Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC

2011-03-18 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
Hello John

The REQUIRED_INTERFACE option in bp.conf/registry might be what you are
after

A route through eth2 for contacting your backup server might be an option

Regards
Michael

2011/3/18 Crowey netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com

 Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad performance issues when
 writing to disc for NetBackup differentials, and as part of that process I
 noticed that NetBackup is not using the backup NIC I have configured on our
 main server.

 Our main server has two NICs configured, eth0 on 172.20.10.23 and eth2 on
 172.20.10.24.  In DNS I have eth0's address resolving to server, and eth2's
 address resolving to server-backup.

 I have NetBackup configured to connect to the address server-backup.  And
 in the Admin Console | Host Properties | Clients I can connect to the server
 - ostensibly via the configured DNS address of server-backup.

 I can ping both addresses on the Master/Media NetBackup server as well as
 the server itself.  However if I do a ifconfig eth0/2 on the server in
 question I get this ...

  eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:14:4F:0D:82:92
inet addr:172.20.10.23  Bcast:172.20.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe0d:8292/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:126134922 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:249411328 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:46698652928 (43.4 GiB)  TX bytes:289231929457 (269.3
 GiB)
Base address:0x8800 Memory:85b8-85ba

  eth2  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:14:4F:0D:7E:FA
inet addr:172.20.10.24  Bcast:172.20.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe0d:7efa/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:197097 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:92088745 (87.8 MiB)  TX bytes:782 (782.0 b)
Base address:0xc800 Memory:b3d8-b3da

 Clearly eth2 (server-backup) is receiving OK, but nothing is going back
 out.

 Any ideas what I can do to resolve this? - I'm sure its probably something
 stupid, but I'd be grateful for any advice on this matter.

 (I'm running RHEL AS 4.6 x86_64 by the way)

 Cheers
 John

 +--
 |This was sent by jcr...@marketforce.com.au via Backup Central.
 |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
 +--


 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC

2011-03-18 Thread Daniel Otto
Both NICs are on the same IP segment. 
addr:172.20.10.23 Mask:255.255.255.0
addr:172.20.10.24 Mask:255.255.255.0
As far as the OS is concerned they are on the same dedicated segments with 
equal weight (Metric:1) in the routing table and probably binding to eth0 
first. Run bpclntcmd -self to see which interface(s) NBU thinks it is using. My 
guess is both will show up. 
REQUIRED_INTERFACE only works for outbound TCP SYN requests sent from the 
server. If you are backing up using both interfaces then REQUIRED_INTERFACE is 
not an option. If only using the eth2 then try this- 
REQUIRED_INTERFACE = server-backup. 
Otherwise to try using static host routes to force the OS to pick eth2 over 
eth0 depending on which IP segment the clients are on if you want your backups 
to use that interface. 
Dan O

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:08 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC

Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad performance issues when 
writing to disc for NetBackup differentials, and as part of that process I 
noticed that NetBackup is not using the backup NIC I have configured on our 
main server.

Our main server has two NICs configured, eth0 on 172.20.10.23 and eth2 on 
172.20.10.24.  In DNS I have eth0's address resolving to server, and eth2's 
address resolving to server-backup.

I have NetBackup configured to connect to the address server-backup.  And in 
the Admin Console | Host Properties | Clients I can connect to the server - 
ostensibly via the configured DNS address of server-backup.

I can ping both addresses on the Master/Media NetBackup server as well as the 
server itself.  However if I do a ifconfig eth0/2 on the server in question I 
get this ...

  eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:14:4F:0D:82:92  
inet addr:172.20.10.23  Bcast:172.20.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe0d:8292/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:126134922 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:249411328 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
RX bytes:46698652928 (43.4 GiB)  TX bytes:289231929457 (269.3 GiB)
Base address:0x8800 Memory:85b8-85ba 

  eth2  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:14:4F:0D:7E:FA  
inet addr:172.20.10.24  Bcast:172.20.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe0d:7efa/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:197097 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
RX bytes:92088745 (87.8 MiB)  TX bytes:782 (782.0 b)
Base address:0xc800 Memory:b3d8-b3da 

Clearly eth2 (server-backup) is receiving OK, but nothing is going back out.

Any ideas what I can do to resolve this? - I'm sure its probably something 
stupid, but I'd be grateful for any advice on this matter.

(I'm running RHEL AS 4.6 x86_64 by the way)

Cheers
John

+--
|This was sent by jcr...@marketforce.com.au via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA

2011-03-18 Thread John Meyers
Yeah, I was in the same boat, had just upgraded to 7.0.1 and then
realized 7.1 was available.   Delving into the 7.0.1 docs related
to VMware backups using the vStorage API, if you're planning on
using a VM guest as a backup host using the hotadd feature for
access to the vmdk's, I'm pretty certain 7.0.1 isn't compatible
with the vSphere 4.1 vStorage API, but 7.1 is.  I ended up deciding
to go 7.1 as our VMware support group had just upgraded to vSphere
4.1.

The 7.1 upgrade was very smooth and I haven't run into any new
problems so far.

-John

On 03/16/2011 06:20 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
 I just upgraded to 7.0.1 - Wonder if its worth upgrading again. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Coleman [mailto:bill_cole...@symantec.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:48 PM
 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Cc: Marianne Van Den Berg; jpis...@lucidpixels.com; WEAVER, Simon
 (external)
 Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
 
 Netbackup 7.1 has gone generally available after over 315 customers
 installed the software for a total of 4000 days of usage.  40% of those
 customers installed it into a production environment.
 
 How customers can access the software:
 Symantec will be sending an official Software Version Upgrade
 notification during the week of March 21st, which will include your
 license keys and media access information. However, should you require
 immediate access to your licenses and media, we invite you to visit the
 Licensing Portal.
 
 Please follow these instructions for registering your product on the
 Symantec Licensing Portal:
 1.Go to https://licensing.symantec.com
 2.Returning customers Login. New users must Create an Account
 first.
 3.After logging in, select the 'I don't have an Upgrade
 Notification ID' button.
 4.Choose your customer number from the drop down menu and click on
 the select button
 5.Click on the appropriate notification ID
 6.Click on the 'upgrade' button
 7.If you have not upgraded previous versions of Symantec
 NetBackup, you will  be required to do so sequentially in order to
 obtain your Symantec NetBackup 7.1 information
 8.Select the licenses you would like to upgrade and click the
 'Upgrade' button.
 9.Verify contact information for the licenses you are upgrading
 and click the 'Complete Registration' button.
 10.   The license key(s) will be provided on the next screen.
 11.   You may then click the 'Get Software' button to obtain your
 product.
 Please Note:  In some instances you may be required to repeat the
 upgrade process in order to retrieve the current version of the NBU
 product. 
 
 Should you require any further assistance, please contact our Customer
 Care team.
 
 http://go.symantec.com/customercare
 
 -Original Message-
 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
 Simon (external)
 Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:43 AM
 To: Marianne Van Den Berg; jpis...@lucidpixels.com;
 veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
 
 Thakns :) 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Marianne Van Den Berg [mailto:mvdb...@stortech.co.za]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:40 PM
 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); 'jpis...@lucidpixels.com';
 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
 
 You can no longer download from the ftp site - you have to use
 FileConnect.
 I believe that the GA announcement was a bit premature though, and that
 the downloads will only be available later this week. 
 
 Will follow up with URL's as soon as I'm online again.
 
 M.
 
 Sent from my BlackBerry Bold
 
 - Original Message -
 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 To: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com;
 veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Sent: Tue Mar 15 16:27:32 2011
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
 
 Thoughts I have are  I just upgrade to 7.0.1:-(( 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:38 PM
 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
 
 Hi,
 
 Apparently its out now:
 http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-71-now-available
 
 But, I don't see it on the FTP site?
 ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterpr
 ise_Server/
 
 Thoughts?
 
 Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] media expiration as of Start Time.

2011-03-18 Thread Harpreet SINGH

Dear All,

Please advise.. Our some of the big size backup's taking 18 hours to
complete and these backups spans to 4-5 Tapes.

The issue is all the Backup (4-5) Tapes have different expiration time.
Assume my backup start at 01:00 am and it takes 18 hours to complete. I
have the backup retention policy to 3 weeks.
Once the tapes are back after 3 weeks I can see the data expiration is as
of 18:00 hours... etc... where my backup will start at 01:00 am  and it
will fail with error 96.

Please advise how I can expire the backup images before the next  Backup
Start Time..

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  : (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   : (O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
** Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] media expiration as of Start Time.

2011-03-18 Thread Lightner, Jeff
You can use the bpexpdate command to expire images (you want to expire
images rather than tapes - this frees up space on the tapes and if these
are the only images will expire the tape).

However, your question implies you are rather tight on tapes in the
first place and rather than manually expiring tapes early you might want
to invest in some new ones so you can have things expire automatically.


You also don't mention how often you're running this backup.  Hopefully
you don't do it just once ever 3 weeks.  That is to say hopefully you do
not expire the last backup before you run the current one.  If your
system crashes in the middle of the current backup you wouldn't have any
if you're overwriting the same tapes the way you imply.

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Harpreet
SINGH
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:14 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] media expiration as of Start Time.


Dear All,

Please advise.. Our some of the big size backup's taking 18 hours to
complete and these backups spans to 4-5 Tapes.

The issue is all the Backup (4-5) Tapes have different expiration time.
Assume my backup start at 01:00 am and it takes 18 hours to complete. I
have the backup retention policy to 3 weeks.
Once the tapes are back after 3 weeks I can see the data expiration is
as
of 18:00 hours... etc... where my backup will start at 01:00 am  and it
will fail with error 96.

Please advise how I can expire the backup images before the next  Backup
Start Time..

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  : (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   : (O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
** Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] media expiration as of Start Time.

2011-03-18 Thread John Meyers
If the intent is to re-use the same set of tapes, you'd could either set
the retention period to something less than 3 weeks (e.g. 19 days) or
manually expire the images on the tapes prior starting the next backup.
The later could be done using a combination of the 'bpexpdate' and
'vmquery' utilities.

Something like,

  bpexpdate -m $media_id -d 0 -force
  vmquery -deassignbyid $media_id 2 0

This could probably be scripted with a bpstart_notify.policy_name script
if you knew which tapes you would be using.

-John

On 03/18/2011 12:14 PM, Harpreet SINGH wrote:
 
 Dear All,
 
 Please advise.. Our some of the big size backup's taking 18 hours to
 complete and these backups spans to 4-5 Tapes.
 
 The issue is all the Backup (4-5) Tapes have different expiration time.
 Assume my backup start at 01:00 am and it takes 18 hours to complete. I
 have the backup retention policy to 3 weeks.
 Once the tapes are back after 3 weeks I can see the data expiration is as
 of 18:00 hours... etc... where my backup will start at 01:00 am  and it
 will fail with error 96.
 
 Please advise how I can expire the backup images before the next  Backup
 Start Time..
 
 With Warm Regards
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Harpreet Singh Chana
 
 Phone  : (O) 6895 - 4326
 Fax   : (O) 6895 - 4991
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 ** Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
 
 Notice
 The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
 privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
 message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
 recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
 any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
 unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
 and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.
 
 
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] media expiration as of Start Time.

2011-03-18 Thread John Meyers
Actually ignore the vmquery ... portion below.  Forgot this is has been
depricated in current releases and is handled by the bpexpdate utility.

-John

On 03/18/2011 01:29 PM, John Meyers wrote:
 If the intent is to re-use the same set of tapes, you'd could either set
 the retention period to something less than 3 weeks (e.g. 19 days) or
 manually expire the images on the tapes prior starting the next backup.
 The later could be done using a combination of the 'bpexpdate' and
 'vmquery' utilities.
 
 Something like,
 
   bpexpdate -m $media_id -d 0 -force
   vmquery -deassignbyid $media_id 2 0
 
 This could probably be scripted with a bpstart_notify.policy_name script
 if you knew which tapes you would be using.
 
 -John
 
 On 03/18/2011 12:14 PM, Harpreet SINGH wrote:

 Dear All,

 Please advise.. Our some of the big size backup's taking 18 hours to
 complete and these backups spans to 4-5 Tapes.

 The issue is all the Backup (4-5) Tapes have different expiration time.
 Assume my backup start at 01:00 am and it takes 18 hours to complete. I
 have the backup retention policy to 3 weeks.
 Once the tapes are back after 3 weeks I can see the data expiration is as
 of 18:00 hours... etc... where my backup will start at 01:00 am  and it
 will fail with error 96.

 Please advise how I can expire the backup images before the next  Backup
 Start Time..

 With Warm Regards
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Harpreet Singh Chana

 Phone  : (O) 6895 - 4326
 Fax   : (O) 6895 - 4991
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 ** Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

 Notice
 The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
 privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
 message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
 recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
 any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
 unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
 and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

-- 
John Meyers
Lead Systems Programmer
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio.
Voice: 937-775-3580
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Server OS and NBU upgrades

2011-03-18 Thread McDonald, James F. II
Does anyone have any experience (good or bad) with upgrading from
Windows Server 2003 to 2008 and NBU 6.5 to 7.0?  Currently my backup
server is running the older versions of both.  I have the software to
upgrade both of them.  Is there a preferred sequence: upgrade NBU then
the OS or upgrade the OS first and then NBU?  When upgrading NBU, will
it preserve the settings and policies already created?

 

James McDonald

System Administrator

SAIC - IISBU

410-312-2232

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Brain storm for the Week End (for a shall script)

2011-03-18 Thread Harpreet SINGH

Dear All,

I am on Netbackup 7.0 and OS = Redhat 5.4

Need your help to have a look on this attached script and advise.

This script will send us a consolidated backup status Report after 18
hours.
Also I am able to send the Backup Status by Backup Policy Selection. i.e.
Team A will not know the backup status of Team B

In this script the email sent option is as
-- If backup has any exceptions (i.e. Backup Status Code  more than 0 )
then send email to XYZ + ABC + AB
-- If backup completed successfully then send email to ABC + AB
-- send the Netbackup Logs to AB

(See attached file: mail_bp_reports.txt)
I am heaving a issue with this script where I am not able to select the
Exact Backup Policy Name
ie.

BOSS-BKUP
ERP-Backup


I have noticed if I create a new backup policy with 'BOSS-BKUP-1' or
'ERP-Backup-2' it is also appearing in the backup status. Where I don't
want this.

Please help to have a look and advise how I can select the EXACT Policy
Name i.e. 'BOSS-BKUP' or 'ERP-BKUP' as per my Policy List.


gen_outfile_for_backup_policy()
{
backupPolicyList=  \
BOSS-BKUP   \
ERP-Backup  \
Windows_Bkup\
Windows_Bkup_All\
Windows_Bkup_M-N\
FS-S-BKUP   \
FS-S-BKUP-1 \
FS-N-BKUP   \
ESX_VCB_BKUP\
Resignee_Usrs1  \
Resignee_Usrs2  


With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  : (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   : (O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
** Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


mail_bp_reports.txt
Description: Binary data
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Check_coverage :-Script not working.

2011-03-18 Thread pranav batra

Hello Mates,
 
Below is the url :

 


  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Check_coverage :-Script not working.

2011-03-18 Thread pranav batra






Hello Mates,
 
Below is the url  that states ,how to generate Hardware,OS and NB client 
version in a text file.
 
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH128723

 


I have tried but every time hardware output is always empty.
Also ,while running this ,i am getting
 
./check_coverage: test: argument expected
Generating Hosts Report
Completed report

The Hardware/OS Report can be found in /tmp/hardware_rpt.03-18@17:09
The Hosts Report can be found in /tmp/hosts_rpt.03-18@17:09

Please suggect if I am doing something else i see that there is a bug in the 
check_coverage script.
Do we have any other option to generate the clients os ,harware and NB verion ?
 
Thanks ,|
pranav___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu