Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
who? Symantec or Aptare? -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 2, 2007 5:59 PM Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare Spoke to support today. They just ADDED some more support personnel. W00T! La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
aptare. Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/05/2007 12:23 PM To NB List Mail veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare who? Symantec or Aptare? -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 2, 2007 5:59 PM Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare Spoke to support today. They just ADDED some more support personnel. W00T! La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
We have been using Aptare for about 5 years now and it has worked very well. Their support is excellent. I agree, that even with NOM, we will want to keep Aptare for historical purposes. We use Aptare for our SOX reports. Without it collecting that information would be very painful. = Carl Stehman IT Distributed Services Team Pepco Holdings, Inc. 202-331-6619 Pager 301-765-2703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/01/2007 09:13 PM To Hindle, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc NB List Mail veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare On 2/1/2007 2:03 PM, Hindle, Greg wrote: Does anyone use netbackup 6.0 and the Aptare reporting software? Yup - works like a charm. I have used Aptare's Storage Console software for several years and have absolutely no reason to migrate to a free NOM. I don't see NOM being a full-fledged reporting packages - that's the *extremely* expensive Backup Reporter, but more of an operations manager which is, after all, it's title. You'll have some operational control with NOM that you won't have with Storage Console (e.g. down and up tape drives) but you'll give up reporting functionality to get it. Nothing, of course, stops you from running both. NOM is free so go ahead and try it out. Don't forget that it does require a separate server though - don't even think about it installing it on your master server. I've heard that NOM had a lot of bugs in its early releases, and it's only been out since 6.0. With MP4, it's actually supposed to work. Storage Console has a long track record and I trust it to keep my history intact. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
Spoke to support today. They just ADDED some more support personnel. W00T!___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9 Does anyone use netbackup 6.0 and the Aptare reporting software? With NOM being part of 6.0 is there still a need to have Aptare? Greg This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP1 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
Greg I use Aptare and I also just installed and evaluated NOM V6MP4. NOM is very similar to the old CCstor which we evaluated when we chose Aptare. NOM has nowhere near the function of Aptare and I do not like the interface. In addition Symantec just announced a new product that will be doing backup reporting (Backup Reporter). I think this means that the free NOM product is probably not going to receive much love and the new product that will cost you money and it will get the attention. So NOM is not going to catch up to Aptare and I have little confidence in the Backup Reporter product either. Backup Reporter already has a few things I don't like. Primarily it normalizes messages from the backup products. Instead of getting a NetBackup 150 or a TSM (whatever the code is) you will get a standard job was cancelled message, but you may not know it was specifically a 150. Aptare does not normalize messages so if you are running NetBackup, TSM and Legato you will get the product specific information you need to do your job. So Symantec is rolling out the next 6th remake of a backup reporting product in about as many years (Advanced Reporter, Storage Track, GDM, Command Central, NOM, Backup Reporter). Did I miss anything? I want to see a stable product for at least 2-3 years before I look at Symantec's backup reporting again. Monte From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle, Greg Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 12:04 PM To: NB List Mail Subject: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9 Does anyone use netbackup 6.0 and the Aptare reporting software? With NOM being part of 6.0 is there still a need to have Aptare? Greg This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP1 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 Aptare
On 2/1/2007 2:03 PM, Hindle, Greg wrote: Does anyone use netbackup 6.0 and the Aptare reporting software? Yup - works like a charm. I have used Aptare's Storage Console software for several years and have absolutely no reason to migrate to a free NOM. I don't see NOM being a full-fledged reporting packages - that's the *extremely* expensive Backup Reporter, but more of an operations manager which is, after all, it's title. You'll have some operational control with NOM that you won't have with Storage Console (e.g. down and up tape drives) but you'll give up reporting functionality to get it. Nothing, of course, stops you from running both. NOM is free so go ahead and try it out. Don't forget that it does require a separate server though - don't even think about it installing it on your master server. I've heard that NOM had a lot of bugs in its early releases, and it's only been out since 6.0. With MP4, it's actually supposed to work. Storage Console has a long track record and I trust it to keep my history intact. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu