Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-19 Thread ckstehman
Hi

We just finished adding DataDomain to our environment, and did not use 
VTL.  We use CIFS and NFS and
evertything is working fine.


--
Carl Stehman
Distributed Services
Pepcoholdings, Inc.
701 Ninth St NW
Washington DC 20068
202-331-6619







John Meyers  
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/19/2009 08:58 AM

To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc

Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice






Jeff Lightner wrote:
> Make sure you understand that fibre for the Data Domain is an add on so
> costs extra.  In our planning we were going to do fibre but didn?t order
> the add on so ended up having to do GigE with NFS mounts instead.   To
> get throughput we wanted we had to work on doing network aggregation. 
> 
> Having said all that the Data Domains work pretty much as advertised and
> the high compression/deduplication numbers are a reality.
> 

We just did the same thing, end up tagging a DD690 onto a EMC storage bid
and got so focused on the storage bid that we overlooked the fact that the
DD690 as spec'd to us didn't include the FC/VTL option.  Although honestly
I'm not sure that the VTL functionality would really be a plus.  With the
CIFS/NFS configuration, it's simple matter to setup a disk storage or
staging unit to the DD690.  No extra NB licenses costs involved either.
Just wish we had the FC bandwidth available to us.

In the couple weeks we've been using it, we've been seeing pretty 
phenomenal
compression and de-dup rates.

John

-- 
John Meyers
Lead Systems Programmer
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates ("PHI").  This Email is
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed.  If
you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies.  PHI
policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email
communication.  PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such
communications.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-19 Thread John Meyers
Jeff Lightner wrote:
> Make sure you understand that fibre for the Data Domain is an add on so
> costs extra.  In our planning we were going to do fibre but didn’t order
> the add on so ended up having to do GigE with NFS mounts instead.   To
> get throughput we wanted we had to work on doing network aggregation.  
> 
> Having said all that the Data Domains work pretty much as advertised and
> the high compression/deduplication numbers are a reality.
> 

We just did the same thing, end up tagging a DD690 onto a EMC storage bid
and got so focused on the storage bid that we overlooked the fact that the
DD690 as spec'd to us didn't include the FC/VTL option.  Although honestly
I'm not sure that the VTL functionality would really be a plus.  With the
CIFS/NFS configuration, it's simple matter to setup a disk storage or
staging unit to the DD690.  No extra NB licenses costs involved either.
Just wish we had the FC bandwidth available to us.

In the couple weeks we've been using it, we've been seeing pretty phenomenal
compression and de-dup rates.

John

-- 
John Meyers
Lead Systems Programmer
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-14 Thread Randy Doering
Wayne, We have a couple of DD690s (1 Appliance, 1 Gateway) and I've really got 
only good things to say about them. They're easy to setup and configure (VTL 
and NFS).

You might want to consider what your retention periods will be for the data you 
keep on it. We use 3 months max for the VTL, and anything over goes to Physical 
Tape for offsite storage.

At www.datadomain.com there is a pointer to a Best Practices guide for 
Netbackup.

Randy

 




From: "BeDour, Wayne" 
To: scott.geo...@parker.com
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 1:03:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

We are still going to do offsite storage.  The plan is to write from the
vtl to the smaller library and send offsite.

Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-593-9876  
Internet:  wbed...@lear.com

-Original Message-
From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:01 AM
To: BeDour, Wayne
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

I am making the assumption that you:

a) have no requirement for offsite storage or to put it in industry
terms, 
a disaster recovery requirement, and

b) are comfortable with keeping all of your backups on virtual storage.

Personally, I would be uneasy with this, because in the event of a 
catastrophic failure with your VTL (as highly unlikely as it is) your 
backups are gone.  If you are a smaller shop, this risk is acceptable.

On the upside, the performance increase is going to phenomenal.  We just

replaced a non-deduping EMC VTL with a newer one.  One of the things
that 
NetBackup required was to actually emulate the EMC virtual library. 
Otherwise, you will run into some licensing issues.  No biggie, the EMC 
could emulate as many drives and as many tapes as the physical disk 
storage would allow.  There is probably something similar with the Data 
Domain.







"BeDour, Wayne"  
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/14/2009 09:32 AM

To

cc

Subject
[Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice






All 
Our environment HP-UX 11.31 a SureStore 20/700 library with 10 LTO-1 
drives, NetBackup 6.5.2 Master / Media server and one Windows Media
server 
using SSO. 
We are looking at purchasing a Data Domain device, eliminating the 
SureStore library as it is at its end of life and replacing it with a 
smaller library.  We have no experience with a VTL or what pitfalls or 
things to look out for while setting up the new environment.  Any advice

on where to look to gather info, or experiences of what to look out for?

Thanks in advance.

Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-593-9876 
Internet:  wbed...@lear.com


**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
cooperation.

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or cop

Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-14 Thread BeDour, Wayne
We are still going to do offsite storage.  The plan is to write from the
vtl to the smaller library and send offsite.

Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-593-9876  
Internet:  wbed...@lear.com
 
-Original Message-
From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:01 AM
To: BeDour, Wayne
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

I am making the assumption that you:

a) have no requirement for offsite storage or to put it in industry
terms, 
a disaster recovery requirement, and

b) are comfortable with keeping all of your backups on virtual storage.

Personally, I would be uneasy with this, because in the event of a 
catastrophic failure with your VTL (as highly unlikely as it is) your 
backups are gone.  If you are a smaller shop, this risk is acceptable.

On the upside, the performance increase is going to phenomenal.  We just

replaced a non-deduping EMC VTL with a newer one.  One of the things
that 
NetBackup required was to actually emulate the EMC virtual library. 
Otherwise, you will run into some licensing issues.  No biggie, the EMC 
could emulate as many drives and as many tapes as the physical disk 
storage would allow.  There is probably something similar with the Data 
Domain.







"BeDour, Wayne"  
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/14/2009 09:32 AM

To

cc

Subject
[Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice






All 
Our environment HP-UX 11.31 a SureStore 20/700 library with 10 LTO-1 
drives, NetBackup 6.5.2 Master / Media server and one Windows Media
server 
using SSO. 
We are looking at purchasing a Data Domain device, eliminating the 
SureStore library as it is at its end of life and replacing it with a 
smaller library.  We have no experience with a VTL or what pitfalls or 
things to look out for while setting up the new environment.  Any advice

on where to look to gather info, or experiences of what to look out for?

Thanks in advance.
 
Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-593-9876 
Internet:  wbed...@lear.com
 

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
cooperation.

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-14 Thread scott . george
I am making the assumption that you:

a) have no requirement for offsite storage or to put it in industry terms, 
a disaster recovery requirement, and

b) are comfortable with keeping all of your backups on virtual storage.

Personally, I would be uneasy with this, because in the event of a 
catastrophic failure with your VTL (as highly unlikely as it is) your 
backups are gone.  If you are a smaller shop, this risk is acceptable.

On the upside, the performance increase is going to phenomenal.  We just 
replaced a non-deduping EMC VTL with a newer one.  One of the things that 
NetBackup required was to actually emulate the EMC virtual library. 
Otherwise, you will run into some licensing issues.  No biggie, the EMC 
could emulate as many drives and as many tapes as the physical disk 
storage would allow.  There is probably something similar with the Data 
Domain.







"BeDour, Wayne"  
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/14/2009 09:32 AM

To

cc

Subject
[Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice






All 
Our environment HP-UX 11.31 a SureStore 20/700 library with 10 LTO-1 
drives, NetBackup 6.5.2 Master / Media server and one Windows Media server 
using SSO. 
We are looking at purchasing a Data Domain device, eliminating the 
SureStore library as it is at its end of life and replacing it with a 
smaller library.  We have no experience with a VTL or what pitfalls or 
things to look out for while setting up the new environment.  Any advice 
on where to look to gather info, or experiences of what to look out for? 
Thanks in advance.
 
Wayne BeDour
Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-593-9876 
Internet:  wbed...@lear.com
 

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
cooperation.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

2009-10-14 Thread Jeff Lightner
Make sure you understand that fibre for the Data Domain is an add on so
costs extra.  In our planning we were going to do fibre but didn't order
the add on so ended up having to do GigE with NFS mounts instead.   To
get throughput we wanted we had to work on doing network aggregation.   

 

Having said all that the Data Domains work pretty much as advertised and
the high compression/deduplication numbers are a reality.

 



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of BeDour,
Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:32 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice

 

All 

Our environment HP-UX 11.31 a SureStore 20/700 library with 10 LTO-1
drives, NetBackup 6.5.2 Master / Media server and one Windows Media
server using SSO. 

We are looking at purchasing a Data Domain device, eliminating the
SureStore library as it is at its end of life and replacing it with a
smaller library.  We have no experience with a VTL or what pitfalls or
things to look out for while setting up the new environment.  Any advice
on where to look to gather info, or experiences of what to look out for?
Thanks in advance.

 

Wayne BeDour

Unix System Administrator

PH: 313-593-9876  

Internet:  wbed...@lear.com

 

**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
**
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**

This E-mail message and any attachments may contain 
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of 
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender and 
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
 

Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
<>___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu