Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr email

[Justin Piszcz]

Hi,

You need to copy all the files/etc.

I did this awhile ago, you'll want to use the last incremental, it will 
auto-pickup the full.

Justin.

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jim Horalek wrote:

> So my recovery should be to just point to the last Catalog_Backup_FULL? Or 
> the last Incremental?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jim
>
> From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:15 PM
> To: Jim Horalek
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr email
>
> No, but the actual DR files are in /usr/openv/netbackup/disasterrecovery.
>
> I had to use one of those at my last DR.
>
>
>
> From:
>
> Jim Horalek 
>
> To:
>
> "Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" 
>
> Date:
>
> 01/28/2011 05:11 PM
>
> Subject:
>
> [Veritas-bu] Dr email
>
> Sent by:
>
> veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> My email system is broken. Does anyone know of any tricks to get the emails 
> sent by the catalog backups. Perhaps a temp file.
>
> Red hat 5.2
>
> Or is there a command to generate it?
>
> Thanks jim
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
> "PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It 
> only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business 
> with Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender 
> by replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. 
> Thank you for your cooperation."
>
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr email

[Jim Horalek]

So my recovery should be to just point to the last Catalog_Backup_FULL? Or the 
last Incremental?

Thanks

Jim

From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Jim Horalek
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr email

No, but the actual DR files are in /usr/openv/netbackup/disasterrecovery.

I had to use one of those at my last DR.



From:

Jim Horalek 

To:

"Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" 

Date:

01/28/2011 05:11 PM

Subject:

[Veritas-bu] Dr email

Sent by:

veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu








My email system is broken. Does anyone know of any tricks to get the emails 
sent by the catalog backups. Perhaps a temp file.

Red hat 5.2

Or is there a command to generate it?

Thanks jim

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

"PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It 
only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business with 
Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by 
replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. 
Thank you for your cooperation."
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Dr email

[Jim Horalek]

My email system is broken. Does anyone know of any tricks to get the emails 
sent by the catalog backups. Perhaps a temp file.

Red hat 5.2

Or is there a command to generate it?

Thanks jim

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Upgradation, Consolidation and then Migration :-Few Questions 5.1 to 6.5, windows 2k to win2k8

[pranav batra]

Hello Geeks,
 
We have one Master Server( NBU 5.1 MP3) + one media server ( NBU 5.1 MP3).
Both are on windows 2000 SP4.
 
Now our task is to upgrade master server to 6.5.
Upgrade media server to 6.5.
Decommison the media server and move all the media to master server.
 
 
Recover the catalog to another server that would be windows2008 with a diffrent 
name:
 
Steps we have made for this project :
 
 
1) Upgrade both master and media to 5.1 Mp7.
2) Upgrade master to 6.5
3) Upgrade media to 6.5
4) Decommison media server and move all media to master server.
5) Recover the catalog to new server with a different name.( win2k8 box)
 
Some questions that I have are : 
 
1) Can we recover the catalog of windows 2000 machine to windows 2008 :-As both 
will be a diffrent hardware ???
2) Even the name of the machine to which we have to recover the catalog is 
different:-What all steps we should follow for this ?
 
Please suggest with your inputs as this a critical activity for us.
 
Thanks in Advance !!
 
Pranav 

 


  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 57, Issue 7

[Julie Ulrich]

s
> in the GUI : Exit Status: 227 (no entity was found)
> in dos-shell is:
> Invalid line length in line:
> EXIT STATUS 144: invalid command usage
>
> Source server is an AIX machine , destination server is a windows
machine.
> I used the upper case for the driver letter ( for windows system)
> If I try to restore only a single file ( for example XXX810.DEL ) the
> restore works fine. The problem occured when I use the -f option.
> So where is the problem ?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Riccardo
>
>
+--
> |This was sent by riccardo1...@yahoo.it via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
>
+--
>
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/6ad83d4d/attachment-0001.htm


--

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:20:31 -0800
From: Saran Brar 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] test
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

test
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110127/a0e4a04f/attachment-0001.htm


--

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:30:45 +
From: "Thomas, Nick" 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange
2010 dagserver
To: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'"

Message-ID:
<8f42c84847dcdc4db57041ede4fb59973142d...@ex02mx299.icbc.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Good evening all,

We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1.
Anyone else out there seeing this?



This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person
other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited.
 If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient,
please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email
immediately.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20110128/aabe921a/attachment-0001.htm


--

Message: 8
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09 +0100
From: przemol...@poczta.fm
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on
x86?
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <20110128100809.ga5...@host.pgf.com.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2

Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?

Regards
Przemek

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not
supported when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC
(zones).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist?
> Enterprise Applications Delivery -?Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: 
> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers
at
> $WORK.
>  
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going
to
> Solaris on x86.
> 
> Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more
or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>  
> James
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server

[Saran Brar]

Below link looks closer to your issue. Try it

http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH125427



On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Thomas, Nick  wrote:

>  I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed.
>
>
>
> *From:* saranji...@gmail.com [mailto:saranji...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of 
> *Saran
> Brar
> *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM
> *To:* Thomas, Nick
> *Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange
> 2010 dag server
>
>
>
> What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and
> registry entries for the master/media servers.
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick 
> wrote:
>
> Good evening all,
>
>
>
> We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
> only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
> individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1.
> Anyone else out there seeing this?
>  --
>
> *This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
> copies of this email immediately.*
>
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
>
> --
> *
> This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
> copies of this email immediately.
> *
>
>
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server

[Thomas, Nick]

I am getting a 26 client server hand shaking failed.

From: saranji...@gmail.com [mailto:saranji...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Saran Brar
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:45 AM
To: Thomas, Nick
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 
dag server

What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and 
registry entries for the master/media servers.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick 
mailto:nick.tho...@icbc.com>> wrote:
Good evening all,

We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error only 
when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box individually but 
not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1. Anyone else out there 
seeing this?

This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient and 
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized copying, 
dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient of this 
communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not named as 
a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email 
immediately.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  
Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu




This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person
other than the named recipient of this communication is prohibited.
 If you received this in error or are not named as a recipient,
please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this email
immediately.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

[Urs Krolzig]

Hello

Since PD 6.6.1 there is support for PDDO on Solaris x86_64

Check the compatibility list http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH139108

Also in the release notes you cand find this

 Solaris 10 x64 OST Plug-in


Can be found here http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH137146

Urs

- Original Message - 
From: "Daniel Pum" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?


The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server 
dedup or the PDDO plugin.
Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work.
OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data Domain 
does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does.

Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support for 
Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint.

I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has it 
and can share, I think we'd all appreciate it.

-daniel


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of 
przemol...@poczta.fm
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?

Regards
Przemek

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported 
> when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC 
> (zones).
>
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist
> Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: 
> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
> $WORK.
>
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
> Solaris on x86.
>
> Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> James
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu































Auta nowe i używane, duże i małe - największa baza!
SprawdĹş >> http://linkint.pl/f28df

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

[Daniel Pum]

The big one is that there is no dedup support - for either media server dedup 
or the PDDO plugin.
Appliances that use NFS or FC VTL do work.
OST plugin support from the manufacturers varies - for example, Data Domain 
does not have a Solaris x86 plugin but Quantum does.

Another big one is that there is no Granular Recovery Technology support for 
Active Directory, Exchange, and SharePoint.

I've never seen one document that mentions all this, so if someone has it and 
can share, I think we'd all appreciate it.

-daniel


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of 
przemol...@poczta.fm
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:08 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?

Regards
Przemek

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported 
> when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist 
> Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: 
> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
> $WORK.
>  
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
> Solaris on x86.
> 
> Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>  
> James
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu































Auta nowe i używane, duże i małe - największa baza!
SprawdĹş >> http://linkint.pl/f28df

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

[ccosta . ccc]

Vmware Off-host backup capabilities are only supported on Windows OS.


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: przemol...@poczta.fm
Sender: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:08:09 
To: 
Reply-To: przemol...@poczta.fm
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?

Regards
Przemek

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported 
> when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist 
> Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: 
> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
> $WORK.
>  
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
> Solaris on x86.
> 
> Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>  
> James
> 
>___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu































Auta nowe i używane, duże i małe - największa baza!
SprawdĹş >> http://linkint.pl/f28df

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting server not allowed access on exchange 2010 dag server

[Saran Brar]

What error code are you getting. Is it 59? If yes, did you check host and
registry entries for the master/media servers.

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Thomas, Nick  wrote:

>  Good evening all,
>
>
>
> We recently patched our 2010 exchange server with MS patch kb2419640
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2419640 and now we get the above error
> only when trying to connect to the dag. We can connect to each box
> individually but not the Dag. We have even patched the client to 7.0.1.
> Anyone else out there seeing this?
>
> --
> *
> This email and any attachments are intended only for the named recipient
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
> copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named
> recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error
> or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
> copies of this email immediately.
> *
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

[przemolicc]

Can you share which features are not supported on Solaris/x64 ?
Is there any document about it ?

Regards
Przemek

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:28:38PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a lot of cool stuff in NetBackup is not supported 
> when running Solaris on X66 ?
> We considered this as well but luckily we turned to Solaris on SPARC (zones).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bart WALLEBROEK
> Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist 
> Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management
> S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:22:51 -0600
> From: "James Yaple" 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?
> To: 
> Message-ID: <021e01cbbdb8$56e9dbf0$04bd93d0$@yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
> $WORK.
>  
> The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
> Solaris on x86.
> 
> Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or
> less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>  
> James
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu































Auta nowe i używane, duże i małe - największa baza!
SprawdĹş >> http://linkint.pl/f28df

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu