Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Standard vs VMware?? confused :(

2011-07-14 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Under 7.0, I am prices per ESX Host and the number of CPU's on each
Host.
No limit on the clients.
But if you want to do Online SQL / Exchange / Oracle VM, then
apparantly, you need to be licenses for Database options pack.

It gets really confusing at times! As it stands for myself, I am stuck
with doing VM backups like a Physical box... ie: Putting client software
on each VM and treating it like a normal netbackup client.

Have played with VM, and its good fun  but I think its better under
7.0, making use of vSphere 4.x

Simon 

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of A Darren
Dunham
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 6:43 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Standard vs VMware?? confused :(

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:37:09AM -0700, Tony1100 wrote:

 I'm looking into possibly moving to a VMware NBU configuration? and 
 backup VM's via datastore, etc.., but I'm not 100% sure how this is 
 configured.  And honestly, I'd like to stay with the cheapest solution

 (regarding NBU licenses).  I also heard that if I just purchase 
 Enterprise licenses for each ESX host, I can use as many NBU standard 
 clients on VM's that I please.

NBU clients are licensed per physical host.  Check with your vendor on
specifics.

You can purchase enterprise client licenses and perform direct backups
of the Vmware datastore.  This has some benefits.  You can do off-host
backups in a SAN storage environment.  VM disks with lots of files can
be backed up faster than having the virtual server walk it's filesystem.


Or you can purchase standard client licenses and perform standard
backups within each virtual server. 

In both cases, you only need them for the physical machines.  You used
to need one enterprise client for each OS type (windows, linux, etc.) on
each physical machine, but I believe with 7.x (or possibly even 6.5)
that is no longer necessary.

--
Darren
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any
attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its
content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this
email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-o-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office:
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Media server load balancing issue

2011-07-14 Thread pranav batra

Hello Geeks,

We have a setup here with one master and 11 media servers all solaris on 6.5.6
OS is : Solaris10.


We have 3 media servers used for disk based backups using advanced disk by 
netbackup.
We have ZFS pool created on 9,10 and 11 media servers and then using them as a 
advanced disk.

Now the issue is ,We have put media9 and media11 in storage unit group with 
load balancing issue ,but this thing is not working properly as most of the 
backups going on media9 not on media11.

We have made the changes as tried to use round-robin and priortised but the 
issue is still there.

Our media11 is more powerful with 64 GB ram as compared to media9 with 16gb ram 
but still the backups not going on media11.

Any idea/advise to resolve this./


Pranav


 
  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server load balancing issue

2011-07-14 Thread Patrick
Have you tried taking media9 out of the storage group to see if it works to
media11 at all. This might give some more clues. Is media11 the first entry
in the storage group?

 

Regards,

 

Patrick Whelan

VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX.

VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows.

 

 mailto:netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk
netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk

 

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of pranav batra
Sent: 14 July 2011 18:43
To: Veritas
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Media server load balancing issue

 

Hello Geeks,

We have a setup here with one master and 11 media servers all solaris on
6.5.6
OS is : Solaris10.


We have 3 media servers used for disk based backups using advanced disk by
netbackup.
We have ZFS pool created on 9,10 and 11 media servers and then using them as
a advanced disk.

Now the issue is ,We have put media9 and media11 in storage unit group with
load balancing issue ,but this thing is not working properly as most of the
backups going on media9 not on media11.

We have made the changes as tried to use round-robin and priortised but the
issue is still there.

Our media11 is more powerful with 64 GB ram as compared to media9 with 16gb
ram but still the backups not going on media11.

Any idea/advise to resolve this./


Pranav


 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu