[Videolib] [ALA Connect] Need new convener: Media Resources Discussion Group (ACRL - Association of College Research Libraries)

2010-08-24 Thread Catherine Michael
Good day.  Just received this alert from ALA Connect  thought I'd  
share it on the list: http://connect.ala.org/node/110406


Best,
Cathy


To: cmich...@ithaca.edu
Subject: [ALA Connect] Need new convener (new) - Media Resources  
Discussion Group

(ACRL - Association of College  Research Libraries)
Reply-To: ala.connect.re...@gmail.com

((( Reply ABOVE this LINE to POST a COMMENT )))

Greetings Catherine Michael,

From Media Resources Discussion Group (ACRL - Association of College  
 Research Libraries)

New Post: Need new convener
By Joe Clark
--

ACRL is looking for a Convener for the Media Resources Discussion  
Group.  If you are interested, contact Mary Jane Petrowski at: mpetrow...@ala.org


You must be an ACRL member and attend midwinter (and ideally  
annual).  Mary Jane would like someone in place by mid-Sept, 2010.


To view this Post in Connect, go to http://connect.ala.org/node/ 
110406.


--
This is an automatic message from ALA Connect.

To manage your email subscriptions (including unsubscribing), go to  
your Connect profile at http://connect.ala.org/user/33791/subscriptions 
.


For further help, visit the Connect Help community at http://connect.ala.org/help 
 or reply to this email.
View original post: http://connect.ala.org/mailcomment/redirect/%3C33791.110406.0.1282663670 
...




VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] IMDBPro

2010-08-24 Thread Tom . Ipri
Has anyone had any success getting some kind of academic license for 
IMDBPro? They only advertise individual and corporate accounts.

If so, do you have contact info?

Thanks,
Tom
_
Tom Ipri, MS
Head, Media and Computer Services
Lied Library
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
4505 S. Maryland Pkwy 
Box 457035
Las Vegas, NV 89154-7035
702-895-2183
tom.i...@unlv.eduVIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] IMDBPro

2010-08-24 Thread Nancy E. Friedland
I have tried several times without success.

Nancy

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, tom.i...@unlv.edu wrote:

 Has anyone had any success getting some kind of academic license for
 IMDBPro? They only advertise individual and corporate accounts.

 If so, do you have contact info?

 Thanks,
 Tom
 _
 Tom Ipri, MS
 Head, Media and Computer Services
 Lied Library
 University of Nevada, Las Vegas
 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy
 Box 457035
 Las Vegas, NV 89154-7035
 702-895-2183
 tom.i...@unlv.edu
 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
 relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control,
 preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and
 related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective
 working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication
 between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
 distributors.




-- 
Nancy E. Friedland
Librarian for Butler Media, Film Studies  Performing Arts
Columbia University
206 Butler Library
535 West 114th Street
New York, New York 10027
Phone: 212.854.7402
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] French film

2010-08-24 Thread Rhonda Pancoe
Does anyone know where I might find L'Assassinat du Duc de Guise to purchase
or rent?  If it's on a compilation that's fine too.

Rhonda Pancoe
Media Acquisitions Coordinator
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY  13346
315-228-7858 Phone
315-228-6227 Fax
rpan...@colgate.edu
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] Some survey results

2010-08-24 Thread Jonathan Miller
Dear videlib universe 

As some of you noticed we recently did a survey asking some questions of our
customers (hopefully you all ARE customers!) and some of the answers might
be interesting. 

So far we received 76 responses. 

Of these: 

1) 60% of you do NOT license streaming or download rights (40% do) 

2) of those 82% license rights for more than one semester (one year term or
longer) 

3) so that is .82 x .40 = just 33% of you (?) license rights (for a year or
more) 

4) additionally, when you do license rights, 59% is from the distributor's
web site, and 41% from your own or a local server. 

5) broken down further: 

Of the 59% who do license rights from the distributor's web site, 12% do so
as needed for a semester or one class, and 88% do so for a year or more 

Which, if my math and logic is correct(dicey) - that means that  

Only 59% of 82% of 40% of you a) license rights for a year or more AND b)
access the digital files from the distributor's web site. 

Which is (Drum roll): only 19% of you actually need us to make available
this sort of service? 



Interesting (?) results # 2: 

We asked what percentage of your media usage and expenditure is for
online/streaming, vs. DVD purchases. 

Re usage: 

85% of you said 20% or LESS 
74% said 90% or MORE (44% said 100%!) 

Re expenditures: 

81% said 20% or Less
78% said 90% or More 



I know it is a small and non-scientific sample. Maybe we should pretend it
never happened. But - any thoughts on this? 

Thanks!

Best, 

Jonathan 


Jonathan Miller
President
Icarus Films
32 Court Street, 21st Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA

tel 1.718.488.8900
fax 1.718.488.8642
www.IcarusFilms.com
jmil...@icarusfilms.com




VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] Media executable autoplay and computer security

2010-08-24 Thread Hooper, Lisa K
Apologies for cross-postings.

 

Greetings all,

 

I just discovered that we have a number of DVD-ROMs in our media
collection, many of which accompany books, that have executable autoplay
applications on them. Over the summer our technology services team
managing all of the non-staff/faculty computers on campus instituted
some rather vigorous security settings on all the computers which
prevent our DVD-ROMS from playing in any of the computers in the
learning commons, computer labs, and at lectern/media stations in
classrooms. We are at a bit of a loggerhead here between access and
security; I am curious to know how other libraries deal with this issue.


 

Thanks very much in advance.

 

Regards,

-lisa Hooper

 

 

Music  Media Librarian

Howard-Tilton Memorial Library

Tulane University

lhoop...@tulane.edu

504.314.7822

 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] FW: Some survey results

2010-08-24 Thread Jonathan Miller
Sorry, this part was not clear perhaps: 

 Interesting (?) results # 2: 

We asked what percentage of your media usage and expenditure is for
online/streaming, vs. DVD purchases. 

Re usage: 

85% of you said streaming/online is 20% or LESS of your media usage 
74% said DVDs represent 90% or MORE (44% said 100%!) of your media usage 

Re expenditures: 

81% said 20% or Less of your budget was spent on streaming/online content 
78% said 90% or More of your budget was spent on DVD purchasing. 

Thanks! 

JM 



-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Miller [mailto:jmil...@icarusfilms.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:31 PM
To: 'videolib@lists.berkeley.edu'
Subject: Some survey results 

Dear videlib universe 

As some of you noticed we recently did a survey asking some questions of our
customers (hopefully you all ARE customers!) and some of the answers might
be interesting. 

So far we received 76 responses. 

Of these: 

1) 60% of you do NOT license streaming or download rights (40% do) 

2) of those 82% license rights for more than one semester (one year term or
longer) 

3) so that is .82 x .40 = just 33% of you (?) license rights (for a year or
more) 

4) additionally, when you do license rights, 59% is from the distributor's
web site, and 41% from your own or a local server. 

5) broken down further: 

Of the 59% who do license rights from the distributor's web site, 12% do so
as needed for a semester or one class, and 88% do so for a year or more 

Which, if my math and logic is correct(dicey) - that means that  

Only 59% of 82% of 40% of you a) license rights for a year or more AND b)
access the digital files from the distributor's web site. 

Which is (Drum roll): only 19% of you actually need us to make available
this sort of service? 



Interesting (?) results # 2: 

We asked what percentage of your media usage and expenditure is for
online/streaming, vs. DVD purchases. 

Re usage: 

85% of you said 20% or LESS
74% said 90% or MORE (44% said 100%!) 

Re expenditures: 

81% said 20% or Less
78% said 90% or More 



I know it is a small and non-scientific sample. Maybe we should pretend it
never happened. But - any thoughts on this? 

Thanks!

Best, 

Jonathan 


Jonathan Miller
President
Icarus Films
32 Court Street, 21st Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA

tel 1.718.488.8900
fax 1.718.488.8642
www.IcarusFilms.com
jmil...@icarusfilms.com




VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Some survey results

2010-08-24 Thread ghandman
You want me to name names, Jon?  Well, I am not nor have I ever been...

I will venture my opinion that the model adopted by Alexander Street Press
might be on the right track (up front buy-in (too high, I feel, in the
case of ASP) and a yearly (low-ish) maintenance fee.  The issue I have
with ASP is their Curated Collections model, which forces one to take
the whole database--including the good, the middling, and the never-to-be
watched.

My guess is that if the technology were shaken down adequately and the
pricing made reasonable, the number of those putting their nickel on
remote access (including me) would be considerably higher.  There are only
really a few compelling reasons to stream stuff from a local server
(besides the distributor's inability to deliver):  1) The local ability to
tweek the image, call the  shots about formats/standards, and wrap the
stuff in customized metadata and access tools) 2) possibly more robust
network access.

The most compelling reason to go local is one which seems to be the most
contractually fuzzy:  the ability to retain and deliver a title locally,
even if the title drops out of a vendor's catalog. If DVDs eventually go
the way of laserdiscs and other dead media, with streamed delivery being
the only delivery form, we're definitely gonna have to figure something
out.  I have a feeling that our legal folk are going to get pickier and
picker about signing licenses that don't have this kind of clause (as do
many, if not most, commercial full-text databases)

...and, yeah, your conclusions sound like a reasonable description of the
scene, August 2010.



 Dear Gary

 Well, yeah. And if we offered to give it away that would be even more
 popular. (well maybe, not so many of you took us up on that offer,
 actually)


 A) there may have been problems with how some of the questions in the
 survey
 were constructed, but not, I think, the ones I reference and report on the
 results of below.

 B) The main companies that are streaming from their servers to users now,
 as
 far as I know, are not charging extremely high prices. Who is offering
 streaming now at Exorbitant prices and any of the usage is from them? Or
 are you saying FMG and Ambrose and New Day are charging exhorbitant
 prices?
 Is Alexander Street? Please be specific.

 Also you don't respond to the figures we DID collect, however un
 scientific
 (or do you know of a better scientific source of such info/data? I don't).

 So, let's round it off and try it this way: half or less of you are
 currently streaming media (from our sites or your own)

 And about half of the videolib universe would like to stream, when they do
 stream, from our sites - and half of you would like to / will / are able
 to
 do it yourselves. Does that sound right to you?

 AND, of the current media usage by video lib people out there - only a
 small
 part of it is streaming or digital so far, and most of it (well over 75%)
 is
 still DVD

 Do you those three 'conclusions' sound reason able to you?

 Thanks!

 JM






 Jonathan Miller
 President
 Icarus Films
 32 Court Street, 21st Floor
 Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA

 tel 1.718.488.8900
 fax 1.718.488.8642
 www.IcarusFilms.com
 jmil...@icarusfilms.com


 -Original Message-
 From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
 [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of
 ghand...@library.berkeley.edu
 Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:04 PM
 To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 Subject: Re: [Videolib] Some survey results

 Hey Jon

 Interesting (if inconclusive) stuff.  There are some logical flaws in this
 survey (and your conclusion) I think.  The survey responses are, of
 course,
 based on services, content, and technology currently available.
 They're also based on current pricing schemes.

 The real question to ask, I think, would be how many of you would opt for
 subscribing to remote (i.e. vendor-side) access if:  1) network delivery
 were relatively stable for multiple concurrent users 2) image resolution
 were sufficient for study-level access 3) continuing access to individual
 titles were relatively stable (i.e. we could be sure that the carpet
 wouldn't be whisked out from under us whenever distributor/filmmaker
 contracts expired 4) pricing was flexible enough to allow both
 single-semester and longer term-access

 And the real kicker:  how many would get into this business more earnestly
 (either for the short  or long haul) if currently unrealistic pricing
 structure for digital delivery (including the necessity of paying over and
 over for access to the same title) didn't preclude it.

 gary handman

 Dear videlib universe

 As some of you noticed we recently did a survey asking some questions
 of our customers (hopefully you all ARE customers!) and some of the
 answers might be interesting.

 So far we received 76 responses.

 Of these:

 1) 60% of you do NOT license streaming or download rights (40% do)

 2) of those 82% license rights for more than one semester (one