[videoblogging] New Mac Edit Software

2009-07-15 Thread scott stead
Phil Shapiro from DC Media Makers shared this link with me...might be
something to look into if you want more flexibility than IMovie but less $$$
than FCP on the Mac. 30 Day Trial Available
http://www.miensoftware.com/mediaedit.html

Cheers.

  if you'd like to try software that offers more than imovie, but
less than final cut, this $60 program looks like it fits right in
between imovie and final cut.

   see http://prmac.com/release-id-6522.htm


Sample video created with MediaEdit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuwM6urSNpghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuwM6urSNpg

-- 
Scott Stead
www.scottstead.com
www.documentaryclub.org
c) 202.557.1291
e) scott.st...@gmail.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] how to allow broadcast quality video download for EPK?

2009-07-15 Thread Irene Duma
You're right. We did have a lot of custom coding. We coded the  
backend to make it simple and undaunting for our client. The  
traditional Drupal backend is very intimidating to clients, I have  
found.

But I do believe that we can still strive for simpler, more intuitive  
interface design in all our apps or toys. I believe so very much.


On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:53 PM, halley.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:



 I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I love Drupal, so I must.  
 If you had troubles with your upgrade, it's from custom coding. And  
 if there was a lot of that, the same guy in charge of the upgrade  
 woulda kinda known.

 Once you embark on that venture, you need to see it through, and if  
 you act as though it's a surprise, then, well, ya know - the dev is  
 not looking like such a smarty pants after all.

 A solid Drupal, or wpmu, or any other relatively turnkey solution,  
 build has all of the native SEO it needs when implemented properly.

 As to the question about the future, its here if you are working  
 with the right team.

 Sorry for the long day. They happen on the web. Best advice, take a  
 break, have a cold one and look at it again in the morning.

 Good luck.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: Irene Duma ir...@strangeduck.com

 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:05:23
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] how to allow broadcast quality video  
 download for EPK?


 Thanks... I wasn't sure how large Blip allowed files to be, and I
 never heard of the latter. Coolio. Will check out.

 It's tough handing projects over to clients, especially a new Drupal
 web site. I am killing them with notes on how to update and maintain
 their site, include photos, embed videos, never mind optimize each
 page and object for SEO.

 And the teaching part is killing me. And my programmer just updated
 to the newer version of Drupal, and had to update all the modules,
 which caused problems, so he had a rough day too.

 Looking forward to when this will all be y..er.

 Is that in our future? Ever?

 On Jul 12, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Adam Quirk wrote:

 
 
  I'm pretty sure you can host files that large at Blip.
  If you're looking for an easy storage solution for big files in
  general, I
  suggest Drop.io:
  http://manager.drop.io/plans
 
  http://manager.drop.io/plansAnd there's always S3:
  http://aws.amazon.com/s3/
 
  http://aws.amazon.com/s3/--
  Adam Quirk
  http://tangent.ws
  http://wreckandsalvage.com
 
  On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Irene Duma ir...@strangeduck.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi all,
   I am creating a web site for a client which will have embedded
   streaming videos from Blip. However for the EPK, I want to  
 allow for
   downloadable broadcast quality video clips.
  
   Any suggestions on how to make this work? Where and how to store
   them? The client is not very tech savvy, so something simple
  would be
   best. The clips are ranging from 600-980mb.
  
   Irene Duma
   www.strangeduck.com
  
  
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
  
   
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 



 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] New Mac Edit Software

2009-07-15 Thread RANDY MANN
or you can use this and save lots

http://www.mininova.org/get/491576

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:31 PM, scott stead scott.st...@gmail.com wrote:



 Phil Shapiro from DC Media Makers shared this link with me...might be
 something to look into if you want more flexibility than IMovie but less
 $$$
 than FCP on the Mac. 30 Day Trial Available
 http://www.miensoftware.com/mediaedit.html

 Cheers.

  if you'd like to try software that offers more than imovie, but
 less than final cut, this $60 program looks like it fits right in
 between imovie and final cut.
 
  see http://prmac.com/release-id-6522.htm
 
 
 Sample video created with MediaEdit
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuwM6urSNpg
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuwM6urSNpg

 --
 Scott Stead
 www.scottstead.com
 www.documentaryclub.org
 c) 202.557.1291
 e) scott.st...@gmail.com scott.stead%40gmail.com

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] revver

2009-07-15 Thread RODLI PEDERSON
lately when i upload a video to revver it takes hours. what is their problem. 
they have never paid me too.

rodli



Re: [videoblogging] how to allow broadcast quality video download for EPK?

2009-07-15 Thread Jay dedman
 You're right. We did have a lot of custom coding. We coded the
 backend to make it simple and undaunting for our client. The
 traditional Drupal backend is very intimidating to clients, I have
 found.
 But I do believe that we can still strive for simpler, more intuitive
 interface design in all our apps or toys. I believe so very much.

From what I hear from my Drupal friends, the next iteration is
supposed to be much more user friendly and better designed. Ive heard
the vision of drag and drop modules on the pageso you dont have a
admin section...but everything can be changed on the front page if
you're logged in.

Again, maybe these are rumors but I dont mind spreading some Drupal gossip.

Jay

-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790


Re: [videoblogging] Compression best practices

2009-07-15 Thread Rupert
Have you seen:
http://heywatch.com/

Web-based online video encoding.

I haven't used it yet.  Got quite excited about what it says it can do:

It will batch convert to any format, any length, and any resolution  
including HD.  And you can set up your own custom format conversion  
profiles.

It'll distribute your files to wherever you want - CDN, FTP, HTTP and  
Amazon S3.

It will accept videos from sharing sites, URLs and podcast feeds as  
source files.

It allows you to do custom watermarking.

It has a mobile interface.

And it has an API.

It costs, but if I measure the time my computer is locked up in  
compression of different formats, and match that to my hourly rate,  
it's cheap.

Looks like the future to me.

If you try it, let us know how it goes.

Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv

On 14-Jul-09, at 4:00 PM, Adam Quirk wrote:



 Hey all,
 I've used several compression UIs over the years, but I'm curious to  
 hear
 what your favorites are, and what your process is.

 I really like SUPER by Erightsoft (http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html 
 ) but
 I usually have trouble converting from QT to WMV. Directshow seems  
 to throw
 a wrench in the gears.

 I use QT Pro for almost all of my compression, but I'm still hunting  
 for a
 good WMV solution.

 Windows Media Encoder isn't an option for me, as it almost always  
 crashes
 for some reason.

 Is anyone still using Sorenson Squeeze?

 What is your process for compressing to all the different formats  
 from your
 master?

 Mine:
 1. Render uncompressed AVI at 1280x720p
 2. Open in QT, Export Movie, h.264 1280x720p 2.5mbps
 3. Open in QT, Export for Web, iPhone m4v and iPhone 3gp
 4. Open in Super, Export to WMV9 1280x720p 2.5mbps

 Note: I'm on PC, but if you're on Mac please feel free to share too.  
 Someone
 else may be interested.

 Thanks,
 Adam
 http://tangent.ws

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] [TEST] Tiny Canon SD780IS test of 1280 video

2009-07-15 Thread Caleb Clark
Hi all. I just got a Canon SD780IS, the tiniest Canon Powershots. I've put a
very quick photo and test up of the video, it shoots 1280 .mov and is
amazing for it's size and a great backup/documentation camera as usual for
the SD line. This one is also cool in black. Amazon $227 (on July 12th
anyway) Test at: http://plocktau.com/temp/

-- 
~ Caleb Clark
~ Wk: http://gradcenter.marlboro.edu/academics/mat/faculty
~ Hm: http://www.plocktau.com
~ The problem with communication is the assumption it has been
accomplished. - G. B. Shaw.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: [TEST] Tiny Canon SD780IS test of 1280 video= KODAK M1033

2009-07-15 Thread Sunshine Ray
I use the Kodak M1033, very small, great shots and video in HD. It is
very touchy the buttons are so small and getting it to video fast enough
and has so many options. I have record lots, in line for editing or I
would post one, some will be on my channel soon. I got great rate on
sale, some time back. It came with charger for lithium battery that
lasts quite some time, and software, not impressed with the Kodak
Gallery at all. Prior I had great software to work with the photos from
my HP camera, Kodak didn't have. I was told bic lighters bought them out
(shock if true)

http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=12416pq-locale=en_\
US_requestid=2914
http://http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=12416pq-lo\
cale=en_US_requestid=2914

Cheryl


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Caleb Clark cale...@... wrote:

 Hi all. I just got a Canon SD780IS, the tiniest Canon Powershots. I've
put a
 very quick photo and test up of the video, it shoots 1280 .mov and is
 amazing for it's size and a great backup/documentation camera as usual
for
 the SD line. This one is also cool in black. Amazon $227 (on July 12th
 anyway) Test at: http://plocktau.com/temp/

 --
 ~ Caleb Clark
 ~ Wk: http://gradcenter.marlboro.edu/academics/mat/faculty
 ~ Hm: http://www.plocktau.com
 ~ The problem with communication is the assumption it has been
 accomplished. - G. B. Shaw.


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] imovie HD 06-08 -imove 09 - Tutorials - Apple asking 4 Feedback on both

2009-07-15 Thread Sunshine Ray
1- prior asked for tutorials on HD 06, found some on youtube and made a
hidden playlist anyone can access here, one of the kids is a real wizz

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=EEFC30C0493DBBF1search_query=ch\
erylspeaksout
 
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=EEFC30C0493DBBF1search_query=c\
herylspeaksout
however, there was more to learn and was on phone with apple, they still
have HD6 support on the phone, we went through both programs and another
software I am using the Roxio vhs to imovie. Learned alot more, more to
go, some he didn't even know.

I mentioned that others as well as myself were commenting on the text
frame  effects features not in iMovie 09 that are in HD'06, but clip
split was much easier in '09 and that alot of others have made comments
re '09 dropping the text frame/effects features. And they asked that as
many of you as possible please give your feedback and that is it
important to do so.

I was going to start a petition to them if not too late for imove 10, if
there is one to include both, short on time.

If you can add your feedback and ask others to request theses features
be put back in and other feedback, it would be appreciated the more the
better. If i do a petition I will post it.

http://www.apple.com/feedback/imovie.html
http://www.apple.com/feedback/imovie.html

Thank you
Cheryl



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]