Re: [videoblogging] Re:Miro
One line occurs to me as I read through all these. VIDEO WANTS TO BE SOCIAL. I'd challenge the Miro people to make it more SOCIAL of an experience. I think the move AWAY from the permalink button back to the website, and toward obtuse interactive favoriting system is what causes Miro to be so disconnected. Not going to go into what I mean by social. But I will say... VIDEO IS THE NEW PHOTO. Think flickr. Video does want to be social. -mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 9/28/07, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I love the idea behind Miro and I'm very supportive of the project but I'm like Bill. I test to see that my feeds work every week or two and don't use it as a core application. It just hasn't become one of those natural transitions in my computer use pattern and I think it's probably because a lot of what it does I'm already doing through my browser. Does anyone here use Miro as a core application and if so was it a conscious effort to adopt it or did it just slowly become a program you use? I think I might use Miro more if it had a commenting system built in or some more give and take. It maybe needs more give and take. It might be too much of a one way street right now. Pat http://akrobotics.com Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re:Miro
On 9/29/07, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: desktop aggregators are cold. Is that a reference to hot/cold media. Videoblogging is certainly a hot medium. An activator. It is an interesting way to look at it. Because videoblogging does seem to be at odds with desktop aggregators, set top boxes, and portable devices like ipods. -Mike On 9/28/07, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I love the idea behind Miro and I'm very supportive of the project but I'm like Bill. I test to see that my feeds work every week or two and don't use it as a core application. It just hasn't become one of those natural transitions in my computer use pattern and I think it's probably because a lot of what it does I'm already doing through my browser. Does anyone here use Miro as a core application and if so was it a conscious effort to adopt it or did it just slowly become a program you use? I think I might use Miro more if it had a commenting system built in or some more give and take. It maybe needs more give and take. It might be too much of a one way street right now. Pat http://akrobotics.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re:Miro
Patrick Race wrote: Does anyone here use Miro as a core application and if so was it a conscious effort to adopt it or did it just slowly become a program you use? Before my 60GB hard drive filled up due to a lack of recordable CDs, I liked the lean back experience of watching a half-hour show of all my friends latest vlog work. I like the continuous full-screen experience and dislike the stuttering that all too often plagues browser playback.
Re: [videoblogging] Re:Miro
desktop aggregators are cold. On 9/28/07, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I love the idea behind Miro and I'm very supportive of the project but I'm like Bill. I test to see that my feeds work every week or two and don't use it as a core application. It just hasn't become one of those natural transitions in my computer use pattern and I think it's probably because a lot of what it does I'm already doing through my browser. Does anyone here use Miro as a core application and if so was it a conscious effort to adopt it or did it just slowly become a program you use? I think I might use Miro more if it had a commenting system built in or some more give and take. It maybe needs more give and take. It might be too much of a one way street right now. Pat http://akrobotics.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
