[videoblogging] Re: Wordpress Basics

2009-10-01 Thread Caleb Clark
To train our new-to-web-authoring we use Lynda.com's series of excellent
screencasts on all things WP 2.7.

The underlined one's here are free.
http://www.lynda.com/home/DisplayCourse.aspx?lpk2=750

-- 
~ Caleb Clark
~ Wk: http://gradcenter.marlboro.edu/academics/mat/faculty
~ Hm: http://www.plocktau.com
~ The problem with communication is the assumption it has been
accomplished. - G. B. Shaw.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread elbowsofdeath
I disagree. Nokia started down this path with their Internet Tablets, the 770 
and 800, which pre-date the iphone. So they've had their toes in the water for 
a while, including opensource. I had an N800, it had some real nice features 
but it suffered from the usual problem when compared to the iphone: clunky, and 
not enough polished apps = not as much fun.

Open source is not the be all and end all, developers may care more about 
having a feature-rich platform to build on and which offers good opportunities 
for monetizing their work. Open source certainly has its advantages, everything 
Apple have done wrong with app store and approving apps and being control 
freaks reminds people of the benefits of being opensource, and stops us from 
blindly swapping nightmares involving the mobile phone networks being 
gatekeepers, for nightmares where the device manufacturer is the gatekeeper. 
But the open source movement has its own woes and downsides, to date I only 
really consider it a massive success with certain webapps, eg wordpress, and 
probably a few desktop apps but not many really. And the Apple app store also 
opens eyeballs by demonstrating that people are still quite prepared to pay for 
apps if the experience is deemed good enough.

Open standards and interoperability fascinate me more than open source apps. On 
the web I have to rely on many services that are provided by corporations, and 
the same is true for most hardware. But at least if some commons standards are 
used with this stuff, it gives us some flexibility and freedom. With the 
exception of Internet Explorer, Im very happy with where the web and browsers 
have been going in regards to standards, HTML5 and friends will hopefully 
eventually give us a pretty comprehensive multimedia experience that will be 
common across platforms and will allow people to buy slightly locked-down 
hardware without all of the associated pain.

Cheers

Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert Howe rup...@... wrote:

 Nokia has been closed up until now.  The N900 using an open source OS  
 is a radical departure for them - they've been a traditional,  
 hierarchical closed company.  Thus many fewer apps.  Also the apps are  
 more functional, less fun for straight mobile phones.  The moment you  
 bring in a touch screen with a large screen surface area and good  
 resolution, the more things you can do with it.  And then add the  
 financial and career incentive of creating a successful app for the  
 world's most popular mobile computer.
 
 I think you're right, though - Nokia have had to raise their game  
 massively because of the iPhone, and the N900 is definitely a  
 desperate reaction to the iPhone and their subsequent drop in market  
 share.  Making it open and using a slightly different technology for  
 the touch screen is a gamble, but I think it might pay off.  I'm  
 already scheming video apps for it.
 
 
 On 29-Sep-09, at 4:21 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
 
   So Rupert given your experience with Nokia and Apple, I would  
  love to
   read your more elaborate thoughts on the two options for mobile  
  smart phone
   puters. Are you leaning towards iPhone?
 
  I was a Nokia user for a long time...but without being a fanboy, I got
  to say how awesome the iPhone is. The fact that you can figure out how
  to do things without instructions is amazing. Hopefully, other
  companies will follow this model.
 
  It's strange to me that Nokia is open and Apple is closed, but
  developers have created many more applications for Apple than Nokia.
  Being a big fan of Open Source, it's just an example that usability
  will always win.
 
  As far as the camera on the iPhone 3GS, it's not something right home
  about. The image is pretty poor. Little control. Bad mic. BUT BUT BUT
  it is extremely easy to take a video and post it online. So easy.
 
  Hopefully, Apple with all their developers and design sense will just
  set the expectation for how all phones should be, open source
  included.
 
  Jay
 
  --
  http://ryanishungry.com
  http://jaydedman.com
  http://twitter.com/jaydedman
  917 371 6790
 
  
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread elbowsofdeath
Funny isnt it?

Ive tried all sorts of windows mobiles, other smartphones, windows-based tablet 
computers over the years, and oh my how they sucked when looking at the overall 
experience. 

When looking at what makes the iphone great, it does seem strange that nobody 
has come close to copying it effectively yet, even if we rule out other factors 
such as how well known the iphoe is, critical mas of users, journalists frindly 
towards apple etc.

An intuitive interface  gestures, a touchscreen that feels nice and responds 
properly, hardware-accellerated graphics to make everything flow quickly and 
smoothly. Not rocket science, although there are many good reasons why its not 
been so easy for others to copy these effectively, ranging from the touch 
technology used to the difficulty in ripping off the essence of a UI without 
completely copying it. 

I guess it just goes to show that quality design is still a rare skill, and 
that making things easy is difficult. I also blame some generalised failings of 
the sorts of minds that tend to get into development, myself included, it seems 
we often do not have strong instincts about making the interface/experience 
anywhere near as fun and smooth as it should be.

A decade of the microsoft way nearly destroyed this natural born geeks love of 
computers, though I remain very uncomfortable that only one corporation, Apple, 
has saved my love from further erosion. I have high hopes for the Apple tablet 
but I would be far happier if other companies were really getting somewhere, 
joining what should be a new golden age where many technologies have evolved to 
the point where they live up to their promise. In nearly every other area 
technology is still failing me and depressing me,  with the exception of quite 
a lot of music creation software and hardware, of which some very lovely 
products have emerged in recent years. Oh and certain aspects of the web, 
although Im just about to start another post ranting about that so I'll not 
dwell on that further here.

Cheers

Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, hpbatman7 heathpa...@... wrote:
 So I will give props to Apple for the iphoneit does make you wonder 
 though why these other handset makers are having such a hard time making an 
 Iphone cloneI mean it can't be that hard, can it?
 
 Heath
 http://heathparks.com (site under construction)



[videoblogging] Google Wave the state of the net in general

2009-10-01 Thread elbowsofdeath
Google Wave interests me. On face value its just googles answer to twitter, 
social networks, forums, email  blog comments, but the way they are doing it 
makes me interested. For as well as the usual APIs that will allow developers 
to add functionality to the platform, and the now standard ability for users to 
embed this stuff in their own sites, they are also releasing full details on 
the protocol used to make the service work, as well as example code which 
demonstrates how to make your own clients and servers. If adopted by people, 
this means we dont have to worry about Google having complete control over this 
stuff and it all being centralised in the usual way.

So has anybody looked at it in detail? At this stage its one of those annoying 
invitation-based betas so I havent had the opportunity to try it myself, though 
the developers stuff I mention is available and Im starting to read more detail 
about it.

Im interested in it from the point of view of solving stuff we talked about 
here over the years: aggregating content and conversations in a more 
sophisticated way, whilst still retaining control of the data and not ending up 
in a walled gardem that al the API's from the likes of facebook have not really 
torn down, they just added more gates to the wall.

What significant developments have happened on the web in recent years, 
especially pertaining to vlogging? I took my eyes off the ball for a while 
after getting tired with the hype filled web 2.0 stuff once it reached the 
silly greedy commercial stage and then started to vanish up its own backside, 
whats occuring apart from the obvious like facebook and twitter? How have the 
video hosting services evolved, or have they just been treading water and 
trying to survive in recent times?

Are there any interesting projects that people are throwing themselves into? 
There is a hole in my life where once I used to be able to have dreams inspired 
by the likes of fireant, mefeedia, showinabox, and all sorts of other things 
whose names now escape me. Wow, I cant even remember the name of the video 
hosting site that used archive.org and never quite lived up to its potential.

Cheers

Steve Elbows





Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Verdi
One thing I noticed about that N900 is that it's really thick and
brick shaped. It's like 2 iphones stuck together. Won't really slide
into the pants pocket so nicely. Also, I see this with every phone
that my kids use - physical keyboards break when you use them a lot.
We've already replaced multiple phones because of that. On the other
hand my original iphone (my wife is using it) is still going strong at
almost 2 years old - in fact it's better now because it has a newer os
and apps.

- Verdi

-- 
Michael Verdi
http://milkweedmediadesign.com
http://michaelverdi.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread Rupert Howe
Yeah, having held it, it doesn't feel too huge, though - it's slightly  
shorter and not as wide as the iphone, and 18mm thick versus 12mm.   
Which is half as thick again, but about as thick as the other candybar  
smartphones I have had.  Am such a N900 fanboy on this thread, sorry.

On 1-Oct-09, at 6:06 PM, Michael Verdi wrote:

 One thing I noticed about that N900 is that it's really thick and
 brick shaped. It's like 2 iphones stuck together. Won't really slide
 into the pants pocket so nicely. Also, I see this with every phone
 that my kids use - physical keyboards break when you use them a lot.
 We've already replaced multiple phones because of that. On the other
 hand my original iphone (my wife is using it) is still going strong at
 almost 2 years old - in fact it's better now because it has a newer os
 and apps.

 - Verdi

 -- 
 Michael Verdi
 http://milkweedmediadesign.com
 http://michaelverdi.com

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Sullivan
comparable pics here in this thorough review:
http://my-symbian.com/other/preview_n900.php

doesnt seem much bigger than standrad devices besdeis the very sleek iphone.

-
sull
http://vocal.ly


On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Michael Verdi michaelve...@gmail.comwrote:



 One thing I noticed about that N900 is that it's really thick and
 brick shaped. It's like 2 iphones stuck together. Won't really slide
 into the pants pocket so nicely. Also, I see this with every phone
 that my kids use - physical keyboards break when you use them a lot.
 We've already replaced multiple phones because of that. On the other
 hand my original iphone (my wife is using it) is still going strong at
 almost 2 years old - in fact it's better now because it has a newer os
 and apps.

 - Verdi

 --
 Michael Verdi
 http://milkweedmediadesign.com
 http://michaelverdi.com
  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: Google Wave the state of the net in general

2009-10-01 Thread elbowsofdeath
Here is an intro video about wave, looks like I missed wiki and instant 
messaging when trying to list the sorts of things its inspired by/designed to 
replace.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pgxLaDdQw

And I finally remembered the name of the video host of old: ourmedia. Ive just 
been catching up with where this and some other sites have ended up, they are 
still alive but not exactly bursting with momentum or giving us much to talk 
about. Speaking of which, are some of the conversations that used to happen on 
this group now taking place on twitter or friendfeed or peoples blogs or other 
communities, or are they not happening much at all now? Its nice to see this 
group busier of late, and Im just a wondering how to get a sense of the state 
of things, everything is so fragmented and based on popularity or social 
connections these days, Im a bit lost.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, elbowsofdeath st...@... wrote:

 Google Wave interests me. On face value its just googles answer to twitter, 
 social networks, forums, email  blog comments, but the way they are doing it 
 makes me interested. For as well as the usual APIs that will allow developers 
 to add functionality to the platform, and the now standard ability for users 
 to embed this stuff in their own sites, they are also releasing full details 
 on the protocol used to make the service work, as well as example code which 
 demonstrates how to make your own clients and servers. If adopted by people, 
 this means we dont have to worry about Google having complete control over 
 this stuff and it all being centralised in the usual way.
 
 So has anybody looked at it in detail? At this stage its one of those 
 annoying invitation-based betas so I havent had the opportunity to try it 
 myself, though the developers stuff I mention is available and Im starting to 
 read more detail about it.
 
 Im interested in it from the point of view of solving stuff we talked about 
 here over the years: aggregating content and conversations in a more 
 sophisticated way, whilst still retaining control of the data and not ending 
 up in a walled gardem that al the API's from the likes of facebook have not 
 really torn down, they just added more gates to the wall.
 
 What significant developments have happened on the web in recent years, 
 especially pertaining to vlogging? I took my eyes off the ball for a while 
 after getting tired with the hype filled web 2.0 stuff once it reached the 
 silly greedy commercial stage and then started to vanish up its own backside, 
 whats occuring apart from the obvious like facebook and twitter? How have the 
 video hosting services evolved, or have they just been treading water and 
 trying to survive in recent times?
 
 Are there any interesting projects that people are throwing themselves into? 
 There is a hole in my life where once I used to be able to have dreams 
 inspired by the likes of fireant, mefeedia, showinabox, and all sorts of 
 other things whose names now escape me. Wow, I cant even remember the name of 
 the video hosting site that used archive.org and never quite lived up to its 
 potential.
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows





[videoblogging] Re: iPod Nano shoots video

2009-10-01 Thread ernmander
The only problem I have found with pixelpipe is that sometimes it takes ages to 
crunch you video. Say you set pixelpipe to tweet your content, folk click the 
link in twitter, pixelpipe shows you nothing as it is still crunching. 

As for the iPhone 3GS for vlogging the only pain is that when you are pointing 
the camera at yourself and you finish vlogging trying to hit stop, well it's 
like when you were a kid trying to unhook a bra for the first time. Lots of 
fumbling and looking like a fool. But it does take beautiful images (well in 
good light) :)

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan sullele...@... wrote:

 comparable pics here in this thorough review:
 http://my-symbian.com/other/preview_n900.php
 
 doesnt seem much bigger than standrad devices besdeis the very sleek iphone.
 
 -
 sull
 http://vocal.ly
 
 
 On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Michael Verdi michaelve...@...wrote:
 
 
 
  One thing I noticed about that N900 is that it's really thick and
  brick shaped. It's like 2 iphones stuck together. Won't really slide
  into the pants pocket so nicely. Also, I see this with every phone
  that my kids use - physical keyboards break when you use them a lot.
  We've already replaced multiple phones because of that. On the other
  hand my original iphone (my wife is using it) is still going strong at
  almost 2 years old - in fact it's better now because it has a newer os
  and apps.
 
  - Verdi
 
  --
  Michael Verdi
  http://milkweedmediadesign.com
  http://michaelverdi.com
   
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]