[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 to use a specific tape drive for restoration.
The current setup of the Netbackup is 1 unit of Server running Solaris 8 configured as Netbackup Master/Media Server. 1 unit of L180 tape library with 4 SDLT320 tape drives and 1 unit of SDLT320 standalone tape drive is connected to the server. May I know how to restore using the SDLT320 standalone tape drive instead of using the L180 tape library? Note: Backup of the client was to the L180 tape library SDLT320 tape drive and the tape needed for the restoration have been identified and ejected from the L180 tape library. -- */Regards,/* Calvin Chen W. K. System Technical Consultant ** ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Res: Netbackup 5.1 to use a specific tape drive for restoration.
Hi Calvin you can't specify what tape you want to reserve for restore, you can create a Storage Unit with there tapes drives, so always will be a tape available to make restores. Carlos Alberto L. dos Santos (TOCA) Eng. de Computação - Jundiaí - SP Brasil http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlostoca http://netbackupblog.blogspot.com/ carlos_lis...@yahoo.com.br De: Calvin Chen W. K. calvin...@sains.com.my Para: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 3 de Março de 2010 5:43:15 Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 to use a specific tape drive for restoration. The current setup of the Netbackup is 1 unit of Server running Solaris 8 configured as Netbackup Master/Media Server. 1 unit of L180 tape library with 4 SDLT320 tape drives and 1 unit of SDLT320 standalone tape drive is connected to the server. May I know how to restore using the SDLT320 standalone tape drive instead of using the L180 tape library? Note: Backup of the client was to the L180 tape library SDLT320 tape drive and the tape needed for the restoration have been identified and ejected from the L180 tape library. -- Regards, Regards, Calvin Chen W. K. System Technical Consultant Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Res: (no subject)
Open Windows system/application syslog to verify what error is occurring. T+ Carlos Alberto L. dos Santos (TOCA) Eng. de Computação - Jundiaí - SP Brasil http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlostoca http://netbackupblog.blogspot.com/ carlos_lis...@yahoo.com.br De: pranav batra pranav_vent...@hotmail.com Para: Veritas veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Enviadas: Terça-feira, 2 de Março de 2010 18:17:29 Assunto: [Veritas-bu] (no subject) Hello, I am getting following error when try to start backup exec services on BE 10d. = Error starting the service backup exec job engine. The dependency service or group failed to start. === Please provide some solution. Thanks and Regards Pranav Batra Sena, Shah Rukh and the fight over Mumbai Sign up now. Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4
Hi I want to know if there is a possibility to mix LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library StorageTek SL500 with Netbackup 5.1. If there is documentation for this ... pls i want to know TY ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4
Hi, I currently have a similar setup, LTO-3 and one LTO-4 drive in a test SL500 robot. I remember doing a something similar with an L700 back in the day with LTO-2 drives and STK 9840s, it had a lot of issues in that environment (L700), although I did not set that one up originally. For the SL500, I have not noticed any issues to date (I have a single global scratch pool and it picks the correct tape for each drive) even when I have multiple storage units (LTO-3,LTO-4) in the same group. Would I recommend this without thorough and extensive testing? Probably not. Justin. On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Grigore Petrisor wrote: Hi I want to know if there is a possibility to mix LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library StorageTek SL500 with Netbackup 5.1. If there is documentation for this ... pls i want to know TY ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 to use a specific tape drive forrestoration.
Just put the tape you want to restore from in the standalone drive. I have a sdlt standalone on my master as well as a library. And when I need to do a restore I just put it in the standalone drive. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Calvin Chen W. K. Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:43 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 to use a specific tape drive forrestoration. The current setup of the Netbackup is 1 unit of Server running Solaris 8 configured as Netbackup Master/Media Server. 1 unit of L180 tape library with 4 SDLT320 tape drives and 1 unit of SDLT320 standalone tape drive is connected to the server. May I know how to restore using the SDLT320 standalone tape drive instead of using the L180 tape library? Note: Backup of the client was to the L180 tape library SDLT320 tape drive and the tape needed for the restoration have been identified and ejected from the L180 tape library. -- Regards, Calvin Chen W. K. System Technical Consultant ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. James M. Caldwell NCCCS Unix Support Operation Systems Analyst caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu 919-807-7234 (Office) ___ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when required by the statutes. (NCGS.Ch.132) ___ BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Caldwell, Jim TEL;WORK:919-807-7234 EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu N:Caldwell;Jim TITLE:Operations Systems Analyst ADR;DOM;WORK;PARCEL;POSTAL:;;200 W Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27603;Raleigh;NC;20699-5000 LABEL;DOM;WORK;PARCEL;POSTAL;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Caldwell, Jim=0A= 200 W Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27603=0A= Raleigh, NC 20699-5000 END:VCARD ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Jim Caldwell wrote: I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. [ .. ] It is built off the 6.5.4 code base, I only have been using it in test, but no problems so far. I would love to hear what other people have to say. Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
Getting ready to roll it into Test. They give you similar warnings that they gave for the 5.1 to 6.0 upgrade, (i.e. database consistency), but I have heard that it isn't that brutal and glides right through that portion. I gotta test dedupe really bad, so my test system will be on it in the next couple of weeks. Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 03/03/2010 09:49 AM To Jim Caldwell caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu cc veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0 On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Jim Caldwell wrote: I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. [ .. ] It is built off the 6.5.4 code base, I only have been using it in test, but no problems so far. I would love to hear what other people have to say. Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4
Hello, I would not recommend to mix LTO2 and LTO4, better go completely with LTO4 or LTO3, you can configure LTO3 tape drives to read and write LTO2 tape media. When I was planing to mix LTO2 and LTO3 tape drives on SL500, I was told by STK engineers, I would need to have a converter in the tape drive canisters for LTO2 tape drives, and it would cost a lot more extra to compare LTO3 and LTO4 tape drives. Better to have a smaller unit like SL24 with LTO3/SAS tape drives and configure them in hcart2 on NetBackup, I don't think you can buy LTO2 tape drives anymore. Boris On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Grigore Petrisor edy2...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi I want to know if there is a possibility to mix LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library StorageTek SL500 with Netbackup 5.1. If there is documentation for this ... pls i want to know TY ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4
You can do it. Use HCART2 drive and media type for LTO2 and HCART for LTO4. Configured the appropriate barcode rules and you are ok. This may be helpful http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/336024.htm From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Grigore Petrisor Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:19 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4 Hi I want to know if there is a possibility to mix LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library StorageTek SL500 with Netbackup 5.1. If there is documentation for this ... pls i want to know TY ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
Symantec just published their first Late Breaking News article for 7.0. Keep an eye on the LBN updates as you get closer to your update. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/341271.htm .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Jim Caldwell caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu wrote: I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. James M. Caldwell NCCCS Unix Support Operation Systems Analyst caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu 919-807-7234 (Office) ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ??
I'm wondering if any of you know why CentOS isn't supported as a NBU Master? I've tried googledredging, but all I've really managed to find is that it's technically possible, but not supported. I've done it in a VM for a test env., and while it installs fine, I haven't really ran it through its paces to find out if anything breaks. So, I'm curious if anyone knows the reason?? The only one I can think of, beside it being some technical issue, is that Support wants someone (a company and/or paid support) to refer to when it becomes an OS-related issue and that the Master/Media/Server-side demands more of the OS than a client. ~ Robin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Jim Caldwell wrote: I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. We have upgraded our productions servers to 7.0 here. The upgrade was smooth and easy. We did our master server and media server in an afternoon. no harder than doing a 6.5.x patch really. A few things we have noticed: VMWare backups are hugely improved. We have yet to successfully restore a Virtual Machine backup however. It restores the files to the VMware datastore, they all appear to be there, then it claims tar did not find all the files and deletes everything it just restored. There are a lot of moving parts with this and we are still working on resolving this one. Using the new use VM Name selection method in our policies has resulted in vault duplications of images with spaces failing. Otherwise all our normal UNIX and Windows backups seem to be running just fine. I can’t comment on SQL database agents, as we do not use any database agents here. ~ Shawn Plummer Systems Manager CIT SUNY Geneseo The mind can make substance, and people planets of its own with beings brighter than have been, and give a breath to forms which can outlive all flesh. -Lord Byron ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ??
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Robin Small robin.sm...@fresno.gov wrote: I’m wondering if any of you know why CentOS isn’t supported as a NBU Master? The compatibility matrix isn't really about what works - it's about what Symantec will support. Many people have done all sorts of things that work, although may not be supported. In order for Symantec to support CentOS as a master, they would have to build it and continue to update and support it. Every new update would require re-certification on yet another platform. Would you want your master server to be on a platform that Symantec hasn't thoroughly tested? Of course not. I suspect that there's not a lot of demand for a CentOS-based master either. NetBackup is an enterprise product and most enterprises probably want support on their production operating systems. CentOS is not RHEL. It never has been and never can be. It's close, but from an enterprise support perspective, close isn't good enough. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ??
Fair enough.. Or at least along the lines of what I was suspecting was the case (the supportability of it). I'm running mine on SLES (was v9 with v6.x, upgrading as we speak to v11 to go with NBU v7). That resolves my curiosity, Thanks.. ~ Robin From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewi...@ewilts.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 11:37 AM To: Robin Small Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on CentOS ?? On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Robin Small robin.sm...@fresno.govmailto:robin.sm...@fresno.gov wrote: I'm wondering if any of you know why CentOS isn't supported as a NBU Master? The compatibility matrix isn't really about what works - it's about what Symantec will support. Many people have done all sorts of things that work, although may not be supported. In order for Symantec to support CentOS as a master, they would have to build it and continue to update and support it. Every new update would require re-certification on yet another platform. Would you want your master server to be on a platform that Symantec hasn't thoroughly tested? Of course not. I suspect that there's not a lot of demand for a CentOS-based master either. NetBackup is an enterprise product and most enterprises probably want support on their production operating systems. CentOS is not RHEL. It never has been and never can be. It's close, but from an enterprise support perspective, close isn't good enough. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.orgmailto:ewi...@ewilts.org [http://www.images.wisestamp.com/linkedin.png]Linkedinhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption
Just wanted to share my stats, on compression and encryption. I am using NetBackups kms (not mseo) application managed tape encryption. I have one full tape that is encrypted. All the other full's are NOT encrypted. I seem to be getting about the same in the amount of data on the tapes. Less than D0 but more the D00022 - it all depends on the data. So to me it appears that as the tape drive is doing both the compression and the encryption it is working well. I am using LTO4's in an IBM TS3310 library. With NetBackup 6.5.5 that allows 2 encrypted volume pools. I also have not noticed any change in my backup times ( but this is my smaller site) and no overhead on the media server. Media IDRetention PeriodImages Valid Images Kilobytes Status D0 2 weeks 350 350 1906511824 Full MPX D1 2 weeks 338 338 1844456169 Full MPX D8 2 weeks 432 432 1896950470 Full MPX encrypted D00018 2 weeks 343 343 1935539291 Full MPX D00022 6 months225 225 1549978248 Full MPX D00032 2 weeks 366 366 1973503009 Full MPX D00034 2 weeks 403 403 1711366221 Full MPX D00037 2 weeks 344 344 1937260418 Full MPX -Original Message- From: Judy Hinchcliffe Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:42 AM To: 'Shekel Tal'; jpis...@lucidpixels.com Cc: kc.on.the@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption Again, that is why I went with KMS, (kms is NOT MESO) it is application managed encryption that tells the tape drive to do the encryption NOT the media server, kms just has the keys on the master server and NB talks to the tape drive with the keys. Again so the tape drive does the encryption with no over head on the media server. I have not seen an any impact on my master or media server when I started using KMS. -Original Message- From: Shekel Tal [mailto:tal.she...@uk.fujitsu.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:26 AM To: Judy Hinchcliffe; jpis...@lucidpixels.com Cc: kc.on.the@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption From the research I have done on the CPU requirements: It takes roughly 73 clock cycles on a Windows or Linux server or about 87 clock cycles on UNIX server to perform MSEO compression/encryption per BYTE of data backed up. Backing up 100 MB/sec of data through a Solaris media server requires 8.7 GHz of CPU processing for MSEO alone, plus whatever processing is needed for other tasks. To move 200 MB/sec through the media server would require 17.4 GHz of CPU for MSEO. So it's a very cpu intensive process. You would probably require a large multicore process system depending on your throughput requirements Regards, Tal -Original Message- From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: 02 March 2010 15:20 To: jpis...@lucidpixels.com; Shekel Tal Cc: kc.on.the@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption Thanks why I went for kms (tape drive encryption) no overhead on the media server or the clients -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:57 AM To: Shekel Tal Cc: Judy Hinchcliffe; kc.on.the@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption Hi, I have read others' reviews on MSEO-- from what I understand it will peg the CPU and reduce throughput dramatically to high-speed drives. Has anyone not seen that? Justin. On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Shekel Tal wrote: Okay, thanks for the information. I have also been looking at NetBackup Media Server Encryption. It looks quite neat, compresses before encryption and has very nice key management which is a big tick in the box for me. The only caveat is that is software based and has fairly heavy host CPU requirement. Regards, Tal -Original Message- From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: 02 March 2010 14:42 To: Shekel Tal; jpis...@lucidpixels.com; kc.on.the@gmail.com Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun/StorageTek based LTO4 encryption I am now using kms, and because the tape drive does the compression and the tape drive does the encryption, I have not noticed any loss in compression yet ( only have had it running for about 1 week) that was something I was also concerned about. You have to compress before you encrypt, and as far as I could find out the tape drive knows that. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Shekel Tal Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 7:39 AM
Re: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4
Affirmed, recently integrated with existing LTO II drives in SL8500 library. Barcode rules are important as well, make sure the suffixes are modified from L2 to L4, If you don't you'll have problems in legacy migration tape copies. -sj smpt sm...@peppas.gr 3/3/2010 8:40 AM You can do it. Use HCART2 drive and media type for LTO2 and HCART for LTO4. Configured the appropriate barcode rules and you are ok. This may be helpful http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/336024.htm From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Grigore Petrisor Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:19 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] mixing LTO2 and LTO4 Hi I want to know if there is a possibility to mix LTO2 and LTO4 drives and media in the same library StorageTek SL500 with Netbackup 5.1. If there is documentation for this ... pls i want to know TY ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0
We have recently been given the chance to goto 7, but only recently got 1 environment to 6.5.4 six months ago, and still have another environment in the process of still being moved from 5.1 - 6.5 VMWare components would be the only real interest for me. Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:06 PM To: Jim Caldwell Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Rel 7.0 I haven't heard any horror stories from anybody yet, either in discussions for which I'm under NDA nor on the list. So far, it seems to be no worse than any recent 6.5.x release and for some things (like VMware backups) it's significantly better. There are certainly people upgrading their production systems to 7.0. We're trying to find the time to do it ourselves but we're still short-staffed (any storage/backup admins in Minnesota want a new job?). We're at 6.5.4 today as well. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Jim Caldwell caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu wrote: I am contemplating installing NBU 7.0 any known issues or gotcha's? Solaris 10 is my Master/Media Server, clients, Solaris, Windows, Hyper-V and SQL. My current level is 6.5.4. James M. Caldwell NCCCS Unix Support Operation Systems Analyst caldwe...@nccommunitycolleges.edu 919-807-7234 (Office) ___ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when required by the statutes. (NCGS.Ch.132) ___ ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Migrate master from HPUX to Solaris
Hi All, does anyone has document/steps to do the migration? the server name/ip address will be the same, only OS different, migrate from hp-ux to solaris. any info will be appreciate. Thanks, Roedy From: Roedy boy roed...@yahoo.com To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 4:29:50 PM Subject: [Veritas-bu] Migrate master from HPUX to Solaris Hi All, Does anyone here has experience to migrate Netbackup 6.0 MP7 from HPUX to Solaris? is it just copy the netbackup catalog only? Please advise Thanks. Roedy ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
