Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
I'd actually like to apologize for my overly hasy reaction. I would just like to discuss the issue of content sales, ads (which are opt-in) and "wide reuse" rights. - Original Message - From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ; JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points, > including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have the right to > resell our users' work without express user permission and would never do > such a thing. Im cc'ing JD on this email so he can respond. jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points, > including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have the right to > resell our users' work without express user permission and would never do > such a thing. Im cc'ing JD on this email so he can respond. jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com
Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points, including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have the right to resell our users' work without express user permission and would never do such a thing. - Original Message - From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: Videobloggers Sent: Thu Jan 18 13:35:45 2007 Subject: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post JD Lasica put up a post detailing the TOS of some of the big video hosting sites: http://www.ourmedia.org/node/283309 jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
