Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless
blueman writes: Unfortunately, vm itself is not just binding heavy but actually binding dependent in that some key functions *only* seem to work when called from a key binding rather than from M-x. I think this is true btw for certain mark-related functions with next command uses marks. So that while aliases would shorten typing they still don't solve that problem. That is true, but note that `vm-visit-imap-folder' is something you would never invoke with marked messages. My solution has been to free up as many key bindings as possible so that the users can bind them to whatever is most important to them. We also have thread operations now, which can be invoked without messing with message marking. Cheers, Uday
Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server
Lewis Perin pe...@panix.com writes: Uday Reddy usr.vm.ro...@gmail.com writes: Lewis Perin writes: When I submit my password for the (default) inbox, the connection fails immediately with vm-imap-protocol-error: IMAP protocol error: unexpected char (10) Unless you have a working configuration of stunnel, I would suspect it first. If you search vm.info archives on Google Groups you will find earlier discussions of stunnel. Perhaps you can get stunnel to work with some other IMAP server like gmail first to make sure that it works. I just checked against Gmail using imap-ssl, and it works fine with my vm/stunnel setup. Upgrading to VM 8.2.0b might also help, because various improvements have been made since the old release. I can see there have been changes to vm-imap.el lately, so I guess I’ll give it a try. Oh, but wait: I see on Launchpad that 8.1.2 is more recent than 8.2.0b and it’s recommended as an upgrade path from 8.1.1 to 8.2.0. OK... /Lew --- Lew Perin / pe...@acm.org http://babelcarp.org
Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server
Lewis Perin pe...@panix.com writes: Has anyone reading this had experience connecting vm to a Microsoft Exchange IMAP-SSL server? (Successful experience, I hope!) Yes; stunnel4 and IMAP to Exchange Just Worked; My notes suggest I didn't need the additional-configuration-file option. What it might be worth doing is snaffling a copy of the stunnel configuration file that VM creates, and running stunnel by hand to check it's managing to connect OK. Matthew -- `O'-0 `O'---. `O'---. `O'---. \___| | \___|0-/ \___|/\___| | | /\ | | \ | |\ | | The Dangers of modern veterinary life
Re: [VM] Differences between IMAP-FCC and FCC
Uday Reddy usr.vm.ro...@gmail.com writes: blueman writes: 1. Is there any reason that IMAP-FCC doesn't include a 'From:' line whereas FCC does include a 'From:' line? The net result is that for IMAP-FCC, the vm summary gets the sender from the from line which is often then the meaningless VM FCC is a feature of the Emacs mail-mode, which obviously knows nothing about IMAP. IMAP-FCC was added by Rob F to save a file copy *before* we hand the message over to mail-mode. To get a From: header in the IMAP-FCC copy, you should set the `vm-mail-header-from' variable so that you don't depend on mail-mode to fill it in for you. I think we had a discussion about it earlier in the mailing list. Setting vm-mail-header-from still fails to give me a From: header in the copy made by IMAP-FCC:. Also, it seems with FCC: that user-full-name and user-mail-address *override* the setting of vm-mail-header-from which seems to defeat the purpose. Am I missing something or is this a bug?
