[videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Watkins
Brilliant stuff! 

I still hope we'll get past the idea that advertising is the only way to 
monetize online 
video, and have more discussions along these lines.

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A followup to the 1000 true fans post:
 http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/04/the_reality_of.php
 
 - Verdi
 
 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just 1000
 true fans:
 http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
 
   I forgot to add how much I like this blog post.
   Ive always felt like video creators (like many here) could make a
   living directly from a fanbase.
   if you make good stuffi believe people will invest in you.
 
   but as the blog post discusses, it means you got to be willing to
   build a relationship with people.
   its almost like an unspoken contract.
   much different than just picking up a paycheck.
 
   jay
 
   --
   http://jaydedman.com
   917 371 6790
 
   
 
 
 
   Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://graymattergravy.com
 http://reportsfromthefuture.com
 http://michaelverdi.com






Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-04-24 Thread Ron Watson
That was quite an interesting read.

Robert Rich sounds like a very cool guy.

It seems to me that this 1000 true fans idea needs some support.

If we didn't waste so much money on the corporate media, it'd be very  
easy to accomplish.

Cable TV sucks up, minimum, $600 per year. See a movie once a month  
with your girlfriend, and we're looking at another $600. Add in some  
CDs and DVDs for the pop culture junkies and we hop up to $2000 per  
year easy.

I'd really like to see a concerted effort to boycott corporate media  
and try to hit them in the pocketbook to get a little bit of leverage  
to extract some broadcast concessions for public media. These  
concessions should be minor in the coming years as the advent of  
digital distribution hits.

I'm already on board on the boycott, not having cable and I totally  
refuse to watch ABC ever again after that for profit inquisition  
masquerading as a 'debate. I'm sure there are a boatload of people  
thoughtfully abstaining from corporate media consumption, probably  
quite  a few on this list. A website and petition could go a long way  
towards giving the corporate media pause in taking their audience for  
granted.

Thanks for posting this thoughtful essay by Kelly and Rich. I'm going  
to have to buy some ambient music.

Cheers
Ron


On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Steve Watkins wrote:

 Brilliant stuff!

 I still hope we'll get past the idea that advertising is the only  
 way to monetize online
 video, and have more discussions along these lines.

 Cheers

 Steve Elbows

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  A followup to the 1000 true fans post:
  http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/04/the_reality_of.php
 
  - Verdi
 
  On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just  
 1000
true fans:
http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
  
   I forgot to add how much I like this blog post.
   Ive always felt like video creators (like many here) could make a
   living directly from a fanbase.
   if you make good stuffi believe people will invest in you.
  
   but as the blog post discusses, it means you got to be willing to
   build a relationship with people.
   its almost like an unspoken contract.
   much different than just picking up a paycheck.
  
   jay
  
   --
   http://jaydedman.com
   917 371 6790
  
   
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://graymattergravy.com
  http://reportsfromthefuture.com
  http://michaelverdi.com
 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-04-24 Thread Pete Prodoehl
 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just  
 1000
 true fans:
 http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
 I forgot to add how much I like this blog post.
 Ive always felt like video creators (like many here) could make a
 living directly from a fanbase.
 if you make good stuffi believe people will invest in you.

 but as the blog post discusses, it means you got to be willing to
 build a relationship with people.
 its almost like an unspoken contract.
 much different than just picking up a paycheck.

 jay


My problem with this, and maybe I am tainted by my history, is that the 
fans can't all be creators like you are.

It's the old all my friends are in a band problem. You're in a band, 
and your friend is in a different band, and your other friends are in 
another band. That's all good, but when you play a show, will your 
friends who are also in bands come, and pay to get in, and buy your 
shirts and albums? And if they do, do you to do the same? Go to their 
shows, buy their shirts and albums? If so, where does the money come 
from? Most likely it comes from all of you working some other job, 
unrelated to the band.

So I want to support Jay and pay $100 a year, but that is $100 out of my 
budget of me being an artist, and getting the equipment/supplies I need 
to create art, and support myself. So who will pay me $100 a year? Not 
Jay, as the whole thing is pointless then because it cancels itself out, 
so it will be someone else, probably someone who works a normal job 
and makes enough money to be a fan.

It seems like the whole concept relies on the fan to make money to 
support an artist. I know, that is the whole idea, right? But how do we 
still be each other's fans if we can't support each other financially? 
Maybe we just support each other emotionally.

Thoughts?

Pete





Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-05 Thread John Coffey
Hey Heath, our families must be kin. When I remind family of a video, they ask 
you still doing that?
  JC

Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I can't even get my family to watch my videos.but then again, 
they know me, so maybe that has something to do with it...

all kidding aside, interesting principal

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just 1000 
 true fans:
 
 what can an artist do to escape the long tail?
 
 One solution is to find 1,000 True Fans. While some artists have 
 discovered this path without calling it that, I think it is worth 
 trying to formalize. The gist of 1,000 True Fans can be stated 
simply:
 
 A creator, such as an artist, musician, photographer, 
craftsperson, 
 performer, animator, designer, videomaker, or author - in other 
 words, anyone producing works of art - needs to acquire only 1,000 
 True Fans to make a living.
 
 A True Fan is defined as someone who will purchase anything and 
 everything you produce. They will drive 200 miles to see you sing. 
 They will buy the super deluxe re-issued hi-res box set of your 
stuff 
 even though they have the low-res version. They have a Google 
Alert 
 set for your name. They bookmark the eBay page where your out-of- 
 print editions show up. They come to your openings. They have you 
 sign their copies. They buy the t-shirt, and the mug, and the hat. 
 They can't wait till you issue your next work. They are true fans.
 
 http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 


Jimmy CraicHead TVVideo Podcast about Sailing, Travel, Craic and Cocktails 
www.jchtv.com
   
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread Heath
I can't even get my family to watch my videos.but then again, 
they know me, so maybe that has something to do with it...

all kidding aside, interesting principal

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just 1000  
 true fans:
 
 what can an artist do to escape the long tail?
 
 One solution is to find 1,000 True Fans. While some artists have  
 discovered this path without calling it that, I think it is worth  
 trying to formalize. The gist of 1,000 True Fans can be stated 
simply:
 
 A creator, such as an artist, musician, photographer, 
craftsperson,  
 performer, animator, designer, videomaker, or author - in other  
 words, anyone producing works of art - needs to acquire only 1,000  
 True Fans to make a living.
 
 A True Fan is defined as someone who will purchase anything and  
 everything you produce. They will drive 200 miles to see you sing.  
 They will buy the super deluxe re-issued hi-res box set of your 
stuff  
 even though they have the low-res version. They have a Google 
Alert  
 set for your name. They bookmark the eBay page where your out-of- 
 print editions show up. They come to your openings. They have you  
 sign their copies. They buy the t-shirt, and the mug, and the hat.  
 They can't wait till you issue your next work. They are true fans.
 
 http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread johnleeke
I think this is just about right on.

I've estimated I have about 300 of what Kevin Kelly calls true fans,
and I am earning about 1/3 of my living with my self-publishing (in
print and eBooks). Over the past three years it has been my objective
to shift my position left-ward on the long-tail, increasing access
to my fans, and increasing my income, largely using interactive
video over the internet to connect more closely with those who can pay
me for my helping them care for their historic buildings. 

This past year it really seems to be working and Kevin's essay 1000
True Fans crystalizes my thinking on this and gives me new criteria
for measuring my success, and two new ways to push in that direction.

Andrew, thanks for posting this.

John
by hammer and hand great works do stand
by pen and thought best words are wrought
by cam and light he shoots it right

www.HistoricHomeWorks.com



Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
So, what do you do when you have zero true fans?

--
Rhett.
http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime

 I think this is just about right on.

 I've estimated I have about 300 of what Kevin Kelly calls true fans,
 and I am earning about 1/3 of my living with my self-publishing (in
 print and eBooks). Over the past three years it has been my objective
 to shift my position left-ward on the long-tail, increasing access
 to my fans, and increasing my income, largely using interactive
 video over the internet to connect more closely with those who can pay
 me for my helping them care for their historic buildings.

 This past year it really seems to be working and Kevin's essay 1000
 True Fans crystalizes my thinking on this and gives me new criteria
 for measuring my success, and two new ways to push in that direction.

 Andrew, thanks for posting this.

 John
 by hammer and hand great works do stand
 by pen and thought best words are wrought
 by cam and light he shoots it right

 www.HistoricHomeWorks.com




 Yahoo! Groups Links








[videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread johnleeke
 So, what do you do when you have zero true fans?

Find a way to help people so much, and make it so easy for them to
give you want, that they spontaneously give it to you.

John
hammer and hand
pen and thought
cam and light

www.HistoricHomeWorks.com



Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread David Lee King
Ha - Heath, now just ask the family for $100 each and see what happens!

No, wait - it must break down with family... :-)

David

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 4, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I can't even get my family to watch my videos.but then again,
 they know me, so maybe that has something to do with it...

 all kidding aside, interesting principal

 Heath
 http://batmangeek.com
 http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The idea is that a videoblogger could make a living from just 1000
  true fans:
 
  what can an artist do to escape the long tail?
 
  One solution is to find 1,000 True Fans. While some artists have
  discovered this path without calling it that, I think it is worth
  trying to formalize. The gist of 1,000 True Fans can be stated
 simply:
 
  A creator, such as an artist, musician, photographer,
 craftsperson,
  performer, animator, designer, videomaker, or author - in other
  words, anyone producing works of art - needs to acquire only 1,000
  True Fans to make a living.
 
  A True Fan is defined as someone who will purchase anything and
  everything you produce. They will drive 200 miles to see you sing.
  They will buy the super deluxe re-issued hi-res box set of your
 stuff
  even though they have the low-res version. They have a Google
 Alert
  set for your name. They bookmark the eBay page where your out-of-
  print editions show up. They come to your openings. They have you
  sign their copies. They buy the t-shirt, and the mug, and the hat.
  They can't wait till you issue your next work. They are true fans.
 
  http://tinyurl.com/32zzlp
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 


 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: 1000 True Fans

2008-03-04 Thread Ron Watson
So...
How do I take my 1000 interested and somewhat engaged fans and turn  
them into 'true fans'?

A bit about my history, and what I consider to be the problem...

I've been doing online video for about 10 years now.

This video here: http://blip.tv/posts/stats/8523
has been seen by just about every Disc Dogger with an internet  
connection on the planet.

We've been teaching Dog Frisbee in North America and Europe for about  
5 years, and have a great reputation as teachers, judges and  
competitors. I started k9disc.com a Disc Dog portal and discussion  
forum about 4 years ago, and it has been quite successful.

Here's where the problem comes in:
I've been giving instruction and tips away for people for about 4  
years now, and I think that's been a bit of a problem. It seems that  
people would rather pay for an inferior product than to get a quality  
product for free.

The Disc Dog community, as a group, tends to stifle people that try  
to do things differently - especially when there's accolades of money  
involved in the equation. It's very strange. I've largely avoided  
this problem, but it's still around here in the states and it's  
developing in Europe.

So, how do I get past the 'it used to be free, now it's costing me'  
and the negative group dynamics on new ideas and projects to enable  
my 1000 interested and somewhat engaged fans and turn them into 'true  
fans'.

Just kind of tossing things out there and could use the help.

Cheers,
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com



On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:32 PM, johnleeke wrote:

 I think this is just about right on.

 I've estimated I have about 300 of what Kevin Kelly calls true fans,
 and I am earning about 1/3 of my living with my self-publishing (in
 print and eBooks). Over the past three years it has been my objective
 to shift my position left-ward on the long-tail, increasing access
 to my fans, and increasing my income, largely using interactive
 video over the internet to connect more closely with those who can pay
 me for my helping them care for their historic buildings.

 This past year it really seems to be working and Kevin's essay 1000
 True Fans crystalizes my thinking on this and gives me new criteria
 for measuring my success, and two new ways to push in that direction.

 Andrew, thanks for posting this.

 John
 by hammer and hand great works do stand
 by pen and thought best words are wrought
 by cam and light he shoots it right

 www.HistoricHomeWorks.com


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]