[Veritas-bu] Steps to change Master Server Name

2010-02-23 Thread David McMullin
I have performed this rename on Solaris, but used the process mentioned below 
as a 'cheat'

Production master name is foo, at ip address 1.1.1.1
Copy is bar, at 1.1.1.2

On bar - edit /etc/hosts and add entry for foo at 1.1.1.2 
Set DNS to use files first then DNS

On media servers, do the same!

When they try to connect to foo they will go to bar.

Edit the bp.conf on foo and remove any production systems, except foo and any 
media servers you have on that setup.


Basically fool the ip and network to references to foo go to bar.

You can also set the loop back address as the IP on bar, for foo, since the 
master server talks to itself...




Message: 3
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:00 -0700
From: Jeff Cleverley jeff.clever...@avagotech.com
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Steps to change Master Server Name
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
5ec364e31002221228o1028c6cdo2b2196ea69433...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I don't work with Solaris, but for purely a DR test purpose I would guess you 
could do it and actually have both systems on the network.

If you production server is named foo with an IP address of 1.1.1.1, you should 
be able to set up your new DR box at an unused IP address such as 1.1.1.2.  
From there you set the local host file to your server name and IP, and either 
turn off dns or set it to use hosts first.

Any regular devices would still go to your production server unless you modify 
the clients also.  The DR server should not be getting the production server 
traffic since it has a different IP address.  This should allow you to bring up 
a DR server on the same network with the same host name.  I am not aware that 
the Veritas database uses the IP address also but I may be wrong.

If it were a real case of needing to put the DR server into production you 
would want to rename the server to the original name and IP address or change 
dns to point to the new IP address.

Jeff

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Lightner, Jeff jlight...@water.comwrote:

 In a DR you'd typically set the name of the DR server to what the
 original master had been.   The only reason I could see for keeping
 original DR server name is that you intend to run whatever was already 
 on it concurrently with the NetBackup master you're about to load and 
 that would complicate your life incredibly.

 -Original Message-
 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of 
 lookn4me
 Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:24 PM
 To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Steps to change Master Server Name


 Yes you correct, I am looking to copy the catalog and its database to 
 the new host in order to test upgrading and locate break/fix issues 
 prior to the upgrade.  I need to have as much of the master server 
 functionality as possible.  The question I have is what needs to be 
 done in 5.1 MP4 version to change master server entries in the 
 associated databases?

 Surprising this is an issue in Netbackup if one had to DR a box to a 
 different hostname, the inability to name the master something else.


 mdonaldson wrote:
  Are you planning to copy your existing backup catalog (image 
  database) over to the new environment?  If so, then the master 
  server name is buried in that database it's a far-from-casual 
  process to rename the master server.  There is no published process 
  for it and Symantec will want to charge you for professional services to do 
  this for you.
 
  If you're just going to create a new master server with it's own 
  database, then it's simply a matter of building a new environment.
 
  If you're going to do backups of one client to both environments,
 change
  the first SERVER entry in the client's bp.conf file, that's the one
 that
  should point to that client's master server.  It really should only 
  matter, though, for client initiated actions, like restores.
 
  A media server would be more complex, I'd suggest not trying to 
  dual-master a media server.
 
  -M
 
  -Original Message-
  From: veritas-bu-bounces  at  mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
  [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces  at  mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf 
  Of
 lookn4me
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 6:37 AM
  To: VERITAS-BU  at  MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
  Subject: [Veritas-bu] Steps to change Master Server Name
 
 
  I plan to replicate a production environment on a test server, but I 
  need to change the master server name as the test environment will 
  not be isolated.  Anyone out there have success with the process?  
  The environment is Netbackup 5.1 MP4 on solaris 9 and 10 OS.
 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Any gotchas with 10 GB Ethernet?

2010-02-23 Thread William Brown
Actually it is the 5220 that does and the 5240 that does not.

The T5220 has the 10GbE circuitry on the CPU.  With the T5240 that was 
displaced by the circuitry for the CPUs to talk to each other, and the 10GbE is 
on another chip.  If you hunt round for the architecture white papers there are 
block drawings.

We have a number of T5220s with the XAUI cards and optical 10GbE SFP+.  Goes 
along briskly especially with Jumbo Frames.

William D L Brown


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Larry
Sent: 20 February 2010 02:14
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Any gotchas with 10 GB Ethernet?


Oh yeah, and if you haven't bought the servers yet, Sun has some with dedicated 
busses for 10Gb NICs.  Haven't played with them yet, but it's definitely worth 
considering.  I want to say the 5240 has them while the 5220 doesn't.

+--
|This was sent by la...@hawkeyes.org via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


---
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
---

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu