Re: [videoblogging] http://www.motion.tv/

2006-02-28 Thread Daniel Hehmann



What is/are the other site(s) that share revenue with the users?robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone tried motion.tv yet?  looks like another one sharing advertising revenue with you.   -- cheers r  Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively  my vlog: http://r.24x7.com good hosting sale: http://foo.24x7.com   
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] fireant reporting in feedburner

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Hehmann



I've got a question about FireAnt, so I figured I'd ask it here. Is there any way to view the vids in full screen? I've tried double clicking, alt+enter, seaching for a button, etc. and I've yet to be able to do it. I really like FireAnt but I rarely use it because I like watching vids in full screen. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This thread was also posted in our FireAnt user group, so I'm going to paste my response here as well -- Hmmm... I wonder if Feedburner is looking for the wrong FireAnt useragent... we changed it when we changed the name from "FireANT" to "FireAnt". We will need to follow up with the Feedburner guys to check on this  Here's the other thing with iTunes... it checks all the feeds each
 time you fire up the iTunes application, which may be pretty often if you like listening to music. FireAnt does not check the feeds unless the user tells it to do so. iTunes may also check feeds multiple times per day, thus skewing "subscriber" numbers (those numbers are highly suspect anyhow, so I wouldn't really trust it as a true indication of how many subscribers you really have. I'm not really sure how those numbers are generated)  As Jay pointed out, try including a FireAnt subscription button on your site and its likely you will then see more subscribers in FA. FireAnt is a little different than DTV and iTunes in that we really try to keep all your meta-info in tact. This includes the textual information in a blog entry and especially links. Thus, by encouraging your viewers to use FireAnt, its quite likely that you will actually get more traffic back to your site from FireAnt.  Re: DTV... I think your feed,
 "Motion Graphics Chicago" was included on the front of the DTV Channel Guide for a long time, so that could be why you are seeing more subscribers there as well.  To get more promotion through the FireAnt website, try going in and adding tags and ratings to your channel the episodes in it. We need some more help from the community to try to push up content, so it wouldn't hurt to tell other people to vote you up as well if they like your stuff. We are also planning to re-architect the front page of FireAnt.tv pretty soon to make it more dynamic so that it features more content and changes more regularly. This should also help bring more promotion to more vloggers.  And speaking of promotion, we could always use your help in the promotion department. You guys know us, and you probably also know that we're fairly modest when it comes to self promoting. We don't really do press releases, and we hardly even promote FireAnt
 on the videoblogging mailing list (we see that more as a discussion environment than a promotional one). So, please give us a boost and blog about FireAnt if you can. Your help really goes a long way.  -Josh  http://FireAnt.tv   On 2/24/06, Mason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   according to feedburner my podcast:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/MotionGraphicsChicago   is really popular with iTunes and DTV, but not with fireAnt.  feedburner reports that we only have 3 fireANT readers.   i just dont see how that can be right.  do other people have more fireAnt users showing up?  any ideas why that might be?   mason  www.mgchicago.com  www.popvlog.comYahoo! Groups
 Links   
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Four Eyed Media Monsters

2006-02-22 Thread Daniel Hehmann



Personally, I don't see why Four Eyed Monsters wouldn't be considered a vlog. While the central theme may be the film, the focus is clearly on the filmmakers themselves, That is the primary difference between FEM and other film-based vidcasts such as Kite Circuit, or what's going on for Clerks 2 and Superman Returns and so forth. While those all focus on the technical aspects, and giving a behind the scenes look at the creation of a film, FEM focuses on the relationship between two filmmakers and their journey getting their film out there.I also think it's unfair to pass what they're doing off as nothing but promotion for their film either. I have no ambition to watch the trailer for King Kong, because I've already seen the film itself. I've seen FEM the film twice, and I still follow their vlog religiously. The original poster was absolutely right in saying that if anything, the film and the vlog compliment each other, and create something greater than the sum of its parts.
 That's the true appeal of the film and vlog in the first place, so I really don't think it matters what you label it. The film takes the best aspects of documentaries, fiction, dramatization, music, and a subjective point of view to create something we haven't seen before. Watching the film, there is no way to pigeonhole it into a specific genre, because it encompasses a little of everything. It's a narrative, based on real people, involving a script and filmed scenes, and shown through the eyes of the filmmakers. One thing I do know, is that if it weren't for their vlog, I wouldn't even know about vlogs in the first place. It's through following theirs that I came upon the vlogs of the people in the group. I didn't go from watching FEM to looking for shows and serials or whatever, I looked for other vlogs. For people to sit here and say that FEM shouldn't be considered a blog is foolish, and is only going to hurt by pushing away people like myself, instead of
 gaining from what FEM is doing. -DannyRichard BF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Old timers on this list are gonna love me bringing this up again.  Newbies are probably going to love me even more for disturbing the  mainstream media lovefest which seems to have taken over this email  list in the past few months.  I received some offlist emails about my Four Eyed Monsters post,  which I really think should be reposted here, as they had much more  information about the project, and offerred an alternate view to my  naive opinions. If you emailed me, please CC it here, it will be  interesting for others to read.  But the question it poses is yet again, what is this list for?  The simple answer is to help out new videobloggers. Which again begs  the question
 ducking what is videoblogging? /ducking  In recent months, reading this list you would be fooled into thinking  that videblogging means video on the Internet. We have countless  "videoblog directories" which simply aggregate RSS enclosures, we  have "videoblog aggregators" which simply play video over the  Internet, we have "videoblog hosting providers" which simply host  video on the Internet, we have "videoblog shows" which are simply  amateur TV series hosted on the Internet... the list goes on.  Videoblog is a buzzword that most people seem to use to describe  anything with video and the Internet.  Others, like me, think it is more about the personal and all that it  entails. So the gap between these opinions is still, after 18 months,  enormous.  The point of the recent Four Eyed Monsters discussion seems to have  been "how to use the Internet to promote your more traditional film",  which
 I'd argue has jack to do with this list.  On the vlogtheory list, arguably whose main job is to define  videoblogging, we've basically given up discussing the definition,  because nobody will change their mind about what they think a  videoblog is. It's like walking into a party where everyone has their  arms crossed and nobody is talking.  Michael's Vlog Anarchy video was a great bird flip to definition, but  this list is now a perfect example of why videoblogging needs to be  defined, otherwise perhaps the list should be renamed from  videoblogging@yahoogroups.com to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  What do you think?  I'm especially interested in the new members' opinions, as they  probably haven't had a lot of the citizen media, fuck big media  rhetoric we used to go on about here a year ago, but now tend to no  longer bother about.  Regards,  Richard SPONSORED LINKS   Individual   Fireant   Use  

		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant