Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-16 Thread Pete Prodoehl




jmedakev wrote:
[snip]
 
 Don't listen to Verdi. Clearly he's an unrealistic idealist.

My advice is that we *should* listen to Verdi, because he is an idealist.

We need more Verdi's in the world...

Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-14 Thread Andreas Haugstrup




On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:26:44 +0200, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Personally, I don't really feel comfortable with the idea of video
 files with scripting and side effects anyway. How long before the
 first Quicktime virus brings it all tumbling down ?

QT's interaction with your file system is very limited. You can't write a 
virus if you can't make QT handle executables or at least write to the 
file system. a QT virus is impossible.

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread James A. Donnelly




This is like watching a comedy Roast with Don Rickles.




--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Michael Verdi wrote:
 
  I wasn't trying to cruelly shame somebody out of their dream. I'm 
  all about helping people do their thing. My whole point is, if you 
  want to make money as a content producer go do TV or radio because 
  it's not happening here. If you do want to videoblog, I stand by my 
  advice. I think it's good for everyone.
 
 Is your advice sound? Yes. Is your attitude poor? Yes. The guy
would probably be perfectly happy to start without sponsorship, but he
doesn't know any better, it appears. You could have provided that
same advice without pouncing on the guy. Seriously, every time
someone mentions the topic of sponsorship, advertising, making money
in any way, etc, no matter how misguided, you've gone into a tirade.
 
 I really like you, your work is awesome, and your rants crack me the
hell up. Your work has been invaluable to the community, but
sometimes you really piss me off (yeah, I know, I do my fair share of
pissing off too). Thusly, I've answered with a Verdi-style rant in vlog.
 
 http://clintsharp.com/archives/2005/08/13/rant/
 
 Clint
 
 -- 
 Clint Sharp
 New Media Guy  Technologist
 ClintSharp.com Contact Info: http://clintsharp.com/contact/
 
 We are the media.












  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread t.whid




interesting...

wonder if it fails quietly if the device is offline... also would want to ensure that the user 
knows what the dealio is too...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a 
 hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time 
 someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT 
 file ping a server.
 
 On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:48 PM, t.whid wrote:
 










  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread Andreas Haugstrup




On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 19:56:19 +0200, andrew michael baron 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a
 hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time
 someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT
 file ping a server.

Barring tools like LiveStage Pro which I'm not all that familiar with 
yet...

QT allows you to load an URL at a given point, but this URL is made 
visible to the viewer (it either opens in their browser or in a Quicktime 
window) making it not-so-usable for this kind of stuff.

One thing I did make a proof of concept of was the use of an image. 
Quicktime loads the image at a certain point, but the image is really a 
web script returning an image. This makes logging of viewers possible.

However, you cannot do this easily (that is without LiveStage Pro) with 
self-contained files. If you just save as self-contained in QT Pro you end 
up with the image being saved in the .mov itself (and thus it won't hit 
your server). IIRC you also have to use SMIL - if you don't QT will load 
the image at the begining of playback no matter when the image is to be 
shown.

Even with SMIL the image will be loaded ahead of time so you can't use 
this technique to get very detailed stats (you can maybe determine viewers 
in 5 second blocks).

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread andrew michael baron




If we are talking scale, it would be more beneficial to go with the 
downloadable/ping scenario, I would assume, because:

1. most computers that are prepared for quality streaming are likely 
hard-wired-online anyway.
2. Cell phone distributions or other platforms that might normally 
just connect to get the data and then go off-line again, will likely 
not be up for streaming, because that is big service cost to stay 
online.
3. If you can make ad money without paying for bandwidth, that would 
be the biggest reason.
4. Considering we know nothing about how many people watch any given 
TV show, even with d/l files, you can be way more accurate than the 
advertiser demand on TV.
5. According to the Red vs. Blue guys, who receive 1 million d/l a 
week from their weekly show, its to the advantage of the content 
creator to not be overly specific because deep down inside, you may 
feel that your video is being watched by more people than are 
reported (sometimes two people are in the room when they watch your 
video, or someone e-mails it to a friend or watches again, etc.)
6. By having the file d/l instead of streaming, you are allowing for 
a wider distribution potential, it seems.

I should be working but this is like relaxing to me :)0)

On Aug 13, 2005, at 2:00 PM, t.whid wrote:

 interesting...

 wonder if it fails quietly if the device is offline... also would 
 want to ensure that the user
 knows what the dealio is too...

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a
 hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time
 someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT
 file ping a server.

 On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:48 PM, t.whid wrote:








  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ 
 SIG=12h8bi4e2/M=362335.6886445.7839731.1510227/D=groups/ 
 S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123963233/A=2894361/R=0/SIG=13jmebhbo/ 
 *http://www.networkforgood.org/topics/education/digitaldivide/? 
 source=YAHOOcmpgn=GRPRTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/In low income 
 neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers. At Network for Good, help 
 bridge the Digital Divide!/a./font
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links














  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread andrew michael baron




#7 Video wont stream to the video ipod or psp or other portable devices.

On Aug 13, 2005, at 2:14 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:

 If we are talking scale, it would be more beneficial to go with the
 downloadable/ping scenario, I would assume, because:

 1. most computers that are prepared for quality streaming are likely
 hard-wired-online anyway.
 2. Cell phone distributions or other platforms that might normally
 just connect to get the data and then go off-line again, will likely
 not be up for streaming, because that is big service cost to stay
 online.
 3. If you can make ad money without paying for bandwidth, that would
 be the biggest reason.
 4. Considering we know nothing about how many people watch any given
 TV show, even with d/l files, you can be way more accurate than the
 advertiser demand on TV.
 5. According to the Red vs. Blue guys, who receive 1 million d/l a
 week from their weekly show, its to the advantage of the content
 creator to not be overly specific because deep down inside, you may
 feel that your video is being watched by more people than are
 reported (sometimes two people are in the room when they watch your
 video, or someone e-mails it to a friend or watches again, etc.)
 6. By having the file d/l instead of streaming, you are allowing for
 a wider distribution potential, it seems.

 I should be working but this is like relaxing to me :)0)

 On Aug 13, 2005, at 2:00 PM, t.whid wrote:


 interesting...

 wonder if it fails quietly if the device is offline... also would
 want to ensure that the user
 knows what the dealio is too...

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a
 hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time
 someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have 
 the QT
 file ping a server.

 On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:48 PM, t.whid wrote:









  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
 ~--
 font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/
 SIG=12h8bi4e2/M=362335.6886445.7839731.1510227/D=groups/
 S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123963233/A=2894361/R=0/SIG=13jmebhbo/
 *http://www.networkforgood.org/topics/education/digitaldivide/?
 source=YAHOOcmpgn=GRPRTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/In low income
 neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers. At Network for Good, help
 bridge the Digital Divide!/a./font
 
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links











  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 font face=arial size=-1a href="" href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/">http://us.ard.yahoo.com/ 
 SIG=12hegosgc/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/ 
 S=1705554021:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123964093/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/ 
 *http://www.thebeehive.org
 Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the 
 Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy/a./font
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links











  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread Jan McLaughlin




You've not heard a word Verdi said. Apples  oranges.
J
-- 
It isn't done alone. Pay more.
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com
http://the-hold.blogspot.com
.

On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:31 PM, jmedakev wrote:

 Verdi,

 You're off in la la land.

 You know more then anyone video blogging takes money and time.

 So what if this guy wants to work out a business model to get some
 compensation.

 You keep selling yourself short and working for free. In the mean
 time, others will figure out ways to bring fresh creative content to
 the world and make some money to continue their work at the same
 time.

 Mike,

 I've had a lot of luck finding sponsors. It helps when they agree
 with your message. Find the people who are looking to contact your
 audience and approach them.

 I've also had luck finding a TV station to air my stuff. This helps
 tremendously. There are small TV stations everywhere that are looking
 for fresh content to sell to advertisers.

 Don't listen to Verdi. Clearly he's an unrealistic idealist.

 Jamie
 thekeverreport.com


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 On Aug 12, 2005, at 8:25 PM, RadioMike Perazzetti wrote:
 My colleague and I have been brainstorming podcasting ideas and we
 figure the best way to do it and do it right is to obtain
 underwriting,
 sponsorships, and the like with advertising coming in at a close
 second
 or third.


 Hey Mike,
 This is pretty much a flame. Don't take it personally, I don't
 even
 know who you are. Your email though brings up what I think is a
 really important point that I didn't want to let slide.

 Personally, I think that quote above tells me your looking at this
 whole thing as a means to make a buck. In my opinion this dooms
 you
 to a life of producing complete and utter bullshit. Listen, if
 your
 stuff hit the right demographic and was bland enough you'd be on
 the
 radio or TV already. Since it's not, you must be looking to be a
 low
 budget imitation of bland, mindless crap. That doesn't seem like
 a
 very good business plan.

 Here's my suggestion: you and your colleague should go get
 yourselves
 on the radio or TV if that's what you want. If, on the other
 hand,
 what you really want is to podcast or videoblog, I have a few
 places
 to start: 1. Brainstorm some good ideas about content and forget
 about good ideas for underwriting. 2. Better yet, fuck
 brainstorming, if you're creative you probably have some stuff
 you're
 just dying to do - do that instead. 3. Quit lurking around and
 just
 get started. Then get better at it.

 Peace

 --
 Verdi
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://freevlog.org
 http://graymattergravy.com






 Yahoo! Groups Links











  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread davedraws




--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Fun fact: the remake of the Dukes of Hazzard TV show is the top
 movie this week at 30.6 million dollars...

Holy crap. When i read this i fell down, wet my pants, and crawled to my bed to weep into 
my pillow.

I dont care if you are arguing about money or art or whatever the heck. just please for the 
love of all that is holy, don't stop, or do anything to discourage one another to stop. 
please.

sweet christmas... dukes of hazard

Dave






  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread Frank Carver




Saturday, August 13, 2005, 6:56:19 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:

 Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a  
 hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time  
 someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT 
 file ping a server.

This is one of those ideas that sounds reasonable until you look at it
from the other side and see how much effort people already put into
preventing just this sort of spyware. Anyone using it would get
hated real quick.

Also note that (as Andrew pointed out a little later) this model fails
completely when content is downloaded when on-line, but viewed offline
or on a portable device. This is already how the majority of podcasts
are listened to, and the proportion of video watched this way is
(slowly) increasing.

Finally, not everyone uses the official QT player to play even QT
movies. I usually use the free VLC player, for example, whch works
fine for basic video/audio tracks but largely ignores any other fancy
stuff. Other people automatically transcode into a preferred format,
which would also almost always lose such tricks.

Personally, I don't really feel comfortable with the idea of video
files with scripting and side effects anyway. How long before the
first Quicktime virus brings it all tumbling down ?

-- 
Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk







  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.

2005-08-13 Thread James A. Donnelly




Take a look at www.Cnet.com, they have videos embedded everywhere
products, product testing, commercials...but it's all Flash Video.
jad
www.dummycast.com
www.madpod.com
www.madlymedia.com
www.moonvideo.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Michael Verdi's critique about making a buck podcasting or
vlogging is understandably paranoid. In most media, the bland and the
bad crowd out the unique and the good.
 
 I heard my first critique about using vlogging to make money last
night at a special event at the Apple Store in SoHo. The presenters
ran a film/video two-day workshop ($495 to $595 for 16 hours hand-on
instruction) which seemed to be the reason for their presentation.
 
 They said they had gone to a website that sold magic tricks. 
Instead of descriptions, you clicked on the picture of the trick and
saw a short 30 second or 60 second video of the magic trick being
performed.
 
 They seemed to know virtually nothing about vlogging. However,
their description of Internet video being used as a sales tool for a
product is certainly something that is going to grow. Internet video
will be co-opted and used as insertions into web advertising on a
regular basis in the very near future.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Michael Verdi 
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 11:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Questions Regarding Sponsorships,
Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.
 
 
 On Aug 12, 2005, at 8:25 PM, RadioMike Perazzetti wrote:
  My colleague and I have been brainstorming podcasting ideas and
we
  figure the best way to do it and do it right is to obtain 
  underwriting,
  sponsorships, and the like with advertising coming in at a
close 
  second
  or third.
 
 
 Hey Mike,
 This is pretty much a flame. Don't take it personally, I don't
even 
 know who you are. Your email though brings up what I think is a 
 really important point that I didn't want to let slide.
 
 Personally, I think that quote above tells me your looking at
this 
 whole thing as a means to make a buck. In my opinion this dooms
you 
 to a life of producing complete and utter bullshit. Listen, if
your 
 stuff hit the right demographic and was bland enough you'd be on
the 
 radio or TV already. Since it's not, you must be looking to be a
low 
 budget imitation of bland, mindless crap. That doesn't seem like
a 
 very good business plan.
 
 Here's my suggestion: you and your colleague should go get
yourselves 
 on the radio or TV if that's what you want. If, on the other
hand, 
 what you really want is to podcast or videoblog, I have a few
places 
 to start: 1. Brainstorm some good ideas about content and forget
 
 about good ideas for underwriting. 2. Better yet, fuck 
 brainstorming, if you're creative you probably have some stuff
you're 
 just dying to do - do that instead. 3. Quit lurking around and
just 
 get started. Then get better at it.
 
 Peace
 
 --
 Verdi
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://freevlog.org
 http://graymattergravy.com
 
 
 

--

 YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
 
 a.. Visit your group videoblogging on the web.
 
 b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
 
 

--









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.