Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support (Best Answer)
Already seen that - can confirm 100% its supported through 2008 :-) ! I personally dont see that many that have upgraded to 6.0 and most may wait for 6.5. however, how stable this will be remains to be seen something official to be published when 6.5 gets released ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Jacobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 15:54 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; WALLEBROEK Bart; Steve Dvorak; Jeff Lightner Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support (Best Answer) Thanks to all on this thread. The below response is where I'll place my stake in the sand. _ This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm <http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm> However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist CustOPS - SDC Deployment Tel: + 32 2 655 30 75Mobile: + 32 478 31 61 77 S.W.I.F.T. SCRL _ >>> "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/22/2007 8:15 AM >>> It appears you misread something. He was saying that 6.5 isn't considered a "major" release change (being a 6.x like 6.0) so the EOL wouldn't occur until 7.x. Accordingly there's no reason to talk about it "changing". It might but then again Symantec might go belly up like Enron, global warming might accelerate to the point where it is 10,000 degrees, someone might start shooting off nukes or the sun might go nova. The idea of the discussion was to try to provide the Symantec philosophy - not carve out new commandments in stone. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:40 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support But it changes! Just like Micrsofts approach to kill NT off --- threatened to end support And at the last minute extended it ! Why Because people were not ready. Surely Symantec can see that 6.5 on the way My guess is there will be a 7.0 too !! (Long way I know) :-) Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 13:18 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support The difference being the author of this email was from Symantec and he was trying to explain the company's philosophy in addition to the dry facts of the link. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:01 AM To: 'Steve Dvorak'; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv <http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv> -ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support coun
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support (Best Answer)
Thanks to all on this thread. The below response is where I'll place my stake in the sand. This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist CustOPS - SDC Deployment Tel: + 32 2 655 30 75Mobile: + 32 478 31 61 77 S.W.I.F.T. SCRL >>> "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/22/2007 8:15 AM >>> It appears you misread something. He was saying that 6.5 isn't considered a "major" release change (being a 6.x like 6.0) so the EOL wouldn't occur until 7.x. Accordingly there's no reason to talk about it "changing". It might but then again Symantec might go belly up like Enron, global warming might accelerate to the point where it is 10,000 degrees, someone might start shooting off nukes or the sun might go nova. The idea of the discussion was to try to provide the Symantec philosophy - not carve out new commandments in stone. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:40 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support But it changes! Just like Micrsofts approach to kill NT off --- threatened to end support And at the last minute extended it ! Why Because people were not ready. Surely Symantec can see that 6.5 on the way My guess is there will be a 7.0 too !! (Long way I know) :-) Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 13:18 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support The difference being the author of this email was from Symantec and he was trying to explain the company's philosophy in addition to the dry facts of the link. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:01 AM To: 'Steve Dvorak'; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Lif
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
It appears you misread something. He was saying that 6.5 isn't considered a "major" release change (being a 6.x like 6.0) so the EOL wouldn't occur until 7.x. Accordingly there's no reason to talk about it "changing". It might but then again Symantec might go belly up like Enron, global warming might accelerate to the point where it is 10,000 degrees, someone might start shooting off nukes or the sun might go nova. The idea of the discussion was to try to provide the Symantec philosophy - not carve out new commandments in stone. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:40 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support But it changes! Just like Micrsofts approach to kill NT off --- threatened to end support And at the last minute extended it ! Why Because people were not ready. Surely Symantec can see that 6.5 on the way My guess is there will be a 7.0 too !! (Long way I know) :-) Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 13:18 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support The difference being the author of this email was from Symantec and he was trying to explain the company's philosophy in addition to the dry facts of the link. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:01 AM To: 'Steve Dvorak'; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Life date starts the timeline and process leading to End of Support Life for that Major Release and its related Minor Releases and Maintenance Packs. "Standard Support" We will initially provide "Standard Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels for Licensed Software while the Major Release and its related releases are generally commercially available until the date of their EOL. We will then continue to provide Standard Support for all Cases at all Severity Levels for thirty (30) months following EOL. "Partial Support" is a more limited level of Support Services than you would receive under "Standard Support." Partial Support is when our technical support engineer provides you with known Fixes/Patches/Workarounds, existing Maintenance Packs, or information from our technical knowledge base in response to your request for assistance. Partial Support does not include development of any new modifications to your Licensed Software. Nor will we attempt to reproduce the Problem or escalate issues through managem
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
But it changes! Just like Micrsofts approach to kill NT off --- threatened to end support And at the last minute extended it ! Why Because people were not ready. Surely Symantec can see that 6.5 on the way My guess is there will be a 7.0 too !! (Long way I know) :-) Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 13:18 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Steve Dvorak; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support The difference being the author of this email was from Symantec and he was trying to explain the company's philosophy in addition to the dry facts of the link. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:01 AM To: 'Steve Dvorak'; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Life date starts the timeline and process leading to End of Support Life for that Major Release and its related Minor Releases and Maintenance Packs. "Standard Support" We will initially provide "Standard Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels for Licensed Software while the Major Release and its related releases are generally commercially available until the date of their EOL. We will then continue to provide Standard Support for all Cases at all Severity Levels for thirty (30) months following EOL. "Partial Support" is a more limited level of Support Services than you would receive under "Standard Support." Partial Support is when our technical support engineer provides you with known Fixes/Patches/Workarounds, existing Maintenance Packs, or information from our technical knowledge base in response to your request for assistance. Partial Support does not include development of any new modifications to your Licensed Software. Nor will we attempt to reproduce the Problem or escalate issues through management channels or to our engineering resources. Such Partial Support will be subject to the availability of resources, and we may need to limit the time we are able to spend on the Problem. At the end of the thirty (30) month period described under "Standard Support", we will cease providing any Standard Support, and we will cease providing any Content Updates. Instead, we will provide "Partial Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels. Partial Support will end seven (7) years from GA of the applicable Major Release. There are other instances where we may begin to provide Partial Support for a product. As a rule, we will only provide Standard Support Services for a current Major Release of Licensed Software (for example, version 3.0) along with two prior Major Releases (say, versions 1.0 and 2.0). My $
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
The difference being the author of this email was from Symantec and he was trying to explain the company's philosophy in addition to the dry facts of the link. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:01 AM To: 'Steve Dvorak'; WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Life date starts the timeline and process leading to End of Support Life for that Major Release and its related Minor Releases and Maintenance Packs. "Standard Support" We will initially provide "Standard Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels for Licensed Software while the Major Release and its related releases are generally commercially available until the date of their EOL. We will then continue to provide Standard Support for all Cases at all Severity Levels for thirty (30) months following EOL. "Partial Support" is a more limited level of Support Services than you would receive under "Standard Support." Partial Support is when our technical support engineer provides you with known Fixes/Patches/Workarounds, existing Maintenance Packs, or information from our technical knowledge base in response to your request for assistance. Partial Support does not include development of any new modifications to your Licensed Software. Nor will we attempt to reproduce the Problem or escalate issues through management channels or to our engineering resources. Such Partial Support will be subject to the availability of resources, and we may need to limit the time we are able to spend on the Problem. At the end of the thirty (30) month period described under "Standard Support", we will cease providing any Standard Support, and we will cease providing any Content Updates. Instead, we will provide "Partial Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels. Partial Support will end seven (7) years from GA of the applicable Major Release. There are other instances where we may begin to provide Partial Support for a product. As a rule, we will only provide Standard Support Services for a current Major Release of Licensed Software (for example, version 3.0) along with two prior Major Releases (say, versions 1.0 and 2.0). My $.02 won't buy you a cup of coffee and my summary is not the "official" position of Symantec. :-) Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:42 AM To: 'WALLEBROEK Bart'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And correct me, but I did point out the original PDF was dated 2005 ... When 6.0 had only been released and was seen as a total shambles of a backup system ! So this makes sense My guess 2008 - 09 ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
You better add a $ to this, because I want a coffee and I am going to ignore this link as its been seen many times and does not give a true reflection on the answer needed. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Dvorak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2007 00:43 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); WALLEBROEK Bart; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Life date starts the timeline and process leading to End of Support Life for that Major Release and its related Minor Releases and Maintenance Packs. "Standard Support" We will initially provide "Standard Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels for Licensed Software while the Major Release and its related releases are generally commercially available until the date of their EOL. We will then continue to provide Standard Support for all Cases at all Severity Levels for thirty (30) months following EOL. "Partial Support" is a more limited level of Support Services than you would receive under "Standard Support." Partial Support is when our technical support engineer provides you with known Fixes/Patches/Workarounds, existing Maintenance Packs, or information from our technical knowledge base in response to your request for assistance. Partial Support does not include development of any new modifications to your Licensed Software. Nor will we attempt to reproduce the Problem or escalate issues through management channels or to our engineering resources. Such Partial Support will be subject to the availability of resources, and we may need to limit the time we are able to spend on the Problem. At the end of the thirty (30) month period described under "Standard Support", we will cease providing any Standard Support, and we will cease providing any Content Updates. Instead, we will provide "Partial Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels. Partial Support will end seven (7) years from GA of the applicable Major Release. There are other instances where we may begin to provide Partial Support for a product. As a rule, we will only provide Standard Support Services for a current Major Release of Licensed Software (for example, version 3.0) along with two prior Major Releases (say, versions 1.0 and 2.0). My $.02 won't buy you a cup of coffee and my summary is not the "official" position of Symantec. :-) Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:42 AM To: 'WALLEBROEK Bart'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And correct me, but I did point out the original PDF was dated 2005 ... When 6.0 had only been released and was seen as a total shambles of a backup system ! So this makes sense My guess 2008 - 09 ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WALLEBROEK Bart Sent: 18 May 2007 10:56 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bough
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Symantec's support documents clearly spell out what is and isn't supported based on major/minor version numbers. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/custserv-ent.nsf/docid/200612011400 2855 Bottomline, Symantec provides "standard support" on a product for 30 months, or until it is EOL'd (i.e. the EOL message this chain referred to). Once a product is EOL it goes into a 30 month standard support countdown (Symantec has the ability to choose whether they put the patch in the older version, or write for the newer version only). At the end of the 30 months, Symantec will require you to upgrade only if the problem you encounter is a new problem that requires a code fix to resolve (i.e. Symantec is not obligated to write the fix, but suggest you upgrade to resolve). Standard support is provided on a major release and all minor releases and maintenance packs, etc. Assuming that is true, 6.5 is simply an extension to 6.0. 5.1 if EOL'd in Oct should still be eligible for "standard support" for an additional 30 months (if I am reading correctly), and therefore, should not be a concern to anyone on this thread. "End of Life" or "EOL" means when we cease marketing or distributing a Major Release and its related releases of Licensed Software. The End of Life date starts the timeline and process leading to End of Support Life for that Major Release and its related Minor Releases and Maintenance Packs. "Standard Support" We will initially provide "Standard Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels for Licensed Software while the Major Release and its related releases are generally commercially available until the date of their EOL. We will then continue to provide Standard Support for all Cases at all Severity Levels for thirty (30) months following EOL. "Partial Support" is a more limited level of Support Services than you would receive under "Standard Support." Partial Support is when our technical support engineer provides you with known Fixes/Patches/Workarounds, existing Maintenance Packs, or information from our technical knowledge base in response to your request for assistance. Partial Support does not include development of any new modifications to your Licensed Software. Nor will we attempt to reproduce the Problem or escalate issues through management channels or to our engineering resources. Such Partial Support will be subject to the availability of resources, and we may need to limit the time we are able to spend on the Problem. At the end of the thirty (30) month period described under "Standard Support", we will cease providing any Standard Support, and we will cease providing any Content Updates. Instead, we will provide "Partial Support" for all Cases at all Severity Levels. Partial Support will end seven (7) years from GA of the applicable Major Release. There are other instances where we may begin to provide Partial Support for a product. As a rule, we will only provide Standard Support Services for a current Major Release of Licensed Software (for example, version 3.0) along with two prior Major Releases (say, versions 1.0 and 2.0). My $.02 won't buy you a cup of coffee and my summary is not the "official" position of Symantec. :-) Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:42 AM To: 'WALLEBROEK Bart'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And correct me, but I did point out the original PDF was dated 2005 ... When 6.0 had only been released and was seen as a total shambles of a backup system ! So this makes sense My guess 2008 - 09 ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WALLEBROEK Bart Sent: 18 May 2007 10:56 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialis
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
And correct me, but I did point out the original PDF was dated 2005 ... When 6.0 had only been released and was seen as a total shambles of a backup system ! So this makes sense My guess 2008 - 09 ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WALLEBROEK Bart Sent: 18 May 2007 10:56 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist CustOPS - SDC Deployment Tel: + 32 2 655 30 75Mobile: + 32 478 31 61 77 S.W.I.F.T. SCRL ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist CustOPS - SDC Deployment Tel: + 32 2 655 30 75Mobile: + 32 478 31 61 77 S.W.I.F.T. SCRL smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
This is the official answer I got from Veritas support this morning regarding this: Hi , I have picked up your case. Originally when Version 6 was bought out the following was published. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/279039.htm However, this has not been updated and is truely out of date. Have checked and at the moment their is no plans to end the 5.x. We support 2 major releases so only when Version 7 comes out will 5 be obsoleted. (that is not comming out anytime soon) Next version will be 6.5 later this year. Sorry its not a direct answer to the question but product marketing have not formalised this. Best Regards, Bart WALLEBROEK Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist CustOPS - SDC Deployment Tel: + 32 2 655 30 75Mobile: + 32 478 31 61 77 S.W.I.F.T. SCRL ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
I just upgraded several versions of the NBU Client (3.4, 4.5 and 5.1) to a NBU Master running 6.0. It really is a mixed bag. My goal was to upgrade everything to at least 5.1 and I did eventually get that done but in the mean time I migrated lots of clients with mixed versions. Old System - 5.1 MP4 - versions 3.4, 4.5 and 5.1 all worked fine. New Version - 6.0 MP4 - Standard and Windows policies ran fine on 4.5 Oracle/RMAN was buggy on 4.5 / ok on 5.1 Exchange has a known issue with restores so they had to be upgraded to 6.0 (backups fine on 5.1) None of the 3.4 clients run on 6.0 from the 10 or so I migrated. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whelan, Patrick Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:40 AM To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Carl Mathews; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Not supported or won't work? We are running some 3.4 clients with the master at NBU 5.12MP6 and they work fine. Unfortunately we can't upgrade the Solaris 2.6 clients so we are stuck with 3.4. Of course if they won't work with 6.x then we can push them to upgrade or get rid of the boxes. :) Regards, Patrick Whelan NetBackup Specialist (Contractor) COLT Telecom Architect & Engineering +44 20 7863 5243 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: 17 May 2007 15:25 To: 'Carl Mathews'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support If I understood correctly, older clients are not supported - I think 5.1 or higher is needed for 6.0! My clients (some) run 3.4 and are not supported, and I cannot upgrade them to the later version at this stage. Hopefully they will be phased out in 2008. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Mathews Sent: 17 May 2007 14:59 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We have Windows clients running NB_4.5. If will take some time to upgrade the clients after the server has been upgraded to NB_6.0. Does anyone know if you can backup-up and restore 4.5 Windows clients with a 6.0 Solaris server? Thanks Carl Mathews University of Arkansas --- >We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so >I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for >us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu * The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the named addressee and/or have received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept responsibility for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any viruses. No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, its subsidiaries or affiliates ("COLT") and any other party by email Communications unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party. Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more inform
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Not supported or won't work? We are running some 3.4 clients with the master at NBU 5.12MP6 and they work fine. Unfortunately we can't upgrade the Solaris 2.6 clients so we are stuck with 3.4. Of course if they won't work with 6.x then we can push them to upgrade or get rid of the boxes. :) Regards, Patrick Whelan NetBackup Specialist (Contractor) COLT Telecom Architect & Engineering +44 20 7863 5243 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: 17 May 2007 15:25 To: 'Carl Mathews'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support If I understood correctly, older clients are not supported - I think 5.1 or higher is needed for 6.0! My clients (some) run 3.4 and are not supported, and I cannot upgrade them to the later version at this stage. Hopefully they will be phased out in 2008. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Mathews Sent: 17 May 2007 14:59 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We have Windows clients running NB_4.5. If will take some time to upgrade the clients after the server has been upgraded to NB_6.0. Does anyone know if you can backup-up and restore 4.5 Windows clients with a 6.0 Solaris server? Thanks Carl Mathews University of Arkansas --- >We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so >I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for >us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu * The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the named addressee and/or have received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept responsibility for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any viruses. No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, its subsidiaries or affiliates ("COLT") and any other party by email Communications unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party. Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more information refer to www.colt.net or contact us on +44(0)20 7390 3900. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Jeff As pointed out earlier, should get an annoucement later today and hopefully clear this up once and for all. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 May 2007 14:32 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); smpt; Scott Jacobson; Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support My point was to challenge the blatant statement. We can all opine and many had long before his post was made. I just saw no reason why we should accept that statement as the "fact" without some sort of support - hence my ironic question about divination. You say they're only giving you 5 months but I don't know where you got that. 6.0 has been out much longer than that. Personally I don't claim to "know" when 5.1 will be EOLed. I know what Datalink told us but they could be as wrong as everyone else. It just seems pointless to me not to move forward once 6.0 is mostly stable which by all accounts it is with MP4. Sticking one's head in the sand isn't going to make 6.x go away and as I previously wrote waiting for "new features and fixes" in 6.5 is waiting for vaporware which I've never thought was a good idea for many reasons including the possibility they won't materialize. If your environment is totally static and your 5.1 (or even 3.4) is working for you and you can handle everything that comes up without calling the vendor don't move ahead. If, however, you work in shops that do actually add new systems and technology from time to time it makes sense to plan for moving ahead or at least be sure you know exactly what it is that prevents moving ahead. Here we know we're going to do Data Domain soon and we'd rather have 6.0 in our environment before that so we can know what changes were introduced by 6.0 and which were later introduced by Data Domain. There was a time I had the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" mindset. What I've learned however is that you often find yourself painted into corners when you didn't take newer patches or distributions and suddenly have a pressing business need to get more recent technology going. You end up having to upgrade EVERYTHING rather than just adding the technology you want. It is bad enough when the business imposes restrictions that keep you from moving ahead but even worse when professional administrators become the roadblocks themselves. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:57 AM To: Jeff Lightner; smpt; Scott Jacobson; Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Jeff Well think about it . Most companies announce end of life for a product and normally give 12 - 18 months! If what you are saying is right, then Symantec are giving us 5 MONTHS to change ??? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 21:20 To: smpt; Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 > ---Original Message--- > From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support > Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 > > I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less > DSSU > issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between > choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA > > > I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait > for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and > let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a > hard place in terms of migration choices. > > > In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm > starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" > and not a hard date. > > > Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct > 2007 end of suppo
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
It is not supported. You should be at 5.x or 6.0 for netbackup 6.0. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Mathews Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:59 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We have Windows clients running NB_4.5. If will take some time to upgrade the clients after the server has been upgraded to NB_6.0. Does anyone know if you can backup-up and restore 4.5 Windows clients with a 6.0 Solaris server? Thanks Carl Mathews University of Arkansas --- >We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so >I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for >us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
If I understood correctly, older clients are not supported - I think 5.1 or higher is needed for 6.0! My clients (some) run 3.4 and are not supported, and I cannot upgrade them to the later version at this stage. Hopefully they will be phased out in 2008. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Mathews Sent: 17 May 2007 14:59 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We have Windows clients running NB_4.5. If will take some time to upgrade the clients after the server has been upgraded to NB_6.0. Does anyone know if you can backup-up and restore 4.5 Windows clients with a 6.0 Solaris server? Thanks Carl Mathews University of Arkansas --- >We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so >I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for >us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
We have Windows clients running NB_4.5. If will take some time to upgrade the clients after the server has been upgraded to NB_6.0. Does anyone know if you can backup-up and restore 4.5 Windows clients with a 6.0 Solaris server? Thanks Carl Mathews University of Arkansas --- >We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so >I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for >us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
My point was to challenge the blatant statement. We can all opine and many had long before his post was made. I just saw no reason why we should accept that statement as the "fact" without some sort of support - hence my ironic question about divination. You say they're only giving you 5 months but I don't know where you got that. 6.0 has been out much longer than that. Personally I don't claim to "know" when 5.1 will be EOLed. I know what Datalink told us but they could be as wrong as everyone else. It just seems pointless to me not to move forward once 6.0 is mostly stable which by all accounts it is with MP4. Sticking one's head in the sand isn't going to make 6.x go away and as I previously wrote waiting for "new features and fixes" in 6.5 is waiting for vaporware which I've never thought was a good idea for many reasons including the possibility they won't materialize. If your environment is totally static and your 5.1 (or even 3.4) is working for you and you can handle everything that comes up without calling the vendor don't move ahead. If, however, you work in shops that do actually add new systems and technology from time to time it makes sense to plan for moving ahead or at least be sure you know exactly what it is that prevents moving ahead. Here we know we're going to do Data Domain soon and we'd rather have 6.0 in our environment before that so we can know what changes were introduced by 6.0 and which were later introduced by Data Domain. There was a time I had the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" mindset. What I've learned however is that you often find yourself painted into corners when you didn't take newer patches or distributions and suddenly have a pressing business need to get more recent technology going. You end up having to upgrade EVERYTHING rather than just adding the technology you want. It is bad enough when the business imposes restrictions that keep you from moving ahead but even worse when professional administrators become the roadblocks themselves. -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:57 AM To: Jeff Lightner; smpt; Scott Jacobson; Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Jeff Well think about it . Most companies announce end of life for a product and normally give 12 - 18 months! If what you are saying is right, then Symantec are giving us 5 MONTHS to change ??? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 21:20 To: smpt; Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 > ---Original Message--- > From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support > Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 > > I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less > DSSU > issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between > choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA > > > I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait > for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and > let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a > hard place in terms of migration choices. > > > In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm > starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" > and not a hard date. > > > Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct > 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. > > > Scott > > > >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> > > > Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid > here at both my sites! > > > Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B2
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support - UPDATED
Guys I am going to receive 100% clarification on this matter! What is absolutely certain is the link / pdf may NOT be a true representation of the current life cycle of 5.1 - remember, this PDF refers to 6.0 only. No mention of 6.5! Also, PDF was created 15th Sep 05! Will provide the list with more details later today. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 22:09 To: Jeff Lightner Cc: smpt; Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support There's no way that 10/2007 makes sense for EOL of 5.1. Assuming, and this is a big assumption, given Veritas'/Symantec's history regarding making their release dates with NBU, that 6.5 is released by then, given the initial problems with upgrading from 5.x -> 6.x, they're not going to pull the rug out of 5.1 just yet. If I'm wrong, that's going to be pretty sad. Jeff Lightner wrote: And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 ---Original Message--- From: Scott Jacobson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] ON BEHALF OF Paul Keating SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu <mailto:VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 [LINK: http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf <http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/27 9039.pdf> ] http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf <http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/27 9039.pdf> -- -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] ON BEHALF OF WEAVER, Simon (external) SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu <mailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
All This link here http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/279039.htm <http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/279039.htm> Was last updated on 21st Sep 2005. Either they are sticking to their guns, or no formal update has been announced ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 22:09 To: Jeff Lightner Cc: smpt; Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support There's no way that 10/2007 makes sense for EOL of 5.1. Assuming, and this is a big assumption, given Veritas'/Symantec's history regarding making their release dates with NBU, that 6.5 is released by then, given the initial problems with upgrading from 5.x -> 6.x, they're not going to pull the rug out of 5.1 just yet. If I'm wrong, that's going to be pretty sad. Jeff Lightner wrote: And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 ---Original Message--- From: Scott Jacobson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] ON BEHALF OF Paul Keating SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu <mailto:VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 [LINK: http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf <http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/27 9039.pdf> ] http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf <http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/27 9039.pdf> -- -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] ON BEHALF OF WEAVER, Simon (external) SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu <mailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La version française suit le texte anglais. ---
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Jeff Well think about it . Most companies announce end of life for a product and normally give 12 - 18 months! If what you are saying is right, then Symantec are giving us 5 MONTHS to change ??? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 21:20 To: smpt; Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 > ---Original Message--- > From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support > Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 > > I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less > DSSU > issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between > choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA > > > I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait > for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and > let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a > hard place in terms of migration choices. > > > In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm > starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" > and not a hard date. > > > Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct > 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. > > > Scott > > > >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> > > > Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid > here at both my sites! > > > Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF Paul > Keating > SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 > TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 > MP4to6.0 MP4 > > > [LINK: > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCent > er/279039.pdf] > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf > > > -- > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF > WEAVER, Simon (external) > SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM > TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 > MP4to6.0 MP4 > > > can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > La version française suit le texte anglais. > > This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the > Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or > copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the > intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error > please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender > promptly by email that you have done so. > > Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou > confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y > rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des > renseignements qu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
There's no way that 10/2007 makes sense for EOL of 5.1. Assuming, and this is a big assumption, given Veritas'/Symantec's history regarding making their release dates with NBU, that 6.5 is released by then, given the initial problems with upgrading from 5.x -> 6.x, they're not going to pull the rug out of 5.1 just yet. If I'm wrong, that's going to be pretty sad. Jeff Lightner wrote: And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 ---Original Message--- From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF Paul Keating SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 [LINK: http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf] http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf -- -Original Message- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF WEAVER, Simon (external) SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this mes
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
And you know this through divination maybe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of smpt Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:17 PM To: Scott Jacobson; Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 > ---Original Message--- > From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support > Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 > > I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU > issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between > choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA > > > I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for > 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them > know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in > terms of migration choices. > > > In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting > to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard > date. > > > Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 > end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. > > > Scott > > > >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 > 8:47 AM >>> > > > Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at > both my sites! > > > Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF Paul > Keating > SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 > TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 > MP4 > > > [LINK: > > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf] > > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf > > > -- > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF WEAVER, > Simon (external) > SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM > TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 > MP4 > > > can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > La version française suit le texte anglais. > > > This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the > Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or > copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the > intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error > please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender > promptly by email that you have done so. > > > Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou > confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y > rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des > renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les > destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par > erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai > l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez > éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > immediately, do not copy this message or any att
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
the end of support for 5.x will not be sooner than 12/2008 > ---Original Message--- > From: Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support > Sent: 14 May '07 21:02 > > I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU > issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between > choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA > > > I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for > 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them > know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in > terms of migration choices. > > > In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting > to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard > date. > > > Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 > end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. > > > Scott > > > >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 > 8:47 AM >>> > > > Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at > both my sites! > > > Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF Paul > Keating > SENT: 14 May 2007 15:42 > TO: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 > MP4 > > > [LINK: > > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf] > > http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf > > > -- > > > -Original Message- > FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF WEAVER, > Simon (external) > SENT: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM > TO: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > SUBJECT: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 > MP4 > > > can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? > > > Regards > > Simon Weaver > 3rd Line Technical Support > Windows Domain Administrator > > _EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)_ > Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU > > Email: [LINK: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > La version française suit le texte anglais. > > > This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the > Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or > copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the > intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error > please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender > promptly by email that you have done so. > > > Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou > confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y > rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des > renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les > destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par > erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai > l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez > éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it > for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this > message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and > all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or > falsified. >
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
6.0 still continues to support NT. Regards, -cj Courtenay Jones UNIX Systems Engineer, Raleigh Technology Centre From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:08 AM To: 'Weber, Philip'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Am I right in thinking 6.0 or higher does no longer support NT 4 ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weber, Philip Sent: 16 May 2007 11:52 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 15 May 2007 12:46 To: 'Scott Jacobson'; 'Simon (external) WEAVER'; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies which includes: Egg plc (reg no 2448340), Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd (reg no 3828289), and Egg Banking plc (reg no 2999842). Egg Banking plc and Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and are entered in the FSA register under numbers 205621 and 309551 respectively. These members of the Egg group are registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Citigroup Centre, Canada Square, London E14 5LB. This e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete it from your mailbox. Internet
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Ok its just that the Nt clients run 3.4 still - they cannot be upgraded to the latest IE version as some applications don't function with the latest IE! So effectively, until Nt has gone... We will remain on 5.1 - Because im sure that (as you said) 6.0 will not work on clients under 5.1 or lower (3.4, 4.5 ect) Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Preston, Douglas L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2007 16:29 To: WEAVER, Simon (external); VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Simon, Your answer is Yes and No. Yes: 6.0 can backup up NT4 if it has a 5.1 client on it. No: 6.0 has no NT4 client I still have 3 NT4.0 machines I backup every night with NBU 6.0 MP4. The client on them is 5.1. Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 104 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 8:08 AM To: 'Weber, Philip'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Am I right in thinking 6.0 or higher does no longer support NT 4 ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weber, Philip Sent: 16 May 2007 11:52 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 15 May 2007 12:46 To: 'Scott Jacobson'; 'Simon (external) WEAVER'; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Simon, Your answer is Yes and No. Yes: 6.0 can backup up NT4 if it has a 5.1 client on it. No: 6.0 has no NT4 client I still have 3 NT4.0 machines I backup every night with NBU 6.0 MP4. The client on them is 5.1. Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 104 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 8:08 AM To: 'Weber, Philip'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support Am I right in thinking 6.0 or higher does no longer support NT 4 ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weber, Philip Sent: 16 May 2007 11:52 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 15 May 2007 12:46 To: 'Scott Jacobson'; 'Simon (external) WEAVER'; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies which includes: Egg plc (reg no 2448340
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Am I right in thinking 6.0 or higher does no longer support NT 4 ? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weber, Philip Sent: 16 May 2007 11:52 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 15 May 2007 12:46 To: 'Scott Jacobson'; 'Simon (external) WEAVER'; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott _ Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies which includes: Egg plc (reg no 2448340), Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd (reg no 3828289), and Egg Banking plc (reg no 2999842). Egg Banking plc and Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and are entered in the FSA register under numbers 205621 and 309551 respectively. These members of the Egg group are registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Citigroup Centre, Canada Square, London E14 5LB. This e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete it from your mailbox. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Egg group of companies do not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by the Egg group of companies in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. This communication does not create or modify any contract. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email tr
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
We still have a fairly busy 4.5 environment due to older OS versions so I can't see us moving off our 5.1 environment for a while ... this for us is the "show-stopper" for not upgrading. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 15 May 2007 12:46 To: 'Scott Jacobson'; 'Simon (external) WEAVER'; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott - Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies which includes: Egg plc (reg no 2448340), Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd (reg no 3828289), and Egg Banking plc (reg no 2999842). Egg Banking plc and Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and are entered in the FSA register under numbers 205621 and 309551 respectively. These members of the Egg group are registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Citigroup Centre, Canada Square, London E14 5LB. This e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete it from your mailbox. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Egg group of companies do not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by the Egg group of companies in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. This communication does not create or modify any contract. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
Ok that sounds more like it - but can anyone from Symantec confirm? Rockey perhaps ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: McCammont, Anderson (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 May 2007 15:35 To: Scott Jacobson; WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support My understanding from our Symantec account team is that 3rd Oct 2007 is EOSS (End of Service Support?) for 5.1 - ie. no new maintenance packs, EBFs etc. EOPS (End of Product Support) is 1 Dec 2008 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: 14 May 2007 20:03 To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: 14 May 2007 15:42 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279 039.pdf <http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/27 9039.pdf> -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM To: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmis
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
My understanding from our Symantec account team is that 3rd Oct 2007 is EOSS (End of Service Support?) for 5.1 - ie. no new maintenance packs, EBFs etc. EOPS (End of Product Support) is 1 Dec 2008 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: 14 May 2007 20:03 To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: 14 May 2007 15:42 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM To: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre
Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
I don't believe that customers are being placed between a rock and a hard place - 6.0 MP4 is a stable release that works today. I have not heard of any show-stopper bugs in 6.0 that would prevent anybody from upgrading. You may need an engineering fix or two, and perhaps MP5 will include those, but in general, the current release works for just about everybody. If you really feel that 5.1MP4 is rock solid, and there are no issues, why are you concerned with Symantec continuing to support it? You don't *have* to upgrade - just don't log a call and expect it to get fixed. If you have no issues, you'll have no calls to log and it won't matter if it's supported or not. I've got a non-Symantec product running that we last logged a call on in 2000 (and our license agreement says that we have to keep it under support as long as we're running it). ./Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Jacobson Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:03 PM To: Simon (external) WEAVER; 'Paul Keating'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] 5.1 Oct 2007 End of Support
I also believe 5.1 MP4+ is the most rock solid product I've run (less DSSU issues) and would prefer to stay on that version and not be forced between choosing either 6.0 MP4+ or 6.5 GA I would suggest for those in the group who are also wanting to wait for 6.5 MP1+ to contact their Veritas/Symantec SE/Account Mgr's and let them know as a customer you're being placed between a rock and a hard place in terms of migration choices. In talking with my former RTAM and current local Symantec SE, I'm starting to hear they maybe considering the Oct 2007 date as a "soft" and not a hard date. Now maybe the time to put our voices behind this and tell them Oct 2007 end of support for 5.1 is unacceptable. Scott >>> "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/14/2007 8:47 AM >>> Bit gutted really as I have personally found 5.1 to be rock solid here at both my sites! Guess 6.5 is coming sooner than expected now then !? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: 14 May 2007 15:42 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/279039.pdf -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: May 14, 2007 9:59 AM To: 'Forester, Jack L'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to6.0 MP4 can I have confirmation of this please or a web site or link ?? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une perso! nne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu