Re: [videoblogging] Video Editing Laptop?

2009-06-10 Thread RANDY MANN
ok the best video editing pc laptop for less then 1500 got to be the new 13
inch mac book pro

just put boot camp on it

its like getting 2 computers in one



On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Steve Eisenberg
steve.eisenb...@gmail.comwrote:



 take a look at a commercial HP/Compaq laptop. Not the consumer line.


 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wilton Vought 
 wvou...@gmail.comwvought%40gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
  Can anyone recommend a video editing laptop?
 
  Windows, less than $1500.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Wilton Vought
  www.essentialdissent.net
 
 
 

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: WordPress Plugin of Interest to Onine Video (focusing on series)

2009-06-10 Thread awarner20
I have this plugin working in a simple instance. Here's how:

In my WP back end, I've created a Series named Power of Video with WordPress. 
I then went to the 5 posts I had previously written concerning this subject and 
tagged them each with this series name and updated the posts.

I then went to Appearance--Widgets and added the new Series: List Posts 
Widget. You can see the output on the top right here, 
http://wordpressmodder.org

The beauty of this plugin is that you can create as many series (and series 
Widgets) as you need. Now, I'm sure there are some more uses, so start playing 
and post back if you end up using it for video display. One of the feature 
requests I'm going to ask for is that it pull in the first image in a post and 
auto resize it to a thumbnail...

...if you have any ideas, please make your voice heard to Justin Tadlock, the 
developer, over at 
http://justintadlock.com/archives/2009/06/09/series-wordpress-plugin






Re: [videoblogging] Re: WordPress Plugin of Interest to Onine Video (focusing on series)

2009-06-10 Thread Jay dedman
 I have this plugin working in a simple instance. Here's how:
 In my WP back end, I've created a Series named Power of Video with
 WordPress. I then went to the 5 posts I had previously written concerning
 this subject and tagged them each with this series name and updated the
 posts.
 I then went to Appearance--Widgets and added the new Series: List Posts
 Widget. You can see the output on the top right here,
 http://wordpressmodder.org
 The beauty of this plugin is that you can create as many series (and series
 Widgets) as you need. Now, I'm sure there are some more uses, so start
 playing and post back if you end up using it for video display. One of the
 feature requests I'm going to ask for is that it pull in the first image in
 a post and auto resize it to a thumbnail...

yeah, i noticed that its just a text list now. Not all that helpful if
you're trying to show off a video series. I really wish more WP
developers would add thumbnails to the functionality of their
plugins/widgets.

Jay

-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Open Video Ideas

2009-06-10 Thread Jay dedman
 But to get back on topic, I am still just not sure if it's the software or
 the hardware that needs to be open or if it's just us as
 artists...allowing our works to be a part of another work to create a
 storyengine that tells a whole new story.

You are correct. Creators just need to keep pushing their own work. I
forget sometimes that most videobloggers (and anyone who puts video on
the web)are doing it in addition to having jobs, families,
problems, etc.

It's been said again and again: There is no longer a priest-caste to
make movies, videos, stories, journalism etc. But along with this
opening up, there also isn't a clear pattern/format for us to follow.
Infinite possibilities means infinite anxiety.

Might have been have easier when you knew you had to make a 22-minute
TV show, or a 90-minute movie, that was based on very narrow genre
expectations?  The process of bureaucracy and obtaining approval/money
was almost comforting in a solid excuse for not creating? The chase of
the festival circuit was a predictable struggle?

Anyway...i still do think that an open video/story engine would
help. The fact that you use Sony Vegas and I use iMovie/FCP...makes it
a little more difficult for us to work together without having to
figure out the technical aspects in between.

Jay


-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790


Re: [videoblogging] Quicktime X specs

2009-06-10 Thread Jay dedman
 Eric from blip.tv posted this on twitter and I thought there was some
good
 stuff about the new quicktime.
 
http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/06/09/quicktime-x-heres-what-we-know/

I read deeper into this Quicktime post and found this commentary.
Interesting since we've been talking about this recently:

Of course, what’s missing in all of this is any mention of how this works
 for developers, how things like color profiles might be interoperable on
 non-Apple platforms, or what happens to QuickTime for Windows. In typical
 Apple fashion, this is all about what benefits the Mac and what’s built on
 the Mac’s own technologies. That’s not necessarily a bad thing – in fact,
 Microsoft, you are still working on DirectShow, right (cough)? But the more
 these platforms become proprietary and specific, the more painfully obvious
 the need for better cross-platform frameworks becomes. Nor does everything
 always have to be tied up with the OS. Apple’s own emphasis – portability to
 mobile devices, GPU-native processing – in fact speaks directly to
 cross-platform, OS-agnostic issues.

 Already, many interesting commercial and open source applications are
 starting to build on cross-platform frameworks like ffmpeg/GStreamer. To
 call these developer-friendly, though, would be an exaggeration. Part of the
 problem is that the dark cloud of patent confusion, fueled by the US’
 antiquated intellectual property law, casts a shadow over more widespread
 use of such frameworks.

 I think there’s value in creating OS-specific tools, and it certainly makes
 sense given Apple’s business model. But because we rely on these foundations
 for art, and because development often extends beyond devices with Apple
 logos on them, the alternatives are important. Apple had at one point
 aspired to build across platforms – but the legacy of QuickTime never became
 that, which is part of why it missed out on Web deployment to Flash and why
 it could miss out again on emerging trends in development.

 Apple is focused – perhaps fairly so – on their ecosystem. But when you see
 images like the mobile export option, don’t you wonder a little bit about
 what would benefit your ecosystem?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:videoblogging-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:videoblogging-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
videoblogging-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Open Video Ideas

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Sullivan
is h264 not ok as master source video codec (and final output) for both
vegas and fcp/imovie?


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:



  But to get back on topic, I am still just not sure if it's the software
 or
  the hardware that needs to be open or if it's just us as
  artists...allowing our works to be a part of another work to create a
  storyengine that tells a whole new story.

 You are correct. Creators just need to keep pushing their own work. I
 forget sometimes that most videobloggers (and anyone who puts video on
 the web)are doing it in addition to having jobs, families,
 problems, etc.

 It's been said again and again: There is no longer a priest-caste to
 make movies, videos, stories, journalism etc. But along with this
 opening up, there also isn't a clear pattern/format for us to follow.
 Infinite possibilities means infinite anxiety.

 Might have been have easier when you knew you had to make a 22-minute
 TV show, or a 90-minute movie, that was based on very narrow genre
 expectations? The process of bureaucracy and obtaining approval/money
 was almost comforting in a solid excuse for not creating? The chase of
 the festival circuit was a predictable struggle?

 Anyway...i still do think that an open video/story engine would
 help. The fact that you use Sony Vegas and I use iMovie/FCP...makes it
 a little more difficult for us to work together without having to
 figure out the technical aspects in between.

 Jay

 --
 http://ryanishungry.com
 http://jaydedman.com
 http://twitter.com/jaydedman
 917 371 6790
  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Open Video Ideas

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Sullivan
the open part of video editing tools should prob just be that of an XML
format that lays out the instructions for an edited and produced video...
with all effects, cuts, layers, paths, filenames and other metadata etc
defined.
then the software out there SHOULD be compatible as handlers and allow for
import of these instructions.  since proprietary apps will not care and also
may have their own XML format for such things, open source apps would be
created in tandem and eventually, some of the popular editing tools may
support the standard in the future which can include supporting ogg or
other open codecs.

imagine if we all made videos using SMIL?

sull

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Heath heathpa...@msn.com wrote:



 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Jay dedman jay.ded...@...
  Anyway...i still do think that an open video/story engine would
  help. The fact that you use Sony Vegas and I use iMovie/FCP...makes it
  a little more difficult for us to work together without having to
  figure out the technical aspects in between.
 
  Jay

 In that I completely agree...having a standard or open video
 editing/processing platform would be great for collaborations and I think we
 need to remember that open doesn't have to mean free...because at some
 point that people making all this I am sure would like to have some
 compensation for their time, effort, etc...So some of being open to open
 standards is for us as storytellers editors, etc is to embrace these new
 techs and share the knowledge...

 Although I will admit, it's hard to balance the creative and tech sides of
 me

 Heath
 http://heathparks.com

 
 
  --
  http://ryanishungry.com
  http://jaydedman.com
  http://twitter.com/jaydedman
  917 371 6790
 

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Open Video Ideas

2009-06-10 Thread Jay dedman
 is h264 not ok as master source video codec (and final output) for both
 vegas and fcp/imovie?

Sure, that's doable.

But if we're really talking about collaboration, lets shoot for the
stars. We should be able to swap project files, compression settings,
fonts, make music together, sceensharing...and IM within the editing
project.

Jay

-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790