sure you have a call open with Symantec
  well in advance so you can run all the database consistency checks and pass
  the results back and forth to Symantec to resolve any issues with media - we
  went through several cycles of this.  This environment is Solaris 9 /
  Solaris 10 with 1 master and 4 media servers, 2 Spectralogic libraries with
  LTO2/LTO3 tapes  encryption.  Solaris  Windows clients.
 
  Issues during the upgrade :
 
 - Still had problems with some LTO1 tapes imported from a previous
 environment.  Easily resolved with a call to Symantec.
 - Couldn't automatically upgrade the Solaris clients without going
 to them all to create a symlink for gzip and gunzip, easily resolved but 
  a
 bit naff.
 - Ongoing issues with Advanced Client where I can't get the
 snapctl driver to work at all (Solaris).  See separate posting.
 
  thanks, Phil
 
   --
  *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *WEAVER, Simon
  (external)
  *Sent:* 04 March 2008 15:35
 
  *To:* Tony T.; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Lets hear about your upgrade experience! 5.x-
  6.5
 
   Id be interested to hear if anyone had a plan of action from any NBU
  upgrade - I will be doing 5.1 to 6.5.1
 
  Si
 
   --
  *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Tony T.
  *Sent:* Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:32 PM
  *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Lets hear about your upgrade experience! 5.x -
  6.5
 
  Hi all,
 
  I am interested in hearing about any of the upgrades that you have done,
  mainly going from 5.x to 6.5
  There seem to be quite a few environments (in my area) that are looking
  to upgrade, and I am putting together some documentation
  that asks questions to better prepare for it.  I am still learning the
  ropes of NBU but I have a lot of experience with the server side
  of things especially Sun and AIX systems with SAN storage.
 
  I have the Symantec upgrade guide Upgrading to Veritas Netbackup 6.5
  and it appears to be pretty detailed, but it just covers the steps to get
  from point A to point B.
  Some of the things I am interested in finding out:
 
  - is there anyway to estimate how long step X might take?  I realize
  that there are so many variables that  it is not possible to say
  popluating the EMM will take X hours but
  if enough people chime in on what their experience was like, maybe we
  can come up with  an average
 
  - have there been any show stoppers that were unanticipated?  We could
  all learn from this, knowing what questions to ask up front based on our
  past...er...challenges.  NBU has so many options and is such a broad product
  that I doubt any two environments are identical.
 
 
  Just sort of brain storming here, looking forward to hearing (seeing?)
  what you all have to share.  If we get a good dialog going I will attempt to
  compile it into something usable
  and post it back here.
 
  T.
 
 
 
  --
)
   (
)
  [_])  This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
  and/or
  privileged information or information otherwise protected from
  disclosure.
  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
  immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
  it
  for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
  message and any 

Re: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

2008-03-10 Thread Forester, Jack L
I've seen the external event message before here, and it was due to SCSI
reserve not being set on the drive, allowing another host to send
commands to the drive while the backup was being written to the tape.
But this was back in the 3.4 days.

Jack L. Forester, Jr.
UNIX Systems Administrator, Stf
Lockheed Martin Information Technology
(304) 625-3946

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: Justin Piszcz; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

We've seen it and it appears to be the drive itself (LTO-1/Ultrium).

FYI:  This corrupts the backup so when you try to restore later it will
give you messages about bad tar headers.  Do NOT rely on this backup
even if you later see 0 exit status.

We even had one drive that it appeared it corrupted EXISTING backups on
a tape when it mounted it and experienced this issue.   It appears the
vendor actually sent the drive back to us without correcting this
behavior so we had to send it back.  We now record the Serial Number and
problem for all drives we send back so we'll know if we get a
refurbished drive back later and experience the same problem we'll be
able to gig the support vendor.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:33 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] External event caused rewind during write.

1204936626 1 132 16 media-server-name 2429907 2429907 0 client-name bptm

FREEZING media id CA1234, External event caused rewind during write, all

data on media is lost

Anyone ever seen this before?  What is this usually caused by, bad/old 
media, or?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Which daemon use on netbackup client (LINUX)?

2008-03-10 Thread bbb bb


Recently our veritas Netbackup server (Win 2003) can NOT connect to one of 
client (Redhat LINUX 3.7).  Netbackup admin told me some kind of network socket 
problem.

Can anyone help me on following:

1. which daemon need be up on Netbackup client (redhat LINUX)?   (Netbackup 
client version 5.1)

2. which socket on client use by Netbackup?

Thanks.
_
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Which daemon use on netbackup client (LINUX)?

2008-03-10 Thread Mark.Donaldson
Clients don't run daemons, the necessary processes are started when the
server connects to the client via inetd (or xinetd in the case of
linux).

It should connect on the bpcd port, #13782.  Telnet from your master
server to your client on this port and see if you get a prompt of sorts.
That'll give you a bunch of potentially useful information.

-M 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bbb bb
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:11 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Which daemon use on netbackup client (LINUX)?



Recently our veritas Netbackup server (Win 2003) can NOT connect to one
of client (Redhat LINUX 3.7).  Netbackup admin told me some kind of
network socket problem.

Can anyone help me on following:

1. which daemon need be up on Netbackup client (redhat LINUX)?
(Netbackup client version 5.1)

2. which socket on client use by Netbackup?

Thanks.
_
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012
008
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu