Re: [Veritas-bu] isilon backup accelerator

2010-06-09 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:03:12AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
 If you have a NetApp filer (and there may be other NAS heads that have the
 same functionality) that have multiple security models on the same data,
 this approach simply will not work.  We have some file systems that use both
 Unix and NTFS security so backing the data up using either CIFS or NFS will
 miss the rest of the security information.

Just a note on this point.  Don't know about other systems, but Netapp
says that CIFS backups do properly save UNIX security info.  It's saved
in a SMB structure.

NFS cannot carry the NTFS ACLS though.  So conceivably you can do all
CIFS backups and get all security structures.  (I do NDMP and have
mainly UNIX servers, so it's not something I've tried to test).

-- 
Darren
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] isilon backup accelerator

2010-06-09 Thread David Magda
On Jun 9, 2010, at 19:27, A Darren Dunham wrote:

 NFS cannot carry the NTFS ACLS though.  So conceivably you can do all
 CIFS backups and get all security structures.  (I do NDMP and have
 mainly UNIX servers, so it's not something I've tried to test).

Well, NFSv4 does NTFS-style ACLs. See Section 5.11 of the NFSv4 spec  
(RFC 3530). There's also a draft on mapping NFSv4 and draft-POSIX ACLs  
(draft-ietf-nfsv4-acl-mapping-05).

Don't know of many systems that can show both though. I believe  
OpenSolaris can do UID-SID mapping and such with ACLs if you're  
exporting a ZFS file system to both NFS and CIFS/SMB.

NetApp should be able to handle it if you use mixed QTrees:

http://www.netapp.com/us/communities/tech-ontap/nfsv4-0408.html

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] isilon backup accelerator

2010-06-07 Thread mitch808

I've run into a customer or two that has.  It works, to say the least.

However a better way, and cheaper way would be to just do a synthetic backup 
(ideally with dedupe) of the CIFS/NFS shares themselves.  

You dont have to buy the expensive accelerator head, you eliminate NDMP 
licenses, and you now are future proofing yourself on restores by backing up 
the raw shares, and not using NDMP with a proprietary data format.

+--
|This was sent by mnab...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] isilon backup accelerator

2010-06-07 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:43 AM, mitch808
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:


 However a better way, and cheaper way would be to just do a synthetic
 backup (ideally with dedupe) of the CIFS/NFS shares themselves.

 You dont have to buy the expensive accelerator head, you eliminate NDMP
 licenses, and you now are future proofing yourself on restores by backing up
 the raw shares, and not using NDMP with a proprietary data format.



This seems to be a practice that Symantec is now promoting but there are
certainly complications to this approach and cases where it simply won't
work.  Ideally with dedupe also depends on the data - we have a LOT of
data that doesn't dedupe well at all and purchasing dedupe licenses would
cost us a fortune with little to no gain.

If you have a NetApp filer and are using MultiStore, you now need to use
multiple media servers to back up the same data since they are likely in
different security domains.  This could be further complicate itself by the
way you have your physical backup network cabled - you may need to add even
more network interfaces to separate the backup network from the production
front-side traffic and figure out how to those media servers access the data
over those networks.

Ff you have a NetApp filer (and there may be other NAS heads that have the
same functionality) that have multiple security models on the same data,
this approach simply will not work.  We have some file systems that use both
Unix and NTFS security so backing the data up using either CIFS or NFS will
miss the rest of the security information.

No approach is perfect so you have to decide what is going to work best in
your environment.

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] isilon backup accelerator

2010-06-05 Thread Iverson, Jerald
anyone using an isilon backup accelerator to do ndmp backups directly to
tape?  running Isilon OneFS v5.0.7.13?

thanks,
jerald

Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any 
attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  It is 
intended solely for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed.  Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient(s) is prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu